This is hilarious. Seelbach protested that COAST hit him for voting in favor of the appropriation of $4.4 million for the City Hall Atrium. So, we promised to research the issue.
As it turns out, he did vote "no" on the appropriation, but he did SPONSOR the motion. This document is the motion to appropraite $4.4 million for the Atrium.
So, we suppose you could say "he was for it before he was against it." (Did we ever properly thank John Kerry for adding that to the political lexicon?)
We certainly stand corrected!
This is hilarious. Seelbach protested that COAST hit him for voting in favor of the appropriation of $4.4 million for the City Hall Atrium. So, we promised to research the issue.
As it turns out, he did vote "no" on the appropriation, but he did SPONSOR the motion. This document is the motion to appropraite $4.4 million for the Atrium.
So, we suppose you could say "he was for it before he was against it." (Did we ever properly thank John Kerry for adding that to the political lexicon?)
We certainly stand corrected!
This is hilarious. Seelbach protested that COAST hit him for voting in favor of the appropriation of $4.4 million for the City Hall Atrium. So, we promised to research the issue.
As it turns out, he did vote "no" on the appropriation, but he did SPONSOR the motion. This document is the motion to appropraite $4.4 million for the Atrium.
So, we suppose you could say "he was for it before he was against it." (Did we ever properly thank John Kerry for adding that to the political lexicon?)
We certainly stand corrected!