Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Fracture Modeling
Intro
Theorethical
Background
Modeling Fracture
Parameters
Building Fracture
Model
Import/Display
Initial Data
Analysis
Upscaling
Simulation
Day 1
Day 2
Introduction
Fracture drivers
Why?
Process
Multi-disciplinary approach;
Use analyzed fracture data from wells
Building a Fracture model (DFN+IFM)
Upscale fracture permeability, porosity and connection
factor between matrix and fractures from the Fracture
model
These data can subsequently be simulated
Requires large reservoir tank or thick pay zones to be economical (no matrix porosity)
100% KF
% of Total Perm.
II
III
IV
% of Total Poro.
100% F
Crossflow
No Crossflow
M
F
M
Morphology
Morphology
M to F communication
Restricted communication
Good Recovery Factor Poor Recovery Factor in
Good waterflood
tight Matrix
sweep efficiency
Poor waterflood sweep
efficiency
Fracture
Reality
Matrix
Well Productivity
Field Connectivity
In Place Reserves
Recovery
Approximation
A simplification of the real reservoir is done when creating a dual porosity model
Fluid flow and transport exist in both the connected fractures and matrix blocks
Two overlapping continua, where both are treated as porous media
Layered Model
Real Reservoir
- ->
Fixed Geometry
Continuous Fractures
Equal spacing
Constant Aperture
DFN Model
Real Fractured
Medium
Layered Model
Equivalent Continuum
Layered Model
DFN Model
Real Fractured
Medium
Real Fractured
Medium
Combined Model
DFN Model
Data
Analysis
Model
Parameters
Upscale
& Simulate
Create
Fracture model
Fracture intensity
IFM
Hybrid
IFM / DFN
model
Data Set
Teapot Dome Wyoming (USA)
Teapot Dome is located in central Wyoming. A comprehensive Data Management
project has been conducted to digitize
USAand compile all available data. Data is
available e.g. for research and software testing/training.
Achnowledgements:
Thanks to Rocky Mountain Oilfield Testing Center and
U.S. Department of Energy for using Teapot data
Data Set
Stratigraphy (Outcrops @ Alcova anticline)
N
Cretaceous
Measverde Fm
Teapot Sandstone
Parkman Sandstone
East
West
Unit 5: Fluvial Ss
Unit 4: Non-Marine Carb.
Sh with localized
coal
Unit 3: White Beach
Ss
Unit 2: Shoreface/Beach
Ss
Unit 1: Shallow Marine
Interbedded Ss
and Sh
1 Section
10m
Location,
Number
Quaternary
Alluvium
Mesaverde Fm
Undifferentiated
NPR3 Boundary
0
Carboniferous
Tensleep Fm
Reworked from:
S.Raeuchle et al, 2006 and Cooper, S. 2000
1 km
5
3
4
Data Set
Mechanical Zones (Mesaverde Fm. Outcrops)
Mechanical zones
Separating units according to mechanical properties is important due
to mechanical influences on fracture characteristics.
Unit 2: Shoreface/Beach
Ss
Unit 1: Shallow Marine
Interbedded Ss
and Sh
1 Section
10m
Location,
Number
Quaternary
Alluvium
Mesaverde Fm
Undifferentiated
NPR3 Boundary
0
1 km
5
3
4
Data Set
Mechanical Zones (Tensleep Sst. Outcrops)
Stratigraphic systems
Separating units according to stratigraphic architecture is also important for
prediction of complex fracture development in low-complex reservoir facies.
Data Set
Fracture Intensity (Tensleep Sst. Outcrops)
Fracture intensity at multiple scales
High variability in fracture intensity was demonstrated, caused by original depositional
architecture, overall structural deformation and diagenetic alteration of the host rock.
Fracture intensity depends on stratigraphic scale.
1. Throughgoing fractures
Data Set
Faults at Teapot Dome (Outcrops)
Map of faults and representative
hinge-perpendicular fractures
Data Set
Fractures at Teapot Dome (Outcrops)
Cross fractures
covered
1m
Data Set
Fractures related to Lithology (Outcrops)
Throughgoing
fractures
N
Unit 5: Fluvial Ss
Unit 4: Non-Marine Carb.
Sh with localized
coal
Unit 3: White Beach
Ss
Unit 2: Shoreface/Beach
Ss
Unit 1: Shallow Marine
Interbedded Ss
and Sh
10m
N
n = 24
Quaternary
Alluvium
Mesaverde Fm
Undifferentiated
Charted Locality
NPR3 Boundary
A
Rotation to
Fold Hinge
1 km
n = 23
Data Set
Infer Outcrop observations to subsurface 3D models?
Surface outline
(boundary) of
subsurface 3D grid
Tensleep Fm top
Overthrust
EXERCISES
Module 1
P.42 - 49