Professional Documents
Culture Documents
(O) 978-356-4343
(F) 978-356-6625
rails were desirable for safety and would no doubt be mandated by the Towns Building Inspector upon
seeking a permit. Finally, during a review of the boat ramp area, Mr. Cameron agreed that the angle
was poor but that it may be too extensive of a project for the State to consider at this time.
After the site meeting, Mr. Cameron explained the Public Access Board would arrange for an engineer
to assess and do a survey of the Wharf and then design preliminary plans for repairs and improvements.
The attached draft plans are a result of this work. These plans have been forwarded to the DPW,
Utilities and Planning for their review and comments.
At this time, Mr. Cameron is seeking input and comments from the public and the Board of Selectmen
on the Wharfs draft plan. After this comment period, the Public Access Board will determine a course
of action and pursue the required permits for making improvements and repairing the Wharf. Mr.
Cameron noted that obtaining permits for maintenance of existing structures was easier than an
environmental type work permit. Dredging or removal of any vegetation is much more difficult to
obtain permits and he strongly suggested staying away from requesting dredging at this point and to
concentrate on the Wharfs structural decay issues.
With regard to the funding of the project in question, Mr. Cameron stated that all costs would be paid
for by the State, with the possible exception of a specific improvement requested by the Town, not
anticipated by the Public Access Board.
Thank You for your attention to this matter.
Sincerely,
DRAWING INDEX:
SHEET 1
SHEET 2
SHEET 3
SHEET 4
LOCUS MAP
SCALE IN FEET
0
10
20
SCALE IN FEET
40
SCALE IN FEET
0
10
20
SCALE IN FEET
40
SCALE IN FEET
4
SCALE IN FEET