Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. INTRODUCTION
The application of wind energy throughout the world is growing fast. The
development of larger, more efficient turbines is opening up new frontiers in wind energy
generation in the form of large offshore wind farms. The use of high-voltage direct current
(HVDC) technology can fully realize the potential of these developments. Wind farms
located offshore are planned because of higher average wind speeds at sea and space
limitations on-shore. Offshore wind farms will be different from their onshore counterparts
for several reasons. The turbines will on average have a larger diameter and rated powers,
the farm will be difficult to access during periods with high winds, erection and
maintenance will be more expensive, the turbine noise will probably not be an important
issue, and a submarine electrical connection to shore will be required.
the electrical power components between the generator shaft and the grid connection and it
concerns the way these components are interconnected and operated. Its function is to
convert mechanical power to electric power, to collect electric power from individual
turbines, to transmit it to the shore and to convert to an appropriate voltage and frequency.
The system consists amongst other of generators, cables, transformers and power
electronic converters. Systems are mainly characterized by the type of voltage used within
the farm and for the shore connection (AC or DC) and the frequency of the electrical signals
(fixed or variable). Some efficient way of configuration to collect the electric power from
individual wind turbines and to transmit this power to an on-shore high-voltage power
system node has been discussed here. The inventory concerns both constant and variable
speed wind turbines and transmission by AC and DC cable networks.
Background
Wind power is the world’s fastest growing energy source. By 2020, 12% of the
world’s demand of electricity will be produced by wind. Recent trends are a move from
onshore to offshore, the up scaling of wind turbine size (to 3-5 MW), and the integration of
land and marine-based networks. A major challenge is connecting a variable energy source
to a distant grid demanding power stability.
2. WIND POWER
Wind power is the conversion of wind energy into a useful form of energy, such as
electricity, using wind turbines. At the end of 2008, worldwide nameplate capacity of wind-
powered generators was 121.2 gigawatts (GW). In 2008, wind power produced about 1.5%
of worldwide electricity usage; and is growing rapidly, having doubled in the three years
between 2005 and 2008. Several countries have achieved relatively high levels of wind
power penetration, such as 19% of stationary electricity production in Denmark, 11%
in Spain and Portugal, and 7% in Germany and the Republic of Ireland in 2008. As of May
2009, eighty countries around the world are using wind power on a commercial basis.
Large-scale wind farms are connected to the electric power transmission network;
smaller facilities are used to provide electricity to isolated locations. Utility companies
increasingly buy back surplus electricity produced by small domestic turbines. Wind energy
as a power source is attractive as an alternative to fossil fuels, because it is
plentiful, renewable, widely distributed, clean, and produces no greenhouse gas emissions.
However, the construction of wind farms is not universally welcomed due to their visual
impact and other effects on the environment. Wind power is non-dispatchable, meaning that
for economic operation, all of the available output must be taken when it is available. Other
resources, such as hydropower, and standard load management techniques must be used to
match supply with demand. The intermittency of wind seldom creates problems when using
wind power to supply a low proportion of total demand. Where wind is to be used for a
moderate fraction of demand such as 40%, additional costs for compensation of
intermittency are considered to be modest.
The intermittency of wind power and other renewable power sources creates issues in
power grids, which expect some supplied power to have a certain degree of constancy and
reliability to satisfy baseline demand while other supplied power must respond to variations
in demand.
2.2 Development
To develop a wind farm, a suitable location is first identified. Good locations for
wind farms should have fast steady winds and be near transmission lines. Land parcels on
which wind turbines will be located then must be leased from the land owners. The wind
resource must then be evaluated using data recorded by onsite meteorological towers. The
wind farm project must then be financed and constructed.
2.3 Types
Depending on the location of the turbines installed, the wind farms can be classified
as Onshore, Nearshore, Airborne, and Offshore. Among these, onshore windfarms became
very popular because of its comparative low initial investment and pollution free energy.
Thus such windfarms were constructed in site where continuous unidirectional flow of wind
is available. But the increasing demand and non availability of suitable lands, the world is
now going for offshore wind farms.
2.3.1 Onshore
2.3.2 Nearshore
2.3.3 Airborne
Airborne wind turbines would eliminate the cost of towers and might also be flown in
high speed winds at high altitude. No such systems are in commercial operation.
