Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ABSTRACT: The objective of generating an economical and safe foundation system reducing the settlement rather than eliminating
has led to the change in the design philosophy recognising the fact that most structures can tolerate a certain amount of settlement
The piled raft analyses and design is three dimensional interaction problems, wherein, the applied load is transferred by a
complicated interaction process between the piles and the raft.. The necessity to have a relatively simple design procedure so that the
preliminary design can give adequate but reasonably accurate data for the final analyses is explained. The paper presents such a
simple design process in the form of equivalent pier approach by establishing its applicability by applying it to two cases.Also the
study has brought out the effect of deep compressible deposit sandwiched between two dense layers.
RSUM : Lobjectif de crer un systme de fondation conomique et fiable, par la rduction des affaissements plutt que de leur
radication, a entran un changement dans la philosophie de conception, admettant le fait que la plupart des structures sont capables
de tolrer un certain nombre daffaissements. Les analyses et la conception du radier sur pieux comportent des problmes
dinteraction tri dimensionnels, o la charge applique est transfre par un processus dinteraction complexe entre les pieux et le
pilier. Il est expliqu la ncessit de disposer dune procdure de conception relativement simple, de manire ce que la conception
prliminaire puisse apporter des donnes appropries suffisamment prcises pour les analyses finales. Larticle prsente un
processus de conception aussi simple, sous forme dapproche de pilier quivalent, en prouvant sa faisabilit par son application
dans deux cas. Ltude a galement rvl les effets du dpt fortement compressible coinc entre deux couches paisses.
KEYWORDS: Piled raft, Pier, Peat.
1.
INTRODUCTION
655
DESIGN PROCESS
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
3.
3000 mm
600 mm
0.00 m
4.00 m
D / 2 = 5.65
4
11.00 m
Dense Sand
= 0.3 = 36
3
2
= 20 kN/m ; Es = 30 MN / m
d/2
= 34 ; = 1.8 t/m
2
E = 60 N / mm
14.00 m
650 mm
PIER
13.00 m
Peat
2
3
2
m
2. Observational study
16.00 m = 0.3 ; s = 25 kN/m = 17 kN/m ; Es = 8 MN /Figure
22.00 m
22.00 m
Dense Sand
3
2
= 0.3 = 36 ; = 20 kN/m ; Es = 35 MN / m
C / L of PIER
In this particular case the ratio Le/L namely the ratio of the pier
length to the pile works out to unity and hence the equivalent
length of the pier is taken to be the same as that of the pile.
Once the piles are replaced by a pier then the solution for the
single pile can be applied to estimate the load settlement
characteristics, and the load sharing response; the load shared
by the pier becomes the load shared by the pile group. With this
idealisation it is possible to run the analyses as an axisymmetric
two dimensional problem.
4.
VALIDATION
656
5.
The study of the Table 1 and the Figure 6 which presents the
shaft stress distribution with the depth indicates that the load
sharing ratio and the shaft stress indicate an increase and then a
fall. The shaft stress increase commences at a level of 13m and
extends upto 16m level; and then it reduces. In the case of load
sharing ratio the increase takes place at a settlement level of
20mm in the case of 16.8m deep pier and 50mm level in the
case of 18m deep pier. This trend is absent in the case of 12 m
deep pier which is above the peat layer.
The results obtained from the model 1 are plotted in the form of
load settlement response curves and presented in Figure 4. The
load settlement response of 12m pier is presented separately in
figure 5.
For the pier lengths of 12m, 16.8m, and 18mm. At any stage of
settlement, it was found that the load taken by the piled raft was
far higher than the load taken by the unpiled raft for the
corresponding settlement. The results are studied independently
for the three cases analysed, and then they are compared. From
the load settlement response of the unpiled raft and the piled
raft, the load shared by the pier (pile group) is computed at
different settlement levels namely 12mm, 25mm, 50mm, 80mm
and 100mm and has been presented in Table 1.
7.
HYPERBOLIC BEHAVIOUR
Pier
length
Settlement
12.0m
12m
m
0.54
16.8m
0.64
0.65
0.60
0.58
0.56
18.0m
0.61
0.56
0.64
0.59
0.59
20mm
50mm
0.53
0.37
80m
m
0.30
100mm
0.25
657
Proceedings of the 18th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering, Paris 2013
CONCLUSIONS
658
REFERENCES