Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • SCBA rejects GB court ruling due to lack of jurisdiction

    Uploaded by

    muhammadasifrashid
    15 views1 page
    The Supreme Court Bar Association rejected the ruling of the Gilgit-Baltistan Anti-Terrorist Court against Jang Group Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman, saying the court lacked jurisdiction over the case. The SCBA president said the decision was rejected due to legal requirements and judicial process, and because it was a matter of court jurisdiction and basic rights. A strategy will be formed at an upcoming SCBA meeting to address the ruling, which was seen as a deliberate attempt to damage Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman's popularity.

    Original Description:

    Editorial

    Original Title

    SCBA Rejects GB Court’s Ruling for Lack of Jurisdiction

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    Report this Document
    The Supreme Court Bar Association rejected the ruling of the Gilgit-Baltistan Anti-Terrorist Court against Jang Group Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman, saying the court lacked jurisdiction over the case. The SCBA president said the decision was rejected due to legal requirements and judicial process, and because it was a matter of court jurisdiction and basic rights. A strategy will be formed at an upcoming SCBA meeting to address the ruling, which was seen as a deliberate attempt to damage Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman's popularity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    15 views1 page

    SCBA rejects GB court ruling due to lack of jurisdiction

    Uploaded by

    muhammadasifrashid
    The Supreme Court Bar Association rejected the ruling of the Gilgit-Baltistan Anti-Terrorist Court against Jang Group Editor-in-Chief Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman, saying the court lacked jurisdiction over the case. The SCBA president said the decision was rejected due to legal requirements and judicial process, and because it was a matter of court jurisdiction and basic rights. A strategy will be formed at an upcoming SCBA meeting to address the ruling, which was seen as a deliberate attempt to damage Mir Shakil-ur-Rahman's popularity.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Flag for inappropriate content
    of 1

    SCBA rejects GB courts ruling for lack of jurisdiction

    Azam Ali
    Monday, December 01, 2014
    From Print Edition

    1 0 0 0

    KARACHI: The Supreme Court Bar Association (SCBA) has outright rejected the order of
    the Gilgit-Baltistan (GB) Anti-Terrorist Court against Jang Group Editor-in-Chief Mir
    Shakil-ur-Rahman.

    Talking to this correspondent on Sunday, SCBA President Fazal Abbasi said that the decision
    had been rejected keeping in view the legal requirements and judicial process. Since it is a matter
    of court jurisdiction and basic rights, a strategy will be formed against it in the SCBA meeting,
    he added. He said a deliberate attempt had been made to damage the popularity of Mir Shakil-urRahman through the decision.

    He added that since it was a matter of severe violation of basic rights, it would also be discussed.
    A meeting of the SCBAs Executive Committee is also scheduled in which a strategy will be
    evolved on the travesty shown by the court.

    You might also like