Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • Exhibit 16 - Redaction of Material Derived From Public Documents

    Uploaded by

    Enformable
    81 views9 pages
    In January I sent this information to Senator Barbara Boxer, respectfully asking her to take actions necessary to (a) compel the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to fully comply with its legal obligations under the Freedom of Information Act and (b) review all of its FOIA classification determinations since March 11, 2011, and correct all misclassifications. If after reviewing the documentation and facts that I have provided, the reader is also concerned about the NRC’s interpretation and application of rules governing the FOIA process, I would encourage them to follow-up with their own elected official or Senator Boxer.

    Original Title

    Exhibit 16 – Redaction of material derived from public documents

    Copyright

    © Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)

    Available Formats

    PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    In January I sent this information to Senator Barbara Boxer, respectfully asking her to take actions necessary to (a) compel the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to fully comply with its legal obligations under the Freedom of Information Act and (b) review all of its FOIA classification determinations since March 11, 2011, and correct all misclassifications. If after reviewing the documentation and facts that I have provided, the reader is also concerned about the NRC’s interpretation and application of rules governing the FOIA process, I would encourage them to follow-up with their own elected official or Senator Boxer.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    81 views9 pages

    Exhibit 16 - Redaction of Material Derived From Public Documents

    Uploaded by

    Enformable
    In January I sent this information to Senator Barbara Boxer, respectfully asking her to take actions necessary to (a) compel the Nuclear Regulatory Commission to fully comply with its legal obligations under the Freedom of Information Act and (b) review all of its FOIA classification determinations since March 11, 2011, and correct all misclassifications. If after reviewing the documentation and facts that I have provided, the reader is also concerned about the NRC’s interpretation and application of rules governing the FOIA process, I would encourage them to follow-up with their own elected official or Senator Boxer.

    Copyright:

    Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
    Download as PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 9

    From:

    Sent: To: Subject: Attachments:

    RST01B Hoc Wednesday, March 23, 2011 9:48 AM RST01 Hoc FW: Tokyo March 23 Response to TEPCO.DOCX

    As discussed --- Original Message ----From: Versluis, Rob [mailto:ROB.VERSLUIS@nuclear.energy.gov] Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 9:31 AM To: RST01B Hoc Subject: FW: Tokyo March 23

    --- Original Message ----From: Kelly, John E (NE) Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 8:33 AM To: NITSolutions; NITOPS; SCHU Cc: DL-NERT-AII Subject: FW: Tokyo March 23

    I
    John
    ---- Original Message--From: Peko, Damian Sent: Wednesday, March 23, 2011 5:40 AM To: Peko, Damian; Lyons, Peter; Regalbuto, Monica; Johnson, Shane; Kelly, John E (NE); Lange, Robert; McGinnis, Edward; Boudreau, Robert; Golub, Sal; Harlow, Susan; Herczeg, John; Stark, Richard; Miotla, Dennis; Griffith, Andrew; Goldner, Frank; Duncan, Aleshia (State Dept); Connery, Joyce Subject: Tokyo March 23 Pete et al Some particularly important issues this time.
    (b)(5)

    DK 667 of 1892

    (b)(5)

    DK 668 of 1892

    (b)(5)

    DK 669 of 1892

    Review of TEPCO Analysis of Salt Accumulation - March 22, 2011

    (b)(5)

    DK 670 of 1892

    (b)(5)

    Best wishes as you deal with these extremely difficult circumstances. Dr. John E. Kelly Deputy Assistant Secretary for Nuclear Reactor Technologies Office of Nuclear Energy US Department of Energy

    DK 671 of 1892

    Status of Fukushima Dalichi Reactors 19 March 2011 As of 1600 (EDT) Underlined text indicates updates to this version. Older items will be deleted as necessary to minimize the size of this report and facilitate quick reading. General

    (b)(5)

    DK 672 of 1892

    (b)(5)

    DK 673 of 1892

    (b)(5)

    DK 674 of 1892

    (b)(5)

    Sources include: Federation of Electric Power Companies of Japan Links: http://www.jaif.or.jp/english/ http://www.tepco.co.ip/en/index-e.html http://nei.cachefly.net/newsandevents/inforrnation-on-the-japanese-earthquake-and-reactors-inthat-region/ http://www.iaea.orR/ http://www.mext.go.jp/english/ https://iportalwc.doe.gov/ http://www.nisa.meti.go.ip/english/

    DK 675 of 1892

    You might also like