Professional Documents
Culture Documents
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
LEGAL FILE
Volume I
AMY M. BARTHOLOW
Office of State Public Defender
1000 W. Nifong Boulevard, Bldg. 7, Ste. 100
Columbia, Missouri 65203
(573) 882-9855
Attorney for Appellant
SHAUN MACKELPRANG
Office of the Attorney General
P.O. Box 899
Jefferson City, Missouri 65102
(573) 751-3321
Attorney for Respondent
No. ED100807
INDEX
VOLUME!
Page(s)
FRANKLIN COUNTY C4SE NO. 12AB-CR02409-O1:
DOCKET SHEETS
1-19
INDICTMENT
20-22
23-25
26-29
30-32
33-35
36-48
49-52
53-57
58-59
60-65
66-7 1
72-106
107-140
14 1-143
144
145-147
148
149-150
VOLUME II
DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR JUDGMENT OF ACQUITTAL
15 1-152
153-156
157-162
JURY INSTRUCT1ONS
163-192
JURYS QUESTIONS
193-194
VERDICTS
195-200
SENTENCING VERDICTS
20 1-204
205-2 11
JUDGMENT
2 12-214
NOTICE OF APPEAL
2 15-222
CLERKS CERTIFICATION
223-225
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
226
Report: CZR0026
I2AB-CR02409-O1
Date
Time
06-Feb-2014
94859AM
Page
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Case Type:
Status:
CC F&ony
Judgment Entered
Disposition:
Jury Verdict Guilty
J8007983
OCN#:
Arresting Agency: MOM H P0000
Speedy Trial:
Date Not Entered
-
28-Nov-2012
Disposition Date:
10-Oct-2013
Related Case:
12AB-MC00990
Related Case:
13AB-CC00289
Judge
Judge
Judge
I, I. LAMKE (28266)
Defendant
Prosecuting Attorney
Attorney for Defendant
ReleaselStatus Reason
Change Date
26-Feb-2013
Judge
Transferred/Reas
signed
04-Dec-2012
Judge
Transferred/Reas
signed
14-Feb-2013
Attorney
Withdrawn
Report: CZROO26
Date
Time
06-Feb-2014
Page
9 48 59AM
I2AB-CR02409-01
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Charge Charge
#
Date
Original
Charge:
Disposition:
Charge
Code
Charge
Description
17-Aug-2012 3245000
Order Date:
25-Nov-2013
Sentence or SIS: Incarceration DOC
Length: 2 Years
Start Date: 25-Nov-2013
Text: 2 YRS DOC
ConclCons Case & County: CONC W/CTS III, IV, V
Original
Charge:
Disposition:
09-Oct-20 13
Original
Charge:
Disposition:
17-Aug-2012 2921700
Tried/Court-Not Guilty
17-Aug-20 12 3245700
Order Date:
25-Nov-2013
Length: 365 Days
Text: 1 YR COUNTY JAIL
Original
Charge:
11-Sep-2012 1310000
Disposition:
10-Oct-2013
Jury Verdict-Guilty
Order Date:
25-Nov-20 13
Sentence or SIS: Incarceration DOC
Length: 30 Years
Start Date: 25-Nov-2013
Text: 30 YRS DOC
ConclCons Case & County: CONC W/CTS I, IV, V
Original
Charge:
Disposition:
11-Sep-2012 3101000
1 0-Oct-201 3
Jury Verdict-Guilty
Order Date:
25-Nov-2013
Sentence or SIS: Incarceration DCC
Length: 30 Years
Start Date: 25-Nov-2013
Text: 30 YRS DOC
ConclCons Case & County: CONC W/CTS I, Ill, IV
Report; CZR0026
Date
Time.
06-Feb-2014
94859AM
Page
I2AB-CR02409-O1
Original
Charge:
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
1 1-Sep-2012 1310000
Disposition:
Original
Charge:
Disposition:
Original
Charge:
Disposition:
Filing Date
28-Nov-20 12
565.081)
Jury Verdict-Not Guilty
10-Oct-2013
11-Sep-2012 3101000
1 0-Oct-201 3
8
11-Sep-2012 2702000
09-Oct-201 3
Description
Judge Assigned
Order
SPECIAL CONDITIONS SIGNED. SO ORDERED. I. I. LAMKE/JB
JudgelClerk Note
-
Order
AS A CONDITION OF RELEASE FOR DEFENDANT BOND IS SET
AT $250,000.00 CASH ONLY.
GDW
Bond Set
03-Dec-20 12
Arraignment Scheduled
Scheduled For: 04-Dec-2012: 10:00 AM: I. I. LAMKE; Setting: 0: Frankl
in County
Motion for Disclosure
STATES MOTION FOR DISCLOSURE FILED JB
Notice
NOTICE AND APPLICATION FOR CHANGE OF JUDGE
Judge/Clerk Note
NOTE TO MR M
-
04-Dec-2012
Notice
NOTICE FOR HEARING ON SATES MOTION FOR CHANGE OF JUDG
E
Motion for Change of Judge
04-Dec-2012
Motion Granted/Sustained
Judge Assigned
Report: CZR0026
Date
Time.
Page
06-Feb.2014
948:59AM
4
I2AB-CR02409-O1
04-Dec-20 12
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
HearinglTrial Cancelled
REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF JUDGE FILED BY STATE. MOTION GRANTED. CASE
TRANSFERED TO DIV I. IIL.JB
Scheduled For: 04-Dec-2012: 10:00 AM: I. I. LAMKE: Setting: 0: Franklin County
Motion GrantedlSustained
MOTION FOR CHANGE OF JUDGE GRANTED. CASE TRANSFERED TO DIV I. IILJJB
07-Dec-2012
Judge Assigned
CASE ASSIGNED TO DIV I
GDW
Arraignment Scheduled
Scheduled For: 08-Jan-2013; 9:00 AM: GAEL D. WOOD; Setting: 0; Franklin County
ARRAIGNMENT
18-Dec-2012
Motion Filed
MOTION FOR BILL OF PARTICULARS
27-Dec-2012
02-Jan-2013
1OA.M
RK
Report: CZROO26
Date
Time
Page
06Feb-2014
9 4859AM
5
12A8-CR02409-O1
02-Jan-201 3
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Hearing/Trial Cancelled
Scheduled For: 08-Jan-2013 900 AM: GAEL D. WOOD: Setting: 0, Franklin County
AR RAI C NM E NT
Jury Trial Scheduled
Scheduled For:30-Apr-2013: 9:00 AM: GAEL D. WOOD: Setting: 1: Franklin County: Length:
3 Days
07-Jan-2013
Motion Denied
REQUEST FOR FURTHER BOND MODIFICATION DENIED. GDW/Cw
Note
Request Filed
APPELLANTS REQUEST FOR PREPARATION OF THE LEGAL FILE & TRANSCRIPT,
FILED.
31-Jan-2013
Filing:
ENDORSEMENT OF WITNESS
06-Feb-2013
Subpoena Served
SGT H. FOLSOM
07-Feb-2013
11-Feb-2013
Motion to Dismiss
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Motion Filed
MOTION FOR SURETY BOND
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Report: CZR0026
Date
Time.
Page
06-Feb-2014
9 48 59AM
6
I2AB-CR02409-O1
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Motion Filed
MOTION FOR EVIDENTIARY HEARING ON BOND REDUCTION AND NOTICE OF HEARING
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
Criminal Motion Hearing Sched
Scheduled For: 21-Feb-2013; 9:00 AM: GAEL D. WOOD: Setting: 1: Franklin County
MOTIONS
Hearing Held
STATE APPEARS BY PA PARKS, DEFT APPEARS IN CUSTODY AND BYATTY MUTRUX. ATTY
MUTRUXS MOTION TO WITHDRAW IS GRANTED. ARGUMENTS HEARD ON DEFTS MOTION
FOR SURETY BOND. MOTION TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. GDW/cw
Scheduled For: 14-Feb-2013; 3:00 PM; GAEL D. WOOD; Setting: 0; Franklin County
MOTION TO WITHDRAW
JudgelClerk Note
-
19-Feb-2013
Motion Filed
MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER SUPREME COURT RULE 16
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
22-Feb-2013
Motion Denied
Amended Motion/Petition Filed
AMENDED MOTION FOR SURETY BOND
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Amended MotionlPetition Filed
AMENDED MOTION FOR SURETY BOND
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
22-Feb-2013
Motion Denied
Writ Requested
WRIT OF HABEAS CORPUS
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
21-Feb-2013
Hearing Held
STATE APPEARS BY PA PARKS, DEFT APPEARS IN CUSTODY AND WITHOUT COUNSEL.
DEFTS MOTION TO DISMISS IS ARGUED AND DENIED DEFTS MOTION FOR SURETY BOND
IS ARGUED AND TAKEN UNDER ADVISEMENT. DEFTS ORAL MOTION FOR GAG ORDERS IS
SUSTAINED. DEFT IS FORMALLY ARRAIGNED AND PLEADS NOT GUILTY TO ALL COUNTS.
GDW/cw
Scheduled For: 21-Feb-2013: 9:00AM: GAEL D. WOOD: Setting: 1: Franklin County
MOTIONS
Motion for Discovery
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
22-Feb2013
Judge/Clerk
Note
Report: CZR0026
Date
T me
06-Feb-20 14
Page
9.48 59AM
I2AB-CR02409-O1
22-Feb2013
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Order
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED AND DECREED THAT ALL COURT PERSONNEL. THE FRANKLIN
COUNTY PROSECUTOR, THE FRANKLIN COUNTY PROSECUTORS STAFF. THE DEFENDANT
AND ATTORNEYS FOR THE DEFENDANT SHALL NOT COMMENT PUBLICLY ON THIS CASE.
THIS ORDER IS SUBJECT TO THE EXCEPTIONS SET FORTH IN MISSOURI SUPREME COURT
RULE 4-3.6.
s/GAEL D WOOD
CC:
Motion Denied
DEFTS MOTION TO PROCEED UNDER SUPREME COURT RULE 16 IS DENIED. DEFTS
MOTION FOR SURETY BOND IS DENIED. GDW/cw
Judge/Clerk Note
DEFTS EXHIBITS A & B RETURNED TO DEFT AT FCSO
Motion Filed
MOTION TO HEAR HABEAS CORPUS, VACATE DENIAL OF SURETY BOND OR IN
ALTERNATIVE NEW JUDGE
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
-
25-Feb-2013
Correspondence Filed
CORRESPONDENCE ADDRESSED TO JUDGE RECEIVED AND PLACED IN SEALED
ENVELOPE. NOT READ BY JUDGE.
26-Feb-2013
Order
DEFENDANT HEREIN HAS FILED A REQUEST FOR CHANGE OF JUDGE ON FEBRUARY 25,
2013. ALTHOUGH THIS IS NOT TIMELY, THE COURT HEREBY SUSTAINS SAID MOTION IN
CHAMBERS AND THE SUPREME COURT IS REQUESTED TO ASSIGN A JUDGE FROM
OUTSIDE OF THE 20TH, 23RD, 24TH AND 42ND JUDICIAL CIRCUITS TO HEAR ALL FURTHER
PROCEEDINGS IN THIS CASE.
s/GAEL D WOOD
JudgelClerk Note
FILE SENT TO PJ SECRETARY FOR SUPREME COURT ASSIGNMENT
Hearing/Trial Cancelled
Scheduled For:30-Apr-2013 : 900 AM; GAEL D. WOOD: Setting: 1: Franklin County: Length: 3 Days
Hearing/Trial Cancelled
Scheduled For:01-May-2013. 9:00AM: GAEL D WOOD; Setting: 1; Franklin County; Length: 3 Days
HearinglTrial Cancelled
Scheduled For:02-May-2013: 9:00AM; GAEL D. WOOD: Setting: 1: Franklin County: Length: 3 Days
Judge Assigned
SUPREME COURT ASSIGNMENT TO JUDGE KEITH SUTHERLAND. FILED.
JudgelClerk Note
-
06-Mar-2013
07-Mar-2013
Subpoena Served
VALERIE WEINHAUS CHM MATTHEW FOX, PAT CUNNINGHAM, MICK MARUSCHAK, S.
MERTENS, JAMES HOFFMAN. SGT PERRY SMITH, JEFF WHITE
Jury Trial Scheduled
Report: CZR0026
Date
Tme
06-Feb-2014
9 48 59AM
Page
I2AB-CR02409-O1
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
08-Mar-2013
Answer Filed
STATES ANSWER TO DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR DISCOVERY
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
11-Mar-2013
Motion to Dismiss
MOTION TO DISMISS FILED
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Notice of Hearing Filed
NOTICE FOR HEARING ON DISMISSAL OR ALTERATIVE SURETY BOND
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
15-Mar-2013
Motion Filed
FOR RETURN OF PERSONAL EFFECTS.
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
18-Mar-2013
Motion to Quash
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
19-Mar-2013
Hearing Held
Memorandum Filed
MEMORANDUM ON NON WRITTEN WAIVER OF COUNSEL
Hearing Held
State by PA Robert Parks. Defendant in person and in custody. Case called on record for motions
hearing and pre-trial conference. State requests leave to amend Indictment by interlineation to correct
the body of Count V to read the defendant committed the felony of attempted assault of a law
enforcement officer charged in Count IV (not VI), and to correct the body of Count VII to read the
defendant committed the felony of attempted assault of a law enforcement officer charged in Count VI
(not IV). Leave granted. Court takes up Motion for Return of Personal Effects. Motion granted in
part, as to gold ring; motion denied in part, as to watch. Court takes up Motion to Quash Indictment.
Motion denied. Court takes up Motion to Dismiss. Motion denied. Defendant advised of perils of self
representation. Memorandum on Non-Written Waiver of Counsel filed and copy to each party.
Defendant requests court take up Bond Motion. PA objects. Court allows motion, hears from
defendant and PA, Court leaves bond set at $50,000 cash only and sets $250,000 surety bond. So
Ordered: Is! Keith Sutherland
Scheduled For: 19-Mar-2013: 9:00 AM: KEITH M SUTHERLAND: Setting: 0: Franklin County
JudgelClerk Note
COPY OF LOG SHEET FILED
-
Report: CZR0026
Tme
Page
Date
06-Feb-2014
948 59AM
9
I2AB-CR02409-O1
19-Mar-2013
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Bond Set
Amount of Bond Set $250000 SURETY: OR $50000 CASH ONLY.
-
Stipulation Filed
STIPULATION AS TO INTRODUCTION OF THE TAPE MADE BY DEFENDANTS EX-WIFE INTO
EVIDENCE FILED.
Order
Order to return to defendant or his representative (1) gold ring now in the possession of Troop C
evidence officer: and to retain the Black and Silver Watch in the possession of Troop C evidence
officer (see order). Is! Keith Sutherland
Motion Denied
18-Mar-2013
Motion to Quash
Motion Denied
11-Mar-20 13
Motion to Dismiss
Motion GrantedlSustained
IN PART, RING
15-Mar-2013
Motion Filed
Motion Denied
IN PART, WATCH
15-Mar-2013
20-Mar-2013
Motion Filed
JudgelClerk Note
-
Order
SPECIAL CONDITION OF BOND: GPS MONITORING, IS TO BE COMPLETED WITHIN 24 HOURS
WITH PROOF FILED. SO ORDERED. IS! KEITH M. SUTHERLAND/RK
21-Mar-2013
Answer Filed
STATES SUPPLEMENTAL ANSWER TO DISCOVERY.
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
List of Witnesses
ENDORSEMENT OF WITNESS
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
Objections Filed
DEFENDANT/VICTIM OBJECTION TO NON WRITTEN WAIVER OF COUNSEL AND MOTION TO
DISMISS. BASED ON DISCOVERY.
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Report: CZROO26
Date
Time
Page
06Feb2014
9 48 59AM
10
I2AB-CR02409-O1
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
0l-Apr-2013
List of Witnesses
ENDORSEMENT OF WITNESS
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
19-Apr-2013
24-Apr-2013
Motion to Quash
STATES MOTION TO QUASH DEFENDANTS ENDORSED WITNESSES FILED.
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
Notice of Hearing Filed
FOR 04/25/13 @9 AM,
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
25-Apr-2013
JudgelClerk Note
COPY OF NOTICE OF ENTRY FOR DOCKET ENTRIES OF 04/25/13 TO PA AND DEFENDANT. RK
-
Motion In Limine
STATES MOTION IN LIMINE 1 FILED.
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
12-Sep-2013
Order
JudgelClerk
Note
Hearing Held
DEFENDANT IN PERSON AND IN CUSTODY. STATE BY PA ROBERT PARKS. DEFENDANTS
MOTION TO SEVER THE CHARGES ARGUED AND DENIED. DEFENDANTNICTIM OBJECTION
TO NON WRITTEN WAIVER OF COUNSEL AND MOTION TO DISMISS, BASED ON DISCOVERY
ARGUED AND DENIED.
DEFENDANTS REQUEST FOR EMERGENCY BOND REDUCTION HEARING ARGUED AND
DENIED.
STATES MOTION IN LIMINE 1 ARGUED AND GRANTED.
STATES ENDORSEMENT OF WITNESSES GRANTED.
STATES MOTION TO QUASH DEFENDANT ENDORSED WITNESSES GRANTED AS TO THOSE
HIGHLIGHTED IN YELLOW.
COPY OF PROSPECTIVE JURORS QUESTIONNAIRES GIVEN TO PA AND DEFENDANT.
DEFENDANT AND ANYONE ON HIS BEHALF ORDERED NOT TO COMMUNICATE WITH
PROSPECTIVE JURORS PRIOR TO TRIAL IN ANY WAY.
DEFENDANT PROVIDES APPLICATION FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICES TO COURT.
COURT ORDERS APPLICATION BE DELIVERED TO PUBLIC DEFENDER BY CLERK. COPY OF
APPLICATION FILED UNDER SEAL.
CASE REMAINS SET FOR JURY TRIAL 04/30 THRU 5/2/13. 50 ORDERED: KEITH
SUTHERLAND/RK
Scheduled For: 25-Apr-2013; 9:00 AM; KEITH M SUTHERLAND: Setting: 0; Franklin County
ALL PENDING (AS OF 04/25) MOTIONS
JudgelClerk Note
ORIGINAL APPLICATION AND AFFIDAVIT FOR PUBLIC DEFENDER SERVICES DELIVERED TO
PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE. COPY PLACED IN SEALED ENVELOPE AND FILED
JudgelClerk Note
COPY OF RECORDING LOG FILED.
-
Report: CZR0026
Date
06-Feb-2014
FRANKLIN COUNTY
CIRCUIT COURT DOCKET SHEET
T me
9 48 59AM
Page
I2AB-CR02409-O1
26-Apr-2013
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
26-Apr-201 3
Motion GrantedlSustained
Motion Granted/Sustained
DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR TRIAL CONTINUANCE GRANTED BY CONSENT. CASE PASSED
GENERALLY.
SO ORDERED: KEITH SUTHERLAND!Cw
Hearing/Trial Cancelled
Scheduled For:30-Apr-2013: 9:00 AM; KEITH M SUTHERLAND; Setting: 0: Franklin
County; Length: 3 Days
Hearing/Trial Cancelled
Scheduled For:01-May-2013 ; 9:00AM; KEITH M SUTHERLAND; Setting: 0; Franklin
County; Length: 3 Days
Hearing/Trial Cancelled
Scheduled For:02-May-2013; 9:00 AM; KEITH M SUTHERLAND; Setting: 0: Franklin
County: Length: 3 Days
02-May-2013
Subpoena Served
SGT PERRY SMITH, MSHP
20-May-2013
Subpoena Served
CHM MATTHEW FOX. MSHP CRIME LABORATORY
24-May-2013
Subpoena Served
JEFF WHITE, LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING ACADEMY
SGT H FOLSOM, MISSOURI STATE HIGHWAY PATROL
MICK MARUSCHAK
CPL S MERTENS
PAT CUNNINGHAM
SGT H FOLSOM
JEFF WHITE, LAW ENFORCEMENT TRAINING ACADEMY
06-Jun-2013
18-Jun-2013
Subpoena Served
JAMES HOFFMAN
23-JuI-2013
Certificate of Service
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE. NOTICE OF HEARING
Report: CZROO26
Date
06-Feb.2014
Time.
Page
9 48 59AM
12
I2AB-CR02409-O1
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
20-Aug-2013
21-Aug-2013
Request Filed
REQUEST FOR MOTION TO TAX DEPOSITIONS AS COURT COSTS
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
04-Sep-20 13
Certificate of Service
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Notice of Hearing Filed
FOR 09/12/13 c 9A.M.
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Suggestions in Opposition
DEFENDANTS OPPOSITION TO STATES MOTION IN LIMINE
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Motion In Limine
DEFENDANTS MOTION IN LIMINE/MOTION TO EXCLUDE
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
12-Sep2013
Order
Report: CZROO26
Date.
Lme
Page
06-Feb-20 14
9 48.59AM
13
I2AB-CR02409-O1
04-Sep-2013
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Motion to Dismiss
DEFENDANTS AMENDED MOTION TO DISMISS THE CHARGE OF TAMPERING WITH JUDICIAL
OFFICER FOR DEFECT IN THE INSTITUTION OF THE PROSECUTION
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
12-Sep-2013
Order
Affidavit Filed
AFFIDAVIT OF JUDY KROPF
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
06-Sep-2013
Motion Filed
MOTION TO TAX DEPOSITIONS AS COURT COSTS
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
12-Sep-2013
Order
09-Sep-2013
Exhibit Filed
Exhibit A, Defendants Opposition to States motion in limine; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Certificate of Service
Certificate of Service; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Hearing Held
Scheduled For: 12-Sep-2013: 9:00 AM: KEITH M SUTHERLAND: Setting: 0: Franklin County
Order
GRANTING MOT TO TAX DEPOSITIONS FILED ON 09-06-13
Filing:
RECORDING LOG SHEETS FILED.
Report: CZROO26
Date
Tme.
06-Feb-2014
948.59AM
Page
14
I2AB-CR02409-O1
22-Sep-2013
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Motion In Limine
Defendants Second Motion in Limine: Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
01-Oct-2013
02-Oct-2013
Judge/Clerk Note
NOTIFIED PA AND DEFENSE COUNSEL THAT MOTION IN LIMINE AND OTHER MOTIONS
NOTICED FOR 10/08/13 @ 9A.M. WILL BE HEARD ON 10/08/13
8:30 A.M. RK
-
03-Oct-2013
Motion Filed
Motion to tax depositions as court cost; proof of deposition cost; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Subpoena Requested
Subpoena, Heather R Clarke: Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Subpoena Requested
Subpoena, Steve Everhart; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Subpoena Requested
Subpoena, Marty Leach; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Subpoena Requested
Subpoena, Jeffrey White; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
07-Oct-2013
Suggestions in Opposition
Defendants Opposition to State s Motion in Limine 2 Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Report: CZR0026
Date
06-Feb-2014
Time
948 59AM
Page
15
I2AB-CR02409-O1
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
08-Oct-2013
Motion In Limine
STATES MOTION IN LIMINE 2
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
Hearing Held
Sched Wed For: 08-Oct-2013: 8:30 AM; KEITH M SUTHERLAND; Setting: 0: Franklin County
MOTIONS
Jury Trial Conducted
STATE BY PA ROBERT PARKS. DEFENDANT IN PERSON. IN CUSTODY AND WITH COUNSEL
HUGH EASTWOOD AND CHRISTOPHER COMBS. STATES MOTION IN LIMINE 2 FILED,
ARGUED AND DENIED. CASE CALLED FOR JURY TRIAL. VOIR DIRE CONDUCTED. JURY OF
TWELVE MEMBERS AND ONE ALTERNATE EMPANELED. TRIAL BEGAN. COURT RECESSED
AT 5 P.M. FOR EVENING.
Jury Instructions Filed
JudgelClerk Note
JUDGES NOTES
-
09-Oct-2013
10-Oot-2013
> AT EACH BREAK DURING TRIAL, JURY INSTRUCTED PRIOR TO LEAVING COURTROOM.
SAR ORDERED. SENTENCING HEARING SCHEDULED FOR 11/25/13 @ 9:30 AM.
DEFENDANT GRANTED ADDITIONAL 10 DAYS FOR FILING MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL.