2.3.4 Offshore
3. OFFSHORE WINDFARMS
Offshore wind farms are likely to be larger than those on shore as the economies of
scale in offshore projects are more significant. Compared to onshore wind power, offshore
wind power is more complex and costly to install and maintain but also has several key
advantages. Winds are typically stronger and more stable at sea, resulting in significantly
higher production per unit installed. Wind turbines can also be bigger than on land because
it is easier to transport very large turbine components by sea. Offshore wind development
zones are generally considered to be ten kilometers or more from land. Offshore wind
turbines are less obtrusive than turbines on land, as their apparent size and noise is
mitigated by distance. Because water has less surface roughness than land (especially
deeper water), the average wind speed is usually considerably higher over open water.
Capacity factors (utilisation rates) are considerably higher than for onshore and nearshore
locations. In stormy areas with extended shallow continental shelves, turbines are practical
to install.
Offshore installation is more expensive than onshore but this depends on the
attributes of the site. Offshore towers are generally taller than onshore towers once the
submerged height is included. Offshore foundations may be more expensive to build. Power
transmission from offshore turbines is through undersea cable, often using high voltage
direct current operation if significant distance is to be covered. Offshore saltwater
environments also raise maintenance costs by corroding the towers
Offshore wind turbines will probably continue to be the largest turbines in operation,
since the high fixed costs of the installation are spread over more energy production,
reducing the average cost. Turbine components (rotor blades, tower sections) can be
transported by barge, making large parts easier to transport offshore than on land, where
turn clearances and underpass clearances of available roads limit the size of turbine
components that can be moved by truck. Similarly, large construction cranes are difficult to
move to remote wind farms on land, but crane vessels easily move over water. Offshore
wind farms tend to be quite large, often involving over 100 turbines. These wind farms are
likely to be located some distance from the shore.
3.1 Indian Scenario
At the end of September 2007, India had 7660 MW of wind generating capacity and
is the fourth largest market in the world. Indian Wind Energy Association has estimated that
with the current level of technology, the ‘on-shore’ potential for utilization of wind energy
for electricity generation is of the order of 65,000 MW. There are about a dozen wind
pumps of various designs providing water for agriculture, afforestation, and domestic
purposes, all scattered over the country. The wind farms are predominantly present in the
states of Tamil Nadu, Maharashtra, Karnataka and Gujarat. Other states like Andhra
Pradesh, Rajasthan, Kerala and Madhya Pradesh have a very good potential.
Electric energy generated by offshore wind generating facilities requires one or more
submarine cables to transmit the power generated to the onshore utility grid that services the
end-users of this renewable energy source. Because the power from the wind turbines is
generated as an alternating current (AC) and the on-shore transmission grid is AC, the most
straightforward technical approach is to use an AC cable system connection to facilitate this
interconnection. Present state-of-the-art and the most cost effective AC technology for this
type of interconnection is solid dielectric (also called extruded dielectric or polymeric
insulated) cable, usually with cross- linked polyethylene (XLPE) insulation. This is the cable
system technology presently used for all offshore wind farms constructed to date (all of
which are located in Europe) primarily as a result of: ease of interconnection, installation,
and maintenance; operational reliability; and cost effectiveness. For relatively small
generating capacity wind farms it has been sufficient to bring the power to shore at the same
voltage used to interconnect the wind turbine generators (WTG), typically 33 kilovolt (kV).
As the energy generating capacity of the wind farm increases, however, use of submarine
cables in this voltage class for the connection to shore would require a prohibitively large
number of cables and would lead to high line losses and excessive voltage drops combined
with unnecessary sea-bed disturbance to accommodate installation of many cables. One
solution is to step up the wind farm transmission voltage from the WTG production and
collection voltage of 33 kV to a higher AC voltage suitable for transmission to shore. This
requires an offshore substation platform containing step-up transformers. The first wind farm
large enough to require this approach is the 160 MW Horns Rev Wind Farm commissioned
for operation in December 2002 in Denmark.
Corona is another factor. Corona discharge is the creation of ions in a fluid (such
as air) by the presence of a strong electric field. Electrons are torn from neutral air, and
either the positive ions or the electrons are attracted to the conductor, while the charged
particles drift. This effect can cause considerable power loss, create audible and radio-
frequency interference, generate toxic compounds such as oxides of nitrogen and ozone,
and bring forth arcing. Both AC and DC transmission lines can generate coronas, in the
former case in the form of oscillating particles, in the latter a constant wind. Due to
the space charge formed around the conductors, an HVDC system may have about half the
loss per unit length of a high voltage AC system carrying the same amount of power. With
monopolar transmission the choice of polarity of the energized conductor leads to a degree
of control over the corona discharge. In particular, the polarity of the ions emitted can be
controlled, which may have an environmental impact on particulate condensation. (Particles
of different polarities have a different mean-free path.) Negative coronas generate
considerably more ozone than positive coronas, and generate it further downwind of the
power line, creating the potential for health effects. The use of a positive voltage will reduce
the ozone impacts of monopole HVDC power lines.
