Who has really won the II.

World War
'Everything faded into mist.
The past was erased.
The erasure was forgotten.
The lie became truth'
One of my greatest passions is history.
Whether the 2000 years or the last century.
The real and true history, not that we are
told in the schools, in the universities and
in the media which is anyway either
incomplete or one-sided or completely
wrong.
Because, history consists of the lies, the
historians have agreed upon.
Today I want to deal with the theme - the
end of World War II -, because there-over
are the greatest myths and fairy tales.
At that, I will explain three sections.
Who won the war in Europe
Why the Japanese Empire really
surrendered
Why it came to the Cold War
Parsifal, April 29, 2016
Why is it important to know the actual course of history ?
To start with we should know, it is criminal to falsify history and to lie about what happened in the past.
Secondly, one understands just why the world is as it is, if one knows the true history.
And third, I find the wisdom of Orwell absolutely right:
'Who controls the past controls the future: who controls the present controls the past'.
So, it is about control and manipulation of people.
The orwellian statement symbolizes the system by which the elite dominated humankind.
Just like in his book, Nineteen Eighty-Four, there is in the real world no history that exists unaltered.
There is really The Ministry of Truth and there are hundreds of thousands of workers every day busy to match the past to
the present.
But not only the record of the past is changed, also the texts authors have once written.
These are adapted to the Zeitgeist and revised with political correctness.
'The prevailing narrative is the historical writing of the rulers'
- Karl Marx
I find it intolerable how just the recent history is told us adults and our youth.
There really is noting more important to know as the real course of the preceding events.
Not these tales of the so-called Western victorious powers because the winner writes the history.
From this false historiography namely accrue certain opinions and actions which are also wrong.
We know, for example, theatrical motion pictures have almost nothing to do with the truth, while the moving images
perform a very big influence.
Actually, we have two problems when it comes to the knowledge of the history.
A complete lack of knowledge, because many people do not know anything.
Or they know something, but it is wrong.
For example, about the II. World War.
It is told the tale the United States have won the war in Europe.
No matter what you read, hear or see, America is the winner.
The films and reportages only show US soldiers as 'liberators'.
1

Who has really won the II. World War

Here, everyone who has studied the history truly and unbiased knows the former Soviet Union has won the war in
Europe.
Thereover you can hear almost nothing, although this fact is quite easy to prove.
The British and American forces in Western Europe were confronted with 20 divisions of the Wehrmacht.
Only 20 !
In the East, the Soviet army fought against 200 divisions of the Wehrmacht.
That is, just numerically to enemies, the Soviet Union has led 90 percent of the war, and thus enormously contributed to
the victory.
Even Churchill had to admit it was the Red Army that 'has ripped out the guts of the Nazi war machine'.
Here's another number that shows the commitment and sacrifice.
The Soviet Union had to complain 20 to (rather) 26 million war dead.
The Americans and British 300.000.
On the German side, alone only from July until November 1944, the Eastern Army (Ostheer) had lost 1.2 million soldiers.
That is for me in inversion of argument, when Nazi Germany would not have applied 90 percent of its war machine in the
East, if the Wehrmacht would have been free to fight in the West, then the British and Americans have absolutely had
zero chance to set a single foot on European soil.
The invasions of Sicily and Normandy, the German Troops would have been able to ward easily or would not have taken
place at all because anyway, North Africa and England would have been themselves occupied by the Wehrmacht.
It would then not have come to the bombing of the Allies, which was was carried out from the British Isles that damaged
the German armaments industry seriously.
The Nazis had their 'wonder weapons' developed without ruffle and mass-produced, as the V2 and jet fighters, plus the Abomb, and even could have erased the East Coast of the United States with the transatlantic bombers.
All this was prevented only through the immense commitment of the Soviet Army.
The Soviets have given the 'invincible' German Wehrmacht a crushing defeat where entire armies were encircled and
annihilated, made millions of prisoners.
The Battle of Stalingrad was doing a rather small section, although referred to by historians as THE REVERSE.
Much more devastating was the Operation Bagration, the United Red Army major offensive against the Army Group
Centre (Heeresgruppe Mitte), which began on June 22, 1944 with the attack of four Soviet Fronts.
video:

Eastern Front Battlefield - Russian photo archives collection

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TR_tdJF1bE

This led to a total collapse of the Army Group Centre and the loss of 28 divisions of the Wehrmacht.
It is considered the most severe and most loss making defeat of German military history.
The Operation Bagration was not only critical to the German war defeat, but a lasting influence on the political
development.
video:

