Futurity

Twitter isn’t a super reliable way to gauge emotion

Scientists shouldn't assume that Twitter accurately reflects real life, according to a new paper. Here's why.

Twitter is an unreliable witness to the world’s emotions, argues a new paper that highlights the risks of assuming that Twitter accurately reflects real life.

With over 300 million monthly active users around the globe sharing their thoughts in 140 characters or less, sociologist Eric Jensen of the University of Warwick acknowledges that studies based on Twitter data are “particularly alluring” to researchers and the media.

However, he cautions against this “big data gold rush,” pointing out that there is no evidence that social media content shared on Twitter is a truthful reflection of how its users feel.

Twitter users have developed their own unique cultural behavior, conversations, and identities, which shape the ways in which they present their views online. Social convention, power relationships, and identity influence online conversation just as much as off-line interactions, but in ways that are not yet fully understood.

“Twitter users present only one side of themselves on social media, shielding their true feelings for good reasons, such as professional reputation,” says Jensen. “There is clearly a large gap between what people post on social media and how they really feel, but how exactly people manage the relationship between their offline and social media identities is still being uncovered.”

Jensen also highlights the problems of drawing broader conclusions from a sample of Twitter users. It has been proven in several studies that Twitter users are not representative of the general population. In just one example, men are much more likely to use Twitter than women. Prolific users who tweet many times a day may be over-represented in any sample dataset.

“When researchers find themselves with easily accessible data, there is a temptation to apply those data to interesting research questions and populations—even when there are limitations in the representativeness of the sample,” says Jensen.

“Enthusiasm for accessing digital data should not outpace sound research methodology.”

The paper appears in PLOS ONE.

Source: University of Warwick

The post Twitter isn’t a super reliable way to gauge emotion appeared first on Futurity.

More from Futurity

Futurity3 min read
Fitness Trackers And Phones Can Help Monitor Multiple Sclerosis
Monitoring and treating multiple sclerosis requires reliable and long-term data on how the disease is progressing. A new study finds fitness trackers and smartphones can supply the needed data. Multiple sclerosis (MS) is an insidious disease. Patient
Futurity1 min read
This Year’s Cicada Invasion Will Be Double Trouble
For the first time in more than 200 years, two broods of cicadas—Brood XIX, known as the Great Southern Brood, and Brood XIII, known as the Northern Illinois Brood—will emerge from the ground simultaneously this year. Hannah Burrack, professor and ch
Futurity3 min read
How Can Physics Become More Diverse?
A new paper explores the problems with physics culture and provides a road map for making departments in the field more equitable. Physics has long suffered from the perception that the most cutting-edge work is done by lone geniuses, usually white m

Related Books & Audiobooks