>
>
Report: CZROO26
Date:
O&-Feb-2014
Time
CIRCUITCOURTDOCKETSHEET
Page:
9:48 59AM
16
I2AB-CR02409-O1
10-Oct-2013
11-Oct-2013
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
16-Oct-2013
29-Oct-20 13
Notice
notice; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
Motion Filed
motion to tax depositions as court costs; deposition cost; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
25-Nov-20 13
Motion Granted/Sustained
25-Nov-2013
Motion Denied
25-Nov-2013
Motion Denied
Motion Filed
Defendants Motion to Tax Depositions as Court Costs, and Other Court Costs: Ex A, Deposition Court
Reporter Costs: Ex B. Clarke subpoena service fee: Ex C, Leach and Everhart subpoena service fees:
Ex D, White subpoena service fee: Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
25-Nov-201 3
Motion Granted/Sustained
01-Nov-2013
08-Nov-2013
Motion Filed
States motion to forfeit weapon: Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
25 Nov-2013
Motion GrantedlSustained
Report: CZROO26
Date
Time
06-Feb-2014
948 59AM
Page
17
I2AB-CR02409-O1
15-Nov-2013
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
Response Filed
Defendant s Memorandum in Opposition to State s Motion to Forfeit Weapon; Exhibit A Affidavit of
Judy Kropf; Ex B Receipt: Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
-
Suggestions Filed
Defendant s Supplemental Suggestions of Law in support of each of his original, renewed & second
motions for judgment of acquittal; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
25-Nov-2013
Motion Denied
DEFENDANTS MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL DENIED. KMS
Motion Granted!Sustained
ALL MOTIONS TO TAX DEPOSITIONS AS COURT COSTS GRANTED. KMS
Motion Denied
DEFENDANTS SECOND MOTION FOR ACQUITTAL DENIED. KMS
Motion GrantedlSustained
STATES MOTION TO FORFEIT WEAPON GRANTED, FORFEITURE STAYED PENDING APPEAL
AND POST CONVICTION RELIEF PROCESSES. KMS
Defendant Sentenced
DEFENDANT IN CUSTODY, IN PERSON AND WITH COUNSEL HUGH EASTWOOD AND
CHRISTOPHER COMBS. STATE BY PA ROBERT PARKS. ALLOCUTION GRANTED. COUNT I:
2 YRS DOC; COUNT III: 1 YR COUNTY JAIL; COUNT IV: 30 YRS DOC; COUNT Vs 30 YRS DOC,
ALL CONCURRENT. CC/CVF. 29.15/24.035 ADVISED AND NO PROBABLE CAUSE FOUND. SO
ORDERED: KEITH M. SUTHERLAND
Judgment CVC Entered
Judgment Against: JEFFREY WEINHAUS; Amount: $68.00: Satisfied Date:
Judgment Entered
COURT COSTS
Judgment Against: JEFFREY WEINHAUS; Amount: $20,006.25; Satisfied Date:
Transfer Filed
Commitment report: Electronic Filing Certificate of Service
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
26-Nov-2013
Report: CZROO26
Date
06-Feb.2014
Time
CIRCUITCOURTDOCKETSHEET
Page
9.48 59AM
18
12A8-CR02409-O1
27-Nov-20 13
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
03-Dec-2013
Motion Filed
MOTION FOR RETURN OF PROPERTY OR EVIDENCE
Filed By: ROBERT E PARKS
05-Dec-20 13
23-Jan-2014
05-Dec-2013
Motion Granted!Sustained
Motion Granted/Sustained
09-Dec-2013
Certificate of Mailing
NOTICE OF APPEAL, CRIIMINAL CASE INFORMATION FORM, PAUPERIS ORDER. & COPY OF
JUDGMENT MAILED TO THE MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS, TO ROBERT PARKS AND
NOTICE OF ENTRY TO HUGH EASTWOOD.
Memorandum Filed
Defendant-Appellants Statement of his Status; Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Motion to Withdraw
Motion to Withdraw: Electronic Filing Certificate of Service.
Filed By: HUGH A EASTWOOD
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
1 0-Dec-201 3
Motion GrantedlSustained
MOTION FOR APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL GRANTED. PUBLIC DEFENDER APPOINTED SO
ORDERED KEITH SUTHERLAND
16-Dec-2013
Receipt Filed
MISSOURI COURT OF APPEALS-EASTERN DISTRICT ACKNOWLEDGEMENT OF NOTICE OF
APPEAL, FILING
APPEALS COURT CASE NO ED100807.
23-Dec-2013
Correspondence Filed
Letter to clerk, received & scanned.
Filed By: JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
24-Dec-201 3
Certificate of Mailing
Notice of 12/23/13 correspondence. filing to Defendant.
Report: CZROO26
Tme.
Page
Date.
C6-Feb-2014
948 59AM
19
I2AB-CR02409-O1
ST V JEFFREY R WEINHAUS
13-Jan-2014
Judge/Clerk Note
17-Jan-2014
JudgelClerk Note
STATES EXHIBITS #1 AND #2 FROM MOTION HEARING ON 02/21/13 RETURNED TO
PROSECUTOR.
23-Jan-2014
Motion GrantedlSustained
ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR DISPOSAL OF PROPERTY OR EVIDENCE RECEIVED FROM
JUDGE SUTHERLAND. (THIS MOTION ORIGINALLY GRANTED ON 12/05/2013.)
28-Jan-20 14
Judge/Clerk Note
-
06-Feb-20 14
Judge/Clerk Note
-
LEGAL FILE COPIED, COMPILED CERTIFIED AND MAILED TO, AMY BARTHOLOW, MISSOURI
PUBLIC DEFENDERS OFFICE, APPELLATE DIVISION, WOODRAIL CENTRE, 1000W NIFONG
BUILDING 7, SUITE 100, COLUMBIA, MO 65203
IN I I IF Cli
SIAIF,OI MISSOURI
STM F OF MISSOURI.
Plaintiff.
VS
JEFFERY R WEINHAUS
White/Male DOB: 10/06/1966
SSN: 486-80-3880
2360 Highway K
Saint Clair, MO 63077
Defendan
l2\B-CR02409
Division No. II
OCN:
PA File No. 071131707
Cause No.
I
I
2
NO
INDIC FMENF
Q?.
I
820,2
r-.
lhe Grand Jurors of the Count .fFra-..1in, State of Missouri, charge that:
COUNT I CLASS C Fl.LONY POSSESSION OF A CONTROLLED SUBSTANCE
Charge Code Number: 3245022
The defendant, in violation of Sction 195.202, RSMo, committed the class C felony of possession of a controlled
1 S.ctions 558.011 and 560.01 1, RSMo, in that on or about August 22,
substance, punishable upon corn .tio
the defendant possessed Morphine, a controlled substance, knowing
20 12, in the County of Franklin. State
of its presence and nature.
COIJNT II ( LASS
The defendant, in violation of SLeoo (5,( I RSMo, committed the class C felony of tampering with ajudicial
officer, punishable upon conviction uncr SeLtions 558.011 and 560.011, RSMo, in that on or about August 17, 2012,
r c defendant, with purpose to harass or intimidate Judge Kelly Parker, a
in the County of Franklin, State fMi
1 officers official duties, tampered with the judicial officer by
performar
judicial officer, in the
f-
I
r
for treason.
J
execute
and
threatening to try
.
The defendant, in violation of S etron S2( RSMo, committed the class A misdemeanor of possession of a
i under Sections 558.011 and 560.0 16, RSMo, in that on or about
controlled substance, pun ishab F
of Missoun, the defendant possessed marijuana, a controlled
i.
August 22, 2012. in the County lr
substance, knowing of its prse1.
.
COUNT IV CLASS
1)
COUNT VI CLASS A F
I he defendant, in violation of
of assault of a la enfareinent
that on or about Sepihr I
officer, the defendai
physical injury to him, by shoe:
A FRUL Bil I
lie
I 13ill
F oreman
2- S
C4S4
-5
4
Judge
STA FE WITNESSES:
SGY II. Folsom, Missoun State High
Kelly Parker
In
)
)
JI:I1LRY R Vv UNIIAUS
Vhite/Male DOB: 10/06/1966
SSN: 486-803880
Defendant.
01 FRANKLIN
Cause No.
I 2ARCR0409-0l
Diision No.1
Judge: St
OCN:
PA File No. 0711U707
)
)
)
)
cr
,
BILL n
M1SSoU
Fhe defendant, in violation of Section 195.202. RSMo, committed the class C felony of possession of a
controlled substance, punishable upon conviction under Sections 558.011 and 560.011, RSMo. in that on or
about August 22. 2012, in the County of Iranklin. State of Missouri. the defendant possessed Morphine, a
controlled substance. knowing of its presence and nature.
COUNT II CLASS C FELONY IAMPERING WITH JUI)ICJAL OFFICER
C1iarg Code Number: 2921706
The defendant, in violation of Section 565.084, RSMo, committed the class C felony of tampering with a
judicial officer, punishable upon conviction under Sections 558.011 and 560.011, RSMo, in that on or about
August 17, 2012. in the County of Franklin, State of Missouri, the defendant, with purpose to harass or
intimidate Judge Kelly Parker. ajudicial officer, in the perfbmiance of the judicial officers official duties.
tampered with the judicial officer by threatening to try and execute the Judge Kelly Parker for treason.
COUNT 111 CLASS A MISDEMEANOR POSSFSSION OF UP TO 35 GRAMS MARIJUANA
(barge Code Number: 3245762
Ihe defendant, in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo, committed the class A misdemeanor of possession of a
controlled substance, punishable upon conviction under Sections 558.011 and 560.0 16. RSMo. in that on or
about August 22, 2012. in the County of Franklin. State of Missouri, the defendant possessed marijuana, a
controlled substance, knowing of its presence and nature.
COUNT IV CLASS A FELONY A [TEMPT ASSUALT 1ST 1)EGREI: ON LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICER
(barge Code Number: 1310099
the defendant, in violation ot Section 565,081 1. RSMo, committed the class A felony of attempted assault of a
law enforcement officer in the first degree punishable upon coniction under Section 558.011. RSMo. in that
on or about September 11. 2012. in the County of Franklin. State of Missouri. Sgt Folsom was a lass
enfbrcenient officer, the defendant knev. Sg. Folsom sas a lass enforcement officer and atiempted to kill or
to cause serious physical injury to him. b trying to draw a weapon to shoot at Sgt lolsorn.
The defendant, in violation of Section 571.015, RSMo, committed the felony of armed criminal action,
punishable upon conviction under Section 571.015.1, RSMo, in that on or about September 11, 2012. in the
county of Franklin, State of Missouri, the defendant committed the felony of attempted assault of a law
enforcement officer charged in Count VI, all allegations of which are incorporated herein by reference, and
the defendant committed the foregoing ftlony of attempted assault of a law enforcement officer by. with and
through, the knowing use, assistance and aid of a deadly weapon.
COUNT VIII CLASS D FELONY RESISTING OR INTERFERING WiTH ARREST FOR A FELONY
Charge Code Number: 2702099
The defendant, in violation of Section 575.1 50, RSMo, committed the class I) felony of resisting an arrest,
punishable upon conviction under Sections 558.011 and 560.011. RSMo, in that on or about September 11,
2012, in the county of Franklin, State of Missouri, Sgt Folsom and Cpl Mertens, law enforcement officers,
were making an arrest of for defendant possession of a controlled substance and the defendant knew or
reasonably should have known that the officers were making an arrest. and. for the purpose of preventing the
officers from effecting the arrest, resisted the arrest of defendant by using or threatening the use of violence
or physical force.
ROI3ER I L PARKS
Prosecuting Attorney
of the County of Franklin,
State of Missouri, by
Is! Robert I. Parks
Robert E Parks 6333
Prosecuting Attorney
ST\TE WI fNESSES:
Pat (unnmgharn. 1400 Independence Drke. Suite 1102. RoHa .M()
Mike Maruschak. 1400 Independence Drie. Suite 1402. Rolla. Mo
Sarah Eerhart.
SGT H Folsom. Missouri State Highway Patrol. I roop I Headquarters. Roila. MO 6402
(I IM \4anhe Fox. MSI IP ( rime Laborator. 151(1 Fast Nm Street. Jefferson Cit... MO) 65 101
Phil Gregor.
James Hoffinan. 1616 Oak knoll. Saint (lair. MO 63077
S. Mertens. Troop I Headquarters. Rolla. Mo 65402
KelI Parker.
SG1 Perry Smith, Missouri State Highway Patrol. 891 Technology Drive, Saint Charles, MO 63304
Valerie Weinhaus, 711 S. Osteopathy, Kirksville. MO 63501
Jeff White, P.O. Box 568, Jefferson City. MO 65102
15501 RI
FILED
State of MissourL
DECi
is.
BILL ft MILLER
Jeffrey Weinhaus,
Defendant.
R1.Qt [:51 FOR I)ISCOVER\
COMES NO\V de6.mdunt. b and through counsel. pursuaii:
to
Rules 1
ti
and
25.04 \lo.R.Crim,P. and Section 505.032 RSMo (1986). and requests the lollowing
within ten (10) days and or throughout the duration of this cause.
1. The names and last knon addresses of persons whom the State intends to call us
witnesses at any hearin or at the trial, together with their riiten or recorded
statements, and existing neinuranda reporting or
sumniariy.tng
part of all
of
their oral
statements.
2
Should the defendant notify the State of its intent to rely upon the defenses of mental
disease or delect pursuaii to Section 552.030 RSMo or alibi, the defendant
specifically requests the names and addresses of all witiiecses the State intends o call
as rebuttal witnesses, together with any written memoranda ol their statements.
Wardiusv. Oregon. .112 .S. 470. 93 S.Ct, 2208. 37 L.Fd.2d 82 (I 973) State v.
Curtis. 544 S.W Jd 580 (Mo bane 1976).
the defendant or
any
to
tIme mnakirme. md a
all mtnesse to :ue aekmi ledonieni. or such statements, and lust Lno n addicses of
such witnesses
fhose portions
the offense
ith
hm
testimon> or pen
ad
I1
.:t
1%
available
ti
tli,
State.
f experts. made in connection sith tile particulax case.
including results e. I
experiments ore
xt; ..n
7. An> books, papta documents, photographs or objects which the State intends to
introduce into e iuc. e . the hearing or trial, or which sere obtained from or belong
to the defendant
8. An> record ol whir cn.:.i1 convictions of persons the State intends to call as
tends to negate le
degree of the olCe:
ll.Allitemssetcn
possession ox
12 1 he statements
comiection
ssit!.
presenti> intent
13. ibe meinoranit.. o.
an person tnt
fendant is charged
on. n ithin
the possession
or
. J
matter LII
this
in agent of
the State in
,ttnal
.aries of an oral statement nude to an apent of the State 1y
ith the subject matter of this cause whether or not
cr2-i
C
a. th si
it
1 nt.
I;)
l th:
at
.in
rat.
connection with :1 e
18. All reports. mci
of this case.
and any other data in the handc of the State and its agents in
anti
in general duria
20. 4ny material ii
the mitigating t
2l.lhenamcf.ant.
haung inform.
22. Statements of
to the detendi
IdA
t arenties
aen
1
enfo
n
jj)I
(l98(;;
of
ns interrogation or interview conducted b> any member
.Lb
agencies, of ill p
24 Copies of hook ii
agencies reiatin.
25. All press reiLa4.,
defendant, this c
26. Copies of all 911
call fbr assisranc
Defendant
IRTIFICATE OF SERVICE
The un I rsi
was sent LS. M alt
S. Church St., P
IN
FILED
DEC 18 2012
D.C.
State of Missouri.
)
)
Cause No 12A13-CR02409
Jeffrey Weinhaus.
Defendant
)N FOR BILL OF PARTICULARS
Comes nos Dc:
y and through his attorney, and moves this court pursuant to the
of Rule 23.o
provisions
an
1. Defcndantisch
Substance (Cou:
one count of M
counts of Atten
wit
counts of Arinec
Arrest or Interfe
2. The Indictment
adequate., prep
on
two
to
enable him
to
engaged in tl
1
3. From the
t.mc
acts DeIk.au
areallcs1 ..i.
lnent.
Page 1 ol
on
wine
att
or
ol thoe acts
wh
c
1
h those acts arc allepcd to bane
occurrel. 1
4. AstoCo U
a.
h. lnc!.
Ia
5. As to th:
i.
a. :fl c:.
at
b.
zan
\l
ii
C.
specific
ni
ins IV-VIlI.
6. Defense coulbe
from the
..
of each incident
7. Defendar
single cr.
.ieed said etent occurred at all, and that such matters ma> be
subject U
of thet
8. Failurc
the Sta
the e.
s. to conduct an appropnat
Page) of 3
un estigation of
tIn. witiicce
expose F:
id
counsel a I r
Constitut
mike
teed b\
rtic1e 1, Section I
onstitut
\V111l,1i
VV
V
Mtssouri to file
ate of
1 71 7 Park Avenue
St Louis. MO 63 104
p: 314-270-2273
f: 314-884-4333
1T1FJCATE OF SERVICE
The iinJ:
mailed this 1)eee
Franklin Couni
15 S. Church St.,
Union, MO 630
recoilie
nevs Office
s
I.
PJgL
7<1
.on
-:
itru\. 63 I I
-i
\\
its
___
_
IN
1-
rC6 LJU
icsuI
(I
FEB132013
tY-rior1 1) iSiS
jS j&c
(c
P-cr iJp&c oc
Cr
(S S
ot4kDS z
ztkJRE
iS
(cs
1 O&JL-1
1
C4
\
()
J
ForE (r
1 I5
eOUEEUT
(c1Tc
T2J
t-
t J3
T EJj iJT Cj p
c
CttO
j-
(}s
is-k
i4,S
tj
Cc -to
110 -$
jiJcL
Cnccs
-t
-i4j
cA,cs
E C\-E
too
Co 6Q-F 4(
c(rR)Q
jL( ki
COIZDPJ6S
jfF
7
(O
Q(1
1 t
0
c
i--
4-S
ccc
Ltt1(LT
E&jj
iJ cec
L\cc
tQL)
-\e (-tYS
/kJ(k)6.
ff
ELxI
t flIopQ
C) A
)E
O&JES
cdi
JTj 4cn
Of7O
1tE
114-&
Secccy
U
(&rmuT1c&J
by
P-fcc
PcAxc4
r3
--J-
(cs R
TZbCcS
S
IJ(
C
0
s
4
oc
Ccu4
4c
pocic
tAJS
co
SCojouc
k 1i I Li
r4
j
(C-i
( L0
1:Eoji-
-t-4-r
Laij
2oz.
J
I- C-k
SCT
S
OF-fl C
TC)
LSTj
tcS
AJ
CpJ
1z
Se-n c t 3)
Qr t:
?T(QJJED
i7i4Q LU (J
di
(cj
&O
j/J
13
(Jh1-fSPIO f31J
t-f LJ4c2.e t J1 LJ
il*o
OTQ 6Lir
E
L)Qf (P
(C) (V
Cp
VC)
0
9
1(
QLJ
OCQj
(\
jjJ
uJy
LJQ
L)
-f4J
5LJ
(OQoi(
usco
Sc
?LcQ C
rE4
(\
ID&
krr
rcs
Ti
(jU
(C
11c
(rf
0C
JQs
r/iT
uf Lo2S
PuC
TH
OL
C
21
LL)
L+4
cEC hyJ
5c
C-) 3\ kfl)
CYD
Q3 3H
Gdu
i-V 3atddy
S\z(
3flz
0
o)
)n
c)(LJ
-E O
rt
;)
;f4- (13
3LtjiS
(irJ LQ
cio
Y)
d O3 4Q
3
j
I
3Q
4D3cL
ct-v
(N
3)rj)
3J3
r t
31--L
34
-_
cr
Dr 2??a
V 05
I LO5 n
fL-
2YL3 3+-
cjicL
--
Th
3fl1j
2! 3dOj_
/- :L ( 3 ) s) r 3 QL-9 J)
r3- 2O) )3dn5
Li
SCfl
d3 jO -i-) S
5 3 i=tf) (ry cr tl\JAJJ
h*
)c2
35
)
O2_. C134 i
JO (
eI
smw9cL
L)
Th3
ROaQLL
c24
3
)
3
vs
Jeffrey R. Weinhaus,
Defendant
FILED
MAR 18 2013
JO
Comes now the Defendant, Jeffrey R. Weinhaus, acting Pro Sc, and moves this
Honorable Court to Quash the Indictment in the above captioned cause, and supports this motion
with the following:
I.
On November 28th, 2012, the State obtained its eight-count indictment in this cause. Fo
that indictment, the Defendant has pleaded not guilty.
II.
It has been held repeatedly that an Indictment by a grand jury is prima facie evidence of the
existence of probable cause, unless the same is overcome by a showing in evidence that the
indictment was obtained by fa)se or fraudulent testimony, or through improper
means.OS1eppuhn v. Railroad, 199 Mo. App. 571, 204 5, W 579; Van Sickle v, Brown, 68 Mo.
627. 637; Wilkinson v. McGc 265 Mo. 574, 586, 178 S. W. 471. Campbell v. Myers, 287 S.W.
842, 221 Mo App. 858 (Mo. App, 1926) [emphasis addedj
Defendant contends that Sgt. Folsom provided false testimony to the grand jury, which
the grand jury relied upon in their indictment. In support of this contention, the 1)efendant
submits the following:
Defendants Motion to Quash Exhibit A -The Indictment. Count VIII of the indictment
states the following;
COUNT VIII CLASS D FELONY RESiSTING OR INTERFERING WITh
ARREST FOR A FELONY
Charge Code Number: 2702099
The defendant, in violation of Section 575.150, RSMo, committed the class 1) felony of
resisting an arrest, punishable upon conviction under Sections 558.011 and 560.011. RSMu, in
that on or about September 11, 2012, in the county of Franklin, State of Missouri, Sgt Folsom
and Cpl Mertens, law enforcement officers, were making an arrest of for defendant possession of
a controlled substance and the defendant knew or reasonably should have known that the
officers were making an arrest, and, 1r the purpose of preventing the officers from effecting
the arrest, resisted the arrest of defendant by using or threatening the use of violence or physical
f)rce. [emphasis addedj
The indictment identifies the States Witnesses as Sgt. II. Folsom, Missouri State
highway Patrol, Troop I Headquarters., Rolla. MC) 65402, and Kelly Parker. No other
identifying information for Kelly Parker was provided in the indictment. Defendant assumes
that Kelly Parker is Judge Kelly Parker. Judge Kelly Parker, to the best of l)eferidants
knowledge is not alleged to be a tness to the events of the th of September 2012,
As Sgt, Folsom was the only witness that could have pros ided tcstimon to support a
charge of resisting arrest, Defendant asks this Honorable Court to examine the Troopers report
from the 2th of September 2012. (1)efndants Motion Exhibit B)
At this point with all the units in place at approximatel\ 1246 hours. I contacted
Weinhaus by cellular telephone to request that he meet Corporal Mertens and 1 at the
MFA Oil station near his residence under the ruse that e were going to return his
computer equipment. Weinhaus ansered the cellular telephone and I explained to him
that Corporal Mertens and I wanted to return his computer equipment to him toda.
Weinhaus immediately suggested that it would have to be a public place and that he
did not trust me as he thought this might be a ploy to arrest him. I again assured
him that, the meeting was to return his computers to him and that I wanted to make
it as easy as possible for him, I asked him if we could meet him at the MFA Oil station
near his residence on Route K in Piney Park. Weinhaus agreed, but he informed me that
he would have several persons with him when he arrived to check things out. I again
informed him that only Corporal Mertens and I would be there and we did not want to
cause any kind of incident by bringing other people. Weinhaus agreed to meet us in
approximately 15 minutes. f emphasis addedi
The report made by Sgt. Folsom clearly contradicts his latter testimony before the grand
jury. Sgt. Folsoms report identifies that the 1)efendant suggested that the meeting was to arrest
him, but was assured by Sgt. Folsom on the L9th of September 2(112 that the meeting was to
return his computers. Subsequent to that report, Sgt. Folsom testified to the grand jury that the
l)efendant knew or reasonably should have known that the officers were making an arrest. [he
grand jury testimony of Sgt. Folsom, the only witness to the event who testified before the grand
jury. has been demonstrated to ha e provided fraudulent testimony to the grand jur,
Whereas the Defendant has demonstrated that the indictment has been overcome by a
showing in evidence that the indictment was obtained by false or fraudulent testimony the
MOTION TO QUASH
EXHIBIT A
STATE OF MISSOURI,
Plaintiff,
)
)
VS
JEFF ERY R WEINHAUS
White/Male DOB: 10/06/1966
SSN: 486-80-3884)
2360 IlighwayK
Saint Clair, MO 63077
Delndant.
)
)
)
)
)
)
I 2A13-CR02409
Cause No
Diviston No. II
OCN
PA File No. 071131707
!Jy ,
ip1c1MEr
B
M/ti-,,
FRA
y IN COJj4.
The Grand Jurors of the County of Franklin, State of Missouri, charge that:
COUNT I CLASS C FELONY POSSESSION OF A CONTROUID SUBSTANCE
Charge Code Number: 3245022
The defendant, in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo, committed the class C felony of possession of a controlled
August 22,
substance, punishable upon conviction under Sections 558.011 and 560.01 1, RSMo, in that on or about
knowing
substance,
controlled
a
Morphine,
possessed
2012, in the County of Franklin, State of Missouri, the defendant
of its presence and nature.
