Professional Documents
Culture Documents
There are multiple tools for assessment. Harada and Yoshida (2010) suggest several including graphic organizers, K-W-L charts, matrices, checklists, logs, and exit passes. Determining which of these different types of assessment tools to use depend upon multiple factors: For instance, What are you trying to access? What are the learning goals? Harada and Yoshida (2010) also suggest designing the tool to facilitate instruction and support independent learning. (p. 19). This is important because it implies that the tool be designed around the project or assignment. Each assignment will have different learning goals, but when school librarians are involved in the development of the tool, we can ensure that the assessment shows evidence of critical thinking and deeper understanding and demonstrate the connection to information literacy standards. Even simple tools such as the K-W-L chart organizes students thinking, guiding them to consider what they know, what they would like to learn and then clarifies what that have learned. The end product then provides the school librarian with solid data demonstrating student learning and success.
There is a lesson that I believe student assessment involving the school librarian would have been appropriate and beneficial. In reviewing the curriculum for the marking period, the media specialist was aware that the second grade classes were learning to distinguish between natural and man-made geographic features. The media specialist prepared the media/information literacy lesson suggested in the district curriculum planner to teach the second grade students how to use Google Maps. The lesson had students exploring land features using this web-based program. The media specialist demonstrated how to search for a location, how to change between map and satellite view and how to expand out from a current view. The students performed the activity, but it was obvious, in observation, they did not make the connection between searching various views using Google Maps and distinguishing between natural and man-made features. There was no direction given to the students to search for natural and man-made geographic features as they explored Google Maps, nor was there direction to distinguish and document features as they searched and explored. If the students had been given a graphic organizer to use to guide their exploration, then the confusion could have been minimized as the students could have been given tasks to complete as they finished the organizer categories. A graphic organizer could have been easily designed to direct students to search for both natural and man-made features on Google Maps and then identify the features with pictures or text. The school librarian could have created such a tool for the students to complete as they navigated the program, identifying features as they searched. This simple tool would have provided a documented way to demonstrate student understanding of the topic as well as demonstrate their Student Assessment by Stephanie M. Flaherty [Type the date]
ability to navigate Google Maps, thereby making a strong connection between the media lesson and the larger school curriculum.
References
Harrada,V.H. and Yoshida, J.M. (2010). Assessing for Learning: Librarians and Teachers as Partners. Santa Barbara, CA: Libraries Unlimited Kachel, Debra E, and Lance, K.C. (2013) Librarian Required. School Library Journal 59(3). 28 School Libraries Work! Research Foundation Paper. (2008). Danbury, Connecticut. Scholastic Library Publishing. Accessed April 10, 2013 from: http://www.scholastic.com/content/collateral_resources/pdf/s/slw3_2008.p df Todd, R. J. (2003). School Libraries & Evidence: Seize the Day, Begin the Future. Library Media Connection, 22(1), 12-18. Wallace, V., & Husid, W. (2011). The Achievement-Assessment Link. Library Media Connection, 30(2), 10-11.