Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

Unavailable
The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood
Unavailable
The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood
Unavailable
The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood
Audiobook16 hours

The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood

Written by James Gleick

Narrated by Rob Shapiro

Rating: 4 out of 5 stars

4/5

()

Currently unavailable

Currently unavailable

About this audiobook

James Gleick, the author of the best sellers Chaos and Genius, now brings us a work just as astonishing and masterly: a revelatory chronicle and meditation that shows how information has become the modern era's defining quality-the blood, the fuel, the vital principle of our world.

The story of information begins in a time profoundly unlike our own, when every thought and utterance vanishes as soon as it is born. From the invention of scripts and alphabets to the long-misunderstood talking drums of Africa, Gleick tells the story of information technologies that changed the very nature of human consciousness. He provides portraits of the key figures contributing to the inexorable development of our modern understanding of information: Charles Babbage, the idiosyncratic inventor of the first great mechanical computer; Ada Byron, the brilliant and doomed daughter of the poet, who became the first true programmer; pivotal figures like Samuel Morse and Alan Turing; and Claude Shannon, the creator of information theory itself.

And then the information age arrives. Citizens of this world become experts willy-nilly: aficionados of bits and bytes. And we sometimes feel we are drowning, swept by a deluge of signs and signals, news and images, blogs and tweets. The Information is the story of how we got here and where we are heading.

LanguageEnglish
Release dateMar 1, 2011
ISBN9780307914972
Unavailable
The Information: A History, a Theory, a Flood
Author

James Gleick

James Gleick was born in New York in 1954. He worked for ten years as an editor and reporter for The New York Times. He is the bestselling author of Chaos, Genius, Faster, What Just Happened and a biography of Isaac Newton.

More audiobooks from James Gleick

Related to The Information

Related audiobooks

Science & Mathematics For You

View More

Related articles

Reviews for The Information

Rating: 3.976345889070147 out of 5 stars
4/5

613 ratings60 reviews

What did you think?

Tap to rate

Review must be at least 10 words

  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    De informatietheorie van Shannon vormt zowat de kern van dit boek. Shannon koppelde het begrip 'informatie' los van betekenis, zodat het gekwantificeerd kon worden zodat er plots een hele nieuwe wereld openging. Om daar te geraken, neemt Gleick ons mee langs een kronkelig pad dat loopt van tamtam over woordenboeken, de computermodellen van Babbage en Turing en de booleaanse logica. Later volgen nog de biologische informatie opgeslagen in DNA, de quantuminformatietheorie en Wikipedia. En dan heb ik niet alles vernoemd. Doorheen het hele werk is informatie nauw verbonden met communicatie. Informatie als de boodschap die overgedragen wordt van zender naar ontvanger. Die overdracht gebeurt best zo efficiënt mogelijk, met minimale inspanning en maximaal behoud van betekenis. Daarbij speelt de opkomst van de informatica - zeg maar de informatietechnologie - een essentiële rol. Dat is een duidelijk keuze. Verhelderend is dan ook wat Gleick niet behandelt in zijn boek: de opkomst van de boekdrukkunst, de encyclopedisten, het Mundaneum en alle technieken om informatie te classificeren: van UDC en DDC tot ontologiën of de ontwikkeling van een semantisch web. Informatie als opgeslagen kennis die vindbaar moet zijn, is niet wat Gleick interesseert. Gleick is een journalist. Hij beschrijft en reconstrueert en is daarbij meer geïnteresseerd in het verleden dan in de toekomst. Hij doet geen poging om vooruit te kijken en je mag van hem ook geen filosofische uitweidingen verwachten, al zetten met name de hoofdstukken over onze zelfzuchtige genen en over de quantummechanica daartoe wel aan. Immers, misschien moeten we de uitspraak 'In den beginne was het woord' wel interpreteren als 'In den beginne was er informatie'. Wat zouden daarvan niet de consequenties kunnen zijn? Gleick is een uitstekend wetenschapsjournalist, had ik hierboven eigenlijk moeten schrijven. Dat hij duidelijke keuzes maakt, kan niemand hem kwalijk nemen. Zijn boek zet aan tot nadenken en tot verder exploreren. Meer moet dat niet zijn.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is an impressive book. It takes solid, well sourced scholarship and packages it for a general audience. What is really surprising is the very narrow definition of "The Information" used, basically the content described in Claude Shannon's Mathematical Theory of Communication, and still makes it interesting and accessible.

