You are on page 1of 12

Peterson 1

Thomas Peterson Professor Angela Rounsaville ENC 1102H 28 November 2013 Through the Computer Screen: An Online Analysis of UCF Communication Introduction It is rather difficult to walk across a college campus today and not see a student on his/her cell phone or computer using a social networking site. Because of this, it is easy to argue that social media is ubiquitous for young adults, college students in particular (Boyd 210). One of the reasons this phenomena is occurring is partially due to the inundation of such readily available and apt technology but another reason is that social networking has become commonplace and a routine for our generation. With students spending what seems to be an inordinate amount of time plugged into social media, it makes one curious for what they could possibly be doing for that long. A good majority of the time, these students are interacting with one another through social media. This interaction can be seen as communication. As weird as it may seem, there has definitely been a shift in the past years in reference to communication. Before the advent of technology such as laptops, cell phones and iPods, people typically communicated to one another either in letters through the pony or through face-to-face interaction. Because this form of communication via the internet is as new to not only our society, but humanity as a whole, there is a lot of room for error and problems. Joseph Grenny once said The world has changed and a significant proportion of relationships happen online but manners havent

Peterson 2

caught up with technology (Mientka). Through my research, I am hoping to define the trends of communication across specific social media sites that I feel encompass the University of Central Florida (UCF) online community as a whole in order to understand the UCF community itself and how those within it interact with one another. From the research that has been conducted and future research, there are two main goals. The first is to understand the student body of UCFs online community. Because this school is primarily a commuter campus, one of the better ways to get the bigger picture is to go online because not only would that encompass a large proportion of the students, but the students are already there and more or less are waiting to be researched whether they know it or not. The second end goal that can be achieve through this sort of research is to clearly define the social norms of communication of a forum that is relatively new and not highly researched thus far. These can be seen as social media websites; those specific sites that I will be analyzing in fine detail include Facebook, Instagram, Tumblr and Twitter. While I am looking at the UCF online community to further enhance my understanding and appreciation of it, the superordinate goal of my project is to document and uncover the communication styles within social media in order to contribute to the conversation on social media and communication. Where my research picks up where others have left off is that I am documenting specific sites and looking at the community of a college university (the second largest in the country to note). There is already some discussion on social media communication. However, they all seem to talk about the prevalence of this communication online that unifies the people who go online, but I personally do not see taking place. Author Denis McQuails book Mass Communication Theory: An Introduction discusses the effect of an increase in mass media and

Peterson 3

the subsequent changes in communication (McQuail 1). He even makes a pyramid for levels of communication starting with intrapersonal all the way to what he deems is society-wide networks, mass communication for example (McQuail 18). McQuail is basically stating that there is no defining moment that causes a change in communication style, but rather those styles feed into one another and culminate in mass communication. While that is definitely something to take into account, I do not hold this to be true stemming from the online research I have performed. I assert rather, that online communication is not the only form of communication; he speaks in a way that makes it appear that interaction between individuals is everywhere in social settings (like that of social networking sites). Furthermore, Tumblr has been dubbed a communication trendsetter (Creamer). All of these professionals are creating a picture that would lead readers to believe that those people who log onto social networking sites have this glorious communication with one another and become a homogenous group. While this is stated by men who are experts in their respective fields, I would have to respectfully disagree with his claim for the purposes of my own paper. While there is communication on these sites, the way communication is looked as is completely different between the verbal and nonverbal. Also, it was believed that with a frequent online communication window, there would be a positive effect on online friendship formation (Peter 425). Since the main purpose of social networking is to create a larger network for the individual who makes the account, these findings would prove to be quite useful. When an experiment was performed, the results turned out much more differently than expected. While the experiment highlighted those who were characterized as introverts, it was found that there was no motive for online

Peterson 4

communication for social compensation and in fact there was no correlation between communication and friendship formation (Peter 426). In order to gain a better perspective of the UCF online community, an ethnographical research project will be performed. In addition to understanding this specific community, the reader will be able to learn about specific trends regarding communication that are site specific as well as some trends that are so common for most of the students that attend UCF, that they transcend all every form of social media. This will be a continuation of other scholars within the discourse community of new media studies, but chiefly within the communication studies. Some of the major findings prove to be quite interesting. One of the most intriguing discoveries that what seems to be the most common form of online communication does not even utilize words. This took the research to a whole new level, non-communicative communication. What I mean by this idea of non-communicative communication is that while technically there is an interaction between those on these sites that I have focused on this semester, it is not something anyone would categorize as verbal communication as it does not include any words. In actuality, it is more so a form of validation that is seen on these sites, but this will be discussed in much more detail later. An introduction is used to tie in the reader so he/she will continue to read on; with my own paper, I wanted to establish just where I am looking and what I am looking for; through this research project, I delved online in order to discover the social norms of communication within social media websites utilized by the UCF community. I will later discuss why I chose to employ individual interviews and in depth analysis of a research space as opposed to other methods of primary data collection. The explanation of the findings is perhaps one of the most

