Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Nothing
Nethan Lanzaderas
11B
Mr. Cepeda
Technical Design
5/21/15
Identify the Problem
For every semester in Harmony Science Academy, there is 18 weeks
in one semester. For every 9 weeks in our engineering class, Mr. Cepeda,
the professor, assigns ONE intermediate level project. These last 9 weeks,
our instructor has given us a task to literally build something out of nothing.
The extra parts from multiple VEX Robotics kit has been laying around in
storage for a while. Our professor hated the idea of wasted materials. To
put the excess materials to work, Mr. Cepeda created a project that
included
the
understanding
in
automatic-functioning
technologies,
General Ideas
Research
Having a decent
amount
of
the
hesitation
from
intimidating
intermediate level
of
this
project seemed to
enough. The first person I turned to for assistance was my former engineer
aunt, Shawn Glacken. The first thing she suggested was a rubber band
mechanism: winding it up and letting it go to crush the can. The second
thing she suggested is that the crusher part of my final design should be a
material that is stronger than an aluminum can such as stainless steel. The
sensors she suggested to place into my prototype were sensors similar to a
garage door. I turned to my father for a second opinion and he states that it
would be too expensive to obtain. The third thing she suggested, since she
knew I was struggling on my research, was to look into recycling websites
for ideas on how to tackle the project. I later on began to watch a video of a
large recycling machine and I strongly believed that it would somehow give
me the slightest idea on how my design was going to look like. The large
amount of material compounding did not assist me too much on my design
knowing my can crusher would simply crush one can at a time. Instead of
looking into big factories, the rest of my research consisted on a machine
called a vertical baler. The function of this device is similar to my desired
design and I finally had a wince of hope. As I begin to read further into
machines such as the vertical baler, the table of contents contained
information such as the functions and electrical components of this
machine. But as soon as I arrived to those two pages, it simply provided
Sources:
1. Shawn Glacken
2. Steve Gares
3. www.science.owstuffworks.com
4. www.newwastecare.com
5. www.ipsbalers.com
6. www.wisegeek.org
7. www.cs.cmu.edu
8. www.teachengineering.org
9. www.seatlerobotics.org
10.
www.dsprobotics.com
Consider Alternative Solution
Most
of
these alternative solutions are going to derive from the extra sketches I
made. If the wireless does not work out, Ill most probably switch over to
programming an Xbox controller to control the can crusher.
Select an Approach
Surprisingly, my selected approach does not derive from any of my
sketches but it does serve the same function.
Weebly Post
Size should be reasonable
Build/Test/Refine
The building process was fairly easy after selecting an approach.
Knowing the exact materials made it even better. When it came down to the
electrical portion and programming, it got complicated. While I tried to
connect the motors to the power distributor, it broke. At that point I knew it
wasn't going to work. Instead of trying to fix the technicality, I recorded the
motion of the machine. Before getting the chance of testing the motors, I
was positive that it could not haul such a heavy smasher which was an
anchor. During the refining stage, I did not attempt to make a program nor
fix the motors. Since I did the building stage the last minute, I could not
accomplish an autonomous mode. The smasher also posed a problem
which was the weight. I placed bricks at the end of the prototype as a
counter weight. Overall, if I started from the 2nd or 3rd week this project
was given to us, I think I would have been more satisfied with my results.
Communicate Results
I can honestly say that Im not content. There is no point in crying at this
point because I know I made a mistake on time management and
contribution towards the project. The project overall was a great experience
though. I struggled most of the time, the research and building process is
what interested me the most. My designs throughout followed the same
concepts: can crusher, sensors, servos. Sadly on my final prototype I didnt
attach a servo. I was too busy focusing on the automatic function of my
design which was to recall and drop down on the soda can until a specific
height. The programming stage, in my opinion, would have been the
hardest. I say the words 'would have' because I could not find an online
program for my robot. I found a program called Visual Studios but it does
not directly help with the programming I need for my prototype(although it is
possible to create a simple game on it). An alternative plan besides the
sensor was to connect an Xbox controller to my prototype, program it then
be able to control it. I barely accomplished building a failed prototype due to
harsh procrastination. Everything I wanted to accomplish for this project
has gone to failure. The stress and pressure from the beginning definitely
contributed to my lack of work. I already knew the level of the project but I
just did not contribute myself to the project further. I was simply able to
create a non-functioning prototype.