COUNT II CLASS C FELONY TAMPERiNG WITH JUDICIAL OFFICER
Charge Code Number: 2921706
The defendant, in violation of Section 565,084, RSMo, committed the class C felony of tampering with a judicial
officer, punishable upon conviction under Socnons 55.8.01 I and 560.01!, RSMo, in that on or about August 17, 2012,
in the County of Franklin. State of Missouri, the defendant, with purpose to harass or intimidate Judge Kelly Parker, a
judicial officer, in the performance of the juthcial officers official duties, tampered with the judicial officer by
threatening to txy and execute Judge Kelly Prker for treason.
COUNT 111 CLASS A MISDEMEANOR POSSESSION OF UP TO 35 GRAMS MARIJUANA
Charge Code Number: 3245762
The defendant. in violation of Section 195.202, RSMo, committed the class A misdemeanor of possession of a
00vctien under Sections 558.011 and 560.0 16, RSMo, in that on or about
controlled substance, punishable upon 0
St .te of Missouri, the defendant possessed marijuana, a controlled
Franklin
of
County
August 22, 2012 in the
nature.
and
presence
its
of
knowing
substance,
COUNT IV CLASS A FELONY A
The defendant, in violation of The defendauL i violation of Section 565.081.1, RSMo, committed the class A felony
of assault of a law enforcement officer in thc. first degree punishable upon conviction under Section 558.011. RSMo, in
that on or about September 11,2012, in the (cunty of Franklin, State of Missouri, Sgt Folsom wa.c a law enibreement
officer, the defendant knew Sgt. Folsom wa. . law enforcement officer and attempted to kill or to cause serious
physical iujwy to him, by shooting hIm.
A TRUE BILL
No
JE BILL
Foreman
As a condition of release for defendant bond s set in the amount of$
cQC
C4-SA
STATE W1TNESSES
Judge
__________
________
_____
STATE OF MISSOURI.
Plaintiff,
VS
Cause No
Division No
I2AE CR02400
II
Jeffery R Weinhaus
Defendant
Laws: Defendant shall not violate any Federal. State or municipal law
Li 2
Abuse Prohibition: Defendant will rrcit engage in any abusrve or assauttrve behavior
u 3
Domestic Violence Education Seminar (DyES): Defendant will enter and succeashily attend the OVES program until
ordered otherwise by the court. Defendant will authorize the relevant treating professional to disclose to the Court
No Contact Provisions: Defendant w, I have rio contact with (the vdim) (the victims children) (or) (the victims family).
The Defendant will not initiate ix maintain telephone, conespondence, personal or 3i party coritad with (the victim) (the
victims children) (or) (the victims far y) without the prior written approvat of the Court The Defendant will not enter into
the premisei, travel past or loiter near whiere (the victim) (the victims children) (or) (the victims family) resides or works
YOU WILL BE IN VIOLATION OF THIS ORDER EVEN IF YOU ARE INVITED.
Weapons Prohibition: Defendant wit not purchase, possess, receive, or transport any firearms, ammunition, explosive
device or any other deadly weapon. Au weapons shall be surrendered at
with j
days.
6
u
Parenting Class: Defendant shalt enlcr and successfully attend a parenting class
SupervIsed Custody Transfer or VCJZatlon: Defendant shalt utilize a supervised custodial transfer program that is any
custodial transfer as by Court order s II take place at the local (police station) (shenff s department).
o 8.
.
9
u
SCRAM: Defendant shall, within forty ,ght (48) hours of release from custody, or as soon thereafter as possible, report to
the appropriate authority kr the insta -:n of the Secure Continuous Remote Alcohol Monitoring device on Defendants
person. Such device shall remain in p a until the conclusion of the criminal case.
j 10
11
GPS Monitoring:
j 12.
tj 13.
Off,er
14.
not (be seen with) (contact) (live with) the other co-defendants from this case
Motion to Quash
1
Exhibit B
fendant,s
DEt
O5T
REPORT DATE:
U622j2
TROOP OF OCCURjN( I
SCENE PROCESSED:
IDCC AT SCENE:
LLS OF INVESTIGATION
FY WEINH.AUS
3.
On September 11, 201
after obtaining the arrest warrant f or
Weirthaus, I contacted a rarnber of the Franklin County Sheriffs
Departmnt to see If the local sherifis department wanted to assist us
in serving the arrest wa; rant.
They decHned to assist citing othe:
calls for service ere u .ding
I then contacted Federal Bu eau of
Investigation Agents Pat
uP Cunningham and Mike Max-uschak, who agreed
to meet us in St. Clair
.issouri and assist us in serving the arrest
warrant on Weinhaus.
r ueeting with Special Agent Cunningham and
it
Special Agent Maruschak
agreed to attempt to have Weinhaus meet.
with us at the Missouri
uners Association (MFA) Oil Station on
Missouri RouLe K betwees
Clair and Piney Park, Missouri, which is
in close proximity to Wi
haus residence.
IL was further decided that
the meeting with Weinhau; would be prearranged with him under the ruse
that we were returning a
computer equipment to him chat was seized
trom his restdence on A
ci 22, 2012.
Additionally I arranged for two
fully marked ears from
iissourr State HIqhway Patrols Troop C to
participate in the ar:e
ocration
n toe event Weirinaus ti ed to I lee
arid a vehicular pursuit
Jt this )Oiflt with
1
hours, I coritactec iio,,
et Corporal Mertess
der the rase that we
Weinhaus answered the c
Coruoral Mci t ens aria
C1
today.
Weiihaus ammec
nulltc place and that h
by Loarreat him.
I
5.
A short time lot or
Subaru passenger vLil
pazki.ng lot.
I iiuaeda
frJeizthaus and I also obso
as he entered the parki
his patrol vehicle is w
drove in a circular pat
vehicle past. our locaci
Mertens patrol vehicie.
Mertens patrol vehicle
vehicle.
I then notioc
simultaneously appruar..
I immediately recoyni zec
conversation and he ha1
of his vehicle.
I tX:e,,
his patrol car and c, e
see if Weinhaus woula
trunk was open.
I than
vehicle with the Li.
lot.
Corporal Mertens and I began to exit
tisus accelerated through the parking lot and
a past our vehicle.
He abruptly stopped his
s 1 exited the passenger side of Corporal
then began to approach the rear oL, Corporal
I saw Weinhaus had already exited his
it his vehicle was parked in a mariner which
and an immediate escape route from the
d at the drivers door of his vehicle and
a I continued towards Weinhaus location
a attempt engage him in conversation.
I hod
or
CA
12
26
008
01
7.
I began to hear soic
began to scan left pant
any additional threats
thought came from my ilL
scanned right again tow i
saw his body rotating
re hhot from my servi
1
tapped left again it
Weinhaus immediately icr
Corporal Nertens was co
Weinhausto secure his w
the area of the Y4FA Oil
flat on his stomach wiLt
The weapon was still in
by just a few inches.
near the trigger guar I
the right hand of Weird
the holster from hit, he.
behind me towards Corp
Agent Maruschak was rap
him to cover ire while
I handcuffed Wein
back.
Special Agent Maruschak
Corporal Mertens indiort
1 then bearr
in route.
was injured and he rep
this poInt, I ass st od
right side, nLo a irnr
i
give furthet medical
Weinhaus had sutferci
Liter wounds no the
nth
s weapon anc. he
ne shot fine nis stnV
-
0
I then c ntactel
of the others near th
CJl
me that be ws necu
-contactedGorqe Kn
:
-shooting icrdent,:
and
hegan.tu
to
G8ti
dent f ed w tneses at
at
seene
a ni.orn hIm pfthe off 1 ocr invcdved
ime later, emerqetncy medical peronnei
inhaun for bib injuries.
Weinhaus wan
ambuanee for further tnedical care
conLnu1ng by the Minsour.i SLatc Hiqhwav
-so1gaLive unit, due to the Troop
,nvlved dhdbtircg incident
H. J. Folson, SergeEo
D/DCC, Troop I Unit
Troop T F
cc GHQ
Franklin County PA
Bureau at irivestiqt
HJF: Dim
Tr.ap I Unit
D/DCC, Froop C Unt
Count y Snerift s flepart:mer
t
1
Federal
PDe
QRQL2.
LPOR?ING OPFICE
UPPENCiX2E
12 21 U1
SNRGEAN P
OFF1CEi
Nv
FPAN
TI
QEIE STATUS
09/12,2012
0991
09ll. 2O:
iNvE5r:AT
tANh
FOLS0?
SEHGAN1
H
STATE HWY
WQ
OOTiNG
PATROL
RespectfuI1
itted,
CERTWICATE OF SERVICE
Signature above certi I
Church
St., Room 204,
15 S.
Jeffrey R. Weinhaus,
Defendant
L ED
MA!? 19 3
)
)
vs
COUNTF
)
)
)
)
)
coUrt
rule
and statute controlling joinder, and due to the substantial prejudice Defimdant would suffer if the
charges remain joined. fhe Defendant suggests, and prays this court to group the cases as
follows; the first case being the charge of tampering with judicial officer (RSM0 565.084), the
second case being the two drug charges (RSMo 195.202 and 195.202), and the third being the
charges of attempted assault, armed criminal action, and resisting arrest (RSMo 565.081,
571.015. and 575.150.)
1. The charges were improperly joined. contrary to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 23.05 and
RSMo 545.140.0.
Rule 23.05 states; All offenses that are of the same or similar character or based on tvo or more
acts that are part of the same transaction or on to or more acts or transactions that are connected
or that constitute parts of a common scheme or plan may be charged in the same indictment or
information in separate counts. and RSMo, Section 545140.2 states; Notwithstanding
more
or in/ormation in a separate count/or each otThnse if the ot/enses charged whether telonic.s or
misdemeanors or infractions, or am combination thereof. are o/the ratne or similar character
or are based on the same act or transaction or on two or more acts or (runsuctions connected
the Southern District in State v Smith, (Mo. App. 2() 12) stated;
by dependence or relation,
or by order in a series and joined or linked together tin] a series, having the parts or
elements logically related[.j State v. McKinney, 314 S.W.3d at 341-42 (citing dictionary
definitions); see also State v. McDonald, 321 S.W.3d 313, 318-19 (Mo.App. 2010)
(connected includes things that are joined or linked together in a series or that have
logically related parts or elements). A common scheme or plan requires that the
offenses be the product of a single or continuing motive.
In State v McKinney (Mo. App. 2009) the Court reminded us [W}e explained the interplay
between evidentiary considerations and the joinder rule in State v. Buford, 82 SW.2d 298 (Mo App.
Wi). 1979)
lu be properly joined, the offenses must be part of the same transaction or part of a
common scheme or plan, because to join offenses otherwise would expose the defendant
to prejudice by allowing proof of the commission of unrelated crimes. lhus. to avoid the
emasculation of the evidentiar rule, the joinder rule must be construed so thu/joinder i
be
permitted only when proof or evidence of the commission of one crime must
necessary to the proof of the commission of the other crime. lemphasis added)
transaction. lhev
The charges, arc not all the same or similar, nor are they all part of the same
the
prays this court take judicial notice of the statutory provision and court rule and sever
charges.
the
2. Pursuant to Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.07. the l)efendant moves this court to sever
charges into separate cases. Even if this court considers that the cases were properly joined
(thereby denying the first part of this motion), if tried together, the T)efendant would suffer
substantial prejudice as a result. RSMo 545,885.2 states that substantial prejudice shall mean
real and
a bias or discrimination against the defrndanr or the state which is actually existing or
not one which is merely imaginary, illusionary or nominal. lhe Defendant asserts that joining
the charges of attempted assault on a law enforcement officer (RSM0 565.08 1), and armed
criminal action (RSMo 571.015) (which are alleged to have taken place on 9/112012 at one
location) with the Tampering with judicial officer (RSMo 565.084) (which allegedly took place
on 8/16/2012 at a separate, and an unrelated location) would create a substantial prejudice. in
own
particular, a failure to sever these cases would limit the defendants ability to testify in his
defense on some charges, vhile reserving his right to not testif\ in others. In addition, the jury
would surely be unduly influenced by being exposed to separate, arid completely unrelated.
charges. Further, as this court should recognize. and in the current political climate, the
the
introduction of the alleged use of a firearm by the defendant is hound to severel afict
of
mindset ofjury members improperly influencing them to convict out of fear, and its effect
movine the bar as to what constitutes reasonable doubt
The Defendant understands that some courts ould assert a requirement, that in order to
particularize how the Defendant would be substantially prejudiced, that he should identiri what
testimony ould prejudice him, and how that would influence effect the other charges. lhe
Defendant finds that to he a bar set too high to reach without the court also violating the
Defendants Fifth Amendment right to not be compelled in any criminal case to be a vitness
against himself.
WHEREFORE, Defendant moves this court to sever the charges in accordance with the
above prayed grouping, or as the court would find to be in accordance with State Law and Court
Rule. so as to not prejudice the Defendant.
espectlihi tted,
1
FILED
SEP 042013
IN I III CIRCLI F (O[R I FOR FRAKIPc C0
2Uth H 1)1(1 \I C1RC II
I \I 1 0! \IISSO[R1
IA
D.C
STAlE OF \I1SSOI RI
(ase \o
v,
2 \13-(R
4O)-a
1)eldridani
1:FED\TS N1O[JOI IN
(C) cause
moves the court to piohibit the State lrorn either mentioning or referring to the loIloing items in
voir dire, opening siatenienl examination of tflesses, presentation o c idenee. or closing
argument. or at am other time in the presence ol the jury:
1.
The particulars of Defendants I3ulletinman statements and publications, other than the
Youtuhe iJeo ol August 17. 20121. and subsequent
it;
alue.
stawmeitI ..uuid be prejudicial to the DeRindant and hia\ e little to no prohati\ e
Ih
Utci ti
as
has
There are o deos f Aunust 1 7 one ith captions. the other ithout, l)eidndant
ssitliotit captions. sineL Judge
aireath mmcd to cisnuss the tampering charge based oi th ideo
Parkers name i not mentioned in the speech. and thus the State cannot bring a prosecution
based on an aliec orea to Judge l>arker
(bew
.
a general dis dc ot the content and tone of his contro erlial and extreme speech (Ibis
3/ ib erruled
Grante1
2
ants
Defendants target shooting at his home .1 he State plans to call a uutness, Defend
neighkn Jan s Iloflinan. to testtl5 a to l)efendant and his ex-%ife alleged practice of
targcz ili0t1
ed that
b I liphv a Patrol trooper Sgt. lolsom. (iii en that the I Iighviay Patrol admitt
Detenuant e line to the gas station on September 11 tin the ruse that his computers went
being returned to 1)ctndant. such eidenee is prejudicial to Defendant. stiggesis a bad
.
intent. pmpensit> intl or state of mind. all with no substantise corroborating tt idence
34
and thus its ineiudieial effect outweighs its small ptobative salue. State v. Barriner,
Mu.banc, 2000) jeiting State it Bernard, 849 S.W.2d 10. 13 (Mo bane
S3% .3d 139 1
19)
an
shoss zag the propensit, of the defendant to commit such crimes.). I bus James I Ioflm
Granted
3.
Judge Kelt2 Parkers reaction to the shooting. Judge Parkers reaction to Defendants
and the
speech is in:le ant and subjeeti e under an ubjectis e lint Amendment anal> sit.
case lass br:eled in 1)efendants motion to dismi.s the tampering with udieial officer
charge 1 acu
too mud
piobatr i.
in
ii.
lit and impoitance by a jufl. and thus its prejudicial elfect tar outweighs its
iii..
Oserruled
5k r
1/
spcfc4i.
or
nn I )elWidant anticipates that the State wifl seek to paint him as an attempted
1
courtm
.
necessary for a fair trial and impacting the harshness of the sentence imposed State V.
Jolunon, St 2448 iJul. 16. 2013 i tl3reckenridge. 1, dissent at 0-121 wuing Hard r.
State, I0 5 Id 3 il Ia. 1)ist. Ct. %pp. 2012): Skootes
it
Ct. App. 2009) (see also Id., fn. 4.). If the officers appear at trial in uniform, and
particularly ssith sscapons. then the jurors sill then conclude that the officers are more
tnistsonhy than Defendant. Law enlbrcement officers should thereibre be prohibited
from appeanng in court either in uniform or with weapons. Further. an) law enforcement
witnessc endorsed b the State should be excluded from the courtroom until th* arc
called br testimony.
(herruled
Granted
5.
Am
pno
c.riniinal eons talons. I)efendant has certain misdemeanor cons ictions. 2003
for harassment; 2006 11w trespassing: and a 2007 Suspended Fxecution of Sentence (SES)
for assaulting a police officer. .1 hat es idence is more prejudicial than probative of
I)clcndant intent here. if used improperly See
638 .Mv.
iP). State it
ci fli ral&
.Id
should c .%a:: fesidence of other cninc% due it die highly prejudicial charatter of such
eiiicnce a. State
it
deendant s propensity to commit a gnen crime is not a pioper purpose for admitting
I
evidence, because such esidence mas encourace the jur to cotnict the delendant
bec,u a a
guilt\
bets
actuai!
Granted
6.
\oir dire pronihition.. \t the oir dire stage, the State cannot discuss the Detendants
prior ut Ltnses, or his potential punishiflent II cons icted.
(jrantci
7.
Us erruled
i/
k ndiseloscd
that hine not been disclosed to Defendant. The (ourt may revisit this issue onls if the
State seeks to bring evidence in rebuttal to Defendants case.
8.
o erruled
j_/
Granted
Other civil aLtions ins ols ing Defendant. Any and all other civil actions ins ols ing
DeDidai ,4re irrejevant. particularly the details ci his tso divorces, as sell as an
ongoing
issLieS
in
dispute is zero and their prejudicial effect ould be immense. l)cfendant concedes that
he and ih N ate may note that he is dis creed.
nied
Granted
9.
Defendant resers es the right to mox e further in lirnine based on the States proposed
CViucnce a.
V Ill RI I (R1 I )clendant grass this Court S S I \IN his motion in Imne motion to
ecIude. and ha
so.
Respecttui\ Nuh:j:neLL
Attorney
r )el
dani
Hugh A. F asxo&)d, \1 1
7777 l3onhnu \ mue. Su te 1 (O
St. Louis, NIisotri u3 1 O5 I )4 I
Jia ti .eom
heastood L: eit
(311)
Fax
(314 2 3H
[ci
(314) O
Cell
So Ordered.
/
\1uirIand. (cuit Judge
Date
Cl R I IIICATI OF SFRVICI
2() 13 )he ser ed this document on:
The undersned eertifle that on
Robert F. Parks II
Franklin (ount Pt osecuting \tterne
15 S. Church St.. Room 21)4
/ o3
:r
The methoj(s o er
ict/h\
1
p
ill- (1R(
ST1I ui \11S
)I< r \Ki1N (
(1k1 if
I \1N( )I fi
6
A(J
H RI,
2109 th
(
i
5
c\o. 12\l
JEFf RI V R. V. li \i S.
I )Jd
ml.
1)II i1)\TS VI
DV ANI
(owes
Defendant id
of the Miss un (
\nnoun
c::ihaus. h\ cc ci Huch
to
ne
,N
ihit I fendan
18(a)
AL
md
s{eei\ trial.
3.
4.
lurtii.r.
re arc numerou
it) Ifliit.
ne event
deIiv
\ Hi <r
I )ef.oidan;
Start t i. /
2
J
d
11
3
a
5
d 2
Id. at 29 z
he event
n qUeStwn
c or die and
reirnpt]xe
[CJ ti
to v.
I fin. 64
prejudicin
eII.
1 SI 6, 814 (Mo I
ice of uiiresok ed
s be ucas
I v. 2 1
for trial
i
I hereh
and cinI ;
ar true ..rie
rue
/
JeftreyR \
teat Ihe
a, :erea :
.11
r-,Jt-
ii
State of Mr
Subscribe
-H
:hJ
1
H
ELSTAN FASTW000
PubIc Notary Seat
ote of Mtsoun
fled for St. Lows County
sion Expires Oei 22. 2014
MSSiON #101272g8
/1
(
Notaryfu
Respecti ,ill sat
ai
1
Attoni
Hu
77
L
7
ii!
St. iru
uteT
-.
1041
-a
heast\\ s
-JClla.
ticOin
Fa\
Tel
Cell
The undr igneL
Irk
Rob rut I
Frar I r r
15Ct
Union, \l
-1
1- 01 SIR
,UlC(s
erved
ument on.
4%
%%
IW\L
I.
-C,
CR0. I ) I
U cser
t.J gates as
offenses:
Intruductibn
improper joinder, and Ihilure to sever charges. ins olw a tsso-s ep anal sis. State s. Lore,
293 S.%S.. d 471,475 (Mo.App. 1LD.2009). First, the court determines whether jGinder of the
charges is proper as a mater of law. It lfjc inder is not proper. then r rejtidice is p1
I.
:ouits
discretion
.1. in
..niet.
and
% .:rae.ce
It
ibree distinct, unrelated events fail nexus requirement for Rule 23.05 joinder
1)etendant has been charged with serious felon) offenses occurring weeks apart, without
an
neXus as .equseJ
ii>
or a ,.aaIl :n.U..c
ni)UIJ
.uh-ta..a.i
to Deler.dant c due proees right to a lair trial to submit all the charie to a sin
Ic
.:.
,aa;
jun :n a sini.le
proceeding
Partiewarly:
(gO
i ii
oiiputer
I he August 16
1 )elcndant
(ii
outube charge)
3a (irams Marijuana
. ar a
7,
2j Possessh
Of
P 10
ifust I
Patrol elm a
I a
tiiac at his
at porch.
tnins
Felons
1st 1)egr
1St I)egr
felony A RSMo
Ic a den
}.
65 081
}. (4) Armed
(3) \ssajli
Criminal Action
1nter0rin \
xo )r
d u
where tIne
0.
1o: 6hS I
or
Prsrirnl, I 1w
tamp!
Arrest I
I loas
Iclorm
or
I charges>
Dis ussion
)ased
Felons \ I
tics
110, (orr Off Emrgncy Prsnnl, Fiwy Vvkr, Ltility \k rkr,Chle Wrkr Ut P&P
Assault
()tlr
tame
manner in
are of
or
arc
are part
Rule
of a eurrinion scheme
3!
aes
mat
plan
In the n a as
Lidl
economy, \lrssoum
Dizer, 1 1 S\ 3d 1 6. 161 (MoApp. 1D.2OO3). In applying the rule and the statutes
requirement of connectedness, courts use the ordinars dictionar\ definition. State
,
Ldness re an
a ioiealls re at
it
fact
puhi i
ublie statan,e,
a cial eorrtptlo
the
I he
drug charges are hasc on a s isit and subsequent search ssarraril ser ed b Missouri I hghsay
Patrol troopers to the l)efendants home. I he arrestrelated charges are based on tIre shooting of
Defendant incident to his arrest nearly a month later s here, by the trot pars ossmi adni
lured
Defendant
simm.
thes
is computr egmapnent
to him.
I here are no similar circumstances ere: there is no same transaction here:
there t\s
r more
a ts
or transactions
that
are connected or
ight of
rreles art
t t
pm
I heretore,
Lidh c to
Defendant. It ss oula
for
constitate
eomm
1< i s
.t3 jOl
[c ar
that
part of a m
nor
are
mrnor
stigat 111
1
0 surs is
pa
I cu arts
have thrcc separate discrete, unrelated incidents suhnntted to one furs ni one proceeding
Due pr )ceSs f lass requires that the defendant s riuht to a fair inal must he gisen priorits
user
constietations
eons enienee
(us en that there are eight of lenses. occurring ser hrec days eparated in time hs nearls
a month. a
political .q- cech, to his August 1 7 alleged possession of drugs, to the September 11 shooting of
Defendant h\ the troopers at a gas station a month later
the esddcnce and apply the law to each separate offense State
is lii,mon,
(Me.App. DI) 1 992). 1 his is particularly true hccaus the iame troopers sscre ins ols ed in each
incident, hut the underlying ihcts are unrelated and distinct. Further, the offenses ins olse
dissimilar
ictims. dissimilar tactics, and dissimilar locations (as to the August and September
incidents), and sscrc not proximate in time, Ihat too, counsels this Court to seser the offenses,
State v, French, 308 SW 3d 266, 271 (Mo. App., 2010).
lhe State has pres iously suggested that McI)onald, 321 S2s\ lu at 318 is apposite
,
because of ifs facts. It is not. In McDonald, the charges ssere linked h the Defendants fourday crime spree in which he stole credit cards, a san, and then assaulted the arresting officer ssho
was attempting to apprehend him. Ihose facts are readils distinguishable from the ficts ahos
I ehindant made a m outuhe s ideo on \ ignst 6 cud broadens
I hat scas sc am
ilL
It n
the posssston of ma ij uana and a morphine a let for s hich a search \s arrant ssas issued after
Sgt Iolsom smelled the pot on August 17 And both Lsents sserc ry separate and did not
directly connect an time to Defendants arrest on September II under ii e ruse of a etna nirru his
tee,
hetsseea
the
or
aes
I.
