XYZ is one of the leading Indian Banks and has a vendor base of 1000 vendors performing its business

activities across 12 categories. This bank hires ABC-one of the Big Four firms to perform Third
Party vendor review for 82 vendors. ABC has shortlisted these vendors after thorough and detailed
discussion with Business Heads. The shortlisted criteria also involved parameters like categories catered
by Vendors, Business Volume/Size dealt by Vendor and previous ratings given to Vendors. ABC and XYZ
decided upon the rating and score to be awarded to each vendor depending on the observations during
the review. ABC agreed to give 2 weeks time to vendor to close the highlighted observations so that
they can improvise on their rating and score. ABC represents this data category vise.
Data and Calculations involved:
Category
X1
X2
X3
X4
X5
X6
X7
X8
X9
X10
X11
X12
Total

Count of Vendor Review Category

Category Risk ScoreService category
Name
Risk Score
After 2 weeks window score
3
54
20
2.5
3
42
35
1.25
20
63
46
2.5
4
75
29
2.25
9
41
25
2.5
10
87
42
2.25
6
53
12
2.25
1
78
40
2.4
8
29
25
2.4
1
26
4
2.4
3
56
15
1.75
13
82
57
2
82

Observations during the review are categorized in High, Medium and Low.
Vendor Score= 9*High + 4*Medium + Low
Category Risk Score= Sum of vendors score under the category
Sum of vendors under that category
Service category scores are category specific and does not change during the review.
ABC represented the data in the below format in risk quadrant but now they want to represent this data
in a different way. Please help ABC in this and include Review Category Risk Score and Category Risk
Score- After 2 weeks window in this representation.