Case 1:11-cv-20427-KMW Document 650 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/27/2013 Page 1 of 4

UNI TED STATES DI STRI CT CO URT SO UTHERN DI STRI CT O F FLORI DA Case No.1120427CI VWI LLI AM S DI SNEY ENTERPRI SES , I NC. ,etaI . ,
Pl ai nt i ls,
VS.

Fi Dw

c.

N0# 2 5 2 2 1 3

HOTFI LE CO RP. ,ela/ . ,

Def endant s.
/

S aT E E V M E N u M L A j I j O H E . D s c T
of
.

- 4

O M NI BUS ORDER
THI S MATTER i s bef or et he Cour tupon a pr et r i alconf er ence hel d on Novem ber 21,2013, and num er ous m ot i ons f i l ed by t he padi es
.

Upon a car ef ulr evi ew of t he

m ot i ons, and pur suant t o t he di scussi ons hel d at t he con f er ence and t he

r epr esent at i ons m ade att hatt i m e,i ti s her eby O RDERED AND ADJUDGED as f ol l ows:

( 1 )

De f en dan t s 'Mo t i on t o St r i k e Pl a i n t i f f s 'Pu t a t i v e' t Reb u t t al ' 'Rep od o fDr

.

Ri ch ar dW a t er man( DE 21 7, de emed r ef i l e db y DE 5 45)i s DENI ED.

( 2 ) Def en dan t s ' Mo t i on i nL i mi n et o Ex c l u de Tes t i mon y an d Opi n i on so f

Jenni f erV.Yeh ( DE 573)i sGRANTED I N PART. Ms.Yeh may t est i f y ast ot he

aut hent i ci t y of t he docum ent s pr oduced, but she m ay not opi ne as t o w het her f i l es on Hot f i l e' s syst em wer el i kel yi nf r i ngi ng ori nf r i ngem entI i kel y occur r ed
.

( 3)

De f en dan t s 'Mo t i on i nL i mi n et o Pr ec l u de Us eo f Pe j or a t i v e Te r ms ( DE

57 4)i s GRANTED I N PART. The p adi e s ma yn otu s ep e j or a t i v et er ms bu tmay

use t er ms ofar t .

Case 1:11-cv-20427-KMW Document 650 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/27/2013 Page 2 of 4

( 4)

Def endant s' Mot i on i n Li mi ne t o Pr ecl ude Test i mony, Evi dence or

Ar gumen t Conc er n i n g Meg au pl oa d ( DE 57 5. , DE 5 92, f i l ed under s eal )i s

DENI ED W I THOUT PREJUDI CE and may be r ai sed i fnecessar y att r i al
.

( 5 )

Def end an t s' Mot i on t o Ex c l u de t h e Tes t i mon y an d Opi ni ons o f Sc o t t

Zebr ak ( DE 582 )i s DENI ED.

( 6 )

De f en dan t s' Mo t i on i n L i mi n et o Pr e cl u de Tes t i mon y, Ev i den c e,

or

Ar gumen tCon c er ni n g Hot f i l e' s Pa y men torNonpa ymen to fTa x es ( DE 591 i l ed ,f

u nd ers eal )i s GRANTED. ( 7) De f en dan t s ' Mo t i on i n L i mi n et o Pr e cl u de Tes t i mon y, Evi dence, or

Ar gum ent Concer ni ng I r r el evant Fi nanci al I nf or m at i on Regar di ng Lem ur i a

Communi c a t i on sl n c. ( DE 593, f i l ed un ders eal )i sGRANTED.

( 8 )

De f en dan t s ' Mo t i on t o Dec l ar e Wi t ne s s Una v ai l abl e ( DE 6 40) i s

G RANTED. The padi es shal lconf erand f i l e desi gnat i ons of Pr of essor Boyl e' s r epods, decl ar at i on,and deposi t i on t est i m ony i n advance oft r i al
.

( 9)

Th eJ oi n tMo t i on o ft h e Padi est o Tr eatas ReFi l e d an d Resu bmi t t ed f or

Deci si on Pl ai nt i ss'M ot i on t o St r i ke Podi ons of Decl ar at i on of Pr of essorJam es

Boyl e( DE 578)i sGRANTED. ( 10) Pl ai nt i f f s'Mot i on t o St r i ke Podi ons of Decl ar at i ons of Pr of essor James

Bo yl e( DE 423 )i s DENI ED.

Pl ai nt i f f s'Mot i on i n Li mi ne t o SetOr derofPr oof ( DE 576) i s DENI ED.