Ihe faet ter. are also distinguishable from tat ases cited l, McDonald. e g Morrow, 968
S. 2d at bC, (murder. robbery, stealing a ear, and stealing a purse all sufficiently connected
1w
joinder it .slchols, 200 S.Sk .3d at 119-20 (cortinuous chain of acth ir burglaries leadin2 Li sale
of contraband and .lrugs. directly leading to I )eln&it\ amsu: lkehhald, aS S
.:t 59. 95
iattempung to manufacture met and tamperi:g t ith niotr ehieIe Inked since ear ir mcpone
the item.. :o th, nwtt. cooking site)
II.
In the afternathe. if joinder is proper, the Court can and should sever fur a
raw trial
ant
charges are se ered. or at least the August antI Septemoer charges are secred. The se erance if
criminal offenses is governed by RSMo. 545.885 and Rule 24.07.
1 he threat of substantial prejudice i. real. l)elcndant faces being put on trial .ni all eiizht
oadcast in the \outub
1
charges preju.awo by the shadow of his extieme political Jews as b
ideo. which otac or many jurors may find repugnant or reprehensible I urther. Delendant
intends to introduce evidence at trial of his other Voutube and paper Bulletinman publications
to further place his Youtube tape of August 16 in context of his other public statements and lack
of violent histurs: 1)elndanfs pnor speech :s almr. . :rcial in natr: .and contain staten:Ci.t
against
ptt
cow iption and immoralits by trsJul)s rang nit front Jess Li ass enforcement K
i)etcndant s \lotion to l)ismiss the charge )f I amering with Judicial Officer based on Defe
in the Initutiot of the Prosecution will briet the issue of how Defendants do not constitute a
true threat under the Fight C ircuit factors set iirth m Lnited States 3. Dinwlddle, 61 ,d 913
(8th (ir 1096) Further. First Amend speed on matters of public corruption is to be esalu sled
for its public concern. which includes the factors of content. fonn .aid ontext. Dun t.
Bradsireet, tnt r. Greennuns Builders, lnt. l2 L S. 49. 761.
huec
c cli
iii
euiitet
ill
cicp
ilk
more
WI lb Rli (WI Defendant Jeffre R. \k enhaus moes this Court to SCSI Al\ his second
motion to sescr oftenses, and for such other relief as mas he just, meet uid reasonable.
Respectiully submitted.
\ttorne tar I )eteadait
I he meihod
l\ II h (IR
FILED
1 l\
RI I OR I RA\k
)l( \1 C IRCI II
C) \IISSOCRl
AUG 6 2013
C ase
JEIERIY R. AIYsII\i S
i)eiei:,. ii
DtFE%I
tomes nr
STS ME
(0
1) Mo [ION To SI
OFFENSES
I)elend rot Jc
en
os
v amended
under. good
i)efrndani
The sub.claiae
niollu,
01
1,
nu11on /0
is 11;
JCtiOll
Improper
under. ,d fin
Ci
iges. jnvol e
Stow
I.ove,
ii
ci
ii
proper, severance is
I.
discretion
am
us requirement
as been :lar
clm1\ ci lenseS
eriiu mcii
rvieeted;ie*.
t.
nexus a tequired
the various
to Defendant s di
proceeding.
ss right
1.
Oi
It sas oul I
I i
3.05 jowder
eeLs 11me.
ehenit.
in
ithout
plan
lar lar
..aagt:wt
lkfnar
h JJicia
1 Oflice I
RSMo: 55.084.
inn Defendants
I es .ioii O:Tontr..l
Fxe:pt 35
6.2012vo
1
lola ug ,t
l;e
c.n:puter.
2.
lk:endan.
A$tUL
: cnarge.l
%(fl!%lafl
(iram.Oi
:N
LSMo: 1 5.21)2 :.
ha
Mj: 195.202
smelled n ri,uana on Dc
.LL
3.
R.
ula.
lisO. Vt
\rr. at ( r
.issault
Oiler
1.
it
trial Ac
ion
I nc.ass:1
hi
t RSMo. 571.
I) ssto:
I
t
D
efent:..,
Mercy 1 lospil d
Ilighisa. P.t:a
iii
..i
)5
uhscquent search
ehaargeC)
..2012 conduct as
:ait7Aftempt Assault
hr. L hIlt
3 Wrkr.( ul
OrP&PC,tTcr- 1st
,,:
\ssauhiAttcmpt
c Wrkr Or P&P
h :J4)AnnedC:
ction
isting Intertriria
geii
Oltliirgucs
lkgr Fe ny A RSMo.
Jr
the
cnargcd is its
LicrnJaw
Ripur
in
ossessior Oft p To
2)
felony
ion
i
r 1c1u i
St. I nuis (out
o, :
in
alt i i length
hooting 540111k!
nder
based on
jS
tv o or i
here th
ore per
e.
ore comiected a
us,
in
vhich the en
ol the same or
th same transactio
tO d constitute parts
im tetment or infor
ft
In the interest
Dizer. 11
(,)
of
of onnectedness, e
Bechhold, a,- S.
3d 501, 594-9
nked together
v. McDoi aId, 3.
d 3 13, 3
Defendant in a
i.
or based on two or
nore acts or transact
eherne or plan nua\
te counts.
Is favor liberal
state
joid
In applying the ru
he statutes
Iinar, dictionar d.
in. State v.
uwbe chu
ri
equires things
Rule 23tu
related charges
a scheme or phm.
ttitted:
11 6 1 6 1 (Mo.
S.
requirement
a character, are
or are part ol a e
I at 475
or elements. Stale
.2010).
as to the character, eo. a
etedncss.
drug.
or common
and
arrest
totemeuuts b the
politically extreuui
corruption. 1 he
.lissuuri I lughas
Deti,tndunt ineid
i to hts
atternpft
wise pretexi
on
the shooting of
eapers ori
ore returning his
U.
there t
or uno
tiuts or transact
ill
wi
scheme r plan
s i)et ndant. (1
troopeo irrLlI
II :icfrc,
c to Defendant
ibstaritially prejudic
Defendant to
ide, unre
roceeding.
require
l)ue p a
iss
over considerati
17).
;n th ti
emence. State
Ihe
or e np.e, is not a Ic
c are eight
omplcxit
political speech.
111
ugust 17
ion hs the
e\pense, ci
01
758 (Mo. \p I
witriessa
part of a common
be given priority
i.
the annenience
sc, particularly in
rosecution
1
i las or ofjoinder
flit
in lime by nearly
rar.eing from Dc
August 16 public
a of drugs. to the S
nably distinguish
later
duse the
involved in each
(Mo.Apg
.1)1
2j ibis is part
1 ing Iicts
di s nilar tarn
incidents), and
C nOL
proximal
)O,
State v. Trench,
18 SW 3d 266,
bccausL
S at
day ciii
was atten
its
lu
es involve
ions (as to th
arid September
counsels this (
cr the of hianses.
it
otiald, 32 1 S
\lv
were linked
In
si 1
end bin
troop
t)l0)
sauslvs
i
came
distinct. Further,
dissimtla s ctir
ajurv could
11 shooting of
ren ssaul
It distinguish
s apposite
endants four
sting officer who
the facts abose.
!ki:rjas
the pLs%%% or
mai, a 05:Jh
14: ...Ifla
..:
and u
nandbroadcasi
as separate from
shich a search
:ls
h ptton4
ii
c%.3nt5Wcreer
to the dttl.
i:
dant on Septem.
a the ruse of
direetl) cm n:ct
mat,
spree. nor In
...:
ci,
hcrc
Ut Jst
..
connected ioi
iot
,Ier ; Nichols,
raaud and
leading to sate ci
on
Si .3d at 94-
Luaupting
to r
1k Li lids
in:
rig to Defendant
Bechhold, 65
.,netoartcanands.
intends
..
1
tofiirthcr
,.re
.1
.ii
uhstantial preju
: three sets of
titial
i a
rietaf
aai.c
._I.
a. I t:
I
eaLt.
(he severance of
24.01.
Ik41I)t
iq.. at U
ii
... jurjv
ver
kibepmper,thc(
ehicle linked
.rh
video. 1
SI.:).
1)11)
,.
burglaries
charjus.n.
U Stc
lrl)onuid. e.g..
1 kontinuouscl.
1.
beticen
.1 t
I.icennn
issued aikr
laces ne
%C% n
the V.wtube
r:jirehens:t
r. l)c&ndant
ndpapcr
i& publications
of vio1eit htstors
l)efendants f
ntro m
and imri
iLm
against publiL e
uptiun
British Clii,
1 their Ro
ens
protected pilitic.
spee
in cont
Cl
ial in naturL
ig
ninin
from Jc\
he aced to place
statenents
i1orcunert
1ts
to
extremist hut
l)ef.ndant
C\Cfl
more
motion
to
I iLRI.
)Rl 1)cti.iiidan
C it.luS mii
sc cr
as iii
t\
cs this Cu
he just.
mccl
i
1
Jar
Hugh A. L,am
7777 Bonlsrnm \ enie. Suite I
J)-I14 I
St. I ,oui
x)11u\
stl.eon
(I
heastwo d. eas
lax
7
e)
(14) 7T ,
Tel.
Cell
31$)8U 234
.
(
The undersigned rti ties that on
Robcrtl L k
Franklin (OulflV roseetiting Alt
ii
00 C
15 S. (lurch St
1ruon. Sit) Ha(S
lhe nice
h\
11 01 SFRVICE
2i13 (s)he served this doe
Hail
14C
in the In
threat is
m f i
1
Cm i 9
its puhhe
Inc. v. (,ree,z,n
)secut
Ice
ml Amend
melui
hui/Itr,. I,ic.
Ith
cuit
t
thJu
is te I hoss Defendan
I ni/ed States v. Din
cal ters ol public corrur
ii onient, Ib rn and coi
tH
based on I)etect
ot constilute a true
I 3d 913 (8th
I e evaluated for
I tin & Rradstreet,
FI LED
AUG 6 2013
BYDC
00-0
I
Case No. I 2AB-CR023
JEFFRL R \VLINIIAI. S
Defendant.
DEFENDANiS MOlION TO I)ISMISS [IlK (IIAR(E OF lAMlFRlNC 41111
JUDICIAL. OFFICER FOR DFFE(T 1 TIlE INSTI1l TIO\ OF 111K PROSECL TION
Comes no l)efendam Jeflrc R.
Vi
his Rule 24.04(h) motion to dtsmiss the charge o famperrng With Judicial Otlicer, Felony C
RSMo. 505 .084. for defect in the mstitutio.i oh the prosecution:
1.
I)etCndant hereh moes to disniis that charge on the basis that as a matter of law his
speech is protected b the First Amendment and does not rise to the le\el of a reasonable
thre:a to ati J udicial 0 icer. and urns
parlicularis as
it
Ju12..
3.
l)e!caaiit
niiuire
iiSO
..au
hu as
II.
Facts
4.
to
statements
a true nra:
\t\jfu&Index 7.
5.
( I here is .iIS
Li
secoaJ
Ldeu
ibit UoeS
that both xerc rex iex\ed hx the State and both were reviewed hx the arresting troopers
xx hoa. proha Ic cause statements tormed the basis of Dehendants arrest warrant. Since
the second x deo, lacking captions. does not mention Judge Keils Parker, any prosecution
based on the second x ideo tails as a matter of law since there is no cx idence to support a
lindiiig ol probable
6.
1 he
xx
CjUSC,
7.
1 he idco threatens tout the People will fire various Missouri olheials including the
o.rl \Jniuusr ibm,
s 0)0
At I
Rex
aLtil0Ii
I )ce. aim: Oc:Icrmii rctreices corrupt oil ends arid mn right to blast
cieChCo Circuit
it
\ Oil
10.
At 2u4 1w
.tdtCs
POt nflt it
11
tenetalls se h.n: the right to rernoe you use of tbice. Jon. sCre
oLd
and kill
;tn.
12.
A ta: caption appears at 8:4u that cites Mo. Coma. see. tparticularly as to the right of
the pct.ple
mas dccii
13
tt
it
alter and aholisl their Constitution and form ofgtnemmem whenever the>
necessary
I)eleniant then states at 8:50-9:10 that elected officials who resist will be arrested. tried
by treason by a iury of their peers. and executed for treason and other crimes against the
Anierican people.
14.
15.
16.
Nowhere does l)eflndant himself threaten to arrest. try or execute any person.
17.
ere does l)efendant state the name of Judge Kelly Parker of (ranford
3
Pwticularly. iionl
County.
18.
Jungi..
iai brs
Ikleidant\ statements aboat ace.q ying the court house and putting officials on trial for
treaM.i
10
C )i:wi
..
:cial. an. nancJ besiae Jt.dge Parker in a laundry list, lessening to each of a
ri. b,nLflbl: p Aer and a reast.nahle listener that Judge Parker is being singled out among
tht iilcgedly corrupt oltitials.
3
20
S ( on,t
21
The xideo is part P a recurring series of print publications and broadcasts issued by
Defendant as a citizen ournalist since 1 996. see. eg. I% 1 43 (I3ulletinman print
puhlicatb.
H),
http
23.
The oeral1 thrust and dominant theme of Bulletinman publications and broadcasts are
statements
(oil
particularh that:
a.
Most Nliss un elected officials including elected judges are corrupt and
su
b.
TI e sos ereign People pursuant to the Constitution have a right to fire elected
oilicials, to try them fbr treason according to due process by a jury of their peers,
or P to execute them if found guilty of treason.
reetness or error of the i3ullet nman statements is irreIeant to this anoN sis.
24,
1 he c
25.
The \k ri I Vv ide 4 an s nich anyone may access at anytime ith an internet connection,
is or a F ispi pm4
26
DeIek a
public
27
Li
orurn
III.
The
28.
RS\1
.1i8.. pi..Lht speech that would threaten harm tea judicial officer or his
immeibt
In cont.
29.
Fit ,
fighu.i.
30.
31.
to
Ji4. Parker
of the circumstances,
meiidmt.nt
1st
The Fr. pcech (lausc of the First Amendment Congress shall make no law..
abridgia he
tk%L11 of speech
as
Amen..Tt at can dcieat as a matter of law charges of tampering or harassment that do not
constitute a true threat or t. reasonable apprehension of harm. See. e.g.. State s. Wooden,
No. St
)_
.4o iJan.
.<.
Dclbndaa is a citizen journalist aid blogger with a long history of li. ely and sometimes
offenz.: e .aiucal slatanents against elected officials, but no record ol s iolence.
32.
(First
in ndment
i it of Mo.
lateral onstitution.)
1 sspcetl
Dcletiu
ol h
)n
r atwn
it.
Dun
. .i
7 4
BelIun.,
t5
IsIpe:ci.
,
[11).
vi.
matter of
uF tic concern, as
of public concein
irst
u of Powell.
Thuc I 4724 it
7.
tin the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, mbust.
cominr
ci
wad
bec.aa peech concanmg puolie aflhhs is more than self-expression: it as the essence
at
sci 1-
spe:ct.. a public :.saez. occupies the highest rung of the hierarch> of First Amendment
altn
Althnu... the bowaiacaes of what constitutes speech on matters of public concern are not
weli
the t :.S. Supreme (taut has held that speech is of public concern when it
sC. a Cd.
can he a:tirlt coisa.btd as relating to any matter olpolitical. social, or other concern to
the cona unit>
conc
35.
lo d:ca aliaa: ss I etic: parch is ot public or private concern. this Court naust
indepen. end> exanine the coancnt. form, and context, of the speech as retealed by
the vi 1 record
761.
:.
Snv
36.
a.
::lcr. fpuH
P..
to an a
tt
1-a
I art
interiM
St 01 SJu
I.
Iliad
La
speech.
concern vi heat
it can
supra at
11111.385 U
is
:..
irrdei ant to the question hether it deals nith a matter of public concern.
The en.win of I)etendantts ideo plainly relates to broad issues of interest to society at
largi.. tamer than ma ters of puiely private concern. Dun & Bradsireel, nqra at 759.
38
While h tone of thse messages way tall short of refIned social or political commentary,
the issue inc dee highlights the American economy and unemployment, elected
officia, a..t etc. ted judicial coiruption. abortion- are matters of public import. The video
Judge .wIIy larter s name appears in a pop-up caption at 2:47 in the video, some si,
minute; ieftre the a!:ged trcat made by l)efendant at 8:50-9:10. Even if the video is
flewet. a c. attaning a message related to Judge Kelly Parker specifically. that iould not
changt the fact that the overall thrust and dominant theme of Defendants video spoke to
broade
ablic issues than Judge Parker That is particularly true as other law
enlorcc ment and elected officials are also listed by name in pop-up captions.
40.
(hen I. a l)eIindth is speech was in a public forum on a matter of public concern, that
speech
caiu.n;.
beuroc
,.
iie:ple
wre!y ecaiise it
is
Ia.
it
tinjs
sot
.
1
spa
fl
it
14t
aoCC! 101
.or ewi.
flit:
suby
:n
juror-
a1t.i
it
1 $tc. or .w n. or
Jluws.r, -. I. s..
.
is Tha
iae
..
.aa: Lu
fur
to
sometiiii:s unplcascaf tJexprth.sion. Bose Coip., 466 U. S.. at 510 (quoting New York
Time, ;4
o U. S.. 4.270).
42.
Such
i i i&. is tat:
outrat otis. speech :n order Ii. pro ide adequate breathing space to the freedoms
by the FLu AmendmenC Boos a Barry, 485 U. S. 312. 322 (1988) (some
protu.tc.
hat 04 udant a i. in the holc context of how and where he chose to say it. is
entitk
it)
oerc m
44
pedal
a pate
Iii. p if
ec:h
o I.e. 1
fat
ocuti
pi sit,
rmjnj
inJin
to
if
45.
1 he (.on%titution is not neutral. it was designed to take the gosernment off the backs ot
the jeuple Justice William 0. l)ouglas, The Court Years at 8 198W.
46
Defendant anceces that free speech does not permit lighting words. Chaplins?.; v.
New IIan,pshire, 115 U.S. oc jI942)upholding eons iction for breach of peach where
Appellant strball> attacked a narshal by shouting youre a damned fascist in a public
street)
47
are
Uae Inca t:,at is. spcch Inst would put a reasonable person in apprenhension of
1
allege
.
harm
48.
Under the k
speech does not objectivel) constitute fighting words, nor does it put Judge Parker or
anyone eta: in a rea onable appr:hension ofharm by threatening to interflre with the
IV.
49.
Defendant s speech
exagccrzao
as a r;
In cur tr.ahtaon ci
hypcr. ot.
and
un
cticisn.
ta emi
artieua
L aga
I
...
I) q
%t
with .i nile cope sics superimposed and a list of the congressmen. Ste Jeff
:
nkts.
..n :.
S.
:a i. luif It
t.Cifl 20W
1
to ijk
(324 sahjnspac-lgts
ji.j
cliar3
9.2(h
i.
).tJdn.9.2011,Ut
I..
&L
t.s
wet
ii.
Gd
i.
tu
V.
.:.l.ie
r.
rersuh
b.
Sc ititicil
Aa wrican
lie
%sat3
is.
I
;;.
at n
I
ii
few
lk.brbte
.r
n. ant
cx
si
years
.
iSa,
a dilect
rib
1(1
0l
01
(o.
t.,I,
nhl.c
1
;it:;
51.
:s. naMe
t)flh.fl
actual tlirca
ff5 Li
52.
broadcasts
such a rea.t n is t
l)elendam. speeci
53.
.itthes
Itappears 1
asatniIssi.css. 11
supple.nen
V.
di..th
irue tI.rcka
70
55.
of i)inwidrlie analysis
(1 )b
In eaIuati
factor anal
(8tlLr.
a
ii
lint
tab..
Defendant nateis.
subjeeth i:jeelis
54.
s)
wlictl
set I
,.
ctiii
i:ional.
II
\\ other a e
iher a
pa) erisj1 to
56
Defendant
a.
u. ik.
.a
ti
(8tl
CL
or the
(
ii
casorac
ir. I
Cr
in ic
b.
I he peeJ
1 lie pcec1
tC;
ttte
uc
00
Ci)tre
a a it expresses a determination
id
or
intent to injure
it ic
.J Ri.ai.
a.
iii mi.
c.
d.
cii
e.
arrc
a cnmi
arroimt. S
.1
to
p.
1 he condo. na1it
doleda a
sunmi. e
Judge
fiurI
Park.
but i itei to
etc it
h\ pernolo
In
Cotitesi
purpusel.
ci i
ci Ti
allowable
58
:o
\as ot Ic we d a
57.
ide i c
i:o.a
aflL
1)L
e.
ae
urn, at 30:21-22.
ci
peo
It is
daI Del nc
a .e a
..
c i
0tCii1i ti
0;,
01
.llts intention
was
not to intimidate
at
dc
an
or
for
frighten
purposes of rhetorical
or
ittici id
o\\ 11
e.
(nit ii
reasonable
GI
ieand
cienJ.u
I ret a
reasoniw
inlendLd h
taut
iC
ords r
Nt OL
6)
this
mod
at
I(Ls(lfgaIl,
i I
62 (Orb
0th, Mere te
Court
Circuits
Ct)flc
States r. B z
(,i
ouget
)t
t
i.
instil Ilcieni.
VI.
The Iightn
ircuut plirs
evahiated
60.
r tilts as to
h ihei
sub
c
ctis oh
jectiveh or 3
v,
fl/i Ic, (7
d 1 8,
v.
bcios
61.
62.
tat
ti
recipient cat he on
01 a n
Del endai,t
speed
sas in
to lade K
s P K
In k I J
re ct a
P, ik
t
1 eLli
s
Ictu iIl
tl,t.
JiI,II,, 2.
d %I 8
ft
I gih C
,c
ad
t
i
t
t.
my as to an objectis e es aluation
i ion
( a
not
testify
a I
50 ie hi
i.
-+
legally or
I he admssion ot vcipient
reaction
testiinons
oe
iejud.
juries
is
ocea is
Os
ii
er tneir
i
apact
Ic
Iru
I hn a
Spetch a,
1 be ( our
anaisses
si
64.
rs n
te
Jennifer
E. Rothrnan, Freedom of
als find l)etenda a s pr. cli is not a true threat under other circuits
appeliate r iges a
tests lot
ii in
in
ompam the Secoad ( ircua s recent analysis of true threats against federal
1)etendan
ha
s n ins met Ii cditiori, m o hers of the jur are likely to he sss a ed hs the
emotional
63.
Ir i
il
sper .
cat
dde a usda
threr
tin
t[ n the
onstau in or die
11 s iudge
dmdn
the in
in Chicago
d
11 a udg s had not laced RI \l free men willing to walk up to them and kill
th
for
air del a
1 de ulir
a a I a
a
I
LL
tic
s
IL
ice
mid
nsc
I
ci
di
hence
o sleazy and cunning as to desers e the
65
l umer aIM
vell
postu.
It
as a iii L[) to
or
photog tlis.
C
courti
OUSL
for
each judge. as
Turner had
histo: of links
World (ss.:nd at ne
to
ioe:a aoups
noun
\va :n
thre t to dis
to ecirinilt
0.
Ia ements
a,
Wei
nio
six
\\ enoharis
c.
d.
nm
onhaus did non exhort oihersio kill Judge Parker with any partieularit.
\k LrIhalls
iC\
er p sled maps
usiniess
coot house
c.
is fliil\ ci
Ifl\ at a aourthouc
n1or
-.
1 olsom
cii
ld
ar s u
thr
I )rL a
e irihi
to a
lc.1s
.
might oceups
tIer )ccupen.on itself ran be p re I nil). bce, e g., Lx.3 (Depo. of Folsom)
4-
69.
Th. I unit
Ut)
70
A .pht S
d Cu ait pane.
the tollo
iactc
Iii
b.
cons i*..
Oil
On appedL bdsed on
lj idpem(hicago.
I u i ers pust itatcmaits calhn for the death of a federal judge. and apprin ingl>
C.
tic ta g
d.
Pt .11!
Ihe Fun.
is
iintraetion and
..
r,.
a.
ft.
71.
ii flrir.d
to placs..
h t subsequnt tic
r tide:.
h t Luapl.s. sort ad lie ses and maps for the threatened judges
Jso found that intimidation can constitute athie threat when the intent
t.ourt
...
&s. in
proscribint
iois
VII.
Defendan
72.
The I S.
remei. oun has long dis.n sished incitement from the mere advocacy 01
i.