Moscow - Juni 17, 1944, the last march of the Army Group Centre

The march of the war prisoners who experienced the most calamitous defeat of the German armed forces during the II.
World War at their own figures.
Ahead, with pressed uniforms, well-fed, freshly shaved and cultured the Wehrmacht-officers.
Many of them believed that Hitler would liberate them with a replacement-Army.
In the rear 60.000 of the foot soldiers of the approx. 400.000 survivors, in rags, many without boots, verminous, raddled,
exhausted, maimed, malnourished, suffering from diarrhea, thirsty at 40C and zero clue what to happen next - yeah, such
can be war.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yBksub0DYRM
The German defeat was now finally inevitable; the hopes of the German Armed Forces to be able to force the Red Army at
least to a negotiated peace, disappeared.
video:

Operation Bagration in colour

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tb60dBUvKVI
2

Who has really won the II. World War

The catastrophic setbacks on the Eastern Front prompted the group around Count von Staufenberg to wage the coup
against Hitler on July 20, 1944.
Only, it was too late and also failed the bombing.
Roosevelt, Churchill and Stalin would anyway not responded to the proposal of a truce of a new government without
Hitler.
But the train had already left.
Only a total surrender were to accept the Allies.
The major Winter Offensive of the Red Army which unfolded middle January 1945 on a frontage of 700 kilometers from
the Memel to the Carpathians, rolled inexorably westwards.
Until February 1 - within 18 days of attack - pushed the Soviet troops on the Central Front up to 300 kilometers forward.
The resistance of the Wehrmacht broke then little by little, until the Red Army reached the Reich, conquered Upper Silesia
and East Prussia.
On April 16, the decisive battle of the Red Army, the Battle for Berlin began.
On April 25, Americans and Russians met on the Elbe River near Torgau - also the Russian ring around Berlin closed on
this day.
On April 30, 1945 Hitler committed suicide.
The to 'fortress' declared Berlin under General Helmuth Weidling surrendered on May 2 against the Red Army after the
Doenitz government had abscond to Schleswig-Holstein.
On May 7, 1945, in the Allied Expeditionary Force (Supreme Headquarters) in Reims was signed the unconditional
surrender and entered on May 8 at 23:01 CET in force.
The declaration of surrender was repeated in Berlin-Karlshorst in the Soviet 5th Army headquarters on May 8, already
May 9 to Moscow time.
Therefore, since then is celebrated victory with a military parade in Moscow on May 9.
Clearly, it was the Soviet Union, which contributed significantly to the victory over Hitler's Germany.
Without the huge commitment and the countless victims, it would never have come to surrender and Europe would look
very different.
We are but the story told that the Americans had practically won ALONE the war in Europe.
So, they have also portrayed themselves, act as the big shots afterwards, and the American people believe it to this day.
'In each war first falls prey the truth - often enough before war has even begun.
After that, it can be very cumbersome to revive truth'
- Parsifal

Churchill said shortly before the end of the war:

'We have slaughtered the wrong pig!'

He even championed temporarily for using the remaining SS units, 100.000 men in number, to run a joint new war against
the Soviet Union, but failed to the new realities.
Even at home he would have not been successful with his idea.
Truman, who succeeded Roosevelt (Roosevelt died all of a sudden in April 1945) has said at the time during the war:
'If we see that the Germans win, we should support the Russians; if we see that the Russians winning, we should
support the Germans in order to kill as many as possible'
Thus, the US wanted a destroyed Europe and destroyed the Soviet Union, and then exploit the situation for themselves as
a nation spared from war, remained to dominate Europe.
Stalin and the Red Army foiled his concept.
And a few years after the for the USSR so devastating war, the country was rebuilt.
Even during the war, the Soviets had begun to rebuild the country.
And when was over the new Five-Year Plan (1946-51), were as good as any war damages eliminated and the country
possessed the atomic bomb (since 1949) and was no longer susceptible to atomic blackmail.
The fact that the Soviets have borne most of the war burden is swept under the table because it does not fit into the image
of the enemy, a falsification of history that continues until today against Russia.
Because just after Nazi Germany was defeated, the Allies turned the tables and the Soviet Union was declared the new
enemy.
3

