Everand Logo

Welcome to Everand!

  • Discover millions of ebooks, audiobooks, and so much more with a free trial

    Only $11.99/month after trial. Cancel anytime.

    Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling
    Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling
    Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling
    Audiobook28 hours

    Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling

    Written by Richard Lyman Bushman

    Narrated by James Anderson Foster

    4.5/5

    ()

    About this audiobook

    Founder of the largest indigenous Christian church in American history, Joseph Smith published the 584-page Book of Mormon when he was twenty-three and went on to organize a church, found cities, and attract thousands of followers before his violent death at age thirty-eight. Richard Bushman, an esteemed cultural historian and a practicing Mormon, moves beyond the popular stereotype of Smith as a colorful fraud to explore his personality, his relationships with others, and how he received revelations. An arresting narrative of the birth of the Mormon Church, Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling also brilliantly evaluates the prophet's bold contributions to Christian theology and his cultural place in the modern world.
    LanguageEnglish
    PublisherTantor Media, Inc
    Release dateJan 24, 2018
    ISBN9781541488717
    Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling

    More audiobooks from Richard Lyman Bushman

    Related to Joseph Smith

    Related audiobooks

    Christianity For You

    View More
    View More

    Related podcast episodes

    Related articles

    • Article

      Mormons Remove Church Leader For The First Time In Nearly 30 Years

      Aug 9, 2017

      James Hamula was ousted from a mid-level leadership council based on disciplinary action by the religion's highest leaders, a statement from The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints says.

      1 min read

    • Article

      The Death of a Prophet

      Jan 5, 2018

      The Death of a Prophet
      3 min read

    • Article

      Present-Day Thoughts On The Quality Of Life (1969)

      Mar 4, 2019

      THE ESSAY THAT FOLLOWS WAS originally delivered as a lecture in 1969, but the two of us learned of its existence only in 2002. We were visiting our grandfather and his wife, Marguerite, at their home in San Antonio, Texas. After dinner, our grandfath

      7 min read

    • Article

      Emerson And Thoreau Led A Second Independence Movement – This Time Of Thought

      Dec 8, 2021

      In 1976, Robert A. Gross published “The Minutemen and Their World,” a groundbreaking piece of scholarship about the origins of the American Revolution. Rather than telling the story through accounts of a few Founding Fathers, Gross dramatically broad

      3 min read

    • Article

      How the Mormons Conquered America: The success of the Mormon religion is a study in social adaptation.

      Jun 12, 2014

      At the end of the smash Broadway musical, The Book of Mormon, the protagonist, Elder Price, a zealous young Mormon missionary in Uganda, triumphantly sings, “We are still Latter day Saints, all of us / Even if we change some things, or we break the r

      11 min read

    • Article

      From Father Divine to Jim Jones: On the Phenomenon of American Messiahs

      Aug 26, 2019

      Here's the thing about so-called cults: for all their tragic failings, they’ve provided the only genuine resistance to the forward march of capitalism. The post From Father Divine to Jim Jones: On the Phenomenon of American Messiahs appeared first on

      13 min read

    • Article

      How We REMEMBER

      Jun 16, 2021

      How We REMEMBER
      10 min read

    • Article

      Letters

      Jul 6, 2023

      Letters
      4 min read

    • Article

      Blackness in Bedlam: On Toni Morrison’s ‘The Origin of Others’

      Sep 14, 2017

      It can be incapacitating, seeing your suffering in the mirror. The post Blackness in Bedlam: On Toni Morrison’s ‘The Origin of Others’ appeared first on The Millions.

      9 min read

    • Article

      Disinformation Nation: On Francine Prose

      Apr 26, 2021

      The Vixen makes an implicit argument for good writing, and even good editing, as a form of political defiance. The post Disinformation Nation: On Francine Prose appeared first on The Millions.

      5 min read

    • Article

      Letters

      Sep 1, 2020

      Letters
      5 min read

    • Article

      Remembering Robert Bly

      Jun 1, 2022

      ROBERT BLY was living on a farm in western Minnesota when his first book, Silence in the Snowy Fields, came out in 1962. In the fall of that same year I myself arrived in Minnesota. I had grown up on the East Coast, but my parents were both from Minn

      11 min read

    • Article

      Toni Morrison

      Aug 19, 2019

      Toni Morrison
      5 min read

    • Article

      A Prophet And A President

      Sep 1, 2021

      A Prophet And A President
      15 min read

    Related categories

    Reviews for Joseph Smith

    4.5/5

    144 ratings7 reviews

    What did you think?

    Tap to rate

    Review must be at least 10 words

    • 5/5
      Very objective take from a practicing latter day saint. To me, learning more of the "restorer" of Christ's church on earth was enlightening. Thank you for your work.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 5/5
      Whether you believe he is a prophet or a con artist, this is as objective of a review of Joseph Smith as you are going to get.

