Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Unavailable
    How Democracies Die
    Unavailable
    How Democracies Die
    Unavailable
    How Democracies Die
    Audiobook8 hours

    How Democracies Die

    Written by Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt

    Narrated by Fred Sanders

    4.5/5

    ()

    Currently unavailable

    Currently unavailable

    About this audiobook

    A bracing, revelatory look at the demise of liberal democracies around the world—and a road map for rescuing our own.

    Donald Trump's presidency has raised a question that many of us never thought we'd be asking: Is our democracy in danger? Harvard professors Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt have spent more than twenty years studying the breakdown of democracies in Europe and Latin America, and they believe the answer is yes. Democracy no longer ends with a bang—in a revolution or military coup—but with a whimper: the slow, steady weakening of critical institutions, such as the judiciary and the press, and the gradual erosion of long-standing political norms. The good news is that there are several exit ramps on the road to authoritarianism. The bad news is that, by electing Trump, we have already passed the first one.

    Drawing on decades of research and a wide range of historical and global examples, from 1930s Europe to contemporary Hungary, Turkey, and Venezuela, to the American South during Jim Crow, Levitsky and Ziblatt show how democracies die—and how ours can be saved.

    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherPenguin Random House Audio
    Release dateJan 16, 2018
    ISBN9780525587958
    Unavailable
    How Democracies Die

    Related to How Democracies Die

    Related audiobooks

    American Government For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      China's Evergrande Crisis: A Real Threat to U.S. Stocks?

      Sep 20, 2021

      Many investors had probably never heard of Evergrande (EGRNY, $10.90) prior to Monday morning. But once the massive and massively indebted Chinese real estate company sparked a selloff sweeping from Asia through Europe and on to the U.S., anxious cha

      4 min read

    • Article

      Trumpism Lives On In New Thinktank – But Critics Say It’s ‘Just A Grift’

      Apr 17, 2021

      Malcolm X, Mark Twain, Malcolm Gladwell. Lewis Carroll, Steve Jobs. Douglas Adams, Mohandas Gandhi, Rocky Balboa – all seem unlikely sources of inspiration for a definition of Trumpism. Yet these are among the prominent figures quoted by members of a

      5 min read

    • Article

      Gene Sharp and Social Movements: Contributions and Legacies

      Jul 25, 2023

      Gene Sharp significantly contributed to both the intellectual and practical advancement of nonviolent approaches to conflictual activity against oppressive sources of power. His seminal statement, The Politics of Nonviolent Action, published fifty ye

      21 min read

    • Article

      Democracy Will Prevail

      Jul 23, 2018

      Democracy Will Prevail
      15 min read

    • Article

      Containing Trump

      Feb 7, 2017

      Containing Trump
      12 min read

    • Article

      Larry Diamond

      Jun 24, 2019

      The Stanford scholar known as Mr. Democracy on the shrinking free world, the U.S.’s irreplaceable role in it and his book Ill Winds

      2 min read

    • Article

      Back From the Brink

      Dec 17, 2020

      Back From the Brink
      7 min read

    • Article

      Undoing the World America Made Mr. Trump Goes to Davos

      Feb 5, 2018

      Could this be it? Might the American Century actually clock out at just 72 years, from 1945 to 2017? No longer than Louis XIV ruled France? Only 36 months more than the Soviet Union lasted, after all that bother? The question sounds preposterous. Fo

      5 min read

    • Article

      From The Editor

      Jan 17, 2022

      DEBATES ABOUT THE EFFECTIVENESS OF DEMOCRACY are as old as democracy itself. But in the broader span of history, people power has only ever gotten more desirable. It was the quest for democracy that dominated so much of the last century, especially a