    For library science folks, this book is an excellent reminder of (at least) two things. First, that we had best keep data, information, knowledge, and wisdom straight in our minds as we do our work, and second that there are some very, very smart people who are working to move information out of the technologies we are used to using and if we don't keep up, we will be left behind.

    This is definitely a must read for librarians, but we should keep in mind that "The Information" is really a focused treatment of one perspective on information. It may be the most important perspective for understanding information, but it is not necessarily the same use of the term that is employed in our libraries.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    This is an interesting and accessible history of the field of information theory, from its conception by Claude Shannon in the early days of telecommunication to the present day, including examinations of DNA as information and the current state of information overload.Glieck draws on a wide array of sources and fields, and makes some very dense information accessible to his reader. Reading this has definitely changed how I look at communication and information. There are a lot of concepts here that permeate daily life, or that I run into in my web engineering work and linguistics hobby reading, so I'm glad to have an understanding of the basics of information theory.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Breathtaking.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Brilliant!
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The history of information science over perhaps the last 1000 years but mainly the past 100 or so. It's pretty dense in parts but I found it interesting and helps to understand our modern world where information is everywhere and available to us 24/7.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    "Whoop-de-doo. What does it all mean, Basil?" - Austin "Danger" Powers (1999)

    broad strokes with some nice connections made, but a bit haphazard for my tastes. good stuff, warrants further ponders.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Dense, fascinating, wide-ranging, a researching tour de force. Completely revised my understanding of what information is and how it informs our time.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    If you like the idea of relating information to thermodynamics - more specifically, the second law of entropy, you will whiz through this book in one sitting despite its length. In any transformation, a dissipation occurs. Loss in one form of energy is inevitable; in our futile attempts to avoid this loss, we inadvertently gain energy in other forms. Information can be viewed similarly. As it travels through books, mouths, films, etc it loses something each time. This loss creates room for the unintended lessons.

    I probably slaughtered the description with my futile attempts at explaining this. Suppose we can call this lesson no. 1.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    James Gleik is a good writer and he handles this topic with some flair. From talking drums to DNA via the telegraph and morse code era he pulls together disparate information and weaves it into a coherent whole. But, while I loved much of the minutiae, and was fascinated to learn about unsung heroes such as Claude Shannon and Ada Lovelace, I thought that there some gaps that could have been filled. Maybe the concept of "bandwidth limits" is too mathematical to be easily explained, but I would have liked a little more meat. Read September 2013.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Wonderful read. A nice, readable overview of information theory and its impact on modern society.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    I particularly liked the sections about Claude Shannon and Ada Lovelace.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The premise of this book is rather fascinating and the author has obviously done his research on the topic and structured it well. The material covers the whole of history of information and humanity's relationship with it. It certainly contains plenty of ideas and insights to get one thinking about larger philosophical implications of information as a concept and how it has come to shape human society.My problem with this book is partly rooted in the fact that I started off with some wealth of information about the topic already under my belt. If you have read a bit about computer science and information technology then you might find the passages on Turing and von Neumann monotonous. In addition, at some points the author went somewhat too deep into particular areas. For instance the parts on entropy, thermodynamics and quantum physics are in my opinion too far removed from the context of information theory and break up the otherwise well-paced flow of the narrative.Nevertheless the book is well written, and I would recommend it to anyone with an interest in information science who is yet to delve deeper into the topic.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    Information overload is fittingly the topic towards the end of Gleick's great flood of information topics - language, writing, code, encyclopedias, dictionaries, computing, naming, mathematics, logic, computer science, genetics, the internet. Too much for me to take in, no less do justice to in writing.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A book that is its own subject, so to speak. 400 pages of information about information. Fascinating from start to finish. Mind-boggling or should I say mind-googlng? Just one of hundreds of interesting observations: "Once a piece of information is filed, it is statistically unlikely ever to be seen again by human eyes." (so the point of "saving" is ?)
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    well-written and comprehensive. this history of information includes people and ideas from all the appropriate scholarly fields and understands the contributions those fields made to information theory. Claude Shannon is given his proper place at the center of this new paradigm. Like the Annales school historians, Gleick focuses not so much on human events as on the commodity involved. he seeks to explain what and how the study of information itself evolved and transformed our world rather than just following a ragged timeline of historical happenings.