II
aw
ti
ii p it the kit
i. 1 irs
attn
r cndment protected.
\ to look whether the statement is directed to
: ollns .lnbun.
16
Its
74
lndtemei
ifacne
126o5t:.t
75
at
w.
is
that
ii
76.
treak.
n:I
. i:,mun ca ion. 4
1
politii.a
to
i9s3i
r.
iainn
txion tt.
planning L
VIII. Defendant
dssassu.ate
t itr
ass.,
7$
.au ,c5.09O. I
:1
I.
i.
i.
he wih a
awed oil sh it
1 un
t ne
lt;iIhlNt
C t. )fl. .ii
RSsk
c i
tith a
is disiiz:
SC92846Jan 8. 2013)
alicial liarassnient wider
.utIl the same. RSMo.
S
565 090.lclfl and 565.090 1(5) require a showing that the tl rats put the victim in
brca,onak e apprelenion
Lhcjudiciaa tampenng
different. baLi are essentially an objectite reasonable person standard as to the imminent
harm or It. ianent effect ii the $pcc:h
79
In
into
contained words that. taken together. thmugh their wry utterance inflict injury or tend to
incite an tn nediate breach of the peace and are not prutecttd by the First Amendment
or the Missisuri Constitutior.. Id. at o. quol;ng Chaplinsky, spra. 3(5 tI.S. at 571-fl.
80.
1)cfeniam. speech here is lactuall ekiinguishahle from tbt of Wooden in at least flue
respects:
a.
ii
!.
irnt.
IS
f
Is
c.
to make a me
!l;: r
:t
ot c.
d.
t,rce.
Prc dent Kennedy, C ongresstsoman Chibrielle (Jiffords. and U.S. District Court
Ju i
x deWs tone tas maniacal ted menacing lk&ndanCs tone is hyperbolic, but
e.
no n.t.nacinp
f.
IX.
A o en had a histon
The C
of serious
in take judicial notice that Google has not rcm. ed the ipeech from Its
outs
Ib
rerms of
Servicen
Defendax.t\ speech .sas broadcast from the Youtube website. osned by Cooglc
1ncorporwt.
82.
on
aan. .*e bt
11
http: wv. gtuDe.omucer nuiletin
.
83.
jts
avwt..ni
84
I he I
a.
i:;
: :ike predm
:
, .o
prs sr..
:.
na :
.:: ala.
..
r. eaimp ,.t a
19
85
anned from
a.
tt.nal that is contrun to the You tube Community Guidelines, currently found
ia
86.
% hilts
14
IsatiOn%.
niernat ma ia
and
ackntns
discusscu
s that the fedend appellate circuits are split on this lcgsl standard (as
Iove)
and therefore ifthis Court adopts a partially subjecti.c. tan lard, the
u.zgccs
that Google
and Youtute to not find Defendants pcech to hate violated their C ommunity
Guidelin.a and lerms of Sen ice.
1W
tLtlon
I. Consutu
chaq..c of Iampenng
true thteat.
it
men no
i men
i ac
1th
I \I% his
Respectfully uniicd,
Attorne for I)LnJu1t
H
.
1
MBL r)2058
7777 Bonl mn:. A cnue. Suite I
St. Louis. Miss.ri n3 105-1 )4 I
heastwood a ea\vJla\stI.om
(34)
Fax
ic!.
(314)2
Cell
431-F su 2
(1k 1 lFl( \ I F OF SERVICE
The undcrsigu: rt:iies that on April 6. 20 3 (s)he sered this document on:
Robert 1:. ParKs. 1
Franklin Coum r ecutinc Altoniev
15 S. Church SL. Raorn 204
Mo 630 I
The meth:
k.
hand.
FILED
AUG
62013
;L I.
JEFFREY P
1)ei, e
AFFII)
11 OF Jt DY Kl{OPF
nani
l)eierd u,:
Attacue
lor the ast In or so ears, Hulletirunan was produced in print format and distributed at
various
Bourbon I
vii:
has U
6
De1i d
hu
01
5.
Further
heei: eretteo.
ns lri:cr husband
DEFENDAN I S
[.xhibit
I-A
.i iuiirm that I ha. e rea1 aud niderstuod this documcut. I decLare under oath
I hereby verd
o perjur that to the hest ol ns knos ledge all the statements in this document
and under pci a
are true and erict.
ddy Kropl
State of Mis .w
Counts ofS I
Subscribed ad
I
Notary PuL
heidre nie tn s
/
BulletinmanCom
314-800-3652
na
ducet
pure
tual
rnen
]kpage
i)I11\1)A1 S
1.xhihtt
1-11
a:
ccc
\ieajwlale back at the Ranch. in ieflcrsori C.ounts still Judge Ilouchard sits oct the bench
,uid larniny Herf is raking 0 in. ilase you seen the drug court contract? Iii your face cvi
Main and Boyd
ucnee toat the (ourt is a flaud upon not only it self hut every tiC who it comes in contact
DoSoto
with. Our goserument is so screwed up. the Land records are now ruined since the Recorders
Sit Down or Carry I..
ot Deeds has accepted the MER filings. Do you really beliese that the ote count is honest?
Fresh sliced deli meat. ta, te a
it hey are .sting o ith ansthiric but paper ballots hand counteti it cart be rigged, in this da
an
junk here Fieh ba,ed
.irid me even without a vitsilant oi:ntv clerk. Assessor, personal property urx l.and tax
sandwiches sou[s lot c.l
El. w about a sales tax to i use the i ads and put out fires like the Constitution calls br, With
specials call 636 8ca i it 53lt tax out scrnrnent truth fitnution in the capacity it was created for. Po protect
Mon-Fo 7 to 7
Chuck about his lot
ma:,iean our Cod giS en cii uts Keep pra ing. Have nut heard
aa,l
Sat 7-2 Closed Sunu.
next to the Courthouse. ihoutch mere was a protest at the Jail on Saturday June 16th in honor
of Bradley Kingery who was found dead in the jail on Memorial Day morning as 3:30. Brad
Spotted Horse
would
55 as 24 being held on I believe a failure to appear traffic related warrant The JQSI)
Antiques & More
not even let the Mother look at the body and refused to turn over his belongings. Now his
200 S. Main DeS w
brother is in there ott some 13S1 What is up with that? To top it iril finding a lawyer to sue the
636586- 539b
Sltcrifis department is impossible without a huge sum of cash upfIont fri Jeffco carpet
bagger
lawyers arc coming down trom the City and County to do business with the Court
No
WedsSun
Open
I because most of local attorneys have screwed at least one member of eveiy family in the
Republic of thu
runty [tie people tire fiat broke. tiusted riot to be trusted and now die trickle up effect is
Ravens Brew cof
L.rtuig to Show When peopLe :1-sc it all that is when they lost, it. There is a case that has
Your One Stop Gttt
cen going on in Jctleo for osci 7 years hung jury once now they are trying to get these peo
pl agait based on the testimony of a 12 year old. These folks have spent $250,000 on lawIleartiand Rea:ty
ycrs and die probieni has not gone away. These charges should not have even he fed in the
PA iii Jcffeo. Now you
50 Jefferson S
I first place Seci,nd die lawvet they hired who said that hecanie the
20 thousand that is,
DcSoto 636-P
1
iarnrnorid
Brain
and
30
Iorrest
paid
people
st ould think that idler these
Buying or Selling Real .staEe this matter would have vtuuslied No it gut to transferred to St. Louis County and they
call Patty and her a tuits
sceflt and gave the Dig city lawyers another 50 and they still awe them 100 fbr a hung jun.
THEY SJMPI, i
I hey are now lawyer less arid htokc, llie matter has not gone away even though the alleged
GET RESll
ictirn ha,s changed tier story at iCatt three times arid the uric ts ho took her to the police and
started the whole baIt tolling ss as just picked up and released ,tflcr lie was On Jeffcos most
rGfo(wIFIR
,,ruited list. My (Ol) people you just cant make stuff like tins up. By the way the system
who was the accused
TI
ir..iced the trouble uoung lady nto the home ot the actual abuser
biolhcr. In short otdcr! Itiat is just inc of a hundred stories I could share arid the Bulletin has
Athena School & Flu. r.. oIl
67 Dusts
a very small footprint. Sad what hase we become? Is there any accountability left? I for one
636-337-55(11
cm not get any justice undei this system and Im afraid Im not the only one. They that be
part of this is that
You can trust Pan, S
a ith us are a whole lot more uao they that be with them. llie real scary
If its Broke thr n
i,:c[e are certain people who ate starting to figure this out wiio are trained killers under oath
If its not they di n.u
who make a living under
t,, defictid our Constitution. 1 lint spells lROIJBLE for die people
cs
Honest Mechanics tr
laces. Die> first stole the
diftcrciit
though
story
same
(
otnty
(rawlord
in
lass
of
cokr
a
Computer la,- i
raided his place of bust
ccc
ti
tn.sk
the
c,ctttai ii oni laura in Bourbo,i roth on May 23rd
as
Safety and F
Larry was selling
because
(bat
went
all
flits
children.
arid
cdstoi,iers
Inc
tess teiroi iing
Inspection
5cusCk get high even though it iS- labeled riot for human cnn
1
incense that so tic pcllIars worth of insentory, com
, totally t oat lhey stole thousands t
5
inptior and is I (Ks
. r to top it all off from las ha s at Ounts I nough keep in
5
ti_ta, : sit, cashi is c her k
Genera! i
Ft ci per ha sell big Or is
ts they cs Cii atTested t
1 pr.
ru ic .lniii,ce, .1 or t,
and
product LCti th-ugl. C iiC5cf took att nriones Vi is tt going to take How much
y
U,c las, paying ettizens of this (lice great state are paying these
tre niust we cu,j
306 S. Man: I
tul enemy is You have been
to
i_ti your eyes and see who tli
o
tune
s
inc
rUns fsoW
636-y8t
brain u lie,l into ttuiikiiiig that the 1 and the police arc the good
rd
deceived
tOo,
d
Banners I
i isks md cayan mactune
I ,iiC to luot ,,,,,r ttff CIt., ruodi the rricssscohirg
All your
asiue your pride and open
Ii at your ii u ted puohic Sets cr15. Would you please t-
though the
Priiitmt
or eyes realizing that die dc ts a liar 11w enemy has ta iii in like a flood
is
prayer for
A sign of a good o si
aid ti us Is that hid is ,tll on bc throne and prasem chiaipc thtigs It my
itt and cast
i:h
is
w
eirts
en
itt
If
ize
r
cal
people
ness is a gout
tir
eat a a aver i ItO I, ac a r,00
,itiW.
ml them hut
C1 tg at)
a,:
at
then:
F
lies
\jcre
si
Itt,
s:;l
,c
C-alailo
11
.itt ,,t
Downtown I o?I
ard macb
Cheap Ii
Irons
-,
from
rts>
Off Road \
Pzr
Save a tar -,s
Before SoL
o
0
C
0
07
r- o
00
-0
Zen
:
1
Gr
.ilei_ai
SD
SD
..
-4
SD
-.
Jv1P4
us
Z555tA
53&-4Th-14
-
c,.re-,
.5
I is cuno s
srould be sc no
morai ourage
Coma
BackpaQe
C
-
www.buIIetinmanom
u
or
5potte
i e
9
nti
2005 M
h3ia
AReal LenA
Ovrrr 35 Dr
Brew Cef Lee
aTeasG
lotiarl
Resale ii
I
,j,it
Futy In in
Retaining
Natural
Dan 31
ViperT
850 C---
Herk
UOHts T
Enclosed lOit I
Tw
Treating Pr
e
1
W
Want 0.
Hwy 67 Nexn
re01..o
KT POV
Hsrnn
Motor Sr
4 A
228 N 3
631
-
Dave
,0.
A M:ni
import i
S -
Frrd
16-25
B., 0
A rcasOnaCa
a saisfioc
siN tflnnenr
Heartland
Realty
50 Jefferson Sqaure
DeSoto Mo 636 337 -0600
natty Hammond
Broker/Owner
AicKinley Jewelers
6;fts P/rigs Jewels
Diamonds for Va/e,,t,nes
308 S. Maw DeSoto
65t,X(>-3342
Internet Service
ail
Vie wli certainly keep you up to date on this matter. 1
& Computer Repair
a former Marine who actually honors his oath and in
Call Rick 636789-9050
iS Country. Though let no snare this with you they a e
few ann far between i.r ietf City. If you are a praying
Kennedy Tire
person please pray for Pajl and all our State Reps and
Ness and Used tires
Senators, Pray for the Shenill and his deputies to wake up
I Iss 67 Just South of CC
end reai:ze thaL they are the istrurnents of oppression.
h esrus 036-933-9022
Should revival not come to inc law enforcement comnlu
206 Telegraph Road
Arnold. MO 630111
rnity arrct they keep on enforcing laws that are in direct
(63101 407 5108
)iiitiul of toe Constituuoi i there will be a blood bail., if
baik.
push
will
ney seep on pushing the people some
Ma Vt JuIJcI
When people lose it all that is when they lose it. I v. u d Vets helping Vets in DeSoto, An
riot want to be a member of the law enforcement
outlet shop where you s. ill save
o inmunity or even be within 500 yards of a courthoise.
P The same nine helping those
Tue Arrerican dream has nc-come a nightmare and ut
s. l ha. e onver: so nuch
very one out were are Ike rite Bulletititrian. Most I ant
:uad ouch less write, the unly thing they know hoe. Ira
trait Main cr1 [)eSoto
Davison Jewelry
rio s shoot aid fllakt- FooDs. Most of the American
people dont reall7e that we wrestle not against ilesh and
Pawn Shop
Hwy 61 Feetus
blood but against spirtual wickedness in high places. Most
o ople nont realioc it is rot lie Sheriff or tile polk.eman
636-931 9326
ho IS drMnq that car that pulis them over and that pulls
Get Your Guns 8ig Sale
up to their house to evict them. It is a spirit that lion
I(C(I Lalae
)ossessed that body to do roe works of the devil. Mist
418 S. Main DeSoto
lI tot pray, most will sirnpi( roll over arid take it. I:
there are a few who will think that the cop. judq.
next to Town South Hair
Offenng Discounts and CloseUwyer oanker -s the one who s carrying out this evil r d
Outs or. Cosmetics, Hratth &
some will shoot them do in I for one real/c that rr y
Beauty Stop in and check it out
he devil and I have p wo
r iDle is not a gersoir if
HundidsOf $1 items
Call 314-402-8369
/oi el
flC l)OsCn at U e s-clay, though Im riot or s
wwG, I may Do a
lOl r,se. tnough Im Just pass. p
CAN-Do
.-uj
F-ic oles wc 011 a-ying all the quits arc- -or
MAINTENANCE
hey
tiainr to .ju Jeer Jug or target sriociinq
rrast
trio
ire otying ([ciii bc-c aas- Iney no longer
MR. FIX-IT
i
vertr tent and their ag nts, Boy Im glad that Jr
BiG or SMAU.
U sde ara not oc sealing from tIe a,, i a
314-488-8123
a ok, poor ar a unedu ft nass of people who I
IN t)ESOTO
are coing I - Ii
tlIUStILO t
- iJr.td
INa
Vinyl
illi ci
34-f
07
a
a
0
;E,i
(no;
Ic
i--i
007
,
H
.
0
Za
I
31
10 mm,
rne
O1
His r_ hosr
to
.r
ar,e
Gncrgcs Crnanncoauactrcrn
Sr(.
Alo,rIPa/ I
Re; JO.
Y/flai
n It
4
,ki
1 2012
tehruarr
ouiaee uP
.0\arC so:
s-c
X1MP[HAX ACCU[fl{IING
Certified_IRS
E-Fi!er
ears of Expertise
Sc
SC
Sc
Cfr
Backpage
or
is
patriotism, a phenomenon
www.buHetinmon.com
lone 20 2010
Arisrotte
C
22 Stso
te Sdy t; Cicyh ,.
!? sy I?c e ia y
tan
,
5
..i/
573 18,
Pure PIe
-,
\lega s
NoOr Ir,
ii
xc
he heal I I
Sri-El
Down on -an St
iblcs
Antiques-Ct I
Resale S
Dun,,,,-,
514
,to
S
-
ae
Vip Tra
rail C
,,,
I:,
-C
Pru
Ffl
mu
-ti,,?
Jinirl
Sn
ii Retired on
1
about 2 cents goes to the local not-secrs
Duty? Yea one who has been with the ICSD siice I can
remember is ED KEMP and I heard that he is proud to
cry that he is retired on duty I called ED ar-i e called
on day
re back, I dsk him if he reahy only shoisoo i,
says
in
not
is
he
that
said
He
flellsboro.
week
[felisboro, He is mobile Now Ed wants to [e y or State
Rape oh I mean Rep. tie iS one or tion. mere
Derr;oncrats there are 15 elected off ces ii Jetfco -1-1
are occupied by Dernoimcrats the other uno is Republican
tot he appears to be the biggest turd of thorn ill Darrel
.issey is his name and ho is a corrupt judqc .Jio allows
chird molesters to live iii apartment complexes and as
now sent the Children which were nuiestral by their
step father to a place called Lpworth were tiny are
inlested on a regular basis. I mm Miller is th. ,ir a Ian. ,crs
iL these
and he is in on this child slavery ring as
r for the
ar
5.
COLiC
I
corrupt
roo1le folks are beyond
next five years and not be able to shorn wrtl you at tue
horror stories that spew forth from the try page of
Satans local branch Ihe Courthoistai
1 .sery is created there on a tinily basis and it is goim 9 to
cease and desist as long as Im alive I wil expose these
evil doers and run their ass out of town. Pie whole point
of a free press to tell the people just [iou nod Flier
r rnty, C.
fjoveri meet has becorntn Listen I love li f
ir
uth.
and country enough to tea the people tie
I
S
ss
r
L)ur
fools
for
ill
you
take
leaders
eks ted
-saitrred people who are only concer-och a,,et (4011109
ES
iii aid where their next nigh is going to a a mu
ii wont be
oveytbing is a
there
is
check
the
as
king
i
to g until the payments that silence the ma ses tin c oF.
It wont be long until the People realixe tlo.t there
c,u itry is being stolen trOin tnem. It won F Lx our,
.
Daves
&i
than words.
Dave Messer
Construction
[)Avm:
rit
sist
Ellrorm rounds of Amino th.t where txugnt ;r P
e
hat
di1
C
rrrrllmor
10
tOn
o,
out
coming
start
y
ougfit as woll. I really I ink that they I. no
diii
55t sirat (lunger 150- rae pUt t.tEis
1
.9
E,E
s, r pit tot fairies 0 I l.a I -e Risi,,. Ii51.
1K
1,
ilK.
)()lisaE
i-my
WikIi it comes
S
1
,,
1
i0r vyk
iu-jrI
aid tto
,
lot
iii
0
hoe,
One
ii,
OS(onient 15 (0101151 01(1
C a ,. -r
1 cc ill
a-mt
.0 ,i to c[i,1i(je Oscar pa
to meet it SUS. L -very knee isIll sa rein r iv,
now non, Today is the du of saiiatiun!!!
to-
ri
ViriI
Silk Scm
CAN Do Fr
63&931 -0705
515S
Imprrur
c3rk3cK
Card Corner
Sport/Gaming Cards
Comics all kinds of
636-933-0999
106 Main Festus
f)wight SpurgIn
Class Painting
Ernnio Vii nJ)WS
Holidays, hand Painted
Signs Hell even paint
(I)
-J
-J
Li
your
1-i,
(lit
bavison Jew&ry
Pawn Shop
Hwy 61 Festus
636-931-9326
Get Your
(,uris
baying Gsd
Call
Dwmg,rI
Now
mon nced a I
63
633 salal
isO (orn
kr,,
re
caning
ran
Junkies Tire
Service
(ail,cy79I)
314-401 7313
636-415utry
t O/dWd
Backpage
wwwbuIIetnmancom
At rg
dot snt
Soon
BVIII.
iv,
Sc
Ca,
-,
A Treat
to,
A )HERE3I
K-if I
B i,I,ELIss1 v
C atart
C)
it
ALL OUT I
Co J F
) IF
/ JIM i
1OET
VipBrF
20 Can,
lUrks I
Go
Sc
Whnlcs
(3/
a
5
B oke,
s
t
Dave
WIt
ri c
63/
Mr
it
th
SI
a
Rar
1
lB
P
trc
r,r
F ttJ
nt
ic
jorse ArrtIcjue ii
home ci
Des a lit tot ,e
I)esocd
Mor
cv
Mega Center.
Simply the Ilest
DAvE CAN
rio
im
636-93 -0705
I in
Vinijil
Silk Sctr
UAVE Mussck
Cor-4srrucnoN
ey,
d
at
515S
Imp frizLt
Just south of CC on 67
Card Corner
en
Sport/Gaming Cards
pIe.
d
the
h
elf
ur
636-933-0999
106 Main Festus
Angel Nails
Ut
See eoune, ,,
,nake,ve ,
Ne I ocatron Across
from Sam Ole
flair Mauls I n
Junkiecs I ire
Service
(36411-4 Xl
311 l0I73i
Expert Advice from the Pros
On. of a Kind rare Onds
Iuca-Sat 12-6
Aiirienr
1,
L__
Shoppers Poradke
Leadington Free
Outside Set-Up
bavison Jewelry
Pawn Shop
Hwy 61 Festus
636-931-9326
&et Your Guns
DISCOVER A Li
(r
Mv
arc on a
Yj
B sour r
dot is
5k
is
Pure Pleasure
910(0
(tI
dOI[
rniv.
RI.
JIFfk.J 1< \
I-.
tc.j!
]L
11
No.
\h-CR02409-() I
IlAUS.
OI.
AFFIDAVIT OF
( tue
ase
((Gil A. FAStWO( )D
1.
\I rut urn.
2.
;\tael eJ
true
4.
.\
to
...
tIL.. Ii
1 ,rtF r
4 a
I hereh ert
and
ulu
wide
State
(
Oflt\
5. 2013.
DEFENDANTS
h.hibit
Suhsu cd a a
L
\.Iar
Oil :LigUSt
of AuuusI 1 6. 201
as
eb
a:
are irue a id
Iiuuh
tiLt )1C
5.
video
ide
;-
I fiure me this
z)
01
SANDRU L THUOND
Notliry PuDIi Notary Seal
State of Miseoun
CommissCd for SI LoutS Ct
mmisiofl Expires: Aug 29,
1O43Oi5
8)V13
TOU
110.31 S,aa,,
rJT,j[
GhX
IaplOAIl
of Service
or
I)EFIENI)ANl S
Exhibit
2-B
Acceptance
,,.t
Inc c,
.1
:)re
ia
,0i
I.
o,
3:
'.,..
et..
5ta
,,,,ArI apr(eolr:o
3,111
00
.,V..0,l Os,
II
1 u,e terls. I:- o3ogie I 100;
I
A
a a
it,
-;
o5rec
crc 10,
I 1,1(0
1)
.1
,ui,,I.rrrs
1, ac
a otic, Pt t( tollS
WT Ct It A 3r 1 ,r le I I last
hy maca he roost ,p
I ,,- ,lzrl.1o
,sa yoot 1 t,
r tIE
C lOose arms of Seace at 1 0 si tWo at
roe or ,j you
I Ifl roll c,o To ii, o SI ra :o slot h ten oo Os 0003-
So,;
1,
o,, 10
Iho,
,,
15CC1001
1 05,0 3
if Sea
rns
0 0
.,t)r
0,
0 .151
Sl
,,
old
0 .1
igI to a
p,lriy
moddy
01JICC
1,0,)
ri
,,,,0
I 40
1,
,a,
Ar,
,,,t,
I, I
1 0(11
1 1
Oct
mi
I, I
II,,;
I
.
5 1
tm
31 30,
Or
,II J 5
..
1,015
toe
001:1
0
r
bat,, he Srorac,,
otfed 0111
,Th,L. I .5)) ,,00r
ntril)rrt
practices
itt
ad the
rr
tes
Ito
art,
31
Sara,
.n
sottoare a, oeoaz,_is
ti-mi P1,,
0r
nt ,l
I,
or
1,1Ip[,
1,12
1.1
31
,.I ;Ct
101
l:J,,
A.
ard
11
untO
I; cit ,I.tS -
0,,30 Co.,Al A, .10 TIC01 I.
.010 0
,,
1W ire wI en y ru coo. It
to 1)1
olreraetsie
5,,
[0,ri,,..
ta
JagC yo
1.;.
,3
WI) 011
I,:di
310
.,..
0,1
11)
od-,r r
550
0000
Alt 3) 0
I .5 03
I
1i
,.,
,.Wo,o,,,,CI
W, ,at loomis ai
IA ,.t,S a a00000, tt
,,,,s
You
3,,t ,i
01
1,1
1,14
33101
I,
Lj, of
501 11(1110
,,1 or
C,,nl 0
oil,,) Pi,,yer
It
C,
tI o Sor,,-
1 ado.rtising,
..