      2 min read

    Reviews for How Democracies Die

    4.5/5

    264 ratings20 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 4/5
      this book is a sobering consideration of how democratic governments have, through subtle and even legal steps, evolved into authoritarian states. If American norms--political interactions not legislated but tacitly agreed upon--continue to be eroded we, too, could quickly find ourselves watching the last days of a democratic America.The authors present the histories of countries that were democracies and became authoritarian, highlighting the strategies used by populist leaders to bring the system into their control. Later chapters consider the history of our political parties as gatekeepers as well as the source of conflict. A sad reality is that consensus has only occurred in America when the racist elements have been appeased.And I am not just talking about slave owning states bulking up their political power by making slaves 3/5ths of a person, or the later repression of voting rights. As my readings in late 20th c political history have taught, the repression of African American, and the poor, is active to this day. I was a young adult when I heard our politicians call for 'law and order' and the end of 'welfare queens' and 'young bucks' drawing the dole. If after the mid-century Civil Rights protests we could not be above board with racism, it morphed into new language.I was shocked not to have noticed before that recent anti-immigration movements are rooted in a desire to weaken the Democratic party, since most immigrants, along with people of color, vote Democratic. I knew it was overt racism, just missed that connection.After leading readers through history the authors turn to today's political situation, evaluating the administration's tendency toward authoritarianism. As by the end of 2017, the system of checks and balances appear to be working. BUT, if the Republican party is complicit, the breakdown can and happen here.In the end, the authors offer how the Democratic party should respond to the crisis--not by imitating the Tea Party methods, or by giving up 'identity politics' and letting the disenfranchised flounder, but by committing to consensus politics, forming a broad coalition, and restoring the basic norms that worked in the past: mutual toleration and forbearance.I think this is one of the most enlightening books I have read recently. I highly recommend it.I received a free book through Blogging for Books in exchange for a fair and unbiased review.
    • 5/5
      "We have developed a set of four behavioral warnings that can help us know an authoritarian when we see one. We should worry when a politician 1) rejects, in words or action, the democratic rules of the game, 2) denies the legitimacy of opponents, 3) tolerates or encourages violence, or 4) indicates a willingness to curtail the civil liberties of opponents, including the media.... A politician who meets even one of these criteria is cause for concern.... Trump, even before his inauguration, tested positive on all four measures of our litmus test for autocrats."Presented against the background of other emerging authoritarian heads of state, such as those of Ecuador, Peru, Venezuela, Hungary, and Poland, the authors review the case that Trump represents a dangerous step in a worldwide trend, one that threatens the liberal traditions upon which America was founded. Well written, persuasive, and almost certainly correct.
    • 5/5
      An important book about democracies and how they manage to fail. A book everyone should read in today's divisive climate.
    • 3/5
      Although I definitely learned some things from the book, I left feeling vaguely disappointed.I think the four "warning signs" that the authors mentioned are very good places to start, but I was rather baffled by the authors praising the "backdoor deals" of the political parties in the past as helping democracy. So making things more democratic...leads to less democracy? I understand the point about parties functioning as a way to keep demagogues out of the electoral process, but still.I also found it rather surprising that the authors kept holding up Central and South American coups and dictatorships as examples while not addressing foreign influence in those coups and dictatorships but once or twice (and in a lukewarm way). Instead, America is held up as a paragon of democracy in this book, and the authors conveniently portray the dictatorships in C/S America as being driven solely by internal factors. Let's all ignore the (at times covert, at times very OVERT) American influence in these dictatorships' creation, shall we?
    • 5/5
