You are on page 1of 8
wee aa eee 10) u 12| 13 14] 15] 16] 17} 18 i9 20 2 2a 25 BEST AVAILABLE IMAGE POSSIBLE FILED FEB 19 2014 ‘SUPERIOR COURT CLERK BYJanie Smoter DEPUTY IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF WASHINGTON IN AND FOR KING COUNTY Tnre: ) ) TWILA MARKHAM, ) NO. 13-3-08383-7 SEA. ) Petitioner, ) © ORDER GRANTING and ) PETITIONER’S REQUEST FOR ) | PROTECTIVE ORDER GERALD WAYNE MARKHAM, ) ) } Respondent 1. JUDGMENT SUMM: oy « {Judgment Creditor: MARKHAM Tadgment Deklor: GERALD ‘MARKHAM. Fe] ‘Attorney Fees: $3,000 D. PAxomey’s Fees, Cosis.and Other Recovery Amougis ‘ShatiBear Interest er annura, E. jr net Crediber: ‘Kerma L. Zaike F, | Attomey ent Debtor: \ Philig C. Tsai a) Anthoi L. Uric WW MICHAEL W. BUGNI& ASSOG. PLLC ORDER GRANTING PROTECTIVE ORDER ~ ‘BRDROOSEVELT Way We, STE. 200 Page 1 of3 (2 2550+ FACSTMLE G9) 362-0087 Doriens oe yaar wn 10] ul 12 13 14] 15 16] 17] 18) 19 20 21 2, 23) oa 25| IL ORDER ‘This Motion having been brought by the Petitioner/ Wie, for a Protective Order limiting the scope of the Respondent's Requests for Production, the court having reviewed the Petitioner’s motion, Respondent's response and Petitioner’s reply (if any) and the Court being otherwise fully advised in the premises, NOW, THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that: 1, The Petitioner's motion for Protective Order is GRANTED. The purpose of discovery is to make a trial Jess a game of blind man’s bluff and more a fair contest with the issues and facts disclosed to the fullest extent practicable. Washington State Physicians Ins. he Geet Exchange v. Fisons, 122 Wn.2d 299,858 P.2d 1054 (1993). Paani A eaa wate ¥ Aten pti [“atiorapeed- to ‘use the discovery process as a means to burden and harass the Wife and to gain unauthorized access to the parties” home, seeking to impose obligations on the Wife beyond those allowed by any applicable Local Rules or governing case law. Therefore, the objections contained in the Wife’s letter dated November 18, 2013 which is attached hereto are sustained, and the Husband’s Requests for Production are limited in scope to comport with the| objections therein, : “The wife Shall C2opeate A feultelinn pa ducter 6 ie 2. "The Wife sat? ave FITEMMEAT avaMNST the Hsbamttin the anon of $3,000 For AM care ond investigation re Corts relatiag te tle Apuyl4 20} BEDE teat hen elease of informe lve. ee penn : ; ‘a MO meted q confer to develoo. On ow Wee, eRe, hee ity pate. cai il ES MICHAEL W. Bueni & ASSOC., PLLC ORDER GRANTING PROTECTIVE ORDER — RED ROOSEVELT WAYNE, te c00 Page 2 of 3 (eat FRGMMLE (9808087 , Te the

You might also like