,5iCl
,e
,,
I t,oq
IC.
Cr))
(,t
05
Ti rI,s
r,
ra
I) d
.,
l,o
II.
))d,,I
(0
10
boot
ys
1 1,
)i.,,,OIt
.41,11
offered ny tIre
011 I
ri,
,,,
oloyouco
,iCoo
the Serote
of
poses
A C,_iSlijiOlO
So,
ut
Cr Conteot. or
1)0,,)
appears
I ,.1lI--,r
y.t
.5
I)
tut
poor wntten
onS ty
t)C,
1,.,,,
or
,WIr I usroess
II) p rrs;1
0121,0,,
431
_
5
ill
1
11.. 0
Jy
t:-;t)Ts,.r to
11(1
,t,,1lI
,.,
3y
I,)
d 1
-,
II
lobes
iroaacd tIrat
.23
fill
ri
0,
0 1
it
1101
a, ITT,.
00
,,ttates root
CJri s,t
111
r;ly
.rc, II.
os...ei,
11)0 rohOtSS
.5.13
I
1
1
I
I , .
4 4
.1
t,l,r,, I
Yr,
,trs
I.
tIC 010
l1ll C
to
11
,(iIp,
,j,j,e
or off ne
01,0:
A.
hoel
iO)(flIO,,ri at 151) 10
aou rot t
)I 1,, Use I1,s
,
,.
,(.,.
If,.
it p,.
l,,..)
siltS
I .0
1)11
limo
ake the
a,.;
1
laId,)
at)
10
11011,31
00
.1
1_ ,4.dkl dl
V..l at.
1,,-tt,,-
-.
, 3, 1
arac,.
It
a tOut You
11 ro;,
0 11, 0,311
01400
III
1)
3,
1),,)
,qt
53,,,
111,1,11
,,St
Cl pborclIor
0100) 1)511,
1,
-i
I;
I ItO1.3t,
Ii
-
ce rIb, CWi
.115 S,rrAi.
a red ad tO 5)4
.Ierrt os,icc to hi I
-,
.10300
1,1, ,ir111
Sl0IlSOrOb
1.
4 ,iriAltl,)ll
11
11501)
CC,,
,o, on
11l01
and Rs1rtctions
1 e Ser,, as m
r rt
.1.
i So I ,nheddal,i,,
lt,
0 1
at
I
III
01
si slob
SI)
Se,v,cePe,mite,sons
parrIls)) It
j,
,,,
1,
lat;nt,3,3
1, r r o .,. II
..Ol
01101, 331,
1,4*
,,
ii 1,1
01 cc
,;iUL,)_ or
.3 0
5
&5113
0 1
tent
-o
a i s.-t
S_it j i-SW Uep-.
Se
0
o 1 jaTol
t0 C
rr. air I o
-i A I
can-i
tis
Cl )4CtCO CiL
1
rerirortuc
lr
rcrI-w-
:15
.-
rr ,-iCl(t,silcfc
C
1.111
IC
s
C
i
S
1.5.1,1
11
sOS
-,r)
1.
Oh
.51:1
-S.
,tiCS
-idCcrt5000a
1
lectonabeaniurjeetoaace
-ogiad
flu,
rInd I
iticlto
(Ifl 5
c
p
1
P vi
,--
her
,df oW.
s.-eratorc
-
3cr
10 ci.
:s
11
5, .15
55
is.
-lids
so
t-C
1
s-S
.00
1111 11111
Olt
IS) C
.1 C i r
-1
ci
sIc_C
11 coy
slit,
_ri
,t__
.5, 5
_ii.jr
ii
0,
siii
roriall
CC
,it,jlCi, 5,. -.
rd
sr
rid
--ci.
a.
--
I,
--
- -
--,.I.
-i,,-.,
-i
I.,
Ii
- ,
-al
tl
irsis
Jr
(1
)il 01 tdii,
105 (Ii-
Sr
determined to Lie
Il s 1151
1O,
opyngni
,r
IStO
OitrrlO
It
-i
1 .l5 r
10
1)1.1 II11t
sti.;l 1101)1 11)1113
f cits
0
1)1 Cor,vnqht Ap
cm
1-,: an,
Tht A
,neiI.rc
-
as.tls.,rz-sJu,,
.-
,,.
I
SI
ls, a
rsl-1r
liii
tat(S)
I 1l.1,I ,(i
-C 101 11)
Igiried .ioik,
.11 1,11 sitrs
1
t 0?
ic-3-
001,
that is
to
5115400
.5
.1
Oo
7
irs,
b,
sIC
.11
C,
00111,
511
-LIraoilio
5
3tIIaPS
owtedge
11
it
1
Is
(ia-JO
.1
011
11.,
lIlt
Ci
i 005 SI 0,iltt
CI 10 CIl
IS
,.C-
.,,I
-5111
a sIngle
rInd
-rr,sq ,lrt:ICty
Cliii
nat rs
it
-gIst
rn esrius
1 COlt I
X,
frigrri.
00 1011010
0
vi
III
cmi
(1- rr-
01,1111
Cr
ci
tone
.1]
CI
ii
I-
a
-
l-rr.rl I
,
1 I
1,
01 11,O- 11
I
._,
5,1
CiJ ,r,tatiC
lerels
outu1)e
1
cwi
Sri atonal
10 material
p5110,
hr- ats 0
,,v lv iI,d,lc 110111
but
11.1 rrrIteSlar
er, r
r i
1
Ii
.-
10, I
I ,l
till
1111C
3S
sjh
11 sIIy
0111
I .01
15.
1) -10 WY ave
IinnSobrace.
o Si
t4Crghi
1.s-
-Ille.sI-tllt-,
111
1, nb-sI
15 11110
53
lFis.llt1,
Cs ICr,,
1 nit
11(110
.: s.c SI i_i.
.1
.15
5,
_-.
t.
1,
IC!
:t
1W 1
,,
-,I,:rib
,15.
W
-
)rO)l
I sIn-sp
-.
Oar
Ii
s-ill I
II II
I c irIs
Sri
v_is
.,10
lscO11S,h to usc
S 111 In ocs,.tion tis the Sersice and
sir c 11105 .obnq rd redisinouting part
-.
,in,t
Sc_Cl CC
fti
ls
-.-..
.1
ks
rh
arc
CIA. WI 111,
be
l.illSrsrh
10
.bi,111,,.s.
:.
pr.pine 2-rI,1rA
1,_ill
c_OF
:Cli,
011.
h,oI
s.l1 1(1
5:
iris,.
,,,s
-s.C
_%i
1.1)0 0
1.
1111
11
crace
___
s-,s-l
10
.
C si
-i--
II
.11
lien
3,:
5-
1 fl_v
Cs 1,10
..ICllC a,.
,,,CSrhI. 105 Islit Ri1
5 .1
eO,.I,
pr.rrctoc.,
Cd to o
j a d Ce C X C
,,JaC C
Is it We 1,1.11 s Si
-55 sact, Or mis
1 respors trl or :1115cc or r(J, C- srcav
be cc,
k
SIC
s.rther
ii
,inderstasis.
a
cm
y
aanst
00 .00
s.-s.dY
0110
C4
,1
--1 0
..
s.J
--a.etria.
.-
tLyc
wr
--
r,v-
1:
0
,)fl/
.,..
p-- ,i
or
1,-
(.
1 Conlesl
51
talc_sr
cdtcr-.,
cm
.i
-a -or
SL,,,.SL,
.310
.1.
1
Iran
A, SpC
sS.
Ii
Xi
0
arc
PSI C.
i.
-:
Ia--s
01.
so
aid
h
S1?
,.555
i,rI -r 1111
,s.t--:resr,c.s.s.,,c.s.r;,C-,
11
i o
ai
-.
.-s- i
I sO
tic
--
1-
-sue
stake cr
314
-
IC
V 14
NA S
JH
,/
IICAWMH
4
IEHIS&LKA) IAq9
Al
U
41,Jur
1.
A
Ill I 141.1
,P84114Q,
p-H
11)1 p41
UI
Al
i,11I)
1 ) I
A
HI
1)114)
,LH1 111
1)
IHAbSIHI, JO
lJ
40
p4 151141)44111 41 1
)IlI!
I
I
HI
11
II
1 1W
pIp
1
LUll
I III
,11
S41
A )1
11 II
111
4.4
141 1
I 411 011
I Sf
445
50
II
,1q 5
S 111111
HI
144
11
513 41 /1)4 JI
141,1
114IIIS
U
41_i
10 11
U
1q11,
114
11)4
I)
I JUPUH
1151111 AlP
-0,1
111
(H
aNY OOA
pie
)A4U,
4)0SJ0 4U14H11 044r
HU IL
Ill
10 1 11 LA H
6owi o
1114NA10 1411 Al
H I I 1,) 1)1 1
w0g111J
OH
1111W pq
s6e 10 snoA
HEl
1)4
5,
I11I1I 41
H
0OI4ll I.
UHHI){
SC
140 HOOd)
44
BW0145 4111451110 H 3 41
d1
14-
11
Uu)
lv) 15 1, IA
10,100 N
011 1 / 11 i >11
ANY -0)
NAN 1
A 05/5 001-1
N
IC 01 Al 115 5 lv
C 01111 1 I,,A1i ANY N i N
00101 OHLANVHIIHI II
Si.) 0 0/ 13 Hf A 3 444
USC 101 U) i1fliI1 V V H] I
110 50011111 ANY A) 00 1
HOIHO 10111(100 51)11
10 NDLVSS]D 110 50.1000
1VNOSNll 3 TlV Oss
0 10
lI S-1D AN 10 1100 10
&,el 114001 1-1, AN IN
JJiID SN 1 1_ill NC I I I 115
Si
UI
1015111 1
0
313Dm
51
YVIYJ
I
I I -
1511
If 1
/ 1
f 0111115
1(1 Al
Il I JV
JALL /ISNVS1L
1 110 OSO 1 Al
J I 0) I On
A Si.) .)HI
III I N NC I 5/,
010 IC 101
,)N
110111 1
L
) S I 1
V11 DO
10
dl El
01,111 3 0O
01)
4 II
N
All
IV 1
o 0)) 1 110, All A I
I SSlIO 11
VA I1o 14/
-14/ISV
ANvAHS
113/ 5)) 1 1
NII, 3111 JEl
iA 4 1130.1
I lOA /5001 N
IN I NC
I
NV
it
j 4/
ii, HI,
IV U
A,
H
S I
1,1
i
1
AlHp
11)H UI
11451)
5)
111,110 ),
II
jo
U 44,,
10 (II
)i
1 111 f,,
Lfd H
1 I
A
1
1411 11114
H 1141
11,4500
514
.0)
1,lf AU] 4
11)1311 U , 1)14 PH 1 1 H
I
II 01 14 II. ,lJU, 10.
SSU
11141 14101,
14131(11
A)
St
6
6
St
St
tt.
St
St
St
t
is
St
aSt
St
YosT to
8151i3
Gi
AaouT YOkJ1l
Ines
rrhJnItv
I)IiINDAN1S
Exhibit
2-C
C 30,
i101
1
a
no
r iii
St
its
I on
a Too
YosT jO
00114
,rd we
we
(ii 4
iorin
14,151_i,
.51
xi.nt ,Y,t
ia,
:1
;rr,:rm
orant
-its
attacked
,xjt
It
y,ia I iOC IS tOat you art.
,r3eos that sonrironti else own
ide y other setrs without na-cr
cnn...,
C
1
I
I sit
IC
I
(iwi
ta-rio
go, 4,,
sine
.u,ts hurl
iiyt
pro
rmlyur
intO
hitans000
to shock 01
Thri
0
iii
scoot
0
iCe or i
orIgtl u. III
Ti
or-
3 tOOiI.l
os,y be poima
grit rnuj
.01rrtdClSo(lc
aili
Or
tr
Jr
.
son says a week to
Cog -ytims a sudeo doesnt
ry
Jo
.5 1
4,
r[ltiyi
01
rw
,in. .5.5
trw
-.
omsrary
urn i0ns
st i-.4-io
-0.0 r,(rosrIrlr-r
roe
it
C
I IT
i In be a great way to
a Tera, -oaks- your aeon
it ,s, 1
n to parts patti
I -asalO,, 5.1 Terms of
it
1
1
,
5
S
jdellijcrirrn-lriityq 1
it
tall If :1
10-
12
8/5/ 3
1flOtj!t
earC
I s S
ri
Ii
us
or
01
0
-,
Ten
P,,s
Copyright
Pj
Oris
c
orws 0.t5
wNW ,osjtu& 5
ale ,
or
a
ri
y IT I, 1 to ri response we
1 yt P iw an nI ererrt risk
t,oril rraklnq, I nja assasyr
skeiteye,[udhe
Ct ris
Or
liri;l r
rri
1
p Il
li-it
01
ii
About
0
,fl
t. Is
I-
rrirriO.
0
the
rca eutful
eis It you ye
not
I y u voutdnt say It to
rrpoons:e others, qo
rile
c in ott
ii
ps op
es Cdcos
,rn
ninsMOso,12flC1{0
thderal rn,est
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
ii
12
13
14
1
16
17
18
19
20
21
him he es
sug,estcd
twasok
I)id the
)oy
non v
A I just tr kid to S
he sent it up o I.
was that the though
hosseser, thes ltInt b
was criminal
Q Okay tin did s
oreriff about
arrests;
A On the arrest ss nm
the judge signid it, I car
Courthi use
d I call
norm them t I e ha,
asked them
assist
isi,
t) huttin.
\), I
i.
tJnl I
p fldiflk and seiC ii
Q Okay
A IIowev r the
Si
rut
e lIne ss
Q Vshod ouLr
1
2
eepartrnenO
23
A It was r
Sl,,r
and t
let
i
risi
c ak and
ir o mon
C 0 inig,
ii, tselt,
mid nfter
10
Its
lot ot traf
fairl we
It
tilt
liner
11
road Out, I
In
tto
12
ssi
rrar land
13
14
Do yo
25
I lo&t
ii
a ma
Inni
hr an
19
liii ogo
1< W1
sucn as Er
5 I,ik
20
thrn isern
21
could get
42
45;0fl.
23
) Yo
toe me
16
.0
18
rid
22
24
QWh
i
8
S ( II
irisi
haghssa j
a
6
outs
I r
of
lucre
rra.,rr
le
VSn
40
Page 32
if
1
tm
too
I aIim
Okay
gum to arrc
A so, sir
Q vkhyri
I van
know, going t
he woul I war
base an pr
1 dli
in i iran nod r
ti I r
4
5
6
I 7
8
9
10
ii
12
13
14
15
16
d th n 1 w c.
donrprt
me
n ret
1 ttm
irt
17
rant
trim r
nod d.
1iin
I (lid
in
Ls
Lie fi
urn
20
25
ii
e0
th
origin
iS it I
non malls I
Cmnt a
Ok
7
the is at
a
mi
brought se
1
10
sat I. equ
thin eance
10
12
fbi
lain
13
ft
rsus
14
np
10
line
lIe
hr
,rt
16
n
lrr
st
to the department.
hA station?
rean, we were svell
we
\e had seseral, sou know, our
it
ess
20
2.
ann
2.
Ige
dii
ml
Is si
n down
mt
II
ii
1k
.1
I nat
I S
p (
11
1
S
5.
that
ito
r,I.
r I
24
,hn
Tm
thn e once
I u
arid
(<1
o ton
1
ems
Is;
1
urn so r
1
2
3
tin
hr n sell
22
JeIY,
nCr
at rest hr
sia
21
it
sot
19
in
;;
Itot
18
Lea
mit I
2a
ill
24
ii)
20
p
1 ss
1)LFENDANJ S
I xhibit
3
PILED
IN i111 CIRCI II COt Ri FOR FR %NKI fl COt N r
20th JtI)i( LU (iRCt Ii
Si UI 01 MISSOI RI
SEP 042o
1
tRL,1CdtO.
list?
)
)
for
This amended motion is filing to correct the record Since filing the original motion to
dismiss, undersigned counsel has learned of certain pact misdemeanot convictions 0, Defendant
(the mention of which before thejwy Defendant is moving to exclude in limine in a separate
motion) This amended motion vimpl; corrects that issue but Is otheru Lw unchanged
L
1.
Defendant was charged in the Amended Indictment, inter cilia, with Tampering
ith
Delendant herebs moves to dismiss that charge on the basis that as a matter of law his
speech is protected Li) the First Amendment and does not rise to the IeieI of a reasonable
threat to an3 Judicial Offici.r and thus particulars as it is colortul and unpopular
political speech nes ertheles granted constitutional protection his speech cannot go to a
jun.
Defendant also moses to dismiss that charge because the statements ssere conditional and
true
Facts
liii eat.
is a
I 7. 2012, featuring Defendant and entitled Iul1etinman Rroadcast 8-16-1 2 The Parts
Over \k ith
\ otc.
Lluiluh1 at
(lhere is also a second s ideo that does not feature captions. It appears trom discovery
3 the arresting troopers
that both sere reviewed h the State and both sere reviesed h
whose probable cause statements
formed
mention Judge
based on the second video lails as a matter of lass since there is no evidence to support a
finding of probable cause. let alone guilt.)
6.
[he
T1tten caption on
the
ixplicit hut oh SO true. Bulletinman has had enough of the Insanity. ( onslitution
day is September 17th and September 14th will he the last day of the Defacto
Court. You all is firLd and sill he considered trespassers after that time. Ihe
posser belongs to he people and x e got an eas 70% that say OU got to go. We
the People now realize just what a Iiaud the Court is not univ upon itself hut the
(.onstitution. the People and (iDI) ;\liniehl\ No victim no crime. No justice no
peace. K:io\\ JhSI. S kno peace. Where the Spirit of the I.()Rl) is there is
I ihert
.
Defendant begins the sideo with statements on sanious matters of public concern such as
the poor
slate o
8.
The tideo thwatat. that the People alit tirC arinus Missouri officials including the
State (nuns Administrator. elected Circuit Judges. laayers and policemen through a
Redn.ss and Resocation PetitioC on 9-1 l-2u12.
9.
At 1:17 Defendant generally references corrupt oflielak and my right to blast sou
motherilickers out of there if ae tune to. I dont want to come doan to that. I really
dont.
10
At 2:04 he states generally we hase the right to remose you use of force. Now. were
not going to go out and kill you like you do other people
11.
Defbndant states at 8.33 that Tm being generous in a giving you a month to do it,
which the Court can infer to mean the time frame for the aboi c-described people to
resign.
12.
A text caption appears at 8:40 that cites Mo. (ansi. sec. 3. particularly as to the right of
the people to alter and abolish their (onstitution and form of government whenever they
may deem it necessary
13.
...
Defendant then states at 8:50-9:10 that elected officials who resist will be arrested. tried
by treason by a jury of their peers. and executed for treason and other crimes against the
American people.
14.
15.
16.
Nossherc does l)eindant himself orally state a thicat to arrest, try or execute any pemon.
17
Counts
name
18
Judge Parke(s nanie appears bnefly in a caption at 2.47. soim. six minutes before
Defendan(s statements about occupying the court nouse and putting officiats on mat for
treason.
10
Other officials are named besides Judge Parker in a laundry list. lesemng to each of a
reasonable speaker arid a reasonable listener that .udgc Parker is being singled nut among
the allegedly corrupt offieiais.
20.
The foregoing tiatures a caption stating ii1l of Rights o. presumably the Sixth Amend..
U.S (oust.
21.
At 9.20 the Defendant accuses the I. .5. government of killing 5 million babies, which
the C oufl can infer to mean a reference to legalized abortion.
22.
The video is pan of a recumng series of print publications and broadcasts issued by
Defendant as a citizen journalist since 1906. Set e.g.. An. 1-B (Bulletinman pnnt
publication), authenticated by Al I-A (flidavit of Judy Kropf). Particularly.
The oeralI thrust and dominant theme of l3ulletinman publications and broadcasts are
statements (oft expressed humorously and ulgarly) as to matters of public concern.
particularly that:
a.
Most Missouri eleetea oil icials including eeeted judges are corrupt and
subening the Constitution. and
Ihe soiereign People pursuant to the (onstitution hae a right to lire elected
officials. to try them for treason according to due process by ujurv of their peers
and to cwcute them if found guilty of treason.
4
()
23.
25
Defendant has no prior record of pros oking s iclenee directly related to his Bulletinman
pub! icat ions
27.
(On inldrrnation and belieF l)efendant has three misdemeanor cons ictions in Missouri:
2003 liar harassment: 2006 br trespassing and a 2007 Suspended Execution of Sentence
(SI S) for assaulting a policc. officer.
Ill,
28.
RSMo. 565.084 prohibits speech that souId threaten harm to a judicial officer or his
immediate farnil insofar atThets ahilit of judicial olticer to carr
.
29.
Out
hi duties.
30.
31.
Amendment can defeat as a matter of lass charges of tampering or harassment that do not
constitute a true threat or a reasonable apprehension of harm
is a citizen
1 hat
Sec. e g. State
Wooden,
t statements
critica
aeainst elected
oti als,
32
(first Amendment analysis of political speech of public concern is appropriate also under
the free .peech pta isiun at 1o. (oust., awl I. icc 8 hcsuuns free speech right., track
those of the federal Constitution.)
13
is at
it
S. 749. 758-759 fl985) (opinion of Powell. Ji (quoting t7rst SaL Bank of Boston v.
BeIloti4 435 U. S. 765. 776(1978)). lhe Firci Amendment reflects a profound national
commitment to the principle that debate on public issues should be uninhibited, robust.
and wide-open. Any fl,rL times (a
it
because speech concerning public affairs is more than seif-expressiorn itus the essence
of self-government. Garrison v. Louisiana, 379 II. S. 64. 74-75(1964). Accordingl>.
speech on public issues occupies the highest rung of the hierarchy of First Amendment
values. and is entitled to special protection. ConnicL
it
Although the boundaries of what constitutes speech on matters of public concern are not
well defined, the L .S. Supreme Court has held that speech is of public concern when it
can be fairly considered as relating to an> matter of political, social, or other concern to
the communni. id. at 146 or when it is a %ubjcct ot general interest and at alue and
concern
it
Roe.
83-84
statcnienCs arguabi>
inappropriate ur contrcn erial charaaer.. us irrele ant to the question whether it deals
with a matter ol public eoncern RanAin
it
3i
independenil examine the cornem. Ibmi. and CLflLC.J. at the speech as resealed by
the a hole record. Dun & Bradstreet, Inc.
it
Speech deals ssitl. matters of public concern alien 1: can lie fair)> considered as relating
to any matter of political. social. or other concern to the community
(onnick. supra. at
146. or when iris a subject of legitimate iiea, interest: that is, a subject of general
interest and of aloe and concern to the public. San Diego, supra. at 8344.
Broadcasting (.ovp.
i.
ccc (ox
I Till. 385 U.
statement is irreleiant to the question whether it deals with a matter of public concern.
RankJn v. McPherson, 483 1 S. 378. 387 (1)87).
37.
lhe content of l)efendants video plainly relates to broad issues of interest to society at
large. rather than matters 01 purely pris ate concern. Dun & Brad.street, supra at 759.
38.
While the tone of these messages may fall short of refined social or political commentary.
the issues the video highlights the American economy and unemployment, elected
official and elected judicial corruption. abortion are matters of public import. lhe video
broadca.sic Defendants statcmcnts on
thue
Judge Kelly Parkers name appears in a pop up caption at 2:47 in the s ideo, sonic six
minutes betorc me alleged threat made by l)efindant at 810-911) Lven if die video is
vieaed as containing a niessape related to Judge Kdly Parker cpeciflcally. that aoukl not
.3
change the fact that the o ci all thrust and dominant theme of 1)ekndants
40
\ ideo
listed
spoke to
Gien that l)efendarits speech aas in a public ibrum on a matter of puhhc conCern, that
speech is entitled to special protection under the First Amendment. Such speech
cannot he restricted merels because it is upsetting or arouses contempt 11 there
bedrock principle under!> inc the First \nicndrnent,
it
is a
prohibit the e\pression of an idea sirnpl> because society finds the idea itself offensive or
disagreeable
Texas v. Johnson, 491 13. S. 397. 414 (1989), Indeed. the point of all
speech protection
misguided.
OI es
...
Nor can the State argue that I)efendants sideo must go to the jury because the speech is
outrageous. ()utrageousness is a highly malleable standard with an inherent
subjectiveness about it which sould alloss a jur> to impose liability on the basis of the
jurors tastes or s iews, or perhaps on the basis of their dislike of a particular expression
Hustler, 485 1.
S., at 55 (ii ternal quotation marks omitted). In a case such as this, a jury
is unlikely to be neutral with respect to the content of libel speech, posing a real
42
6 1.