      1 person found this helpful

    • 5/5
      I found this book to be a very well researched and written biography of a very controversial man. As a believer, I found that the book was balanced. I was very familiar with most of the items in this book previously - the information provided enriched my viewpoint of a man that I consider a prophet. I suppose that most people don't know what to expect from a prophet, or I should say, they have a preconceived notion of what to expect. To many people, that notion did not match up with the reality of Joseph Smith. As Joseph himself says, "you never knew my heart" - the same can be said for each one of us to even our closet associates. We only know ourselves, and even at that we are imperfect.
    • 3/5
      Bushman is a respected historian and a devout Mormon. The blend didn’t work for me when Bushman got into commentary on Smith’s revelations. The rest of the history is interesting, and you definitely get a sense almost despite Bushman of how frustrating it was to deal with Smith, but Bushman repeatedly insists that, given Smith’s limited education and poor upbringing, it’s hard to imagine how he could have come up with such elaborate stories, especially ones that have some correspondences with other Biblical apocrypha, absent divine inspiration. I have a couple of things to say about that. (1) Humans are really inventive and creative, even ones from bad circumstances! It’s kind of our thing. Bushman sounds like a Shakespeare truther when he insists that such a lowly creature couldn’t have created an elaborate cosmology. (2) Bushman acknowledges that prophets of Smith’s type were thick on the ground in the US and England in this period, as part of the Christian revival that was ongoing, but he neglects the resulting base-rate problem: even if we accept that producing an elaborate, successful set of revelations was unlikely for any given prophet, people do win lotteries! Bushman is of course free to believe, but I wish he hadn’t neglected the idea of survivor bias if he was going to opine on the unlikelihood of non-divine revelations. (3) As for correspondences, the corollary of human inventiveness is our tendency towards tropes. I’m actually not shocked that both Smith and earlier apocrypha independently produced a story of Abraham’s father worshiping idols in Abraham’s pre-Yahweh youth—are you?
    • 5/5
      Can a biographer - Mormon or not - use words like "revelation" without quotation marks? As a "believing historian," what other choice can Richard Lyman Bushman make? Unlike Robert Remini, a non-Mormon author of a life of Joseph Smith, Mr. Bushman does not write about Smith's "alleged" visions. To do so would be to imply a degree of skepticism and refute the very idea that there can be such a figure as a "believing historian.""Believing historian" may seem a contradiction in terms. History is not about belief but evidence. But biography is also about a specific person and his world, and thus the genre evokes events as the subject saw them. Joseph Smith understood that his story was incredible. If an angel had appeared to another man and provided golden plates which the man was instructed to translate, from the "reform Egyptian," into a new bible, "The Book of Mormon," Smith said he would not have believed it. Smith was in his early 20s when he experienced his encounter with the angel Moroni. Poorly educated, he was nevertheless put in charge of sacred texts that no one else could touch - let alone read - on pain of death. So the angel admonished Joseph, as Mormons call him. Joseph, as Mr. Bushman also calls him, never claimed he was dictating to his amanuenses the literal word of God. He was doing the best he could.Such is the Joseph Smith, rough as a rolling stone, that Mr. Bushman brilliantly portrays in "Joseph Smith: Rough Stone Rolling" (Alfred A. Knopf, 740 pages, $35). Often called a prophet, Joseph was, more properly speaking, a revelator. He simply told people what God and his angels said to him. To be sure, "The Book of Mormon" reflects Joseph's autobiography and the Second Great Awakening that Robert Remini explored so well as he situated Smith in the context of Jacksonian America.Mr. Bushman is aware of cultural context, but his work builds on more than 18 other biographies - most importantly, Fawn Brodie's "No Man Knows My History: The Life of Joseph Smith," published in 1945 and revised in 1970.While Brodie was not a believing historian, she made it difficult to dismiss Joseph Smith as delusional or a charlatan. In her careful analysis, "The Book of Mormon" could not be rejected as just a potpourri of pseudobiblical stories.It is Mr. Bushman's treatment of "The Book of Mormon" that makes this biography a stunning accomplishment. Once again, he begins with Brodie, a Mormon who broke with her church. She saw the text differently from critics who called it "chloroform in print" (Mark Twain) and "a yeasty fermentation, formless, aimless and inconceivably absurd" (Bernard DeVoto). On the contrary, Brodie replied: "Its structure shows elaborate design, its narrative is spun coherently, and it demonstrates throughout a unity of purpose."Mr. Bushman reports these various opinions, but provides his own captivating interpretation. He calls "The Book of Mormon" an "elaborate framed tale of Mormon telling about a succession of prophets telling about their encounters with God. Read in the twenty-first century, the book seems almost postmodern in its self-conscious attention to the production of the