    this book will help you understand our modern world as virtually no other can. it is not profound or poetic but it is informative.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Interesting and entertaining look at the history of information and a few of the key people who helped birth our info-thick world.4 stars oc
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    A good overview of a subject that's both frustratingly vague and undeniably crucial to our age. The closing, which refers to that age of ours, rang a bit odd to me, but no matter. There will be parts that'll bore you, either because they're dry by nature or because you've read about them many times before (at this point I've probably read more summaries of Gödel's incompleteness theorems than love stories), but it's all stuff that a book as broadly premised as this can't avoid.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    Glancing over many of the other lower ratings of this book, I’ve found that most people have already hit upon the major points of why I found it such an unsatisfying reading experience, and there were quite a few of them. To begin with, the actual title and the informational content of the book don’t really seem to jibe. There’s too much biographical information here, and of too many people, for the entire book to cohere in any meaningful way. The connection that one chapter has to the next is tenuous at best. For example, Gleick starts out talking about the ways in which African drummers drum in order to retain the information in a message over long distances (an fascinating way to the begin talking about information as a broad subject), but then almost inexplicably jumps directly into a short history of early English dictionary-making in the next chapter, and follows that with a history of the work Charles Babbage and Ada Byron Lovelace did together, including the Difference Machine and the Analytical Machine. Connecting them is only the thinnest of threads – the work of Claude Shannon and the birth of information theory - which isn’t even substantively developed until halfway through the book. Because of this, the whole endeavor ends up being a mile wide and an inch deep.Is it just me, or does most non-technical science- or technology-oriented writing “The Information” read this way? The narrative net seems like it needs to be cast so far and wide that even those readers who might be put to sleep reading about something like information theory (why are these people reading this book in the first place?) will be able to maintain their interest. It can mostly be avoided when the subject is narrowed to the life and/or ideas of one person, as in Gleick’s previous book on Isaac Newton, though I found that book a little unsatisfying for a different reason: I thought it was much too short.To give off the sense that this book wasn’t fun to read would be unfair. If you’re broadly interested in the history of science, this provides as a good introduction to a number of topics: in addition to the ones already mentioned, Gleick discusses telegraphy, the birth of statistical mechanics in physics and the concept of entropy, and the rise and difficulties of quantum computing. It’s just that the star of the show, the history of how “information” has been treated as such, suffers tremendously.I picked it up because 1) it was on the discount shelf at Barnes&Noble for a reasonable price (and if you can get it for six dollars, I would still say it’s worth investing in), and 2) I felt that my knowledge of information theory would be insufficient for a book that demanded a readership with more expertise. For those interested in something like the history of computing, this would be a wonderful place to start. Anyone expecting something more tightly focused on the likes of Claude Shannon, Norbert Weiner, their colleagues, and the development of fields like information theory and cybernetics will walk away wishing for something much more focused.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Not surprisingly, the subject of James Gleick’s The Information is the field of knowledge known as “Information Theory.” The theory’s origin can be traced to a seminal article written in 1948 by Claude Shannon, an engineer employed at that time by Bell Laboratories. The article, entitled "A Mathematical Theory of Communication," appeared in two parts in the Bell System Technical Journal. Shannon focused on how to optimize the amount of information a sender wants to transmit. His theory is important because, inter alia, its use and practice greatly improves the speed and amount of content that can be transmitted or communicated electronically. As Gleick points out:"Satellite television channels, pocket music players, efficient camera and telephones and countless other modern appurtenances depend on coding algorithms to compress numbers—sequences of bits—and those algorithms trace their lineage to Shannon’s original 1948 paper.”But getting a feel for how the theory works or why it is so important isn’t easy, so Gleick takes the reader on a 180-page historical tour of various earlier forms of communication between remote sites. For example, Europeans were amazed to find that tribes of sub-Saharan Africa were able to send remarkably detailed messages to one another by means of drums. The fact that their languages were tonal (like Mandarin, but unlike any European language) facilitated their “translation” into drum sounds. In another example of comparatively long-range communication, European war fleets were able to transmit messages by way of visual flag signals, but the range of possible messages was limited to a few pre-arranged commands. By the late 18th century, the French were able to send messages long distances by way of “telegraphs.” The