      seems more like a book report than a review, I apologize. From the jacket:“Drawing on decades of research and a wide range of historical and global examples, from 1930's Europe to contemporary Hungary, Turkey and Venezuela to the American South during Jim Crow, Levitsky and Ziblatt show how democracies die – and how ours can be saved.”“ A country whose president attacks the press, threatens to lock up his rival, and declares that he might not accept election results cannot credibly defend democracy “ p206 So how did we get into the current situation?This book begins with a discussion of the four key indicators of authoritarian behavior:1. Rejection of (or weak commitment to) democratic rules of the game2. Denial of the legitimacy of political opponents3. Toleration or encouragement of violence4. Readiness to curtail civil liberties of opponents, including media. P 23/24American democracy has endured many previous threats, including the Civil War and Reconstruction and politicians such as Joseph McCarthy, Father Charles Coughlin and even Franklin Delano Roosevelt who, frustrated with his New Deal policies being struck down by the Supreme Court, attempted to increase the number of judges and thus pack the Court. Each time the checks and balances have brought the system back into balance as outlined by the framers of the Constitution.An important check was that political parties were able to nominate candidates that conformed to party principles. However, after the chaos of the 1968 election, 'In 1972 passage of Mcgovern-Fraser Commission issued a set of recommendations that the two parties adopted before the 1972 elections. What emerged was a system of binding presidential primaries. ' (p 51) This resulted in the parties unable to perform as gatekeepers and keep unsuitable candidates out. In addition, to work at its best, American democracy must be defined by two basic principles: mutual toleration and forbearance. Both of these address the idea that one's opponent is not evil and should not be annihilated; that varying political ideals are just that; that compromises between opposing views can be made.These concepts have been breaking down for many years, as evidenced by the bombastic rhetoric of intolerance of Rush Lumbaugh and progressing through Ann Coulter whose 2008 campaign speech against Obama 'brought forth cries of “Treason!” “Terrorist!” and even “Kill him” from the crowd.” P157. In addition to rhetoric, American politics has become a game of political hardball consisting of maneuvers that are legal, but not ethical or moral.So is the answer to Republican hardball, hardball tactics by the Democrats? The authors say no.”Even if Democrats were to succeed in weakening or removing President Trump via hardball tactics, their victory would be Pyrrhic-- for they would inherit a democracy stripped of its remaining protective guardrails. If the Trump administration were brought to its knees by obstructionism, or if President Trump were impeached without a strong bipartisan consensus, the effect would be to reinforce- and perhaps hasten – the dynamic of partisan antipathy and norm erosion that helped bring Trump to power to begin with. As much as a third of the country would likely view Trump's impeachment as the machinations of a vast left-wing conspiracy- maybe even as a coup. American politics would be left dangerously unmoored. “This sort of escalation rarely ends well. If Democrats do not work to restore norms of mutual toleration and forbearance, their next president will likely confront an opposition willing to use any means necessary to defeat them. And if partisan rifts deepen and our unwritten rules continue to fray, Americans could eventually elect a president who is even more dangerous than Trump.” p 217This book is short, only a bit over 200 pages. It has definitely opened my eyes to nuances of the current political climate and the true danger our democracy may be in.
    • 4/5
      I am in an uncharacteristically long reader's block slump combined with distracting ADD and I've never used a horror story to break me out of previous ones. The horror story of a horrible defense not knowing how to play on Sunday wasn't exactly enough, but it did prompt me to finish this horror story. Sinclair Lewis published the unfortunately prophetic It Can't Happen Here and Levitsky and Ziblatt's relates the actuality of it happening here with the erosive death of democracy in the US. One problem with their analysis is starting from the premise that we've had a democracy to erode. They do noteAfter all, we like to believe that the fate of a government lies in the hands of its citizens. If the people hold democratic values, democracy will be safe. If citizens are open to authoritarian appeals, then, sooner or later, democracy will be in trouble. This view is wrong. It assumes too much of democracy—that “the people” can shape at will the kind of government they possess. It’s hard to find any evidence of majority support for authoritarianism in 1920s Germany and Italy. Before the Nazis and Fascists seized power, less than 2 percent of the population were party members, and neither party achieved anything close to a