Also for directly connected wind farms with 33 kV collection circuits, some form of
reactive power compensation/voltage control may be required. It will, of course, be cheaper
to locate this on land.
4. HIGH VOLTAGE DIRECT CURRENT (HVDC)
A high-voltage, direct current (HVDC) electric power transmission system uses direct
current for the bulk transmission of electrical power, in contrast with the more
common alternating current systems. For long-distance distribution, HVDC systems are less
expensive and suffer lower electrical losses. For shorter distances, the higher cost of DC
conversion equipment compared to an AC system may be warranted where other benefits of
direct current links are useful.
High voltage is used for transmission to reduce the energy lost in the resistance of the
wires. For a given quantity of power transmitted, higher voltage reduces the transmission
power loss. Power in a circuit is proportional to the current, but the power lost as heat in the
wires is proportional to the square of the current. However, power is also proportional to
voltage, so for a given power level, higher voltage can be traded off for lower current. Thus,
the higher the voltage, lower the power loss. Power loss can also be reduced by reducing
resistance, commonly achieved by increasing the diameter of the conductor; but larger
conductors are heavier and more expensive.
High voltages cannot be easily used in lighting and motors, and so transmission-level
voltage must be reduced to values compatible with end-use equipment. The transformer,
which only works with alternating current, is an efficient way to change voltages. The
competition between the DC of Thomas Edison and the AC of Nikola Tesla and George
Westinghouse was known as the War of Currents, with AC emerging victorious. Practical
manipulation of DC voltages only became possible with the development of high power
electronic devices such as mercury arc valves and later semiconductor devices, such
as thyristors, insulated-gate bipolar transistors (IGBTs), high power
capable MOSFETs (power metal–oxide–semiconductor field-effect transistors) and gate
turn-off thyristors (GTOs).
Figure 5: 150 KV mercury arc valve converter for transmitting AC hydropower voltage to long distance.
The first long-distance transmission of electric power was demonstrated using direct
current in 1882 at the Miesbach-Munich Power Transmission, but only 2.5 kW was
transmitted. An early method of high-voltage DC transmission was developed by the Swiss
engineer Rene Thury and his method was put into practice by 1889 in Italy by the
Acquedotto de Ferrari-Galliera Company. This system used series-connected motor-
generator sets to increase voltage. Each set was insulated from ground and driven by
insulated shafts from a prime mover. The line was operated in constant current mode, with
up to 5,000 volts on each machine, some machines having double commutators to reduce
The grid controlled mercury arc valve became available for power transmission
during the period 1920 to 1940. Starting in 1932, General Electric tested mercury-vapor
valves and a 12 kV DC transmission line, which also served to convert 40 Hz generation to
serve 60 Hz loads, at Mechanicville, New York. In 1941, a 60 MW, +/-200 kV, 115 km
buried cable link was designed for the city of Berlin using mercury arc valves (Elbe-
Project), but owing to the collapse of the German government in 1945 the project was never
completed. The nominal justification for the project was that, during wartime, a buried
cable would be less conspicuous as a bombing target. The equipment was moved to the
Soviet Union and was put into service there.
using thyristor valves were relied on. According to experts such as Vijay Sood, the next 25
years may well be dominated by force commutated converters, beginning with capacitor
commutative converters (CCC) followed by self commutating converters which have
largely supplanted LCC use. Since use of semiconductor commutators, hundreds of HVDC
sea-cables have been laid and worked with high reliability, usually better than 96% of the
time.
Rectification and inversion use essentially the same machinery. Many substations are
set up in such a way that they can act as both rectifiers and inverters. At the AC end a set of
transformers, often three physically separate single-phase transformers, isolate the station
from the AC supply, to provide a local earth, and to ensure the correct eventual DC voltage.
The output of these transformers is then connected to a bridge rectifier formed by a number
of valves. The basic configuration uses six valves, connecting each of the three phases to
each of the two DC rails. However, with a phase change only every sixty degrees,
considerable harmonics remain on the DC rails.
