Unavailable
Unavailable
Unavailable
Audiobook9 hours
Top Dog: The Science of Winning and Losing
Written by Ashley Merryman
Rating: 4 out of 5 stars
4/5
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this audiobook
New York Times Bestseller
Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman's work changes the national dialogue. Beyond their bestselling books, you know them from commentary and features in the New York Times, CNN, NPR, Time, Newsweek, Wired, New York, and more. E-mail, Facebook, and Twitter accounts are filled with demands to read their reporting (such as "How Not to Talk to Your Kids," "Creativity Crisis," and "Losing Is Good for You").
In TOP DOG, Bronson and Merryman again use their astonishing blend of science and storytelling to reveal what's truly in the heart of a champion. The joy of victory and the character-building agony of defeat. Testosterone and the neuroscience of mistakes. Why rivals motivate. How home field advantage gets you a raise. What teamwork really requires. It's baseball, the SAT, sales contests, and Linux. How before da Vinci and FedEx were innovators, first, they were great competitors.
Olympians carry TOP DOG in their gym bags. It's in briefcases of Wall Street traders and Madison Avenue madmen. Risk takers from Silicon Valley to Vegas race to implement its ideas, as educators debate it in halls of academia. Now see for yourself what this game-changing talk is all about.
Po Bronson and Ashley Merryman's work changes the national dialogue. Beyond their bestselling books, you know them from commentary and features in the New York Times, CNN, NPR, Time, Newsweek, Wired, New York, and more. E-mail, Facebook, and Twitter accounts are filled with demands to read their reporting (such as "How Not to Talk to Your Kids," "Creativity Crisis," and "Losing Is Good for You").
In TOP DOG, Bronson and Merryman again use their astonishing blend of science and storytelling to reveal what's truly in the heart of a champion. The joy of victory and the character-building agony of defeat. Testosterone and the neuroscience of mistakes. Why rivals motivate. How home field advantage gets you a raise. What teamwork really requires. It's baseball, the SAT, sales contests, and Linux. How before da Vinci and FedEx were innovators, first, they were great competitors.
Olympians carry TOP DOG in their gym bags. It's in briefcases of Wall Street traders and Madison Avenue madmen. Risk takers from Silicon Valley to Vegas race to implement its ideas, as educators debate it in halls of academia. Now see for yourself what this game-changing talk is all about.
Unavailable
Related to Top Dog
Related audiobooks
The Luckiest Kid in the World: The brand-new comedy adventure from the author of The Day the Screens Went Blank Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5There Is an I in Team: What Elite Athletes and Coaches Really Know About High Performance Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5Don't Trust Your Gut: Using Data to Get What You Really Want in Life Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Creating Your Own Destiny Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWe Before Me: The Advantage of Putting Others Before Self Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBook Summary of Daring Greatly by Brené Brown Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Too Many Reasons to Live Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5You Are Awesome: How to Navigate Change, Wrestle with Failure, and Live an Intentional Life Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5You Can Do It: How to Find Your Voice and Make a Difference Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Too Big to Ignore: The Business Case for Big Data Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Black Market: An Insider's Journey into the High-Stakes World of College Basketball Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5What Happens When We Die? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsSport Matters: Leadership, Power, and the Quest for Respect in Sports Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Expectation Effect: How Your Mindset Can Change Your World Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Business Brilliant: Surprising Lessons from the Greatest Self-Made Business Icons Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5It's Not About the Truth: The Untold Story of the Duke Lacrosse Case and the Lives It Shattered Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nothing to Lose, Everything to Gain: How I Went from Gang Member to Multimillionaire Entrepreneur Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Eating the Dinosaur Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Secret of The Secret: Unlocking the Mysteries of the Runaway Bestseller Rating: 2 out of 5 stars2/5The Road to J.O.Y.: Leading with Faith, Playing with Purpose, Leaving a Legacy Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Elevate and Dominate: 21 Ways to Win On and Off the Field Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The U.S. Coronavirus Crisis and the Rise of the "Silver-Mettle" Leaders: 11 Steps up A SILVERPATH Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGame Plan for Life: Your Personal Playbook for Success Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5America’s Greatest Moments In Sports: Legendary Feats of Strength, Endurance, and Will Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsNightlight Compilation Volume 1: THROUGH THE STORM! – with David Kiran Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5
Anthropology For You
Guns, Germs and Steel: The Fates of Human Societies Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Play: How it Shapes the Brain, Opens the Imagination, and Invigorates the Soul Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Neuroplasticity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Billion Wicked Thoughts: What the World's Largest Experiment Reveals About Human Desire Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Bonk: The Curious Coupling of Science and Sex Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Nothing to Envy: Ordinary Lives in North Korea Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Magic: A History: From Alchemy to Witchcraft, from the Ice Age to the Present Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Power of Myth Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sea People: The Puzzle of Polynesia Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Ugly History of Beautiful Things: Essays on Desire and Consumption Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Utopia of Rules: On Technology, Stupidity, and the Secret Joys of Bureaucracy Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Why We Love: The New Science Behind Our Closest Relationships Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Girls & Sex: Navigating the Complicated New Landscape Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5I Am The Storm: Inspiring Stories of People Who Fight Against Overwhelming Odds Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Who Is Wellness For?: An Examination of Wellness Culture and Who It Leaves Behind Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Status Game: On Human Life and How to Play It Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Rethinking Narcissism: The Bad-and Surprising Good-About Feeling Special Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Seven Daughters of Eve: The Science That Reveals Our Genetic Ancestry Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Trickster Makes This World: Mischief, Myth, and Art Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5The Age of Deer: Trouble and Kinship with our Wild Neighbors Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Precipice: Existential Risk and the Future of Humanity Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Alphabet Versus the Goddess: The Conflict Between Word and Image Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5The Art of Making Memories: How to Create and Remember Happy Moments Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Brief History of Everyone Who Ever Lived: The Human Story Retold Through Our Genes Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Top Dog