first devices known as telegraphs were series of signaling devices like semaphores spaced with sight of one another. Signals could be sent from one device to the next, but complicated messages were difficult to transmit because there was no known efficient method to encode the message succinctly. The invention of the electrical telegraph provided the opportunity to send signals much faster than the visual “telegraphs.” However, it was not until an efficient code like the one developed by Samuel Morse was generally put in use that the transmission of complex or just long messages became practical. Just why Morse Code was efficient is is related to a well-defined concept conventionally called the “entropy of a message” or the “Shannon entropy.” It encourages the removal of as much extraneous data as possible from a message to shorten it but without a loss of meaning. Most of you will be aware of this process even without knowing the history and theory behind it. The meaning of “I lv u” is clear, and takes less space than “I love you.” Conventions such as “twitter-speak” allow for even more economy: when someone only says “OMG” you know what that person is communicating, and six spaces have been saved.The initial thrust of Shannon’s theorizing was to condense the quantity of data to be transmitted over telephone lines, greatly enhancing the capacity of the lines to transmit ideas (content) without increasing the amount of physical assets needed to transmit. But the concept of quantifying the extraction of information from raw data soon flowed from telephone engineering into other fields such as psychology, genetics, and quantum physics. Gleick also discusses the tension between the concepts of information and meaning. Although Shannon famously said that meaning is “irrelevant to the engineering problem,” meaning remains the thing humans most want to convey or transmit in communication. The problem remains a sticky philosophical one, and Gleick does a nice job of analyzing it, although he does not solve it.Gleick is a master of elucidating daunting scientific concepts. Just like his earlier book, Chaos, The Information brings to light an intellectually challenging set of ideas and makes them understandable to the layman. (JAB)
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    The Information is a sweeping historical / scientific / technological account of information across time and disciplines. From talking drums, language, DNA, telegraphs, and bytes to Claude Shannon, Charles Babbage, Ada Byron, Samuel Morse, Alan Turing, Stephen Hawking, Richard Dawkins and John Archibald Wheeler. It’s all very fascinating although it gets more complex for a lay reader (that is, me) to understand as it goes along
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    We were taught that atoms and the quarks that compose them are the fundamental building blocks of nature. Gleick teaches how bits—discrete pieces of information—are a more helpful way of understanding the world.Gleick's book is ambitious. It weighs in at 426 pages with 98 subsequent pages of notes, bibliography, and index. The size of the book reflects the scope. In it, Gleick begins surveying information by considering the birth of language and ends with Wikipedia. He traces the understanding and transferring of information through all of human history!There are many fascinating insights throughout the book. Have you ever considered the task the first dictionary compiler faced in standardizing regional spelling? Did you know that Napoleon had a system of mechanical signal towers that could pass messages throughout France (at least on a clear day)? How many repeated numbers would you expect in a long random number? Did you know that Beethoven would have only heard a small amount of Bach's musical output, but we can now hear it all? Have you ever considered what effect knowing everything has on us?Gleick has written more than a history here—he reveals insight into the human condition. Take this meditation on forgetfulness:"Forgetting used to be a failing, a waste, a sign of senility. Now it takes effort. It may be as important as remembering" (407).The Information is a book from a Renaissance man who has though deeply about the human quest to relay and understand information. I found something interesting on every page.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    James Gleick does a remarkable job detailing the history of information and communication from the first scratchings on a cave wall to the cyberspace of today and the quantum information systems of tomorrow. He starts off not at the origin of symbolic language, but a short time after, when those ephemeral sounds between mortal humans leaped out of our minds and crystalized into timeless artifacts and immortal ideas that would forever change our culture and our world. Gleick traces the origins of both writing and mathematics to their historical beginnings and tracks the progress of these formalisms along with the theories and technologies that enabled their innovation and dissemination. He gives the reader both a clear explanation of each innovation as well as personal biographical accounts of the pioneers that made them possible. Both the breadth and the depth of the material is enlightening, and the writing is entertaining as well.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Gleick's history of humanity's growing awareness and understanding of information is detailed, interesting and possibly of use to us as we try to come to grips with our now information rich society.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Really, really worth reading. After a while, I decided to stop trying to process all the mathematics, and just read through that part. I'd like to read his other work.

