1. Design detailed and relevant testing methods, which generate data, to measure the success of the solution.

Evaluating

Basically, create a questionnaire/survey to test how successful your photomation is. Ask your classmates and/or target group to respond to the survey. Record the results in some way (table, graph)... - Share your movie file with your classmates - Create a google form - Email the form to your classmates
Create questions based on the original goals and success criteria of your project. Try to test out your project on your intended target group. If you are unable to gain access to your target group, include questions in your questionnaire that ask how well you

addressed the needs of your target group. For example, you could ask a multiple choice question that asks the survey-taker to guess what your intended target group is. Want to write a great questionnaire? Read this article (again): "How to Write a
Survey or Questionnaire". My Survey = https://docs.google.com/a/isdedu.de/forms/d/12rwA4pg-VcOUHmPEAoxGfTQ5FbATRHlULD-Q 8nLfSHM/viewform Responses= https://docs.google.com/a/isdedu.de/document/d/1ZR-gBqs7biJoMapkzBK3Ny2CGN8twv2drl6IH Gl0WFg/edit?usp=sharing

2. Critically evaluate the success of the solution against the requirements based on authentic tests.

Basically, use the results from your questionnaire/survey to decide how well your photomation met the goals of your Design Specification?
I dont think I met my goals. I think I could have done a lot better. I am not too surprised with my responses but I am surprised that some people didnt know what it was about.

1 person out of 7 people said it was really good, I think they said that because it had quite good sound and it wasnt that long, but I dont agree I think it was more an 8 because it could have been a lot better. 1 person out of 7 people said it was 8, I agree with that person because I thought I should a bit of skill but it could have been a better. The lowest score was 4 but only 1 person out of 7 people chose 4, I am not so sure why but it might have been because it wasnt very talkative and it wasnt that clear that the Hot Chocolate saved the freezing cold person by letting the Freezing cold person drink the HOT chocolate which made the person warm. I am quite happy with my responses but they could have been better, and it would have been nice if I would have had more responses. 3. Explain how the solution could be improved.

Basically, decide how you could make your photomation better. Why would this make it better? Use the results of your questionnaire/survey as well as your own opinions to support your opinions. How could have you improved on the following stages of the MYP Design Cycle: Inquiring & Analysing Developing Ideas Creating the solution
Inquiring & Analyzing I could have worked on creating the final product sooner and I think I did the Inquiring & Analysing Document quite well because I worked for a while on it instead of doing the final Project. I thought the hardest thing in Inquiring & Analyzing was when we were working with Pixlr.com because it had all these confusing tabs/buttons and I wasnt sure what I was suppose to do. I thought it was easy to learn about Alter Egos because I knew that Miley Cyrus or Hannah Montana was an Alter Ego and I had already learnt bit about it. Developing Ideas

I thought Developing Ideas was a little bit easier than Inquiring & Analyzing because I already had an Idea of what I was going to do for my Photomation. Therefore I didnt find it hard to choose a Character and choose what its personality and behaviour would be like. I thought it was hard to do the venn diagram with connection between Me and my Animation Character (the Hot Chocolate) because I wasnt so sure what we had in common and it was hard to get ideas but it worked out in the end. Creating Solution I thought Creating the Solution was quite hard because you have to do the final solution/project. It took me a long time to do my Photomation because I worked more on Creating the Solution not as much on the Final Project. I thought that planning was quite hard because I wasnt sure how long I needed. 4. Explain the impact of the solution on the client/target market. Basically, describe how well your photomation meets the needs of your intended target group (Use the results from your survey)...

Who was your target group? What parts of your photomation worked well for this group? What did not work well for this group? (For example: Was it too simple? Too complicated?) Did the results of your questionnaire/survey show that your photomation was focused on your target group? Do you agree with the results of the survey? Does the data from your survey surprise you in any way?
My Target group was 6.3. 23 % like what the Character did, 23% like how the Character saved someones day, 15 % liked how the character acted, 15 % liked where the Character was (the setting), 15 % liked something else (other), 8% liked how long it was. My Target group didnt like. Here is what a few people said: You could have made her drink it and have a better problem. Put some sounds in it, and say more loud maybe understandable story, maybe why the hot-chocolate saved the day, more movement of the characters. It could have been longer, and the speaking part could be more clear. I agree it could have been more clear. The results didnt really show that my survey was focused on my target group. I agree with the results of my survey, most of them said I could have done better, it could have been more clear e.t.c, and I agree with that. I think some of the reasons for it not being that good is because I didnt spend much time on it, I rushed most of it.

Yes, I agree with my responses I could have done better. I am not surprised at all only a tiny bit, I am surprised that some people didnt understand what my Photomation was about.

Assessment Criteria

does not reach any of the standards described by any of the descriptors defines a testing method, which is used to measure the success of the solution. states the success of the solution.

1-2

3-4

defines a relevant testing method, which generates data, to measure the success of the solution. states the success of the solution against the requirements of the design specification based on the results of one relevant test.

 states one way in which the solution could be improved. states one way in which the solution can impact the client/target market 5-6 defines relevant testing methods, which generate data, to measure the success of the solution. states the success of the solution against the requirements of the design specification based on relevant product testing. outlines one way in which the solution could be improved. outlines the impact of the solution on the client/target market with guidance 7-8 outlines simple, relevant testing methods, which generate data, to measure the success of the solution. outlines the success of the solution against the requirements of the design specification based on authentic product testing. outlines how the solution could be improved. outlines the impact of the solution on the client/target market.