Professional Documents
Culture Documents
BACKGROUND WEAP
Idea started in the 1940s (E.A.L. Smith) Idea:
To generate a Bearing Graph using a model of the pile and the soil Compute stresses during driving.
What it models?
What do we need?
Representative soil profile, Pile type Anticipated installation depth Design capacity (Qd) Ru = Qd x FS Estimate dynamic soil parameters to model soil resistance (Damping, quake) Select candidate hammers based on loca practice and contractors
WEAP Analysis
Typical uses: Graph of Ru versus #blows/L Graph of driving stresses (tension and compression) as a function de #blows/L
IMPORTANT
Must compare what you analyzed with GRLWEAP with actual site/construction conditions!
Actual pile dimensions. Driving system used (hammer, helmet, cushions) sizes, types, materials, etc. Energy and field operation of hammer.
Usually WEAP is complemented with field measurements using the PDA (another class).
Model Pile
Increase R u?
N
Choose first Ru
Output
Capacity in kN
5
1950 1930 1750 1390
8
2250 2570 1980 1580
blows/25 mm: kN kN kN kN
Note: GW = GRLWEAP
Ultimate Capacity Nominal Safe Cap: Gates ENR GWGW -Sand GWGW -Clay
Inspectors Chart
Driveability Graph
SUMMARY
GRLWEAP is based on Smiths model with important extensions such as:
Realistic hammer models Non-linear spring models for interfaces and slacks Alternative soil models Residual stress analysis
The wave equation analysis works with Static Resistance to Driving (SRD) plus a Damping or Dynamic Resistance Important analysis options include Driveability and Inspectors Chart
Recommended Quake Values Soil Type Shaft Quake Toe Quake All Soil Types All Soil Types, Soft Rock In dry soils, or in very dense or hard soils In submerged soils or in loose or soft soils Hard Rock Pile Type or Size All Types Quake Quake (in) (mm) 0.10 2.5 2.5 D/120 D/60 1.0
Open ended pipes 0.10 Displacement Piles of D/120 diameter D or width D Displacement Piles of D/60 diameter D or width D All Types .04
DAMPING
The Damping option screen can be entered by using the pull down menu Options, General Options, and then Damping. The damping options include are those for the Soil, Hammer and Pile. In general, skin damping is computed according to Smith as Rd=Rs(js)v, where Rs is the static resistance at a certain time, js is the Smith damping factor and v is the pile velocity, all at one particular pile segment. GRLWEAP also offers the viscous Smith damping option: Rd=Ru(js)v, with Ru being the ultimate static resistance. Since Ru (js) is constant, this approach is equivalent to a third GRLWEAP option, the Case damping, where Rd=jc(EA/c)v, with EA/c being the pile impedance, as long as the damping constants are calculated appropriately. The first option is the most commonly used one; the second one leads to somewhat more corrective capacity results. For the third, experience or measurement results are needed to find the proper damping factor. GRLWEAP also offers two more Soil Damping Options, which are based on the exponential relationship proposed by Gibson and Coyle. Certain changes of this method were important for good agreement of computed pile top force and velocity with measured values. This led to the last Soil Damping Option which was described by Rausche.
Soil Type Shaft Damping Non-cohesive soils Cohesive soils Toe damping In all soil types
Other Damping options: Coyle and Gibson Damping: The damping is calculated using a non-linear approach, Rd = jRuvn, where n is a damping exponent according to Gibson and Coyle. This is a research option. Rausche Damping: Damping is calculated using a non-linear approach, Rd = jRa vxn (v/vx), where Ra is the activated capacity, vx is the maximum velocity, both occurring during the hammer blow, and n is the damping exponent according to Coyle and Gibson. This is a research option. Damping Exponent: Enter the exponent of the non-linear damping approach. Recommendations are 0.18 and 0.20 for clay and sand, respectively. Only required for either Coyle and Gibson or Rausche damping, a default of 0.20 is activated if no entry is made.