Professional Documents
Culture Documents
CA Vizcaya
and intense description of the landscape, the actions and the objects. However, the
characterization is also stereotyped, since it falls on the idealized dichotomy of the
Good Indians represented by Uncas and Chingachgook; and the Bad Indians
represented by Magua. Captain Heyward represents the romantic hero and Alice, is the
week maiden to be saved. There is no physical description, too.
The focus seems to be on the report of actions, since these happen one after the other
without much delay. They are also used to describe characters attitude (lines 69-71,
Irving; 54-55, Cooper). In addition, Cooper unifies the descriptions with the report of
fast-paced actions in order to achieve suspense and colour in the story; while Irving
includes some adjectives -that may belong to the descriptive mode- in the report of
actions, such as powerful in line 105, beautiful in line 45 or good in line 58.
Regarding the speech, most of it is direct and it functions to help to fit the character
in the stereotype that represents. Abodil and Don Munio are knights and they speak as
knights (lines 50-57). And Doa Mara expresses herself as the fearful wife (lines 5962). The register is formal, the diction is lofty and the syntax is complex. In lines 40-41
and 47-49 we can find examples of inner indirect speech, and indirect speech
respectively. Direct speech is also present at Coopers text, but reduced to the minimum
and it helps to develop the character that represents, since the language spoken by Cora
is articulated (lines 16, 18, 28) and the one spoken by the Indians is almost intelligible
(lines 14,15, 25, 29, 30, 74-75).
Regarding the comment, we can see clearly that predominates at the end of the
Irvings story (lines 160-161). However, since the comment is made with the narrators
evaluations, observations and judgements; we can also appreciate its use through the
text by the authors choice of adjectives and adverbs. In this way the author is
provoking on the reader a positive or negative attitude towards the characters. For
instance, the selection of adjectives by Irving in line 12: noble and in line 58: good
to describe Don Munio and the one chosen by Cooper at line 67: honest to describe
Gamut. Of course, there is much less use of the comment mode on Coopers work than
in Irvings.
Finally, I would dare to say that the description and the speech modes are exceeded
by the report and speech modes in Irvings work, while in the case of Cooper, the report
and description modes dominate his text.