Voltage Source Converters (VSC) have for the first time been used for HVDC
transmission in a real network. Experience from the design and commissioning of the
transmission shows that the technology has now reached the stage where it is possible to
build high voltage converters utilizing Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistors (IGBTs).
Operation and system tests have proved that the properties that have been discussed for
many years regarding VSCs for HVDC are a reality now. They include independent control
of active and reactive power, operation against isolated ac. networks with no generation of
their own, very limited need of filters and no need of transformers for the conversion
process. This is only the first installation of VSC for HVDC.
Using HVDC to interconnect two points in a power grid, in many cases is the best
economic alternative, and furthermore it has excellent environmental benefits. The HVDC
technology (High Voltage Direct Current) is used to transmit electricity over long distances
by overhead transmission lines or submarine cables. It is also used to interconnect separate
power systems, where traditional alternating current (AC) connections can not be used.
ABB pioneered the HVDC technology and is the undisputed world leader in the HVDC
field.
In a high voltage direct current (HVDC) system, electric power is taken from one point in a
three-phase AC network, converted to DC in a converter station, transmitted to the
receiving point by an overhead line or cable and then converted back to AC in another
converter station and injected into the receiving AC network. Typically, an HVDC
transmission has a rated power of more than 100 MW and many are in the 1,000 - 3,000
MW range. HVDC transmissions are used for transmission of power over long or very long
distances, because it then becomes economically attractive over conventional AC
lines. With an HVDC system, the power flow can be controlled rapidly and accurately as to
both the power level and the direction. This possibility is often used in order to improve the
performance and efficiency of the connected AC networks.
5.1.2
HVDC Light
The Pulse Width Modulated Voltage Source Converter a close to ideal component in
the transmission network. From a system point of view it acts as a motor or generator
without mass that can control active and reactive power almost instantaneously.
Conventional HVDC converter technology is based on the use of line-commutated or
phase-commutated converters (PCC). With the appearance of high switching frequency
components, such as IGBTs (Insulated Gate Bipolar Transistor) it becomes advantageous to
build VSC (Voltage Source Converters) using PWM (Pulse Width Modulation)
Technology.
The key part of the HVDC Light converter consists of an IGBT valve bridge. No
special converter transformers are necessary between the valve bridge and the AC-grid.
Aconverter reactor can separate the fundamental frequency from the raw PWM waveform.
If the desired DC voltage does not match the AC system voltage, a normal AC transformer
may be used in addition to the reactor. A small shunt AC-filter is placed on the AC-side of
the reactor. On the DC-side there is a DC capacitor that serves as a DC filter too.
The PWM pattern and the corresponding power frequency voltage of a VSC converter
With PWM it is possible to create any phase angle or amplitude (up to a certain limit) by
changing the PWM pattern, which can be done almost instantaneous. Hereby PWM offers
the possibility to control both active and reactive power independently.
This makes the Pulse Width Modulated Voltage Source Converter a close to ideal
component in the transmission network. From a system point of view it acts as a motor or
generator without mass that can control active and reactive power almost instantaneously.
Furthermore, it does not contribute to the short circuit power as the AC current can be
controlled.
5.1.3 HVDC-Plus
The high-voltage direct-current transmission system HVDC Plus makes use of all the
advantages offered by self-commutated voltage-sourced converter technology. This
includes grid access to very weak AC systems as well as supplying passive networks.
Active and reactive power can be controlled independently. The capability of very rapid
control and protection actions of the converter makes the system highly dynamic, which is
necessary especially for AC faults and system disturbances. Last but not least, the black-
start capability function enables the HVDC system to restart a collapsed network.
HVDC Plus operates with an innovative multilevel converter concept, which offers in
comparison to existing VSC solutions additional significant benefits. Amongst others these
are low losses due to low switching frequencies, full modular design and therewith a
straightforward scalability. In addition to the operation as back-to-back link and as cable
transmission, HVDC Plus can also be used in combination with overhead lines.
Offshore wind farms in the power range of a few hundred megawatts usually demand for
particularly high requirements of power transmission. Many wind farms are located
offshore over a hundred kilometers from the AC system on the coast. This generally
exceeds the economical and technical limits of AC-based cable transmission systems and
calls for new DC transmission concepts, for example based on the HVDC Plus system.