Who has really won the II. World War

There was even the opinion in US military circles, now that the US army is in great numbers in Europe to act together
with the remainders of the former Wehrmacht against the Soviet Union.
In addition, the United States did already have the atomic bomb at that time whereas the Soviets not.
This 'advantage' they wanted to use.
It can be added that Hitler Germany throughout the war maintained with the United States good business (Standard Oil,
IG Farben, Coca Cola, Ford, IBM and so on).
I do not mention here, who has brought Hitler to power, who the Nazi Party financially supported and who made the
German people to murder weapons - which, others can do much better.
However, a book-tip may be allowed:
Hermann Ploppa and Preparata: Hitler American teachers:
Who made Hitler powerful - As the US-British financial elite paved the way of the Third Reich.
Knowingly, it was endorsed the Nazis to smash the occurring from a US perspective specter Communism in Europe.
In short: Only a few months before the outbreak of World War II, the Americans sided directly and indirectly with Hitler.
The Soviet Union, with at least 26 million deaths, the largest number of victims of WW II is likely concealed in the
system-media, as well as the fact that the Auschwitz liberation would not have taken place without the Soviets.
Topped is this by the fact that The Merkel currently positions herself as an unerringly saint and praises the Yanks as sole
liberators of Nazi Germany, which is pure revisionism and cynicism.
'The most effective way to destroy people is to deny and obliterate their own understanding of their history'
- George Orwell
I want not to ignore another point, namely the Lend-Lease Act of 1941.
The Act was passed by the US Congress on February 18, 1941.
It enabled at this time still officially neutral, but, according international law already considered de facto participating in
WW II, the United States, to supply war important material such as weapons, ammunition, vehicles, fuels, foods,
airplanes, etc. to the Axis against Nazi Germany, Italy and Japan warring states.
For the Soviet Union, this aid deliveries were important.
The Soviet Union was given by the US military assistance, worth 9,8 billion dollars, (back then unimaginably large
amounts of money) consisting of 2.803 shiploads.
Conversely supplied the Soviet Union in particular raw materials such as manganese and chrome ores in the value of 7.3
billion to the United States.
The rest of the debt was paid promptly in gold.
Overall reached the goods, which the Soviet Union actually received, only 4 to 5% of war-production of the Soviet Union.
Often the weapons did not meet the specific requirements of the front; there were hardly any spare parts.
Those models were delivered particularly the fighter aircraft in the first place that no one else wanted to have, so junk.
Arms shipments on their own help no one.
It needs soldiers who use the weapons in battle and risk their lives.
In addition came the majority of Russian tanks from domestic production, which have been very successful against the
Wehrmacht.
For example, 50.000 alone of the type T-34.
On the German side the Panzer IV with 8.500 units was the most produced German armored vehicle.
Then, of the stronger Type Panther were produced 6.000 and 1.354 of the Tiger and the Bengal Tiger only 489.
Hitler himself said, alone one weapons factory in the Soviet Union could produce 30.000 tanks.
This supply was indeed NO aid, but only bond.
For the Americans it was just a business.
Business with death and destruction is the American / British main source of income, then as now.
So it is no accident that these 'relief supplies' to the United States to the Soviet Union in World War II where they are
referred to as 'elementary', although this is far from the truth.
The writer Konstantin Simonov, who visited the fronts during the war, while risking his life, notes in his readable war
diaries that the material that the United States gave, was inferior and could often not be used by the Soviet Army, because
the engines of vehicles were unsuitable for the Russian winter,(see. Konstantin Simonov, 'war diaries 1941' and 'war
diaries 1942-45').
4

Who has really won the II. World War

So here is once again an attempt, highlighting inappropriate under the guise of neutrality and objectivity a US
contribution.
I again, am strongly warning before Wikipedia, which always operates propaganda if it is - even remotely - and/or
unthinkable - related to political matters.
Even the time and date of occurrences in Wikipedia is altered to fit into the political correct world-view.
I find all the items on the 'Great Patriotic War' of 1941-1945, in the West as 'World War II' denotes very propagandistic.
The entries throughout diminish the Russians the contribution to the victory, they are marginalized or entirely
suppressed.
On Russian Internet pages that reads quite differently.
Who can not speak Russian, so will never know what 1941 happened in Russia till 1945.
And certainly, Wikipedia would not tell us that.
The authors, the revisionists who control Wikipedia were certainly not there in those years of war.
So can forge in retrospect very easy history.
It is always advisable to consult as many different sources and eyewitness accounts of the few who are still alive as
possible.
In my next contribution to the truth of history, I explain: Why the Japanese Empire really surrendered.
The quatrain on top is quoted from George Orwell: Nineteen Eighty-Four, published in 1949 which was really not thought
as an instruction manual

'History is Written By the Winners'

- George Orwell

http://lovingenergies.net/pt/Who-has-really-won-the-II.-World-War-/blog.htm
http://lovingenergies.net/pt/Who-Has-Really-Won-the-II-World-War/blog.htm

Who has really won the II. World War