Professional Documents
Culture Documents
SECTOR DIGEST
INTELLIGENCE FOR THE PUBLIC SECTOR.
Partner
77
Readiness
To what extent is the municipality ready/capable of fostering positive outcomes through its
open data initiative?
2)
Implementation
To what extent has the city fulfilled its open data goals and ultimately, what data has it posted
online?
3)
Impact
To what extent has the posted information been used, what benefits has the city accrued as a
result of its open data program, and to what extent is the city capable of measuring the
impact?
The implementation section of the Index consists of three types of data sets that cities may have made
available to the public: Accountability, Innovation, and Social Policy. The Accountability cluster includes data
sets related to government finance and elections like government budget data and election data. The
Innovation cluster includes data sets related to government operations like traffic volumes and service
requests. Finally, the Social Policy cluster includes data sets related to outcomes for a community like crime
rates and health performance. Across each type of data set, municipalities were scored on five variables:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
A meaningful and comprehensive open data program will include up to date data sets that are available
online for free in a format that is machine readable, facilitating the analysis and reuse of data by the general
public and developers.
150
100
151
146
131
126
110
110
97
91
85
81
50
Open Cities Index 2015 Top Ten Raw Scores (based on max score of 193)
For 2015, the city that emerged at the top of the Open Cities Index was Edmonton, followed by Toronto
and Surrey rounding out the top three. These cities have placed open data at the centre of their strategies
to open up government, while providing the private sector with valuable data for analysis and reuse.
Edmonton received a score of 78% overall for its open data program, with strong performance in the
Readiness category (73%) and with the highest score under the Implementation sub-category of Innovation
(89%). From government spending data to zoning data (GIS), Edmonton has made a wide variety of its data
available to the public online, with most sets being free, up to date, and machine readable.
Similarly, Toronto has made great strides in posting municipal data sets from a wide variety of
departments/operations. With the highest score under the Implementation sub-category of Social Policy
(83%), Toronto is leading the way in making data sets available related to program outcomes in the
community, including health and education performance data.
Leading the pack under the Accountability sub-category of Implementation is the City of Ottawa, scoring
95% and coming in fourth overall in the Open Cities Index for 2015. From budget data to lobbyist
information, Ottawa has made Accountability data sets a priority in its open data program.
Open Cities Index 2015 Top Ten Scores by Category (Accountability, Innovation, and Social Policy are sub-categories
of Implementation)
National Trends
It is evident from the results of the 2015 Open Cities Index that most Canadian cities have significant work to
do to advance their open data programs. The overall average score for the 34 participating municipalities
was 25% for 2015. The greatest room for improvement can be seen under the Impact category of the Index
with an overall average score of 29%. Municipalities are struggling to accurately measure the impact and
outcomes of their open data programs. Some cities, however, have reported operational cost savings as a
result of their open data programs. With the public able to access municipal data directly online, some
municipalities have measured significant reductions in requests for information, saving the city time and
money. Others have been able to proactively generate local economic development in their communities
via hackathons. A hackathon, whether organized by the city itself or a community partner, can help to
promote the use of open data for the creation of apps and programs that benefit the community as a
whole, such as a transit tracking app or a participatory budgeting app.
Municipalities fared slightly better under the Implementation category with a national average score of 35%.
The strongest showing was under the sub-category of Accountability (50% national average score), with
more municipalities publishing data relating to government budgets, spending, and elections. As
expectations grow for enhanced transparency and accountability in the public sector, the demand for these
types of data sets will also grow. Social Policy is by far the weakest sub-category with a national average of
21%. These types of data sets can be more difficult to come by, with several levels of government
potentially sharing responsibility for data gathering, for example with health performance being heavily tied
to provincial jurisdictions. Social Policy data sets may also contain more sensitive information about
individuals, requiring more work on the part of the municipality to ensure anonymity where required.
Municipalities performed the best overall under the Readiness category of the Index with a national average
score of 41%. The first step in launching an open data program is to identify a team lead and start building
organizational capacity for program implementation. With many communities across Canada, both large
and small, starting to assign the open data portfolio to a department or team, the readiness of Canadas
cities to tackle open data challenges and opportunities is improving. The Top Ten cities are one step ahead
with many having an open data lead and budgets set aside for technology, training, and even community
outreach.
Final Insights
When governments proactively post meaningful data online three things happen. First, efficiencies
externally, internally, and interdepartmentally arise. As open data begins to break down the silos that exist
within government, this improves the effectiveness of city programs, departments, and applications.
Second, new infomediary firms and markets are created once government agencies release information.
With open data released to the market, government bodies will not likely see an immediate direct benefit.
This is a medium to long term strategy that seeks indirect impacts, efficiencies, cost savings, and the tax
revenue that is generated from downstream collaboration.
Finally, those very firms and markets will begin to produce new products and services, helping to solve
essential community problems, all using the data that was posted online. The catch is, when data is posted
online, it must be free, machine readable, and up to date. Without those three attributes, the data cannot
be used to build the most robust applications.
Canadas Top Ten cities in the Open Cities Index have taken the lead in launching open data initiatives
without a proven template or roadmap to follow. These trailblazers will continue to build their open data
programs, experimenting with new processes, technologies, and policies to ensure that the greatest value
for money is achieved, all while continuing to enhance transparency and accountability. Cities just starting
to look at open data as a priority in 2016 can learn from the best practices of the Open Cities Index Top
Ten, applying lessons learned to the unique fiscal and organizational environment of their respective
municipal governments.