Oil platforms, which have a high power demand, also require a high level of power quality
for the transmission if they are to be supplied from the mainland and not locally as in the
past. Power delivery from the mainland not only increases the availability of the electric
supply on the drilling rigs but also renders the maintenance and servicing work unnecessary
for the small power plants currently used on the platforms. This also eliminates
environmentally harmful CO2 and NOX emissions from the small power plants usually
used at sea.
Submarine cables are used exclusively for power transmission across the sea.
However, the transport of power in the form of alternating current via cable is limited to a
length of about 80 to 120 kilometers for technical and economical reasons, depending on
the power to be transmitted. For this reason, direct-current transmission is the preferred
solution.
5.2 Configurations
Most monopolar systems are designed for future bipolar expansion. Transmission line
towers may be designed to carry two conductors, even if only one is used initially for the
monopole transmission system. The second conductor is either unused or used as electrode
line or connected in parallel with the other (as in case of Baltic-Cable).
5.2.2 Bipolar
voltage, transmission line cost is higher than a monopole with a return conductor. However,
there are a number of advantages to bipolar transmission which can make it the attractive
option.
A bipolar system may also be installed with a metallic earth return conductor.
Bipolar systems may carry as much as 3,200 MW at voltages of +/-600 kV. Submarine
cable installations initially commissioned as a monopole may be upgraded with additional
cables and operated as a bipole.
A back-to-back station (or B2B for short) is a plant in which both static inverters and
rectifiers are in the same area, usually in the same building. The length of the direct current
line is kept as short as possible. HVDC back-to-back stations are used for coupling of
electricity mains of different frequency and phase number and two network of the same
nominal frequency but no fixed phase relationship. The DC voltage in the intermediate
circuit can be selected freely at HVDC back-to-back stations because of the short conductor
length. The DC voltage is as low as possible, in order to build a small valve hall and to
avoid series connections of valves. For this reason at HVDC back-to-back stations valves
with the highest available current rating are used.
Combined with the higher average power possible with a DC transmission line for the
same line-to-ground voltage, a tripole conversion of an existing AC line could allow up to
80% more power to be transferred using the same transmission right-of-way, towers, and
conductors. Some AC lines cannot be loaded to their thermal limit due to system stability,
reliability, and reactive power concerns, which would not exist with an HVDC link.
The system would operate without earth-return current. Since a single failure of a
pole converter or a conductor results in only a small loss of capacity and no earth-return
current, reliability of this scheme would be high, with no time required for switching. As of
2008, no tri-pole conversions are in operation, although a transmission line in India has
been converted to bipole HVDC.
Three options for connecting an offshore wind farm have been examined to establish
the electrical characteristics, feasibility and costs.
out to 30 km and power levels less than 200 MW. Putting a substation offshore for this type
of link is novel and the first few would be expensive and require careful monitoring. Thus,
it is unlikely to be used for the first offshore wind farms around the UK.
The advantage of HVDC is the ability to transmit large amounts of power over long
distances with lower capital costs and with lower losses than AC. Depending on voltage
level and construction details, losses are quoted as about 3% per 1,000 km High-voltage
direct current transmission allows efficient use of energy sources remote from load centers.
Long undersea cables have a high capacitance. While this has minimal effect for DC
transmission, the current required to charge and discharge the capacitance of the cable
causes additional I2R power losses when the cable is carrying AC. In addition, AC power is
lost to dielectric losses.
HVDC can carry more power per conductor, because for a given power rating the
constant voltage in a DC line is lower than the peak voltage in an AC line. In AC power,
the root mean square (RMS) voltage measurement is considered the standard, but RMS is
only about 71% of the peak voltage. The peak voltage of AC determines the actual
insulation thickness and conductor spacing. Because DC operates at a constant maximum
voltage without RMS, this allows existing transmission line corridors with equally sized
conductors and insulation to carry 100% more power into an area of high power
consumption than AC, which can lower costs.
6.2 Disadvantages
The required static inverters are expensive and have limited overload capacity. At
smaller transmission distances the losses in the static inverters may be bigger than in an AC
transmission line. The cost of the inverters may not be offset by reductions in line
construction cost and lower line loss. With two exceptions, all former mercury rectifiers
worldwide have been dismantled or replaced by thyristor units. Pole 1 of the HVDC scheme
between the North and South Islands of New Zealand still uses mercury arc rectifiers, as
does Pole 1 of the Vancouver Island link in Canada.
• DC cable transmissions have lower losses than a corresponding AC cable link. The
converter station losses are normally as low as 0.6% per station, and
DC cable losses are only around 0.3-0.4% per 100 km.
