FILED: October 19, 2015 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1710 (1:15-cv-01476-JFM) STEPHEN D. CHAMBERLAIN Plaintiff - Appellant v. PAUL F. HARRIS, JR. Defendant - Appellee JUDGMENT In accordance with the decision of this court, the judgment of the district court is affirmed. ‘This judgment shall take effect upon issuance of this court's mandate in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 41. /s| PATRICIA S. CONNOR. CLERKAppeal: 15-1710 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/19/2015 Pg: 1 of 2 NPUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 15-1710 STEPHEN D. CHAMBERLAIN, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. PAUL F. HARRIS, JR., Defendant - Appellee. Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland, at Baltimore. J. Frederick Motz, Senior District Judge. (1:15-cv-01476-JFM) Submitted: October 15, 2015 Decided: October 19, 2015 Before WILKINSON, AGEE, and HARRIS, Circuit Judges. Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion. Stephen D. Chamberlain, Appellant Pro se Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuitAppeal: 15-1710 Doc: 6 Filed: 10/19/2015 Pg: 2 of 2 PER CURIAM: Stephen D. Chamberlain appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.c. § 1983 (2012) complaint. we have reviewed the record and find no reversible error Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Chamberlain v. Harris, No. 1:15-cv-01476-JFM (D. Md. filed dune 8, 2015; entered June 9, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process. AFFIRMED