S at 270).
Such a risk is unacceptable in public debate se1 must tolerate insulting, and even
outrageous. speech in order to pros ide adequate breathing space to the freedoms
5. 312. 322 1 9
88i (some
entitled to special protection under the First Amendnient. arid that protection cannot he
overcome by a potential jury finding that the
44,
fact. the provocative and inflammatory content of speech can potentially he seen as
positive, Terminiello v. (itj of Chicago, 337 U.S. 1(1949) (Douglas, 3.).
45.
lhe Constitution is not neutral. It was designed to take the government off the backs of
the people.
46.
Justice
Defendant concedes that free speech does not permit lighting words, Chaplinsky v,
ew Hampshire. 315 U.S. 568 (1942) (upholding
1
A
conviction
But here, as discussed infu, we are dealing not with fighting words but rather with an
alleged true threat, that is. sneech that would put a reasonahle person in apprenhcrsion of
harm.
48.
else in
LV.
put
Defendants
Judge Parker or
to interfere
with the
49
Ik&ndanic speech is hyperbolic in tone, not literai. hyperbole is marked by the use of
exaggetation as a rhetorical des ice or ligure olbpeech. It may be used to esoke strong
teeliagi. or In create a strong impreccion. but k not meant to be taken literally.
50.
In our tradition of criticism of public otlictals. this Court can take judicial notice that
hyperbolic statements aganot public oflicials hate been routinely made both generalk
and stith particularity but do not necessarily intend what their plain language states:
In 2010. lormer Got. Sarah Palm (R S) produced a political ad putting certain
with a rifle scope view superimposed and a list of the congressmen. .See Jeff
Muskus. Sarah Palbss IAC Iut,
Jun
I. .S. Rep. Gabrielle Giflords (1)-A/) was among those targeted by Palms
speech.
ii.
(;ur,r& was later shot by a mentally ill individual named Jared I oughner.
ssho subsequcnth pleaded guilty to sanou related felonies. i S
i.
reasonabIe person would not believe Got Pal in ads vatted the actual
shooting of any congressman, including Rep (nlThrds
is.
(ms.
situ a
crime.
(
b.
51.
here. gien the lengthy history of l)efendants hyperbolic publications and bwadcasts
against public officials, a reasonable person sould not vies the video in comet as an
The particular reaction of Judge Kelly Parker to the ideo is irrelevant to this analysis as
such a reaction is subjective and has nothing to do with (lie objection reasonableness ol
Defendants speech.
53.
It appears that the State conairs sith the foregoing, as it has not designated Judge Parker
as a trial aitness. l)efendant has not designated Judge Parker as a witness either in his
supplemented disclose to the State.
V.
Defendants statements art conditional, and do not constitute a true threat under the
subjectii ciubjeeth e factor of Din widdie anal sis
54
it
55
In e aluating whether speech is a true threat, this Court must be guided by the multi-
(ir:wt
c.
d.
1
t
its victim.
hettier the maker of the threat had made cimilar statements to the ictim in the
past. and
e.
Whether the ictim mid reason to behee that the maker of the threat had a
propensity to engage
56.
not
in
iiolence.
sis.
Under the reasonable listener test I aired Slain v. J.ILJL. 22 F.3d 82!. 827-28
kih (ir. 1994. given the entire factual context, the recipient
of
in
or intent to
injure
the future.
b.
c.
d.
to engage in
iolence. had
no
sas it n iewed as a dangerous percon by the Missouri troopers who ececutcd his
arrest warant.
c
&c
I)epo
of
Folsoin at 3PI
can
int:ntion
to
tilt
anal. st
or
Ihe
fnghten
ID
It
Judge Parker but rather to make a political datement to his audienc.e. I his intention was
fairly clear 1mm the context Detenciant made the alleged threat tar purposes ci rhetorical
hyperbolt rather than to intimidate, frighten. 01 coc te Judge Parker beyond what is
allowabi pohtic .1 adocacy
58
59
(In the altematin. l)efenda a suggests that this Court can adopt the Ninth Circuits
reasoning and require that the State prove beyond a reasonable doubt that Defendant
intended his words or conduct to be understood by Judge Parker as a threat .See liaised
Stases r. Bagdasarian, 652 I .3d 1113(9th Cir. 2011): 1 Wted States v. (anti, 408 F.3d
622 (9th (ii. 2005j. Mere negligence with regard to the sictims understanding is
insufficient.)
VL
The Eighth Circuit splits with other circuits as to whether threats are to be
evaluated objectively or subjectively
60.
Defendant ackix wledges that the federal appellate &cuits are split on whether the threat
is to be ealuated objectivels or subjectisely Compare Dinwiddie with Bagsarian with
liaised Stases it Uhite, 670 1.3d 198. 12 4th Cir 20 2, with Tiuner. as discussed
below
61
Dde id mt c ii... les that the I iphth ( ircuit in Dinwiddie ha. held the reaction ci the
recipient an he one of a multitude of lactors in analyiing the speech. Ilere. howeier,
13
62
Kely P tier
Indeed. Jadge Parker ought not to be able to tcstiiS at trial either, as his subjeeue
reaction to the speech would prejudice the Jun as to any ohiecthe ci aluation
tactually
J.IIJL,
of
legalh or
1 he Court can also find Defendants speech is not a true threat under other circuits
anal> ses Compare the Second Circuits recent analysis oftrue threats against federal
appellate judges in Chicago in (iS v. Turner, So. 11-1%-cr (June 21. 2013i.
Defendants speech is distinguishable both under the facts of Turner, and under its legal
tests for true threats.
64.
The 1)efcndant in Turner published a blog on the internet. his blog posts included
statements such as:
Ohn the Constitution or die.
b.
C.
ic iLJge.
itJp
didnt get the hint sent by a gunman who murdered another federal
in Chicago.
11
d.
I hejudge% had not laced lilA!. free men tsilling Lii ssalk up to them and kill
them tar their defiance and disobedience.
os
ruer also pibted photographs, work addressts, and rooni numbers Ibr each judge. as
well as a mario the courthouse ssheir they ssorked. and a photograph of anti truck
bomb barners outsjde that courthouse.
66
Turner had a history of links to iolent groups such as the Ku Klux Klan and Aryan
World (ongTess, and at one point was an FBI informant as to his website isitors who
shared their intentions to comnut violent acts (I umer was later dropped bs the FBI).
67
1 urners viebsite resealed a history of statements ss ith threats against other officials.
together witn threats to di tilge their home addresse and mention of 1w ing enough
bullets to put them down too.
68
Weinhaus riner made reference to executing any particular judge (but for the
mos stamed reading of a six minute lapse between a caption with Judge Parkers
name and statements regarding execution tor treason).
b.
.
\S.caqaus did not exhort others to kill Judge Parker with any particularity.
einhai. neser posted maps or husmes nkrmauon about Jud:: Pa-ker
tout
1,
15
e.
Lx
3 1 I)epo. of Folsom).
69
70.
A split Second Circuit panel affirmed the instruction and cons icuon on appeal. based on
b.
I umers past statements calling for the death of a federal judge. and approvingly
noting her subsequent actual murder.
d.
Posting photographs, work addresses and maps for the threatened judges
chambers.
The Turner court also found that intimidation can constitute a true threat when the intent
is to place the uctim in fear of bodil) harm or death, citing the I .5. Supreme Court case
SIL
16
The I .5
the 11%
L.
Surr:me
lb
te
action. Id.. St t disC) Hen a Indiana, 414 1 .S. 105. 108-1)9 (1973)
74
Incitement is
dist nguishabl: from a true threat. .Ww Yor4 a. reL Spitzo a Operation
Rescue %atl, 273 F.3d 184. 196 t2d (fr. 2001): 1 nlted Slain
126(i 5th (
75.
ir.
is
1983).
Es en langwte such as
threatening.
that in
Defendants Voutube
political communication. See. e.g.. iSAAC? v. Claiborne hardware, 4581 .S. 886.902
(1982) (aflording First Amendment protection to statements at public rallies threatening
to break th:j damn ncckls) of those isiw broke a boycott of segregated retail stores).
76.
Detndaiitb speech here in a public forum. the siorid is ide web, did not rise to the level
of an unequisocal. unconditional and specific expression(J of intention immediately to
inflict injury I nited States a Kelner, s34 F.2d lO?0. 1027 (2d (fr 1976). In that case.
by contrast, tht ICelner Delcndantc cons iction is as affirmed for the statement. [W je arc
Arafat
...
VIII. Defendant\ speech does not constitute fighting words, and is factually
distinguishable from Wooden
77
tiff
and 565.09(1 Ii 5. where the I )efendant sent individual emaib. and letters
Outs
go (jabuelli. (Jiffords on her with a awed off shotgun and pop her cherry like
assassinated piesident John I. Kennedy. Staler. Wooden, No. SC92846 (Jan. 8. 2013)
78.
Although the harassment crime in If ouden is disti,iet from udieial harassment under
RSM. 5o. s84. lir the purpose of anal> sis they arc ubstantially the same. RSMo.
565.090.112;: and 5o5.090. 1j5) require a showing that the threats put the victim in
In Wooden, tue Mo. Supreme Court rejected the l)efendanfs appeal on First Amendment
grounds because, after a detailed factual inquiry into his speech. it found the speech
contained words that, taken together, through their ery utterance inflict injury or tend to
incite an inn tediate breach ci the peace and are not protected by the First Amendment
or the Missoun Constitution. It at 6. quoting Chaplinshy, .supra. 315 1, .S. at 571-72.
80.
DelendanCs peeeh here is factually distinguishable from that of Wooden in at least live
respects.
a
st
in
made his speech onli in a public forum (the world wide wehL in the
18
c.
Wooden made references to dusting olTa sawed-off shotgun. and that he was
going to make a mess of eserything with his sawed-off. Defendant made no
threats to his personal use of deadly lbrce.
d.
e.
Woodens tone was maniacal and menacing. 1)efendants tone is hyperbolic, but
not menacing.
IX.
The Court can take judicIal notice that Google has not removed the speech from its
website, despite Voutubes Community Guidelines and Terms of Senicen
81.
Dcfrndant
lncnrporatta.
82
Delendant s
htjp sssw
iv
1w
(
81
inns
3ouube corn
omrnurnty Guidelines .1 r 2
(.
84.
a.
85.
i utw
You further agree that you will not submit to the Service any Content or other
matcnal that is contrary to the You lube Community Guidelines. currently found
reguations.
$6.
While Defendant suggests that the standard for a threat is an objeetrie one, he
acknosi ledges that the federal appellate circuits are split on this legal standard (as
discussed aNne,. and therefore ilthis Court adopts a partially suliecusc standard, the
continueu resace ol Defemjants speech on the \ outube sebsne suggects that Google
and \ ituwlic di
hot
20
\\ 111 RI! OR! Defendant Jeffres R \k einhaus mocs this ( ourt to SI. S I \I\ his
motion
tu
disi iss c cig nfl amperinf With Judicial Otlicer, I e1on C RSvlo 65 U84 for
defect in the institmion I the prOSecution. an that Defendants speech does not.
I
Respectful is submitted.
Attorney Ida Defendant
FILED
IN FIIF CIRCUF (OLRT FOR FR.\NKli\ (Q
2()th II DICIAI. CIRCI TI I
STAT F OF \flSSO Ri
SEP 042013
Bi o
,
S lATE OF MISSOURi,
Cisc No. I ZAl(R024Ut) 1
JlFFREY R. WEINHAUS.
Defendant.
AFflI)AVIT OF JU1) KRO[F
Comes nov Judy Kropf and states Idr her Affidavit
1.
f this Affidavit.
My name is Judy Kropf and I am an adult capable of rnakin
2.
3.
s of llulletinman. a
Attached as Exhibits 1-B are true copies of various edition
publication written and produced Defendant.
4.
knowledge of Bulletinman
Through my fbrmer marriage to Defendant. I have personal
generally and these representative copies in particular.
in print fomiat and distributed at
For the past 16 or so years. lulletinman was produced
as an attachment to the
various public places in Jefferson Count. in Cra ford County
anil. and in other places in
Bourbon Bystander nex paper also pul-$ishcd b Defend
Missouri.
\eFs1te
and on Yomuhe at
Dl FF\D\fS
Exhibit
1dy Kropf
State of Missouri
S
Notary Public
2013
__
J
t
fre
deed
to
men,rencernberthatinnthe
I S
Ana
Btjlletjnman.Com
314-800-3652
duc.e
kpage:
Exhibit
Downtown Deli
a wi
arrd mesa:
is.
Cheap Jr
iran
1
jP Road
Pr:
BctorL
tO..
0
0
0
0
01
Cv
U
C.
00
Zo
<0
cr0
cp
0
so
so
63&475-7A
(
s car ous that poysrca courage
d ad
4
be cc cJmrmn n the wor
ak 1
warora ccJaoe Sc ram
Lan-doe s doi.ci what cure
nraCI is do There ado be iv
on teared
nvsre unless
ho,srd Vernon Rckenbaaker
r3pottec
B ac kp a e
www.bulletinrnan.
February 1
-
;a or balanco In
Ofli
nitutmt insane
0I2
5
hrrrrse
t
w
a
5
meant by
A,
SatIated
reasonably
ai
srbL mar
.trth thlflkrrll
imacries C.ecca.actar
45 ROCK foils on you
Full upon the ROCK before th
think
when
Meanwhle, back it tne Ranch
here is no hope you et a call aim by GOD OU 1401
confirmation. Paul Curirnart the State Rep trarri House
50 aetferson Sqaure
Sponas I think it is district 105 calk me. dv tirst words to
DeSoto Mc 636-337-0600
are we doomed and he said
tim was a simple
Patty Hamrnord
that we are. Whir confirms what I nave been writing in
Broker/Owner
of
artickts
that
me
tell
to
hut
he
ETIN.
I this BUll
you
Morie
Art epiCs 5
DaC S Main Dcso
03n-)&6-639St
A Real Deal Awaits U
Over 35 be,lers Povens
Brew Coffee Repiabhc of
Tea Teas Gre C
Heartlax1
quesbon,
went on
McKinley Jewelers
Internet
Vet
Twa
l5uys
Fast Returns
Bjgor Small
Debbie Does Them All
COMPDTAX AiCUUN11NI
Certified IRS
E-Filer
Years of Experbse
hi
We
Vinyl
SilO
5cr
314-f
0
ci
0
C
rr
()I
S
0
-Ti
F-
Zo
_____
_______
www.bulletinman,com
Vinyl
Sill. Sc
5158
Jmptrti
Card Corner
(I)
-J
-J
LU
C
5pottcc llorsc
t Morc
es
9
An
u
P-5tarT.aning
rrofecSonoI Ceonisg io
Iutfice Clecnin a .arucics,Jre
.Cocl
a o .T
ac cCor
rJL. e ri
io
cslll
.z
i 4
us v,
ho
I r
:cicc arr
rci
330
.rio
a-
.JCO
u u
-
-c
63541
9,cieS
___________________
e
kp
a
B
ac
g
man.com
wwwbulletin
Tul
Will Rogers
Barns Bar
/)
Wa
VlnjlI
Sill Scii
51585
Impfrtal
Viper Racing
636-9314)333
Outside Set-Up
Davison Jewelry
Pawn Shop
Hwy 61 Festus
of
More
yourui
,, a
,*,o,eS
S,d ,
,er,Oobty
you
,tsu
from
St
q,efy,,u
4ar,
Kay
Or?
ow. marykay.
Shoppers Paradice
Leodington Free
DISCOVER A ama
5,,
may
cvci910f9
01
Silo.
(1O1 I
UIv
\IY
IN I HI CIRCI I I COt JR I 1OR R \\K1 IN COL
If
I
0th A DILIA1 C1RC
SF \iF t )I NIlS,t H RI
SIATF 01 \1ISSOURL
12 \B-CR02409-01
Case No
v.
JEFFRE R. WHNII \US,
Defendant.
2.
Cominunit
Guidelines.
3.
4.
5.
LL
I)ITLNDANT S
Lxhi bit
hugh A. Fsiwood
2-A
State of Missouri
County of St Louis
I
I
Sc
ALz /
/
Notar Public
2013
L,THtJOND
ANt
7 -ursic- Nory Sea
oeir
:
State of MIsoun
orion
ci!uoe
S.rae
Upad
FrND;\Nys
raSOSEffvCE
2B
Terms of Service
.r S,oe
Your Acceptance
,.-
1
r aCt
0
Cr0 pr
,,tCoOS ,.,tvj do CdS
;,ry or,
0
1:0
or \S0(d
:.or
0, ,.e.,0-rC
,roe
..I,l
.Oei
u
0:
,
ty tojt:1 at
1
,.r g:eo aiy
Sma
,ntrorrs the Tet is
ne rm a
oe,t heri ry reference ,iid ,,
s
of
;
o rOt r gas
Otto.- wonv goUge
0, iy a
1, ci cepeti nero
>,
aoi
OiOO,.
O,idnes, tourd a; rv, 1Od ,..lO,r
10
firma
arrnsr.
.ar rn Cvrrrar0, 03.
or rhr:,v i.
ram agree to air, ,iasr rr.r-:,. -i
.
by oar
it
,,,,
to
from,orttrroi.
son
..
,.,
rersice
Although 00 may at erntrt B
p jul05
I ,.rA r shOt 0
a
..
eosrorrs ottirng
0 ed
ri,
.0,
n S a
ar::r
oh
jo
r,t,s,ie d:s 4 so
o:O.rtw rr.o
or
to cc bosop 0, such madific,.,:,
ot C a so a or. r
or tb is I.
a
cO
rnaf
1, .artrpp
a 0
to
2. Service
on tIne
rn of teRer,r:: no uerr-c users woo are also contrioorors 0 OilIest
These terms of Scare CPOy 0, .l
photos, sounds, tousle. a000s 3TO5isri.0
Scrsice ContenC ii ,luijes tie test, s,.,tware, argrts itaph:cs
Sevce
:o
:1w
bute
cost,
or
through,
or,
000055
acm
may
yru
r-r nruer .n:s
ornrhrriatioos, :ntrsr,i I r.c tuaturet i jul
offered dra
I die, ireiud,rrr; tar nut l:rnrte:i to all products, software arId ser4ces
The Serar C rrrcludis lt as,,rrrts 1
Uplc,soter
s
1
j
ruoThoe
ste
,,
l VouTuhe Accounts
,r,ror
imCCouflt
Although YouTube .sitl not br laid
ID, ,i Ios:.es
,y
pm Ocr,,,,-
(eu agree riot too tel or rrod:f, any p.r Ot
1 roitay or nears oher irOn the siouc titaybacr, treges on the horace
You agree not to access Contort :rrmo,tit or:, Ire
rer rxpLrc ry autrOrized rrreanrs Sou lube may designate
1
itself. tire Embedo ,ti{e Player, a itt
unless you ,f,ti,r YorJ]ubos no wntten
ya for ins ri fur- fotloaetg ,omrr,erc at uses
You agie not to ase the
.ipprnsat
tire sale o .100055 to trio Cerorce
wrthrn the Seraco or Content, or
the sale of ,idiwrfisrr g. sporrsotolir;rs or promotrons placed or or
page
of an ad-amnatrteil Slog or wyrosite coritainirig
any
on
:rornotions
t:s.
or
simo:sorslii
the sale of ridSertising
on ttre same cage
Oririrn :rther rrra:erat rrot obtained from reuTube apriecre
Content delrseed sic the
stiles
jet:
and is of sutfc erit value to be tretsa-r for s
dr:srre
do r.,
Prorribrtmrd comrnr-rolal or,
uploading a ungirt l ali :
or artrstic e:terpmrsu
ru
, r
orra, r 1 nrr;
: 0 I, t rion-rlda I
S srI tr:tl mt ciw n Srr.,t rr 4
idiwrtrsing restircrmr
ore intortt
atm- :
Pt
1
ar orrgrrai
wor
on
,i-:
oil
or
-sntrnq
il use -e iorA,
a-i
-rrrrrn-.l ,r
SoPor p punrrx a
:r ,s,u -i,: i -mas rot moOrs 0, 0 ope.
you me the Er oe-tiioiir itt -pSr
r,ct Jul10 bit I tirertert I rinks hi ,k to he you Tube wet-site
-v
mbe ldirbr
r000tronralrty of ti:
im,
orr tire
rr.p aulornaircatry download arid trstlt codates 5
f you use hetm ofiiby uCOa r ,,,ca(r riot Llploaoer 30 Sy :akrr the
caes air ir,,trr,.C irnpoa ert000S arid fm.rrtfmor deseloc trc
or-. mo,otut,,e he-se
scr
Ece,Av
vtm0
tc
ma.
Sk0oiir'
Pa. iO ri-CitririS ann IrTiptiltefy ne,s
i-C
font of bug ftjr ,-ranrt-tf-,n-mrtr,
part ot your usc f ttie Uproadem
updates (and per rr t Youtube 0 it rC,r best-nc coo as
d svsnrrr .rrclud:rig aOhcjt limitation robrt5, spiders, or o1 cc
You agree rot to ace or a,,ir:h ury :iiirnriro:mor
Oie
scottms r
Prat s,r to mao,, reqoest messages to Pro rs Tip
that a:aSes ry Ssont--m-,n
reese s
is Crh
rm--(', .y
0
lOrd hi- ,tsri-; a c
1.0, 0 1 C 5-itmti,
pmoniori 0 tirrit ton: a nurma , 0,1 .,i5. i,
dens
to
use
so
or
B
penmirus
goes
rrn
i
sear
orators of pubic
Notwrtf standing ,trc lames ri, Yr to gruris PC o;
for reatrng publ:c y an-al a: Ic
to for tSr nit, or; tsr at orro Shy to the ester t mrectrsy,rrs
55
mU
a
ernm
tn:-
,ri ,T,r:i-
toy nmsrv a ho m t
to
I 10
m$
Sir r im or
to
rcstriUo
es
id
3.100. p
(3.0
..
0
1.
,ce
3.3.1.
rd
Is perPr I
lOi tint 3503.
0,
st
.1 pVr1.
11.1
0
.iti.,3. (0-Or-S i- 1.
rI-i.,! 901
i -o,;l
a s corer purposes -r.t-t . 0- 1
15
once-i dis,o c
ia
Oft-sntOre5tnCt_3.-JrC.l.
rio
;ciio-s,i
-.-.,
too
crTcrrs CCeroe
be be
3,
0c.
-i0t
Is
1
.,.o
ro,esr
,lrlrt?
e09Id
OS
down
sl
St
ace
C,
.rws lot:
0
e
copy.
cnsltsiensoisre.wi314ht
,.dU0, 33,1.
S 01 Mr en
v c, y
icy
ottent s pro.Jed 3. oi AS lb s
0 5
thr.ogh the procoel oorcirclt,
arm Corritrrr urtles,; ,oi. see a doe
Y(j
E k
S a
Th orttt Cr he vcc v 0
c e(i IC YocT.be s.c,.,
S)ric
oil
s
V
V.
13 3. ron. Ii
1
r a.
c-ic ate I te,.t ron
hrS m M -Se
e 3.-I -@
.rrltr hr.r;ci; 00 .h.r.i. 1 .31-
tIltS icr,
.flrt
.,,ct C -0-
.t
C cOt r-i.rn , C,
properTy tyb,. V iS,,;; 1.
;r-, ; tIe vt
rd 3.1013 Oft( 3
S
that
Conlert
to
txpri,e
may
0
be
03. W1o,t,C 31
C cnlent You turtfot .jnderst -133. .3.
Co so
ccc c J hereby do wa ce ari lcgai a eiutab I ngnts r emeb
iroecent on oh!ecte.iabte. and yo a j on
3.ew.tted be cpol-car e cc aGree C
S at or may trace 0enst S ,,utCre ,o-Ies;sc ; b,rclo or. 0 the CSICOI
10 1 ils ,Snt
S.
lire
sees
a;
I,,rs
all-aes
etc
.e
ti,
-.-,.e
I.
,-o.
i.osc
cy
on
os
,-oemnifc and hold I .rrnless ,,,,.uO,
-sllcceJ Sc law mcatirrc it n,ts. th 0
Dta;o..
.rts,.. ,1 ;-.c Sevco
V
th F er,4,,r nc .13. 1 ,ht!1O5 rod .,s, sOr tO
1 ii ,.)r it Vit
3.5 c Yrj]toi ,iccounr holder ore V 0
1 ,Oc SOt 303.
(flIer
;ooni,.r-, _or-r, i 3, its WrP OSDOtO lo afl3.
understand that YoCti,he d us
3.