text." Such sentences seem aimed at English departments looking for a new text to mine. Certainly, Mr. Bushman feels that "The Book of Mormon" has never been accorded its rightful place in American literature. His aim is not 1179 2174 1293 2185to gain Mormon converts but to show how "The Book of Mormon" is in its own right a legitimate literary work in the same sense the Bible is: "Although the book is above all a religious history of prophesying, preaching, faithfulness, and apostasy, Mormon evokes an entire world."Mr. Bushman acknowledges that proponents of the text "face an uphill battle in resisting this onslaught" of critics who have termed it fictitious and deemed any defense of the book's authenticity as hopeless. Yet he draws on the research of Mormons and non-Mormons alike to show that "The Book of Mormon" cannot be explained away as a novel masquerading as scripture.Like the Bible, "The Book of Mormon" is a narrative, not a treatise, the biographer emphasizes. Careful reading shows that both early Mormons and their critics misunderstood the book, applying too many of its stories to an American setting. Mr. Bushman disperses these distortions when he writes that "The Book of Mormon" "deposited its people on some unknown shore - not even definitely identified as America - and had them live out their history in a remote place in a distant time, using names that had no connections to modern Indians. All modern readers had to go on was the reference to a 'narrow neck of land.' "Although "The Book of Mormon" is often regarded as a text that explains the origins of American Indians as the lost tribes of Israel, Mr. Bushman finds very little evidence that this is so and concludes that the book "seems more focused on its own Christian message than on Indian anthropology. The book refuses to argue its own theory."So why were Mormons persecuted? Why was Joseph Smith assassinated? Why does the church he founded not only endure but thrive? On the one hand, "The Book of Mormon" "challenges biblical authority" - even suggesting that the good book may contain errors. Smith's contemporaries viewed him as a spiritual and political threat (he ran for the presidency), with a fanatical church and a private army that menaced American institutions. On the other hand, "The Book of Mormon" as a new revelation, a reformist Christian text, attracted converts dissatisfied with conventional Christian denominations and longing for the return of revelation. Although Mr. Bushman does not quite put it this way, "The Book of Mormon" is a work of both affirmation and dissent.More than that, "The Book of Mormon" has a universalist message; the "American story does not control the narrative," Mr. Bushman writes. It does not celebrate democracy, the biographer insists, but "endlessly expounds the master biblical narrative - the history of Israel." The text proposes, in Mr. Bushman's words, "a new purpose for America: becoming a realm of righteousness rather than an empire of liberty."If I have focused on Mr. Bushman's interpretation of "The Book of Mormon," it is because he brings his discussion back to biography - its power and its limitations: Biographical analysis runs the risk of making creative works little more than a mirror of the author's life. As one critic puts it, "the book is far grander, much broader, and its internal logic and power go well beyondthe life of Joseph Smith."By delineating the boundaries of biography so sensitively,Mr.Bushman has paradoxically enhanced its authority.
    • 4/5
      While this is a book with a bias (there's no such thing as unbiased opinions when it comes to religion or politics) and while Mr. Bushman, dubbed 'the Mormon explainer' is a believer, he examines the religious sect and its cultural influences with an unflinching eye. Whether you're a believer or a skeptic, there's a lot to learn from this book. Fully entrenched members will be forced to look at a history that is largely untaught, and perhaps ask themselves some tough questions, while skeptics should (at least I hope) come to a better understanding of a people and a culture steeped in folklore and misunderstanding. It's an interesting look at the forces that what went into the shaping of this country and the challenges placed upon the constitution during our nation's, and particularly the West's, formative years. At 740 pages, it took me a while to get through, and though I went into it with many questions, I came out with a broader understanding, but with many questions still remaining. For the curious, this is an intriguing read.
    • 4/5
      A highly respected and respectable bio. My one query of Prof. Bushman's praiseworthy effort is this: Why ignore the Jan.4, 1833 letter which Joseph Smith sent to N. C. Saxton, the editor of the American Revivalist and Rochester Observer, part of which was published in that paper Feb. 2, 1833 and the remainder of which is preserved in the LDS Church Archives? In this letter Joseph accurately predicts the devastations of the Civil War which began 28 years later, the establishment of the Jews in Jerusalem which occurred 134 years later as well as the large-scale conversions and immigrations from Canada, Britain, and Scandinavia which took place throughout the rest of the 19th century, mostly after his martyrdom in 1844. Was the honored professor put off by the unlearned literary style of this letter or did he perhaps wish to portray Joseph Smith more as a forthteller than a foreteller? In my view Brother Joseph was both and deserves credit as both.