Peterson 5

crucial elements of the entire paper as it gives meaning to the product(s) of the research and subsequently validates why the research was conducted in the first place. For my results specifically, the most pivotal claim I will discuss is on the topic (which I will also define) of what I refer to as non-communicative communication. While my conclusion is not a seal on the paper, it closes what I have to say, but leaves room for further inquiry and work by future researchers. This is done because there really is no such thing as a final word that can be said about a topic. Times and circumstances change and that trickles down to new research and new findings; the research I am conducting is an example of this as it could not be done without the technology that enabled online communication. In my own conclusion, I will tie in how all of my findings relate to the notion of communication mentioned above and what it could mean for future generations and the ideals of the University of Central Florida. Methods By coupling two different methods of primary data collection (individual interviews and online analyses of social networking sites), the goals of this research project, which chiefly are to gain a better understanding of the UCF online community and the communication within social media used by said community, will hopefully be achieved. Because my ethnographic research is about online communication through social media, I completed most of my research on the computer. In order to find what UCF students specifically post that will lead me to see interaction between students and understand the student body better as a whole, I looked at the UCF-affiliated tags on Tumblr, Twitter and Instagram and jotted down notes on the trends I see within and on the sites themselves and also paying close attention to trends that may appear between the sites so I can find out what

Peterson 6

makes these sites similar as well as different from one another in terms of who is posting, what are they posting, who is commenting and how they are commenting. For Facebook, there are many different avenues to find a page or group related to UCF, so I will be exploring the UCF Class of 2017 (Official Group) page which I, as well as over 5,000 other students of the freshman class here at UCF are members of. I am using these subdivisions of these websites so I may weed out everything else except what UCF students are posting about UCF or at least what they feel the need to tag as UCF affiliated. In addition to the online method of research, I conducted several interviews. Given that one of my overall goals was to better understand the UCF community, the intimacy of individual interviews seemed apropos for my research as they allow a first-hand perspective on the subject matter. I originally thought there was more to gain from someone about their attitudes on social media when talking face to face as opposed to online; in an online forum, people are more likely to be more radical as to gain attention, where as in person, they will be more real and honest. For the individual interviews, four UCF freshman participated. It consisted of two males and two females from different backgrounds; the panel included an individual of AfricanAmerican descent, another of Jewish descent, a homosexual and a white girl. Their diversification was also furthered when each individual picked a different social media website as his/her favorite. I chose these individuals as I believed I would be the best representation of students not only across the UCF campus, but of most university campuses across the country. Again these interviews were to give the people who posted a voice and so that they could comment and contribute their attitudes about the subject matter.

Peterson 7

The online jottings will allow me to gain a completely unbiased look into the world of the UCF online community while the interviews will provide a much needed personal opinion. While I did an exploitation of a research space (being the social media websites themselves) as well as in depth interviews, there were many other options on how to collect my primary research that I did forgo. Perhaps the most important reason as to why I did not use these various methods, which can include but are certainly not limited to surveys and experiments, is because they would either not be appropriate or would not help to achieve the superordinate goals. Specifically, an experiment looks at a cause and effect relationship; the aim of my research is to note anything and everything I could about the communication on social media that is utilized by students at the University of Central Florida. Results/Discussion: The idea of non-communicative communication discussed earlier is the interplay between online users but utilizes no actual words. More often than not this will be seen as a favorite, like, or retweet. One thing I noted during the interviews on the topic of communication was that when I talked in terms of others commenting on posts made by those I interviewed, they chiefly discussed the likes, favorites and retweets which does not constitute a comment (as no words are used). While this is indeed a form of interaction between users on social media websites, this is not something that can be categorized as verbal communication. In order to not lead the interviewees into validating my claim, I looked heavily into the social media sites to see whether or not this idea of non-communicative communication dominated social media.

Peterson 8

Another form of non-communicative communication can be seen follow on any social media website or a friend request on Facebook. This is seen in which the person who initiates this action wants to see what the receiver is posting in his/her online forum. This follow or friend request is something that takes place quite often, but unfortunately, the general public has no access as it is specific to the holder on the account that is being followed or requested. Yet, there is no denying that it takes place and is another form of communication on the nonverbal persuasion. While in no way explicit, one could argue that this following phenomena can be seen to an extent. A major finding during the course of my research that I noted nearly every time I went to collect data was that on Tumblr, Twitter and Facebook there were picture postings. Even though this is a common posting students use as it is conceivable that the youth generation has become more visual over time, these pictures had another similar attribute; they all were picture linked to a persons Instagram account. What I can take away from this is that Instagram is in a sense at the epicenter of the online social media forefront. While it is not the most popular by numbers across the nation, it is the one that I can see the most crossover between the social media sites I specifically decided to look at. One of the reasons why users do this is so people will click the link and go to the posters Instagram account. Once there, there poster is hoping that the interested party will go through their account and if he/she likes it enough will subsequently follow them. Having a large number of likes on a post is definitely important to students, but a social norm specific to Instagram is what is known as a follower ratio. This is the proportion of people who follow a user to the number of people that individual him/herself follows. It is common knowledge among those who use Instagram that you want to

