Unavailable
Unavailable
Unavailable
Ebook603 pages11 hours
Judicial Politics in Polarized Times
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
()
Currently unavailable
Currently unavailable
About this ebook
When the Supreme Court upheld the Affordable Care Act, some saw the decision as a textbook example of neutral judicial decision making, noting that a Republican Chief Justice joined the Court’s Democratic appointees to uphold most provisions of the ACA. Others characterized the decision as the latest example of partisan justice and cited the actions of a bloc of the Court’s Republican appointees, who voted to strike down the statute in its entirety. Still others argued that the ACA’s fate ultimately hinged not on the Court but on the outcome of the 2012 election. These interpretations reflect larger stories about judicial politics that have emerged in polarized America. Are judges neutral legal umpires, unaccountable partisan activists, or political actors whose decisions conform to—rather than challenge—the democratic will?
Drawing on a sweeping survey of litigation on abortion, affirmative action, gay rights, and gun rights across the Clinton, Bush, and Obama eras, Thomas M. Keck argues that, while each of these stories captures part of the significance of judicial politics in polarized times, each is also misleading. Despite judges’ claims, actual legal decisions are not the politically neutral products of disembodied legal texts. But neither are judges “tyrants in robes,” undermining democratic values by imposing their own preferences. Just as often, judges and the public seem to be pushing in the same direction. As for the argument that the courts are powerless institutions, Keck shows that their decisions have profound political effects. And, while advocates on both the left and right engage constantly in litigation to achieve their ends, neither side has consistently won. Ultimately, Keck argues, judges respond not simply as umpires, activists, or political actors, but in light of distinctive judicial values and practices.
Drawing on a sweeping survey of litigation on abortion, affirmative action, gay rights, and gun rights across the Clinton, Bush, and Obama eras, Thomas M. Keck argues that, while each of these stories captures part of the significance of judicial politics in polarized times, each is also misleading. Despite judges’ claims, actual legal decisions are not the politically neutral products of disembodied legal texts. But neither are judges “tyrants in robes,” undermining democratic values by imposing their own preferences. Just as often, judges and the public seem to be pushing in the same direction. As for the argument that the courts are powerless institutions, Keck shows that their decisions have profound political effects. And, while advocates on both the left and right engage constantly in litigation to achieve their ends, neither side has consistently won. Ultimately, Keck argues, judges respond not simply as umpires, activists, or political actors, but in light of distinctive judicial values and practices.
Unavailable
Read more from Thomas M. Keck
Judicial Politics in Polarized Times Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Most Activist Supreme Court in History: The Road to Modern Judicial Conservatism Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Related to Judicial Politics in Polarized Times
Related ebooks
Infectious Ideas: U.S. Political Responses to the AIDS Crisis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWay Too Cool: Selling Out Race and Ethics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBecoming Political: Spinoza’s Vital Republicanism and the Democratic Power of Judgment Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsBlack Lives and Spatial Matters: Policing Blackness and Practicing Freedom in Suburban St. Louis Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Transformation of Criminal Justice: Philadelphia, 1800-1880 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Liberty Pole: Popular Politics and the Struggle for Democracy in the Early Republic Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Straight State: Sexuality and Citizenship in Twentieth-Century America Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Democracy's Lot: Rhetoric, Publics, and the Places of Invention Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUnfit for Democracy: The Roberts Court and the Breakdown of American Politics Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Feminist War on Crime: The Unexpected Role of Women's Liberation in Mass Incarceration Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5A Few Good Gays: The Gendered Compromises behind Military Inclusion Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsExecuting Freedom: The Cultural Life of Capital Punishment in the United States Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCrimes against Children: Sexual Violence and Legal Culture in New York City, 1880-1960 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsUncontrollable Blackness: African American Men and Criminality in Jim Crow New York Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsAmerican Roulette: The Social Logic of Death Penalty Sentencing Trials Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Street Politics of Abortion: Speech, Violence, and America's Culture Wars Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLove's Next Meeting: The Forgotten History of Homosexuality and the Left in American Culture Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Injustices of Rape: How Activists Responded to Sexual Violence, 1950–1980 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsRightlessness: Testimony and Redress in U.S. Prison Camps since World War II Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLetters of the Law: Race and the Fantasy of Colorblindness in American Law Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsCriminal Intimacy: Prison and the Uneven History of Modern American Sexuality Rating: 3 out of 5 stars3/5Arresting Citizenship: The Democratic Consequences of American Crime Control Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Sold American: Consumption and Citizenship, 1890-1945 Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Police Interrogation and American Justice Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Reconstructing Democracy: Grassroots Black Politics in the Deep South after the Civil War Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsLicense to Harass: Law, Hierarchy, and Offensive Public Speech Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Lost President: A. D. Smith and the Hidden History of Radical Democracy in Civil War America Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsGetting the Runaround: Formerly Incarcerated Men and the Bureaucratic Barriers to Reentry Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolicing the Second Amendment: Guns, Law Enforcement, and the Politics of Race Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Nashville Way: Racial Etiquette and the Struggle for Social Justice in a Southern City Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratings
Courts For You
Make Your Case: Finding Your Win in Civil Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsFederal Rules of Civil Procedure: Hyperlinked, #2 Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5DisOrder in the Court: 31 Funny, Frivolous & Outrageous Lawsuits that Will Make You Laugh Out Loud Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Your Day in Court: Using Common Law with Common Sense Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Representing Yourself In Court (US): How to Win Your Case on Your Own Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5New York Notary Public Exam Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Nolo's Deposition Handbook: The Essential Guide for Anyone Facing or Conducting a Deposition Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Beyond a Reasonable Doubt Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsWhy the Innocent Plead Guilty and the Guilty Go Free: And Other Paradoxes of Our Broken Legal System Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5How To Set Up a Legal Defense Fund for False Imprisonment or Wrongful Workplace Termination [Article] Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsPolice Interactions 101: How To Interact With the Police in Your Car, On the Streets, In Your Home Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5N*gga Theory: Race, Language, Unequal Justice, and the Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5A Matter of Interpretation: Federal Courts and the Law - New Edition Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Represent Yourself in Court: Prepare & Try a Winning Civil Case Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Complete Small Claims Court Guide: Winning Without a Lawyer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Obtaining A Criminal Pardon: Clear Your Name Legally Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsEverybody's Guide to Small Claims Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow to Win Your Case in Small Claims Court Without a Lawyer Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5How to Win Your Case In Traffic Court Without a Lawyer Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Filing and Winning Small Claims For Dummies Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe American Supreme Court Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsJustice vs. Law Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Stanford Law Review: Volume 63, Issue 2 - January 2011 Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsMarc Stevens' Adventures in Legal Land Rating: 5 out of 5 stars5/5Divorce Without Court: A Guide to Mediation and Collaborative Divorce Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsHow Would You Rule? Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Constrained Court: Law, Politics, and the Decisions Justices Make Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsThe Courage of Their Convictions Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5Courage to Stand: Mastering Trial Strategies and Techniques in the Courtroom Rating: 0 out of 5 stars0 ratingsOrdinary Injustice: How America Holds Court Rating: 4 out of 5 stars4/5
Reviews for Judicial Politics in Polarized Times
Rating: 0 out of 5 stars
0 ratings
0 ratings0 reviews