Evaluation Tool

By: Kim Hoke

For each of the sections below, highlight your ranking for each question on a scale of 4 to 1, where 4 is strongly agree, 3 is agree, 2 is disagr
strongly disagree. If the section is not applicable, select NA. If additional comments or suggestions need to be added, add them to the bottom o
If more room is needed, feel free to attach any additional sheets.

Patricia Pearce

Who is getting evaluated:

What is the unit or lesson title:

3 Digit Addition with Regrouping in Ones

What grade level:

K-2

Subject:

Math
Categories

Communication

Strongly
Agree
Agree
"3"
"4"

Disagree
"2"

Communication: The lesson is easy to follow and understand, the materials needed are clearly stated.
The student can find how to contact the teacher with ease via email, message board, etc.

Interaction: Students have the ability to communicate with both the teacher and/or the other
students to collaborate or discuss ideas.

Feedback: Instructions have been given so that students know where they can get feedback from
their teacher and/or give and get feedback from their peers.

Delivery: The directions for when and how to turn in the final project have been given in clear
language.

Comments: I liked how you opened up your Webquest. The only thing that was not very clear was that you told them to click on the link of the
introduction, and there was no link there. It did show up on the process page. Also, when you click on the BrainPop link it needs a password. I'm
your kids know it, but I might suggest putting a reminder on the page so they know where to go to get the information to log on to the program
don't want to put that information out there for the whole world to see. :)

Planning

Strongly
Agree
Agree
"3"
"4"

Disagree
"2"

Content Delivery: The expectations on how the lesson will be presented to the students is clearly
stated (online, face to face, some online & some in class).

Project Delivery: It is stated how the final project will be turned in (hand in at the classroom, email,
website, etc.)

Lesson Design: The lesson fits the grade that it is being presented too, it gives plenty of time to
complete, it is purposeful in the intended outcome.

Lesson Details: The details are presented in a chronological order, and clear directions are given at
each piece of the project.

Comments: I gave you a 3 on project delivery because although you tell them what they need to do, it feels as if I am still not sure what needs
You talk about sharing with the class, but it wasn't laid our clearly to me.

Content

Strongly
Agree
Agree
"3"
"4"

Disagree
"2"

Standards and Objectives: The lesson has the state standards that will be evaluated as well as the
NETS for students.

Goals: The goals of the lesson are clearly stated and align with the state standards and NETS for
students previously state.

Examples: Examples have been given to students to look at through different mediums such as
written notes, videos, audio.

Support: There is opportunity for the learner to get support from the teacher themselves, or through
the classmates. This could be in the form of email, discussion board, face to face, etc.

Multiple Representation: Opportunities were given in not only presentation, but in the project itself
that met the needs of learners who learn from auditory, visual, and kinesthetic.

Assessment: The assessment takes into consideration the different learners and their needs on how
to learn.

Reflection: Students will have the chance to reflect on this project through a survey, blog, discussion
board, etc.

Analyze: Students will have the chance to evaluate the teacher by giving input of what worked, what
needed help, what could be improved, etc.

Comments: I don't teach this young of grade, but I'm assuming that your students could fill in a standard sheet with pictures to evaluate what
bad, need improvement, etc. Also, with the same process, I think the kids could do a reflection piece, but I'm not sure. Again, I don't teach that
grade. Good for you for doing that.

OVERALL STRENGTHS: I really liked your project. It was easy to follow and the steps were listed so that all of the students could follow with ea
the fact that the kids could take a quiz with a partner and discuss why they thought a particular answer worked. I'm sad that I couldn't see the q
it really made the kids think and challenged them to do their best.

OVERALL NEEDS OF IMPROVEMENT: There were only a few things I would have changed. The link on the first page that was not there, and I
put a reminder about the log in information for the kids on the site. Not put the passwords there, but a reminder on where they could find that i
am wondering if you could have put a survey link for the students to evaluate what they had completed so that the information would be there
at a later date and change any parts that may need a little help. Overall Great project.

s disagree, and 1 is
ottom of each section.

Ones Place

Strongly
Disagree
"1"

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

k of the bottom of the

ord. I'm sure that
program. I know we

Strongly
Disagree
"1"

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

at needs to happen.

Strongly
Disagree
"1"

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

te what was good,

ach that young of

w with ease. I enjoyed

ee the quiz, but trust

e, and I would have

nd that information. I
e there for you to look