majority of the vote in free and fair elections.Yes, we've assumed that people can shape the kind of government they have. Of course, by "people" we hadn't counted on the formerly behind-the-scenes "people" now known as corporate "citizens" that are quite no longer behind any scenes. Today's Nazis and Fascists wear Republican, "alt-right" and MAGA trappings in the world of 2016 and later, and achieved a majority in electoral votes in a relatively free election (that is my extension of the text, not theirs.) The authors write a well researched and well composed narrative of historical destruction of world democracies and turn an true eye on what the administration of 2017 has done and is likely to do here, drawing crosshairs and laying the blame properly on the majority party's failures to keep it in check. And, they accurately observe that the current regime did not create the conditions it adroitly takes advantage of, but correctly points to Newt Gingrich for laying waste to all civility (I may be paraphrasing just a bit.)When American democracy has worked, it has relied upon two norms that we often take for granted - mutual tolerance and institutional forbearance.Those are gone.The authors do well to recount all the indicators of destruction of our democracy, correlating with extensive historical examples. They don't have a solution , though - nor could we expect one. Their offered optimism doesn't counter this serious problem that we will be long recovering from, if ever.Stephen King wishes he could write horror like this. Be afraid. Be very afraid.
    • 4/5
      The book is in part about modern democracies and another part about the current US president Trump, how things are evolving, and what's wrong with it. And some ways to save the US democracy.
    • 5/5
      An important book about democracies and how they manage to fail. A book everyone should read in today's divisive climate.
    • 4/5
      I would have called this book How (American) Democracy Dies. Having made that little quibble, this is an excellent book. For me, the first part is excellent, where the authors detail the four signs that point towards a movement from democracy to an unenlightened autocracy. These signs are clear enough for me to see what has happened in my own country, and what is happening today. There are danger signs aplenty.The book does indeed focus on the USA, and this is something that they stated upfront. Having said that, I would have liked more analysis of what is happening across the world. There is scant mention of Asia, and this is a weakness in the book because a large percentage of the world's population lives in India and China.Still, it does provide enough food for thought, and much cause for worry.
    • 5/5
      I am a fan of mysteries and thrillers. I enjoy being scared by potential evil in the world. I have even carried this forward to books about true evil in the form of studies of actual serial killers. However, nothing is scaring me more than the books I have been reading about the Trump White House. This was another book that has me up at night. The authors pointed out that our democracy is not guaranteed to survive unless we work to maintain it. They provide us with the histories of other countries that have succumbed to authoritarian rule. Such countries exhibit all or some of four key indicators: rejection of or weak commitment to democratic rules of the game, denial of the legitimacy of political opponents, toleration or encouragement of violence and readiness to curtail civil liberties of opponents, including the media. They then went on to reflect how Trump has exhibited all four indicators. However, all is not lost, and they discuss how we can survive Trump by restoring the basic norms that once protected it. This is a fascinating and insightful look into what is going on today and should be required reading for us all.
    • 4/5
      Democracies die when one party stops treating the other as legitimate. This is happening in the US. Levitsky & Ziblatt argue that tit for tat is not helpful but they don’t identify tactics that are, which is frustrating—they indicate that things like coup attempts by the other party are bad and lead to backlash that speeds the transition to autocracy, which I get, but this to me does not translate to the idea of perhaps abolishing the filibuster if/when Democrats get some control back. That said, it’s not clear to me that other people have a clear path forward either unless the Republican party decides to clean house, and this is a useful look at repeating patterns: the key difference between those countries that succumb and those that don’t, they say, is whether the mainstream party to which the fascist insurgency is closest decides to embrace it for short-term benefit (Weimar Germany, Venezuela, etc.) or reject it and support the “opposing” mainstream party to keep fascists out of power (more recent Germany, France).

