You are on page 1of 1

Name:

LINNEA JANE MEAD Technology and Design

ETL216 Marking criteria Ass 1

Comments

The Design, Make, Appraise process is clearly outlined in the report and
PPT. Including, for example, process, research, Design Brief,
sketches/plans, materials selection, skills and tools use, linkage to the
CF and other literature, personal reflection and learning, discussion of
ideas on LearnLine (brief ref in report), critique of process, commentary
on the learning pedagogy of the aid produced, commentary on the DMA
as a personal learning tool and also as a pedagogic approach for
children in school, reflections/comments as a teacher.
The pictorial representation in the PPT sufficiently details the
construction and operation/use. Including for example: well designed
PPT, quality of photographs, compressed photographs, clear & brief dot
points/labels, showing you as the 'constructor', adequate details but not
more than required, is durable and child proof.
At least two recycled items are used and it incorporates reasonable
complexity. Including creativity of design, uniqueness, creativity of
materials use, modification of materials, has required significant time
and level of difficulty, has 'professional' look/quality, has resulted in
stretching your comfort zone and skill base
Suitable for age group designed for and achieves desired learning goal.
Including aspects of interest/motivation, appropriate and justified
pedagogical underpinning (supported) as learning aid, has some
indication of how it will be used, indications of appropriate alternative
educational uses, links to several CFs
Overall presentation and English expression is of a professional
standard. Including, well written, correct referencing, appropriately
organized, appropriate headings, well laid out, files well labeled,
correctly submitted (two files in correctly named folder which is zipped),
report word length within -10% to + 20%

Very well done. Good planning. Good linkages to curriculum


framework which are quite explicit. Some supporting linkages to
other literature. Good commentary on the design process.

20

19

PowerPoint is very good. Reasonably good pictures of


construction, but they could have been a little bit more detailed.
Photographs compressed. PowerPoint presentation well
designed. Final product looks very nice.

20

17

recycled nature is very high. Creativity of this project is high.


Complexity is high and has required you to engage in different
kinds of materials and tools. Final product looks quite
professional. I think this stretch your comfort and skill base.

20

19

age-group suitability seems to be very good. Well justified against


curriculum framework. Well supported pedagogically.

20

18

overall presentation is very good. Except, I think your headings in


your report are far too big. Good In text citations. files correctly
labeled and presented.

20

Total for this assignment

100

General Comment: well done.

17

90

You might also like