Integrative

Case 1
-Merit Enterprise Corp.Aiacoboaie Ciprian
Ilies Ramona Madalina
Popovici Livia Ioana
BA, GR1

a) Discuss the pros and cons of option 1, and prioritize your thoughts. What are the most
positive aspects of this option, and what are the biggest drawbacks?
The first option Sara Lehn considers when asked to raise the $4 billion needed for the dramatic
expansion planned by the CEO, is borrowing the money from JPMorgan Chase, a bank they have
previously made business with. One problem could be that this time the amount is much bigger
comparing to the seasonal credit lines and medium term loans made before.
One important drawback of borrowing from banks is the covenant that banks impose on companies to
which they lent money. Covenants are rules placed on debt that are designed to stabilize corporate
performance and reduce the risk a bank is exposed when giving a large amount of money to a company.
Examples of covenants may be: cannot issue any more debt until the loan is completely paid off; cannot
participate in any share offerings until the loan is paid off, etc. covenants can be very straightforward
and sometimes difficult to deal with.
Another drawback is that the company will have to pay interest annually plus the repayment of the
principle.
The most positive aspect of this option is that debts can often work as tax shields. Interest paid on debt
is a tax-deductible expense, so the company could save some money by financing with debt instead of
going public. The investment the company wants to make is big and the interest will also be pretty big.
Therefore, the deduction in taxes will also be pretty high, saving the company from paying so much
money.
Another positive aspect is that the company will not have to search in many places to find investors. It
will only go to the bank, and the employees working there will take care to raise the money needed and
give it to the company. So, the company will not have to contact third parties that may even be risky and
jeopardize the plans of the firm.

b) Do the same for option 2.

Saras second option is to transform the company in a public one. The positive aspects of this option are
that Merit Enterprise had an excellent financial performance in the last years so probably many
powerful investors will be interested to buy the stock and the stock could command a high price on the
market.
The second positive aspect is that for the first time the company offer to employees a compensation in
stock or stock options.
Another advantage is that going public generates publicity and increases awareness of the company and
attracts new customers.
Stock Value Appreciation If your public company performs well, the value its stock tends to increase.
This is one of the foremost reasons to Go Public, the future value of the company stock.

Retain Control - In most cases, Venture Capital investors will want to appoint someone on their team as
a member of the board of directors. Moreover, they usually want to have more than half of the
ownership and/or voting rights. Through the public equities market, or going public, you can maintain
control.
Liquid Equity - When you take your company public, your shares can be used as or turned into cash, for
paying debts, acquiring another business, etc.
Control Risk - If you ever feel that your shares will drop in price, you could sell them. Naturally, proper
public disclosures are required. Publicly traded shares are much easier to sell quickly than are privately
held ones.
The biggest drawbacks in this case are extensive disclosure requirements for investors and the problem
that on the secondary market any kind of individuals or institutions might wind up holding a large chunk
of Merit stock.
Public companies also are faced with the added pressure of the market which may cause them to focus
more on short-term results rather than long-term growth. The actions of the company's management
also become increasingly scrutinized as investors constantly look for rising profits. This may lead
management to perform somewhat questionable practices in order to boost earnings.

c) Which option do you think Sara should recommend to the board and why?
I think Sara should recommend option 2 to the board; as the company is on a growth trajectory there
could be continuous demand for funds which cannot be met by retained earnings and debt alone,
therefore keeping the future in perspective equity issue will be a good decision.
The final objective of any company is to improve performance, growth and shareholder wealth which
can be met by growing in size unless these objectives are replaced by management control as a private
company will have a growth limited by the funds available for investment.
Though cost of equity is high there are no fixed financial payments linked to it.
Even though Merit will require larger financial and other disclosures, this will only bring in more
transparency and better corporate governance in the company.
Though both equity and debt have their pros and cons, an equity issue also increases the debt capacity
of the firm as the firm can resort to higher debt in future.
Today we are in a global market competing not just with local peers but also internationals, therefore
going public gives better visibility, brand image, larger investor base and recognition.