      1 person found this helpful

    • 4/5
      The authors really jump head first into their subject, causing a splash so big, the reader may immediately think the actual title is "Trumpism 101". They promptly lay out four key signs of an authoritarian government, and, without any help from the authors, it is easy to think of statements or actions America's current president has done that meet those criteria. Has the legitimacy of the most recent presidential election ever been questioned? Ever heard the phrase "Lock her up!" at one of his rallies? How about his encouragement of his supporters to physically assault his non-supporters? Is the phrase "Fake news" familiar to you? What's your best guess on what he thinks of Putin? However, the book quickly gets away from Trump and cites many examples of well known authoritarian governments in recent decades in other parts of the world, to give perspective to what may or may not be happening in America. The book then points to two essential "guardrails" to democracy, those dimensions of government beyond representative government, balance of power, and other well known foundations of America's republic. It is this discussion that is often overlooked and is much more of a factor in making or breaking the better known pillars. Eventually, the authors narrate the "unraveling" of America to where it is in 2019. Many readers may be surprised the authors lay significant initial blame on a former key government official, rather than the current President, for why we are where we are. Finally, the book tries to guide the analysis to what, if anything could and should be done about the current state of affairs. I'll let other readers come to their own conclusions on how successful the authors are in doing that. Personally, I think it lacks a recognition of some essential dynamics at play, which surprises me somewhat, given how much depth they give to the subject up to that point. All in all, this is a concise review of democracy for not only the Bernie Sanders or even Jeff Flakes of the world, and you don't even have to read The Rise and Fall of the Third Reich to appreciate what the book has to say. It is about what every American should know before giving a political candidate their support, regardless of the details of their lives.
    • 5/5
      A somber, realistic, but hopeful look at the dangers to American democracy by the loss of mutual tolerance and forbearance and some strategies for preserving it.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 5/5
      Written so simply, easy to understand, I read it in one day. It is a real eye opener for those who never thought it could happen here. Absolutely frightening and depressing. Can't recommend it highly enough.
    • 5/5
      Best book for what is going on in our government and the movement to extremism. Also, realistic solutions to problem.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 5/5
      I haven’t even read the book yet but the Title is incorrect. The United States is not a democracy. We are a Constitutional Federal Republic. Just saying.
    • 5/5
      This is a well-researched analysis of the factors leading to the death of democracies, the signs of the rise of authoritarianism and the threats to the checks and balances that were supposed to prevent the election of demagogues. It outlines strategies employed by elected authoritarians to consolidate their control: "capture the referees, sideline the key players and rewrite the rules to tilt the playing field". The authors demonstrate how Trump has attempted to employ each of these tactics. The fact that we have tolerated this is evidence that we have "defined deviancy down" and accepted the unpardonable, a "fundamental erosion of norms". The book was informative about the fall of democracies in other countries and would have been merely interesting to read were it not for the Trump election. Now it's not just interesting, it's painful to read. This wasn't supposed to be able to happen here. Frankly, I have little hope for us when one party is controlled by self-dealing, unprincipled, greedy, hypocritical, xenophobic, short-sighted, anti intellectual, cowardly, mean-spirited, racist and win-at-all costs members. (I could add more adjectives, but you get the idea.) It's a party of people making their last stand as the ruling class and I don't see them compromising, even if it means destroying democracy in the process. The breakdown of democracy is gradual and can still be prevented. However, even if the authoritarian slide doesn't totally destroy democracy the authors (and I) fear that it will leave it severely weakened. Also, there is the danger that we are just one security crisis away from having no checks applied to Trump at all. At least the authors do suggest some solutions.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 5/5
      Essential reading, and not just for Americans. These two Harvard scholars take a broad sweep of the countries where democracies has been killed off, sometimes temporarily, by autocratic leaders. They identify the processes that led to democracy's death in places as disparate as Venezuela and Hungary. Next they review the American experience. The analysis should give us pause. All democracies are fragile.The book reveals that the election of Trump is merely the tip of an iceberg that has been long developing. Can we see the signs in our own democracy? What can we do about it? The authors have some suggestions.
    • 5/5
      Excellent analysis of where we are and what needs to be done.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 5/5
      Over the past 2 years we have watched politicians do and say things unprecedented in the U.S., but which have been recognized as precursors to democratic crises in other places. We usually think democracies die by military coup, but they may also die at the hands of our elected leaders. Using examples from history, and focusing on events in the US from the 1980's through today, the authors demonstrate that, yes indeed, we are in danger of losing our democracy. Although the authors are well-regarded historians, they write in easy to understand language with vivid details. This is one of the most important and chilling of the many books I have read on this topic since the 2016 election. I am not hopeful