Pl ai nt i f f s shal lf i l e a pr oposed l i mi t i ng i nst r uct i on i n advance oft r i al .

( 1 2) Pl ai n t i f f s' Mo t i on i n Li mi n e t o Pr ec l u de Test i m ony f r om Pr evi ousl y Un di s cl o s ed Thi r dpadyW i t n es s e s( DE 5 79 )i s DENI ED,

Case 1:11-cv-20427-KMW Document 650 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/27/2013 Page 3 of 4

( 1 3) Pl ai n t i f f s 'Mo t i on i nL i mi ne t o Pr ec l u d e De f en dan t sf r om Of f er i n g Cer t ai n Opi ni on s ofDr .Andr ew Cr omady atTr i a l( DE 58 0)i s GRANTED I N PART Dr.
.

Cr om ady m ay nott est i f y as t o Hot il e' s cont r oloveri t s syst em ort he am oun tof t he St udi os'dam ages,but he m ay t est i f yr egar di ng com put ert echnol ogy, such as di gi t al f i nger pr i nt i ng t echnol ogy, and t ak edown not i ce accur acy
.

( 1 4) Pl ai n t i f f s'Mo t i on i n Li mi n et o Pr ecl u de De f en dan t sf r om Of f er i n gt he

O pi ni ons ofDr .M at t hew R L yn de a tTr i al ( DE 581 )i sDENI ED.
.

( 1 5 ) Pl ai n t i f f s 'Mo t i on i n Li mi n et o Pr ec l u de De f en dan t sf r om En t er i n gi n t o
Evi den c e Dep os i t i on Tes t i mon yo fRu men St oy ano v an d At ana s Vang el o v( DE

5 85,f i l ed u n ders eal )was W I THDRAW N b y St i pul at i on o ft he padi es ( DE 6 43,

f i l ed underseal ) . However ,t he padi es r eser ved t he r i ghtt o ent erdesi gnat ed
podi ons oft he deposi t i on t est i m ony as necessar y att r i al .

( 1 6) W a r nerBr os .En t edai n men tI n c. ' s Mo t i on i n Li mi n et o Ex c l u de Ev i d en c e

of W ar ner ' s August 2O11 Audi t s of I t s Ant i pi r acy Syst em f or t he Pur pos e of

Sh o wi n g W ar n er ' sCul pab i l i t y( DE 58 6, f i l e du nd ers e al )i s DENI ED. ( 1 7 ) W ar nerBr os.En t edai n men tl nc . ' s Mo t i on i n Li mi ne t o Ex c l u de Evi den c e
and Ar gument Regar di ng d l per j ur y' 'i n Connec t i on wi t h Coun t er cl ai m ( DE 587,

f i l ed un d er s eal )i s DENI ED W I THOUT PREJUDI CE and ma yb er ai s ed i f

necessar y att r i al .

( 18) By Decem ber 3. 2013,t he padi es shal lf i l e any pr oposed voi r di r e

ques t i ons.

( 1 9 ) By De cem ber4.2 01 3,t h e par t i es s hal lr e f i l et h ei rJ oi n tSub mi s si on o f Pr op os e dJ ur yI ns t r uc t i on s( DE 63 6. ,DE 64 6,f i l ed u nd er s e al )a s on es etof

Case 1:11-cv-20427-KMW Document 650 Entered on FLSD Docket 11/27/2013 Page 4 of 4

pr o pos ed j ur yi n s t r u c t i on s, des i gna t i n g an y di f f e r enc e sb e t we en t he pr o pos al so f

Pl ai nt i f f s and Def endant s wi t hi n each i nst r uc t i on
.

The pr oposedj ur yi ns t r uc t i ons

shoul d be pr edi cat ed on t he El event h Ci r cui t pat t er ni nst r uct i ons. The padi es

s hal l al s o emai l a Mi cr os o f tW ORD v er si on o ft h ej oi n tpr op os edj ur yi n s t r u ct i ons

t oc ha mber sa twi l l i ams @f l s d. u s c our t sgov by Decem ber4,2013

.

( 20 ) By Dece m ber 6 , 2013, t he p adi e ss hal lf i l e a doc u men ti den t i f y i

ng

i nf or mat i on di scl osed i nt hi s case t hatm ustr em ai n conf i d ent i al ,i t sI ocat i on, and

t he r at i onal ef ori t s conf i dent i al i t y

DO NE AND ORDERED i n cham ber s atM i am i Fl or i da t hi

,

day ofNovem ber ,

2013.

KATHLEE M W I LLI AM S UNI TED S ATES DI STRI CT JUDG E

.