Rating: 4.021739130434782 out of 5 stars
4/5
92 ratings9 reviews
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A great read about Winning. Many things that we usually miss when thinking about the reasons and keys to a win are sometimes not what we might think of.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Contrary to some modern schools of thought, competitive drive isn't a maladaptive property that needs to be shamed. This book gives great insight into the internal mechanisms that drive humans to compare, contrast, challenge, and strive for greater results. It provides a sound explanation to why winning feels good, losing feels bad, and how we were built to handle such results.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5A bit short. Interesting research on winning. Ok overall thought
- Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Really gets the reader thinking of why some people are top performers and some are not. A lot of scientific and historical references but all are explained for the layman to read. Good book
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5I am not convinced.To oversimplify: the authors of this book divide people into two groups, each with two subgroups. One group likes to compete, the other doesn't. Since the first is mostly men and the second mostly women, they exist in roughly equal proportions in the population. The subgroups of the Competitors are the Honest competitors and the Win-at-any-cost competitors. The subgroups of the Non-competitors are the those who succeed if forced into competition and those who fail.I'm willing to accept their four groups as a tentative hypothesis (though I've given them "classificatory" names rather than the names they use, such as "Warriors" and "Worriers"). They offer some pretty good data that there are such groups. But now I'm going to rename those four groups....Honest Competitors: Competitors who build things upWin-at-all-costs Competitors: JerksSuccessful Non-competitors: CooperatorsUnsuccessful Non-competitors: Failures.Based on what the authors say (and here I don't consider their data as good), the Honest Competitors add the most to society. The Cooperators are next. The Failures contribute nothing but don't impose much cost on society. And the Jerks give us wars, financial crises, racial discrimination, sexual prejudice, crime, sexual abuse, and so forth.So: Suppose we can push people to become either Competitors or Non-competitors, but can't determine in advance which subgroup they will belong to. Which is what it sounds like to me. Which is better, to produce Competitors or Non-competitors? If you produce all Competitors, you'll have Honest Competitors building things up and Jerks tearing things down. If you produce all Non-competitors, you'll have Cooperators building things up (if not as effectively as if you had a society of Honest Competitors) and you'd have Failures, well, failing -- but not doing any harm.The authors assert that the payoff for producing maximum Competitors is higher than that for producing maximum Non-competitors. This is where the problem comes in. Have they proved this? I'm definitely a Non-competitor, and it didn't seem so to me; when I apply utility theory, it sure looks like Non-competitors win. I suspect that a Competitor would say that they did prove it. The "winner" is in the mind of the beholder.So who is right? Well, here's an interesting thought: If either Competitors or Non-competitors had a fundamental advantage, evolution would favor it and the other sort would die out. We still have Competitors and Non-competitors. Which argues that Competitors aren't overwhelming the opposition nearly as much as this book suggests....
4 people found this helpful
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Hmm. A lot of different research areas and claims about women’s reactions versus men’s reactions that usually lose the appropriate overlapping bell curve limitations. They identify people as Warriors (perform well in the face of threat; good in a pinch but can overlook things/not plan longer term) and Worriers (can do really badly faced with an unfamiliar threat, but good at planning, and facing a familiar challenge can outperform Warriors because they practice). Again, it felt like some discussion of spectra was missing; I’m pretty damn competitive and I didn’t see myself in either of those descriptions. Fact I didn’t know: if you’re on a team, increased testosterone increases cooperation with teammates, not competitiveness with them—testosterone seems to increase motivation to do whatever’s socially rewarded in a situation, not “aggression.” I was also left unconvinced by the claim that sports provide a model for democracy, because the rules are in the open and thus people see what “fair play” is and also feel outrage when the rules are violated, which is why the Greeks had the Olympics and democracy. While I accept that corruption in one area of society may influence others, I find it hard to tell a causal narrative.
1 person found this helpful
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Interesting case studies cited and some surprises about the effects of competition on people. Gets bogged down in a few spots, but still worth the read.
- Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5This is probably my own fault for reading a book about a subject that I'm not interested in, but I've liked previous articles by these authors and decided to give it a shot. My conclusion is that I'm still not interested.The book is about competitiveness, and how it can positively impact performance across a number of fields. The deal with this author is that he's one of those pop science writers who reads the research, and then gives you the headlines in an easy to digest way. This is a fine approach, but it wasn't enough to make me care about this topic.One annoying thing, though, is that in summarizing the research, he omits a lot of steps. Again, this is a good policy, otherwise it would be like reading a stack of abstracts, and who wants to do that? Nobody. I know of what I speak, because I used to have to do that for work. I know it sounds like what could be better, getting paid to read about interesting research -- but in reality, there was a time crunch and it's dense stuff to have to read and report out on. ANYWAY, so what will happen is that he'll describe a research study, and then by the end, the details or numbers don't exactly match up. The point of the findings is still there, but it bothered me that the authors/editors didn't try to make this smoother. The shtick is that the research reveals things about competition that are counter-intuitive to what we might think ... but I don't know, man. I think that assumes a lot about what I think. Some of the big zingers didn't seem that unusual.In case you're wondering, major points include:- brain chemistry determines a lot about an individual's response to the stress of competitive situations- individuals can learn to better manage competitive situations- I think that might be all the take-aways. I thought this would be a longer list.
- Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Fascinating look at competition, how nature and nurture combined make us competitive or not. Individuals vary widely in how they respond to competition was a central point in the book. The science and psychology behind this was very interesting.