1 1,, .Ortr, cqor 0:0 .3 5103. .1, 1.4 .033. 3. SIlt,,, 3
r in sii,ill te soars rOipOrS I 1 lit y 0.. ci C t tr-rt
l,cerses nqfs or,5lrts a
or toe Serorce. You 1Irc repreaenl. 0,13 cci ill :3, 30.. ow on tac the necessary
e,
opsr qi
;r,
so
,
ou 01050 13.. VoUC,t-e, ll: Vent, radirnarl<
arid 3
h Coritcr t 500 sulo
permissions to ttuh, 0
Seiaee oilS i-IrS C I -es teens 0 3. clone
o other prunnetars olts II 00.1 I- s,i,.on It 1 ii pjc-r rtior trVfs.
13
e.
0 cr 10 it r,73.s
,C.tcirt
liow,.ei
..s,jhr.
,.t,
,-
lipr,s ii is,.
5 a - t,;iw c;,a, -Im .3,0) [or rVtlle and tonst,tatrl.
grant Yut,ltits- ii ,,rlijr,t,
in )nr-iectlor cdl tI-c be ace cr3
reoroduce drstrrbut orepre denoveise a 333<5 1 1 eplay aria perfomr tSr Content for
1.011313
viiid red stabutir p part
oo
and its ic ;esso,s crrd .ibi lea S . riCoh iii Ciii iij Without Oh tattoo
Ynu]ubes 1
.r 1 V ,t,rdi,r lair-oils cod rcrouglr atis rredrc i,hannefs. ou also
tI all Of tire 5cr-sic,- aei der,ot:c ,Solks -cr,1
Cameo StoopS to; Serace cr13 to use.
hereby grant each user of lIre Ceraie S rio e ,oi-a 5 or o,.r to access your
,
itl.lettr
howecer.
rerrraatd or deieteu The abuse
curses qarltec liv you a siso comments you sobmt ore perpet,,a coo rreatcable
A phystcal i electronic
rliegedhy Ire rqea
i,
,.
,-
-,st
Cu
.1 liOl oo itS VI
ird,el , s.c S it ,rer Ii Ir 1
P statemcr brat you ram- ..ait c
t,t c, , t,.VtO,r 0 tao aV
3.
autnor:er cy or,.. n,r
cc rIle aol odor pc a y I pert o lat ou ae
cr
A state mets loot h - rtl,oi c, ,, I r
aurhonsad 1 ,
.
Y gibe
hyrrofSrMcP
jer3
xso,
ST- F
r
.1
)C
ot
h e
I,
f i
ni
1hQhJy
rxvs rc
or
rn he
car x
-,
9, Warranty Duaclaimer
cT X N
) TIE F
A E nac
A 01 F
A. L I
L
A
HF
YC I AGREE HAT YOL R SE .
ALMA,
F,i)TI.ES. AND AvN C )5
-F ClEAT
FIT,
r
YORVITLE DAN LAS 5,5100
a alI-h T
IT IC iN
C - N)
A 5P\
)iFl1,
1iARIFANTIE5 LRFS
Hi IT
t,0ERl
YL AETiT vi AnUF.C AR
CE -ir UG F
MAKES NC DTFFRAN,Ir
iF CL CNS Liv
S IL AND ALA AlS N LIAR
CONTI OR r C CORD A Ii TN S LA 0-Rn
1
cR5 NAL TI.0R9 DR 0CuFERA
LW FR
RA, F
,) NA
ERRORS V AKE
I OR 00
F TOP SERvILE S
4
n-V SCuFF A ICESS TO AND List (
C F..,.lTN,
DAMAGE Oh ANY NATE-FE C TA)SZI
I c; SIC
RE At RVLITS (rAE Lid AN ANTi An PnFTSCFAL
ALA uSTo .,v ralD A ,Ti S< OF 0- Fly
liQN DR -CESSARON CF
T
NFOrMAEIDN AND:Ok NAAC;,L Er ,FIVAtI Tv :-F,I--O[T OltOIN ii, AN INERRU
HORSES OR HE LIKE WRCH
TRANSMISSION TO OR FRONt OUR Ni-iV CE 5 IV) ANY [TUGS. V ROLE S. TRO,,AN
ANY ERRURS CC
MAY RE RAFESMITIT E (0-rd IH-FOUAH DII F, vivl A S BY ANY THIRD PARTY ANDDR
(If- Hb
Sr
A AS A RI S
OMISSIONS IN ANY CONE NT dR F- OR ANN LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY RuNE INCLIRRE
RLICEa
0
[lACE ACALABLF ,LA T0- S
0- ANN CORTCNv PLJSH LOA,SD EANTVITTEE IFOThEI-FvVISE
FS -ON AN, rR000
OUTJ13F DOES NOT WAPPAN. r FCCvdSv.LLRLAi I OFF ASSuME RE SiENSTIII
Hf- SERVICE
0 CR ANY HYP,-FLINKE
SERVICE ADVERTISED OR 01 in CEO NY A IHIRv F ART A vEiROUGII
01-F
1 R ( N (OilER AOVE OTiS NO AND YQ DARE WILL NOT 1FF A PARTY TA
SERVICES OR FEATURE El IN ALA BARN
iN MI -NI(2RINE; ANY TRANSACTiON 131 A LEN LAO iNC Ti-I RDA-AR F
IN ANY WAY dl. RESPOROIFT E
i,RCFiCi,
lEVi
AD OlD- Tff( P,RCIuASE OP A iPODL,L OF, SECT>PROVIDERS OF PRODUCTS 0-F DEIFy it
AliT su lF,l-fF 7,,.APN A-I- F!
MEONLM OR IN ANY LNAIFFEI\tyt NT Tn v -IJ, (I 155 -LId [OS 1,0-VENT
APPR(RRIAT F
.
,:
.,
,,
,-
Lia brlIty
10, LIre
1 Di
i;ERS ,TSL-CFQRS LMPcCYLES CIT AGENTS. BE LIABLE TO TOL FOR
IN NO B SENT SiALL ECJUBF
WIATSO[VLR
ANY DIRECT. INDIRECT .RC DENTAL SW CA. FONITIiiF DR CONSEQUENTiAL DAMAGES
INJURY OR
RESULTING FROM ANY I ERRORS MIItAIrF-S UI-F INACCURACIES OF CONTENT, Ill PERSONAI
ACCESS TO AND USE OF OUR
PROPERTF DAMAGE, Of ANY NAILIHI WHA 10-1 VON, RESULTiNG I RAM YOUR
ANDIOR ANY AND ALL
SERVICES (III) ANY UNAUTHOIFIZL I ACCESS if) HR USE DI OUR SECURE SERVERS
ANY INTIRiFUI-ti,JN OFF
PERSONAL INFORMATION ANDOF AiNAACIiI :WORMA LION STORED TRIRLIN. (IV)
TROJAN lOIFSLS Dli
CESSADON OF tTFJSNST,IISSION TO DR I-RUM OUR SF-IFEICFS, I1VI ANY BUGS, VIRUSES
ARTy kNDOR N ANY
ANY THIRD 0
THE LIKE, WHICH MAY BE [RANSMI1IF U 10 OR HROUGH CUR SERVICES BY
Cop ANY LOSS OR DAMAGE OF ANY KIND INCURRL GAS A RESULT
ERRORS OR OMISSIONS IN ANY CON tUNE OR
I VIA TI-IL
OF YOUR USE OF ANY COOT! NT IOSTI U i.MOLE,) TRANSMI TED OR OTHERWISE MADE AVAILAB
i
1
ANY DHER FFGAL ThEORY AND CCL HL
SERVICES WHETHER BASED ON ,,ARIGTNA CONIRAI TORT, OR
Till LORE GOIN,T LIM ATlON r
OR NOT THE COMPANr S ADVIScD OF AL EOAv,IBiLITY Or SUCH DAMAGES
PlY I APi IN TIlL APP COIL I vJRISOICrON
LIABI1 ITS SHALt APPLr TD THE I Uui.IrS I nI-lEN F PERMIT TElL
tatfon
of
To the extent pemiultrid by ,rppluc,lhIe law, yoc I-air, iv HIrerS iriii,,mrrvfy and hold harrnlurss YorjTutre
oblugatoos I LSSCS Ihablll as.
officers, directors, employees and agents. ft iii irS ,i,a nO any anD all clams, damages
,fuislrTq fror - F) your use Cu ,,11J 14 ATSS to tIE,
costs or debt, and expenses III cluduni BILL lull hasted to aIorueyv fins
vv,
13. Assignment
hasp veu-r-,s if Service nvd any rvhts -rid
D, ass,qned ry TouTub, wctliou r,vsl
14 General
l 0
.,l,
ev
,-v.I v , n-ot
-cs ,nvee ten v the S a c a_yr Lt-l-,lvr -,h,n---l
xvi ,-i F Es ettie sLe ,t C qeneor I
webs te that 001S noT 31w. iv, I a, vv:vT v
C ii
I
ub,t, Ia dan- 4 C FLAIr
Cal Im a Ti ccc T,prn, if Sen r hal Ii 3 a an I ti
--
--
Pa A
1--,i &
lL.r,v 1
c.vi
0 H iv, xvtho
whole a I c sI f rr
ouEj5e tret,r,1o
yi., ,,id 7
DCII brlwse
-
respedl tc Its conflIct of awl- p i LIrl, Ar Llvr
ori.y es
1
al.
,cniy
Tao
C -1514 S-into
rrpp-Lr
it
r-Jil:-r
-F
,-,-,-,
Lv,e,yl,s:a-r,I
-vp-Sc si,lI be oe
a:,,- ,,v ct- ii nDl-, is tim yin a a at, oilem
Tnrpe Scrviv.n tcgef- ,,-utn vii,, 5.,T y 5 1,.
i,uhr
:P-,e,i,rv
rn icia , iil - Sr v 1 ii P lJi,iiflvtnl bcwe-v , ) aii1 on
LI ,rrcd by V T
1 dunes LI
Ii ripeer 1 4 0 Iv Ire ril ,,rd 1 1
iei n,IAL,
S
he i-r Tacr aria pan-, I of tIc c n- oF a a r
1
such LuviSlo shih nol ,rTI1Lct
Ddhrd JunO1O
y Wortdwdr
Pbow
er
COL)vnght
OrfJOn,XVStOC ESSrtS
Creators
Pprtner s
S rd teedbr
AIerrtsie
On
Orrsropers
Pp
YouTrker
YouTibe
Community Guideltes
1- IND N1 S
t Xl ii
2-4
.--,
f- i-ggiiiq c
Youtihe: Sic
Staying Site or
Y ituby
alirsand I your adeo strews someone berg plrysoslty hurt, attacked, or riuntitiated. dont pout it
or similar things intended to Shock or
is not a shock ste Dcrit post gross-out sidecis of acciderds. dead bodies
VouTube
disgust
Respect copyright. Only upload adoor, that you rhOde or that you are authoozed to use, This means dont upload adeos
you didnt make, cx use contenf ri your i,ideoa that someone else oasis the copyrrght to. such as music tracks, snippets
of copynpliled pmgrurris or skleos made by other risers, without riecessar/ authoriSatiOnS Road our 000ynqht Tips fri
more inkirmasktn
We encourage free speech ar-at defend eeryrlner ricrit In express unpopular pants of aew but we tunt permit hate
speecn Ispeech which attacks or demeans a group baect e- race or ethnic ongin, religion, disatatity. gender, age seteran
status and sexual onenrationigerrier Identity)
Things lute predreoty behasror, stalking threats. harssrrient intimidation. heeding pnsacy reasaling other people s
seriously
pesoriai rderrnalkxt. arc inciting others to commit calera acts or to artiste the Terms of Use are taken wary
ouTube
Anyone caugtit doloci these things may be permanently banned from 5
aews tts riot
Ewaryone hates spars. Dont create meifeadin descoprioris, taos. titles or thunrbriauls in order to increase
ay to post large amixints of untargefist, unwanted or repetitiar content, including comments and prisete messages.
any around the
Please take these rules seriously arid take them to heart Ckxft try to leek for loopholes or try to lawyer your
giadelinrrsjust understand them arid try to respect he spell in which they were created ft youd like more details check
out our Crasirnurily Guideline Tips
VouTube
is
Cad
and
i-a-is
tar
t
might be Sou
Hare ban with the cite Theres a lot to see hero unit lots at folks making amazing stufflcinr- of them
iquir,ment getting urwape sr-ct easier to use ll th lane s, dire ii, and e-ov
Ca- be ii great way to
Let tttks strew atuit you think r-edbecrs part of the r-rerr-nce arid woes dare with inspect .idens.
-rare your own
ronlrr-eoLs -are
misc mends, Share stories, ursi mate your lent- si see ,utic rs,rwrr. St cure
pdtlicipihte
to drjeos it,,: iftect i-u, critic ttitests of ,nnnst trier-s C 0 ,tai Ot dxi 01 l WOy- to
rI-tigorrsr-
here mai ltnno yousf you find that t udale.s our lemas at
iTi lii- tatf If I
nab, clicK the but on that 5ds I ,i under the Is is ,us sari-n op i submit it for ri-sew by Yj
waste ti r warthirict itIrSiS, jo-. torO 1,1 it
i-:si----eOv
Ia
5,sr,etflru
It
si
hell coitsirti
-g
jr 5,
You ray sot lice ewaybing you ccc Somi- of tie i-ce, i-ni
lti
JirthO cnijiTiJix5ineS
Fuhe
SPaS
osigrit iL 0
; lt
crt
to
cJ
1
ri
N. dr
Uatp Spr S
i3Oc.C
q rod Dsiusni.
s liea Arts
in
i
xrit.calry a
i;atom: scouts
triJ br
rsir
t sa yn.. -a s w s.nw
Vrile S m ft not scorn
actistles that rise ,r reerrot
)Cjra tO Sal ecous, ltel
roor .i.lno or
0
toidod
s
trw
ontorit
IS assasi
:t e na at
r es:rustari .i cob mae c
trige
or
solos
thai r ii S
U J
at a eriau nh a cal harm or death
I 5 Any Jof) 001 S CO hst S
( ii 1 OQil St100t
trot to I Ci liStS. i t
to n ,nltorr attach a aft-as
:re-storn:rr 0 oiL
.r or cooci 0
1,0
t
iiii
1
dii
t
or ii or dicurnerrtarv 500 -ic
.
ducati
,hitdipri
Sopynqfrt
Privacy
Hraosment
1 uti re riot
tO trw community a respectful outs
ill Snot stutri ij -rid interacting w
cy it
It corres doiei to respect Yci tuoes
rriunh ii you wouldi It
or
rum
mne
a
S
follow
nt yor. a- iridcr Cr Osow the line,
no
sure wtrothe a sdco or comme
narass demean, or V permooste others.
00 tOts Ar- if yr e Iookiniq to atack
V
,omeorie S face. doer say C on
550W 00
Impersorratlor
irmreats
Users
ariyuagrr InigiiSir
About
terms
Press 8 Blogs
trivacy
Copyright
Policy S Safety
tIcy io
s trouldrrt feel tSr ttrar ird wrpr
cauiriry Woridoide
Advertemrrq
S.Sr
on
oulube rnoJ
Off
Item-lepers
Our
ri
15W lIrrirerrir corer SlitS
urutI t)eOti
C S S000r
1
sB-RO2$090
ST FE OF MISSOI RI v
JEFFRE R. WEldiAt s
Pac 3
o
I)o 5
Did the
2
3
4
was criminal.
Oka4
16
17
20
21
Okay
ahead and
A Jioweser, they felt like I could go
own.
my
on
ant
serve the warr
Q Who did you talk to at the sheriffs
22
depanment
18
19
23
24
25
sIt
5.
Station on K
14
like
16
17
19
2]
one
werent a loi of Cntranees and Cxits, where no
went
ng
anythi
if
hurt
could get could be possibly
22
wrong.
23
there
20
24
25
-1
45 32
n
0
Paqe 31)
Q
2
tOo
&
4
S
Why not?
110
11
12
13
14
15
16
20
21
22
23
24
25
to
Iroop
we
our
know,
,
you
seseral
had
\4e
s.
firearm
9 brought seseral
The only thing
things.
and
us
ivith
ent
equipm
safety
10
da. when I spoke to Jeff on
ii thai concerned rue was that
he hadnt been agitated
and
d,
i: the phone he was agitate
him before.
with
dealt
I
si
hen
3 the times
.4
is
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
PCi I
has him
& Originalh we bad, we had set up to
is es er, when I talked to
ho
,
station
Fs
M
the
at
us
meet
tjnl been
C, thats an hour and a half awas, lse
meet me.
him
base
just
would
I
career,
2 there once in ms
warrant. I would
Counts
in
Frankl
a
was
it
Sluice
3
somewhere in Franklin
4 ruormnalls have the people meet me
to the department.
down
them
5 County and take
about your safety at
ned
concer
you
Were
Okay.
6
Q
((Lilt
occurred. but
He was not happs about things that
agitated.
seemed
he
ila,
that
and
hi (l(drtt seem agitated,
use
you
when
me,
tel]
just
you
Can
floss so
behaviors did
the word agitated, what statements or
ng real
A Just his tone of voice, lie was talki
thiuk he
dont
I
he-he,
and
curt,
real
was
lie
fast,
he was
so
me,
trust
didnt
trusted me, and he told me h
on edge as well.
)
25
--
QL,j Were
at gas
\
rrnmnps,
s asnt
fuel pumps at bu
the pr(senc
location
initially. becausa
DE1T\1)\TS
Exhib ii
3
JL FFRL Y R WLINH4L S.
Defendant.
)
I
)
)
)
)
Contents of Delendants ear shotgun and handgun. [he troopers recovered a shotgun
and a handgun from Defendants car after they shot Defendant Those two weapons
stayed in the ear after Defrndant exited the car. 1 he troopers own testimony to date
indicates that the used a ruse of returning seited computer equipment to lure Defendant
to thc gas station to sene at arrest warrant. I he recording of Defendant indicates that his
state of mind was that he believed the ruse, in that he triumphantly declared that he had
won and that his seiied property was being returned. lhere are no charges inwhin&
unlawful possession or use of the shotgun and handgun. I here is no collateral es idence
of bad intent by Defendant. \ ci the State wants to argue Defendant was loaded for
at
ha e noti ng to do
charges against Defendant. particularl as they sere unkno\\n to the troopers until long
after they shot Defendant. I he prejudicial effect of allo\\ ing the Stale to present
e idence of the shotgun and handgun is o er helming. but the probati e ci Lct is lo\\
and misleading.
Granted
2.
O erru lea
Defendant reser es the right to moe further in I/mine based on the States proposed
evidence at trial.
Court
SI. Si 1
UN his second motion in limine, and
IW
Robert I Parks. II
I ranklin Count Prosecuting \norne\
15 S. Church St. Room 204
1 mon. MO 63084
LI?
Iii
LJ
m
S I A IL 01 M1SSO( RI,
PlaintilL
(ause
,\ B-(R024(
\i.
l)
1)rsision No.
Nuther1ri;
jt,j,c.
Jellery R
cinhaus
I )e fl.ndant
tIre
e. i1rrcses
dar rue
question
or
to
comment
the follossing
That defendant is the ic1im of a crime in this case and not the defendant.
not the
victim
as
deldicunt
\ ft inn
cause. \ ictirns in
i)ulcrJa::1
Robert I
Parks 6J
Prosec.otng A[torne\
( ount
mon.
1 1 ranklin
Mrssourr (y30d4
PROOI 01 SLRVIC I
delivered
this is to certi1 that a cops of the above and ftregoing ssas hrnd
Court (fl prrl 2 2(1
to cleidndan jr
en
FILED
SEP 04 2O
BILL D MiLLER
R \\ I l\II\1 S
I)ctend.ni,
I
l)EF I2\1)ANTS OPPOSITION TO STATLS MOl ION IN LIMlN
[rt
2.
3.
t to shoot and
Ii is uneorltru\ erted. ho\e\er. that Sgt. il.J. lolsom used his tirearn
4.
nld\
( or
5.
001
NI
t\
Ji
chm tint
eg
to
fl
ictim of a police
ce
6.
r the mrs
FhL ue
i.fier I
but a*
In
the
Def:alai;
npe:s
to.
a pie
7.
is
Accordinel
it
argument
if
the Defendants
)e;etJaiit
6205(
lluhA. lugod. \113l
7777 BonI ine As ernie. Suite 1603
St. Louis. Mi: soin o3 105l )41
heastwood .ast a dlnss sticorn
lax
(34: dV3
,
\oX
(3l.
(cli
3i
ii
Ihe underd:i ed
a H
Robert 1:
Franklin ( tat i>:
15 S. Chuic t
Oit
nion. M
I ties that on
ecutlllg
\twrne\
rn 204
Ihe methi,di
a:
-I
PO1
I4JSOUFI SlATE iiLl
NEPOPJ OF :li:.S:zutica;
Smmco:2
S
:sE;:::
INVCLEi) SIICCI INC
FRANKLiN
C9,ll/2jl
INACIIVF
:IOiNFtL:N CCSJNIY
0CC TYPE: C
COUNTY
)ATE/TIME:
OFFENSE SIAJ J
DOCATION:
:1
SCENE PROCESSED:
00CC AT
SCENE.
tJtESTIJA
NMARY
T
1.
The vict h
a.
Jeffre
eihaus who
A chronc
a.
ag:
is descrihec
6, L9C6, residiiig t
pnone number 3 14
cynops:
of
evOnts
i S
IS
a white male,
23CC Hi Lway K,
cS
CO
date
St.
OWS
b.
At
d.
ccci
nc
iy
r:aua
1 24u heart, Je
as C tloirhaw
wa:
:al_ccd
cc the
r,
--_-_.
G__
SIAIE OF MISSOURI.
Cause No.
Plaintiff.
I 2AB-CR02409-0 I
l)ivsion No.
Sutherland
Judge:
VS
JelTery R Weinhaus
Defendant.
COMES NOW, the State of Missouri, by and through Prosecuting Attorney Robert F.
Parks, and moves that the attorney for the defendant. the defendant. and defense witnesses during
voir dire, opening statement, presentation of evidence and final arguments shall he instnicted not
to mention or be pennitted to elicit testimony either direcii or indirectly by question or
comment the following
Any reference to I)efendants 13-Tube Videos still being shown on U-Tube,
Although Defendants L -Tube videos are still being shown on .J-Tube such information is
irrelevant to these proceedings as the issue before the jury is their effect in August and
September of 2012. Any reference to their present statue would not be probative to the jury and
would be out weighted by their prejudicial effect.
Sustained
Respectfully submitted.
/s Robert H. Parks
1)enicd
Robert F. Parks- 36333
Prosecuting Attorne
Counts of Franklin
I. men, Missouri 630X4
FliLzU
OCT
I
1
BILLD. M L
FRANKLIN CCJifl
By
2313
.:
PROOF 01 SERViCE
Ihis is to certify that a copy of the ahoxe and foregoing F rnai1ed to the attorney of record
s Robert I.. Parks
cot l\
SIATFOFsIISSOL.RI.
)
)
Kelly Parker under the elements of RSNIo. 565.084 MAI 3d 329.85. The Court has already
ruled that the subjectic reaction of Judge Kelly Parker is admissible testimony. and thus the
Court has indicated that the jury is not simply to make an objectie ealuation of the speech. but
also a sutiecthe ecaluation. Whetl ci the speech constitutes judicial tampering is not lust a
question limited to ujwst and Septeinbet 2012. the jury must determine whether l)efendants
weech as reasonably calculated to harass Judge Parker and whether the Defendant so acted
____
ith the purpose to harass Judge Kel l\ Parker in the perlorrnane of the judicial oftIcei s oluic ial
duties.
,\s such, the fact that Googles \ outuhe ser ice has I erms Of Ser\ ice and
Communit Guidelines. that the
utuhe
hether the
line of inuir on cross examination. \\ hats sauce tar the goose is sauce tar the gander.
V H EREFORE Defendant JetTre\ R. Weinhaus mo es this Court to 1)1 NY the States
Motion in Limine 2. and for such other relief as is just, meet and reasonable.
Respectfully Submitted.
:\ttorfley for Defendant
JJuh .1. Lastuood
I lugh A. Eastood. MIII. ti 62058
7777 I3onhomrne Avenue. Suite 16(13
St. Louis. Missouri 63 I (>5-I 941
heast. ood a east oodIa stl.com
(314) 727 4473
Fax
Id,
(314)7273533
(314) 809 2343
Cell
j/isfQ?!rJ1.fonlbs
(hristopher M. (ombs, MIII. 11655 2
4242 Laclede A e.. Unit I 04
t. 1.ouis. MO 63108
cornhschris I agrnail,com
Iel,3l4 578 1465
I a.\: 314 531 1069
([lull IC 11 01 SlR\ l( F
I he undersigned certifles that on 10 07 2013 (s)he sel\ ed this document on.
Robert L. Parks. Ii
I ranklin Count Prosecuting \tton e
I S. ( hurch St,, Room 04
f nion. MO 63084
fIzh 1. 1a,,iuood