• Long AC cables produce high amounts of reactive power requiring shunt reactors at both
ends. In extreme cases the reactive current may seriously reduce the active power
transmission capability. These drawbacks do not arise in a DC cable.
• DC links can connect two asynchronous power grids in cases where it is impossible or
impracticable to establish a synchronous interconnection.
• The high controllability of the DC system can be exploited to improve the operating
conditions of the interconnected grids.
AC Cable DC Cable
Higher cable costs: more cables needed Lower cable costs: fewer cables needed
Lower power transfer capabilities (per cable) Higher power transfer capabilities (per cable)
7. APPLICATIONS
Increasing the capacity of an existing power grid in situations where additional wires
are difficult or expensive to install
Power transmission and stabilization between unsynchronised AC distribution
systems
Connecting a remote generating plant to the distribution grid, for example Nelson
River Bipole
Stabilizing a predominantly AC power-grid, without increasing prospective short
circuit current
Reducing line cost. HVDC needs fewer conductors as there is no need to support
multiple phases. Also, thinner conductors can be used since HVDC does not suffer from
the skin effect
Facilitate power transmission between different countries that use AC at differing
voltages and/or frequencies
Synchronize AC produced by renewable energy sources.
Costs vary widely depending on the specifics of the project such as power rating,
circuit length, overhead vs. underwater route, land costs, and AC network improvements
required at either terminal. A detailed evaluation of DC vs. AC cost may be required where
there is no clear technical advantage to DC alone and only economics drives the selection.
However some practitioners have given out some information that can be reasonably well
relied upon:
For an 8 GW 40 km link laid under the English Channel, the following are
approximate primary equipment costs for a 2000 MW 500 kV bipolar conventional HVDC
link
Converter stations ~£110M
Subsea cable + installation ~£1M/km
While choosing the technology used for conversion of AC and DC based on VSC’s,
the HVDC Light is an attractive solution for offshore wind power when HVDC is
considered for offshore wind power, the most attractive technology is the voltage source
technology in ABB version named HVDC Light. The evidence is in the table describing the
differences between the technologies.
When the HVDC transmission an interesting alternative, a typical case for HVDC
Light in an offshore application could be of 350 MW transmissions with 70 km sub sea
cable and 30 km land cable
The direct investment cost for HVDC Light option including converters, cables and
installation of cable and converters will be in the range of 110 – 140 MEuro. The range is
primarily given be differences in installation costs and local market conditions. For the AC
cable option there is similarly a range in cost 110 – 140 MEuro. This corresponds in both
cases to 310 – 400 kEuro/MW and gives similar results as in the previously quoted study.
The two alternatives are thus similar in cost and a detailed study for the individual case will
determine the best solution. But other factors should also be considered such that may show
beneficial for the HVDC option:
Grid reinforcement costs may be significant in the AC case but are very unlikely for
a HVDC voltage source solution
Cost for power flow equipment in the AC case
Possibilities to go much further on land with underground cable at very moderate
cost in the HVDC case.
Increased transmission capacity in existing AC grid (HVDC case).
Obtaining cost information on the different options for different wind farm sizes
proved quite difficult as none of the equipment is off-the-shelf. Budget costs and some
simple assumptions on scaling have led to the following conclusions.
8. CONCLUSION
The equipment required for the electrical infrastructure of offshore wind farms is
available. The early offshore wind farms are likely to use electrical designs quite similar to
those adopted for recent on shore developments. A maximum voltage of 33 kV both for the
wind farm collection circuits and for the connection to land is likely in the first instance.
However, as large offshore installations are developed (>100 MW) then HVDC
transmission to shore may be more cost effective. Considerable development work is still
required for the large offshore substations or converter stations which will be required for
large offshore wind farms.
8. REFERENCES
1) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High-voltage_direct_current#High_voltage_transmission
2) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_power_cable#Submarine_cables_for_AC
3) www.abb.com/cawp/gad02181/18e68b778f900952c1256e4b002b25be.aspx
4) http://energyzarr.typepad.com/energyzarrnationalcom/2009/03/ac-dc-wars-continue-
part-ii.html
5) powersystemsdesign.com/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=86:pdf-
full-magazine-archives&catid=21:content&Itemid=87
6) http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Submarine_power_cable
7) www.abb.com/cawp/gad02181/c1256d71001e0037c1256d08002e7282.aspx
8) http://energyzarr.typepad.com/energyzarrnationalcom/2009/02/index.html