Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Heading:
U.S. Supreme Court:
Plaintiff
Defendant
Plaintiff: ACTON
Appellant: ACTON
- Federal district court upheld the school districts policy for drug testing athletes.
- The appellate court reversed that decision based on that the policy violated both the Fourth and Fourteenth amendments
and the Oregon Constitution.
- VERNONIA SCHOOL DISTRICT 47J appealed that decision to the United States Supreme Court.
Question(s) Presented (what is the dispute and which points of law apply):
Does random drug testing of high school athletes violate reasonable search and seizure clause of the Fourth Amendment?
The Fourth Amendment was extended (by the Fourteenth Amendment) to cover search and seizures by state officers. The
collection of urine under the school policy was a search. Student athletes also have lesser expectations of privacy that
their peers who are not athletes. The court noted the little privacy in a locker room. Student athletes also voluntarily
subject themselves to a great degree of regulation as well. Finally, the court viewed the policy as a deterrent of drug use
by student athletes, as well as to prevent harm to them. The court found that the schools policy met the Fourth
Amendments reasonableness requirement and was thus constitutional.