Scientists Are Not So Hot At Predicting Which Cancer Studies Will Succeed
A scientist tested his peers' ability to pick which cancer experiments would pan out. They failed more often than not, which doesn't say much for intuition or efficiency in the scientific process.
by Richard Harris
Jul 04, 2017
2 minutes
Science relies on the careful collection and analysis of facts. Science also benefits from human judgment, but that intuition isn't necessarily reliable. A study finds that scientists did a poor job forecasting whether a successful experiment would work on a second try.
That matters, because scientists can waste a lot of time if they read the results from another lab and eagerly chase after bum leads.
"There are, an associate professor of biomedical ethics at McGill University in Montreal. "What you want is a way to discriminate between those investments that are going to pay off down the road, and those that are just going to fizzle."
You’re reading a preview, subscribe to read more.
Start your free 30 days