    It did lead to one of the oddest, and shortest, conversations I ever had with my dear old Dad, where we both shared what we knew about Boolean mathematics. Everything I know about it came from this book.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Ambitious, expansive, dense, and frequently quite interesting.
  • Rating: 5 out of 5 stars
    5/5
    I loved this book so much. It was everything I could have hoped, and that's saying something. However, it's hard to transform gushing praise into a useful review, even harder since in this case I listened to the audiobook & I find it pretty difficult marshall my thoughts about audiobooks into a useful order.

    What I will say is that the title is pretty startlingly accurate. A history (which, I cannot stress enough, so fascinating -- the chapter on dictionaries alone made me want to jump up and down with glee) that tracks the emergence of information, our ability to hammer down a concept for it, a theory, as information becomes something we can think about, as we begin to recognize information itself as a transformative force, and a flood -- because after centuries of scrambling to gather little bits of information, in a strange reversal, we find ourselves struggling to contain it.

    The book ranges in topics from talking drums -- this is the first chapter and aside from being riveting it's a great introduction to the book, about the transmission of information and perceiving the transmission of information and grievously underestimating a seemingly simple process and performing miracles with a relatively simple set of tools -- to the evolution of computing to quantum physics to Wikipedia. Every step along the way was marvellous & the author treats every subject with respect and rigor.

    The whole thing is mind-blowing and wonderful. Gah. I'm done. So good.

    A note on the audiobook: my favorite reader ever. This guy sounds so cool. He's awful with accents but I forgive him.
  • Rating: 3 out of 5 stars
    3/5
    In few words (an approach Gleick himself may want to consider), this book made me feel as if I'd been bludgeoned by an historical fact- checker and made to eat all my vegetables.

    The information (as opposed to The Information) contained herein has been presented in a more entertaining and easily-digestible format in half a dozen biographies, several Neal Stephenson novels and (seriously) a few of my 25-year-old computer science texts.

    And while I'm not claiming that any of the above is necessarily true, as a mathematician and engineer, it's the overall impression left by Gleick's book. Grain of salt, and all that.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Awesome book. My only quibble is that the final 5 or so chapters bounce around with little connection, and are essentially appendices to the first, excellent ten chapters.
  • Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
    4/5
    Seriously how does Gleick understand all of this well enough to explain it to people like me?