Peterson 9

have more followers than people you follow, thus increasing your follower ratio. This ratio communicates to others that this profile is something special and that the postings are liked by a large number of people. From the primary research collected, it seemed to be that for Twitter, Instagram and Tumblr, the notion that most of the communication occurred in a non -verbal manner proved to be true. For Tumblr, arguably or seemingly the least used (or least tagged UCF) almost every notification that a posting would get was in the form of a like. While having the option to reblog or even comment, it was seldom used within the UCF tag of Tumblr. Furthermore, in Instagram, which is one of the most popular sites with its integration of multimedia had hardly any interaction within the UCF affiliated tag. In one sitting, it seemed as though most of the photos that were shown only had between 12-20 likes. Continuing the trend from Tumblr, there was no verbal interaction in the form of a comment on the pictures. On Twitter, which mainly consists of 140 character maximum text posts, there was little to no interaction as well. While I have seen my friends having conversations on Twitter, I was unable to find this in the #UCF subsection of Twitter. While one of the most fundamental aspects of the UCF creed is the idea of community, it does not seem as though this core belief extends itself to the digital world between students. There was however, one outlier for the non-communicative communication; where others appeared dead and empty, Facebook seemed to be lively and an explosion of interaction. Whether a troll, question, sales pitch or otherwise, one will seldom see a post on the UCF Class of 2017 (Official Group) that goes on without at least one like or comment. In actuality, most of the postings within this specific group will have many comments and likes

Peterson 10

from many freshman. While not all of the 4851 members of this group are freshman at UCF, there are many students who are there to help one another. Considering that most of the members are new students at UCF, a majority of the postings are questions on a myriad of topics ranging from which classes/professors to take, where to go for events etc. In addition to questions, there are many picture and text posts that are jokes either about the common struggles that are experienced by most UCF students or bashing other schools, namely USF. Facebook is the most reciprocative social media website I looked into. There are several explanations as to why this was observed. First and foremost, the UCF Class of 2017 (Official Group) is perhaps the most specific subcategory within a site I looked into and perhaps since the purpose of this groups also contributed to the fact that there was far more interaction than the other sites. So while non-communicative communication dominated social media, it is still important to note that there was still some communication found during my primary research data collection even though it is possibly attributed to an error in the space which was observed here being the UCF Class of 2017 (official group) page. Many interesting things about the UCF community and how they use social media were discovered in addition to the discoveries made on communication. What proved to be most intriguing during the interviews was when furthered probed on the favorite site the individual utilized the most, three of the four stated that they liked that particular site because of the easiness factor they believed the website to possess to communicate their ideas and interests with friends depending on the website itself through a post. While all of the sites are different from one another, there is still a large commonality in that the user will make postings. A good portion of the time, a posting is in the form of text/picture and the reasoning behind why

Peterson 11

someone makes a posting often goes unknown except maybe to convey a message to people they know are following them and eagerly awaiting what the poster has to say/show. When asked, most of the students in the study say they post what they post so others will see and react to it. I feel accomplished when I get a lot of likes on a(n Instagram) post said one student. That feeling of pride seemed to be a theme for all the others as they too agreed that when a post gets a certain number of likes and/or favorites, they feel better about themselves. This leads me to believe that a central reason why people make postings is to not only have others see what they are doing, but for others to give them approval and thus their postings and profiles are subsequently justifiable. While the student I interviewed in the study seemed to be preoccupied with how many likes/favorites a posting got, none of them mentioned someone literally saying that they liked the post. This again led me to believe that that majority of social interaction online took a nonverbal or non-communicative form. Conclusion: Social media dominates the lives of most young people, especially college students. Like I mentioned earlier, Joseph Grenny once said The world has changed and a significant proportion of realtionships happen online but manners havent c aught up with technology (Mientka). If people do not communicate effectively online, not just on social networking sites, then the future of communication online seems abysmal. Considering that a majority of communication online is what I have learned to call non-communicative communication and words are seldom being used to interact with one another I wonder what is to come next for social media not only on college campuses, but on a much wider scale as well.

Peterson 12

Another angle with which to look at the situation is a little closer to home, the UCF campus itself. I have said the phrase, UCF community time and time again in this paper, but that implies that there is a community already there. The University of Central Florida prides itself in making a strong sense of community for all 60,000+ of its students. Considering this is the second largest secondary education institution in the country, this is no small task. Furthermore, the Burnett Honors College also has the same goal; its entire symposium course that all first semester honors students must take is built and taught around the idea of building a strong community within the honors college. Since most students use their phones for everything nowadays and many clubs, organization, resident communities and classes are going online, it would make sense that UCF utilize the internet to help build this utopia of a community it preaches to alumni and prospective students. However, from my findings, it seems as though the students are indeed connected, but how strong that connection is to one another, much less to all 60,000+ students is unknown.

You might also like