You are on page 1of 5

1 John Henry Doe

2 Anywhere Street
3 Wonderland,
4 Republic of California
5 Private Attorney
6
7
8 SUPERIOR COURT, STATE OF CALIFORNIA
9 COUNTY OF WONDERLAND
10
11 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA ) Case no. MC-LV-IN-TR-xx-xxxxxxx-
12 )
13 Plaintiff )
14 )
15 vs. )
16 )
17 )
18 JOHN HENRY DOE ) WRIT OF ERROR
19 ) QUAE CORAM
20 Defendant ) NOBIS RESIDENT
21
22
23 John Doe )
24 )
25 Counter-Plaintiff )
26 )
27 vs. )
28 )
29 PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA, )
30 Et al )

31_____________________________________________________________
32_

33 Writ of Error
34 THE COURT COMES NOW to review the facts, record, and process resulting in the
35 rulings dated June 14th 2009.
36
37 The record shows that this court of record held a hearing on June 14th 2007 for the
38 purpose of Arraignment.
39
1 Plaintiff was not present, council for the plaintiff/counter-defendant was represented
2 defacto by Judge Bxxxxx, and John represented the defendant/counter-plaintiff in
3 personam.
4
5 I , John Doe , one of the “People” of the Republic of California, hereinafter known as
6 John, decree the following:
7
8 Under the Great Common Law, John is not subject to any legislated acts, statutes,
9 ordinances, codes or any thing that has the “color of law”.
10
11 I am fully capable of being responsible for my own affairs.
12
13 I am neither a 14th amendment citizen with privileges granted by the UNITED STATES
14 government nor subject to it’s jurisdiction.
15
16
17
18 The case law substantiating my right to claim of sovereignty is listed in Exhibit B
19
20
21
22 Judge John x Bxxxxx, hereafter referred to as Judge, erred in his capacity as a magistrate
23 on June 14th 2009 in the above case.
24
25 As a magistrate in a “court of record” the judge’s duty is to administer to the needs of
26 the plaintiff(s) bringing suit before the court.
27
28 At this arraignment hearing no counsel for the plaintiff brought charges, but instead the
29 judge brought forth the charge.
30
1 When the counter-plaintiff requested to be heard on the issues brought up in the
2 counterclaim the judge refused to hear them.
3
4 As the counterclaim issues are vital to the defendant/counter-plaintiff’s case the judge’s
5 refusal to address the counterclaim demonstrates his complete disregard for fairness in
6 applying the Law.
7
8 The Judge acknowledged the counter-complaint in court when [he] was asked by the
9 counter-plaintiff, “do you have before you a counterclaim, dated June 6th in this matter”;
10 with [his] response of “I do”.
11
12 The Judge claimed that the court’s only business was to address the traffic ticket, get a
13 plea from the defendant and that only a plea of guilty, not guilty, or no contest was
14 acceptable.
15
16 The Judge refused to enter his oath of office into the record when asked to do so.
17
18 The Judge’s actions cannot be construed as being fair as he decided to represent the
19 plaintiff when no plaintiff was present and ignore the counter-plaintiff pleadings.
20
21 The Judge took control of the proceeding without regard to the counter-plaintiffs rights.
22
23 The court failed to present an injured party, a claim of injury, with the supporting facts,
24 after having been notified in writing of the defendants refusing the ticket for cause.
25
26
27
28 The genius of a court of record is not to be undermined. It is the birthright of every
29 American to settle issues in a court of record, if he so chooses.
30
1 The rules of a Court of Record, were not followed, the magistrate attempted to function
2 as a tribunal, and the court was ineffective in furthering the goal of justice for all.
3
4 This Court, having reviewed the facts, the record and the processes by which the rulings
5 were issued, finds that Judge Bxxxxxx , the [magistrate] conducted his own court,
6 without notice or concurrence of the parties, and without due process.
7
8 These failures to follow the prescribed procedures are sufficiently disruptive to the goal
9 of providing fair justice that the court finds it necessary to issue a Writ of Error Quae
10 Coram Nobis resident as follows:
11
12 This Court rescinds all orders entered June 14th 2009
13
14 This Court orders the clerk of the court Bxxxx Bxxxx to record no more orders in this
15 case without this Courts approval.
16
17 Further, the magistrate, plaintiff, and defendants are invited to each file and serve on all
18 other interested parties a brief no later than July 10th 2009 to show cause to this court
19 why this order should not take effect or should be modified. The court, mindful of the
20 rights of the parties and the importance of fair play, will liberally construe the arguments
21 presented.
22 THE COURT
23 WITNESS the hand and the SEAL of the COURT this 4th day of July 2009
24
25
26
27 ______________________________
28 Jeff Doe
29 Private Attorney
30
31 SEAL
1
2 The following would not be included in a Writ of Error:
3 Notes: These documents are not to be construed as legal advice. They are for example
4 purposes only. Some helpful notes are included in the Counterclaim example also, and
5 I forgot to mention when listing your complaints (1.,2.3.) put each complaint singularly
6 so it has to be responded to as either admit, deny, I have no knowledge, otherwise if you
7 do one long run-on accusation the answer can say (deny) to everything even though only
8 1 part of it is denied. Thank you Peter Graves of Jurisdictionary a wonderful
9 instructional set of CD’s that teach how to use statutory law.
10 The writing should be spaced at 1.5 lines which can be set at ‘Format’ in the Word
11 toolbar> then go to ‘Paragraph’ >then set Line spacing at 1&1/2 and then click O.K.
12 The purpose of a Writ of Error is to point out the ‘defects’ in whatever it is that you wish
13 changed. As the Sovereign it is your court:
14COURT. “An agency of the sovereign created by it directly or indirectly under its
15authority, consisting of one or more officers, established and maintained for the purpose
16of hearing and determining issues of law and fact regarding legal rights and alleged
17violations thereof, and of applying the sanctions of the law, authorized to exercise its
18powers in the course of law at times and places previously determined by lawful
19authority.” [Isbill v. Stovall, Tex.Civ.App., 92 S.W.2d 1067, 1070; Black's Law
20Dictionary, 4th Edition, page 425]
21
22The COURT is the “person and the suit of the sovereign”,pg 425 Blacks 4th.
23 I, John Henry Doe have stated numerously, and unequivocally that I am a sovereign (one
24of the People of California), and not once has this been disputed or objected to.
25
26The Magistrate is to ‘referee’ between the plaintiff and defendant, not to side with the
27Plaintiff or defendant. Once you become Plaintiff in a counter claim he is work for
28justice for you as well as the opposing Plaintiff. Often times the opposing Plaintiff is not
29a Sovereign however as they are Fictional entities such as the STATE OF CALIFORNIA
30or any corporation. Corporations don’t have eyes to see or mouths to speak with and have
31an inferior status compared to a flesh and blood man/woman.
32The result of this Writ of Error was the Judge did vacate the Trial Date set at the
33arraignment as requested by my Writ of Error. But….the Judge set a new trial date and
34claimed the Defendant (JOHN DOE) plead not guilty, which did not occur. My court
35then sent of new charges of Contempt of Court, etc.
36
37All praise to Bill Thornton, His site http://1215.org/lawnotes/index.html , his dvds of
38Seminars http://1215.org/seminar/denniswhipple.htm
39
40

You might also like