Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Nautilus

    Why We Shouldn’t Accept Unrepeated Science—Our Author Responds to His Critics

    by Ahmed Alkhateeb Aug 17, 2016 4 minutes

    Last month a long thread evolved on Hacker News, a popular discussion forum, in response to my Nautilus article, “We Should Not Accept Scientific Results That Have Not Been Repeated.” Much to my delight, it generated a rich conversation involving scientists and non-scientists alike. That’s fitting, since our inability to independently replicate our results, I argue, threatens to undermine trust in the scientific enterprise—something every citizen has a stake in.

    Before I respond to the arguments against my position from the Hacker News community, allow me to quickly summarize my view. I think the irreproducibility crisis we are currently witnessing needs to be seen in a particular light.

    You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.

    More from Nautilus

    Nautilus9 min read
    The Marine Biologist Who Dove Right In
    It’s 1969, in the middle of the Gulf of California. Above is a blazing hot sky; below, the blue sea stretches for miles in all directions, interrupted only by the presence of an oceanographic research ship. Aboard it a man walks to the railing, studi
    Nautilus7 min read
    The Part-Time Climate Scientist
    On a Wednesday in February 1938, Guy Stewart Callendar—a rangy, soft-spoken steam engineer, who had turned 40 just the week before—stood before a group of leading scientists, members of the United Kingdom’s Royal Meteorological Society. He had a bold
    Nautilus8 min read
    A Revolution in Time
    In the fall of 2020, I installed a municipal clock in Anchorage, Alaska. Although my clock was digital, it soon deviated from other timekeeping devices. Within a matter of days, the clock was hours ahead of the smartphones in people’s pockets. People

    Related Books & Audiobooks