Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Year 9/Stage 5
Teacher:
Syllabus reference
Knowledge and Understanding: Living World
Content:
LW2 Conserving and maintaining the quality and sustainability of the
environment requires scientific understanding of interactions within, the
cycling of matter and the flow of energy through ecosystems.
(a) recall that ecosystems consist of communities of interdependent
organisms and abiotic components of the environment
(c) describe how energy flows through ecosystems, including input and output
through food webs
Outcomes:
SC5-14LW analyses interactions between components and processes within
biological systems
Text: Oxford Big Ideas Australian Curriculum Science 9, Oxford,
Chapter 4, pp 9699
S Cash, G Quinton, C Tilley (2012)
Language focus: Classifying and describing, definitions, technical terms in
biological sciences
Preparing for reading (Stage 1)
Background knowledge: (from previous learning)
nitrogen:
gas in atmosphere
Assignment 2
Oxygen cycle
oxygen originally produced by cyanobacteriaprokaryotic autotrophic organisms
plants came later and also contribute oxygen
respire aerobically or anaerobically
balance of oxygen: production photosynthesis, use aerobic respiration
Phosphorus cycle
essential compounds for living organisms phosphorus, potassium, calcium
plants absorb from soil
dead matter broken down to minerals
Assignment 2
Assignment 2
2.2 Content Selection and Organisation - Organise content into an effective learning and
teaching sequence.
Content in this lesson plan is organized very effectively and appropriately. The plan uses a
staging system, with each stage improving on and dependent on the previous one. This can be
seen through an examination of each stage. Stage 1 details the necessity of requiring previous
knowledge in topics which relate to this lessons content to ensure student understanding.
Stage 2 relates to student reading of the assigned text and the highlighting of information that
they deem key, whilst stage 3 consists of individual or group note taking. Stage 4 is the final
stage and involves the collection of information and compiling it to create a group made text
regarding the topic. This use of staging is also effective as each stage can be timed, resulting
in an effective lesson that is easily controlled and does not require and make up or follow up
lessons.
3.5 Use effective classroom communication Demonstrate a range of verbal and non-verbal
communication strategies to support student engagement.
The lesson plan utilizes both verbal and non-verbal communication strategies to support
student engagement. This can be seen through the lesson plans use of individual or group
note taking and also the joint construction in stage 4. The lesson plan allows for the option of
either individual or group reading and highlighting of the text, and also group collaboration.
The use of individual work promotes non-verbal communication as it allows for students to
analyse the text themselves. As for the verbal communication, the lesson plan use of group
analysis of the text and collaborative note takin helps in improving student engagement as it
involves each student or each group of students. This group work ultimately promotes and
encourages student engagement as it employs both verbal and non-verbal communication.
4.2 Manage Classroom activities Demonstrate the capacity to organize classroom activities
and provide clear directions.
The stage system of the plan ultimately demonstrates the capacity to organize classroom
activities and provide clear directions. Stages 2-4 involve having the option of either
individual or group work depending on teacher discretion or previous assessment data, as to
which method works best. Ultimately, the lesson plan allows for teachers to choose which
method will work best for their students. This plan works as a very decent baseline that
allows for teachers to change how students are taught or engaged, depending on their own
experiences with students. The plan utilizes the stage system which allows for appropriately
timed segments of learning that are easily controlled, by time or direction. Similarly, these
segments are easy to follow as each stage is built on the last, which also makes a brief lesson
introduction easy.
4.1 Support student participation Identify strategies to support inclusive student
participation and engagement in classroom activities.
The lesson plan utilizes group work and engagement. This is clearly evident in stages 3 and 4
of the plan. Stage 3 involves the group compiling of key terms from the text, thus promoting
group collaboration and teamwork when doing this task. Stage 4 does the most towards
inclusive student participation as it involves a whole class joint construction of ideas to
compile a text from the notes. The use of a student being the one writing notes on the board
in stage 3 encourages whole class and student participation as the teacher has been somewhat
removed, allowing the students to direct this stage of the lesson and therefore becoming the
most involved possible, as they are directly responsible for the content they are learning.
Assignment 2
Report:
Section 1
All schools are an ever changing environment of students and teachers with ever changing
needs. For the purpose of this report, only the diverse needs of students will be focused upon
in relation to the chosen standards of the Science lesson plan selected. Standards designed by
the Board of Studies Teaching and Educational Standards (BOSTES) are created to provide
teachers a guideline to effective teaching. The graduate standards selected for this lesson plan
were chosen as aspects of the lesson plan showing evidence of these standards being used
effectively. However, there are multiple variables that must be considered when designing
lesson plans and thus this report will discuss how well the chosen standards meet these
variables.
Ideally, a school classroom environment should be that of a differentiated classroom, an
environment where the individual and diverse needs of each student are catered for (Moore,
2012, p. 49). However this is not always the case and thus standards must be analyzed to see
which individual and diverse needs of students are met. One of the most important aspects in
designing a lesson plan is that of student learning styles. Sprenger (2008) and other
researchers have complied a list of components representing learning styles as follows;
environmental, emotional, sociological, physiological, and psychological. It is important to
recognize that each student may belong to one of these components, multiple of them, or
none at all and thus the wide variety of variables become evident. The lesson plan utilizes
almost all components of learning styles. This can be seen through standard 2.2 where the
organization of the lesson plan, involving stages, can help with emotional learners, whereby it
may be beneficial for the learner to focus on and complete one thing at a time. Similarly, this
structure of the plan also helps with psychological learners, whom may appreciate the use of
bit by bit or stage learning to achieve a final goal. The standards in the plan also do well in
dealing with sociological learners, people who appreciate working in groups or alone, as
standards 3.5 and 4.1 give the option to allow for group or individual work. Standard 3.5 also
deals with environmental learners, e.g. having sound present when learning or having no
sound present, as the option of group or individual work can provide both. Standard 4.2 could
help with psychological learners and their need to stay focused on the stage work provided by
the lesson plan. Ultimately, it is difficult to facilitate physiological learners in a science
classroom as it is often difficult and dangerous to involve movement.
Another important variable to consider is that of the cultural diversity of students. Students
from culturally diverse backgrounds are often faced with problems of trying to fit into a
school system that they may be unfamiliar with or does not cater to their needs. The standards
chosen for this lesson plan do not do well in facilitating this cultural diversity of students.
The text used in the plan is written in English and does not take into account English as a
second language (ESL) students. This could be fixed by using texts in languages that these
culturally diverse students are from and thus would help standard 3.5. Similarly, the lesson
plan and the standards do not show a catering towards Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander
students and as Simpson and Clancy (2005) have examined, these students require a different
style of learning from the mainstream one in order to further understanding of content.
Ultimately, this lesson plan exists to be modified and amended to ensure teachers enable their
students to understand content. As this is the case, it can be seen the necessary changes that
need to be made to help facilitate culturally diverse students. The content in this lesson plan is
somewhat bare in terms of interaction however examples of Aboriginal and Torres Strait
Islander ecosystems could be involved to create discussions and possible interactions of
Assignment 2
students from these backgrounds. This would help promote standards 3.5 and 4.1 in
encouraging student communication and participation. Similarly, standards 4.2 and 2.2 could
be met through the use of Reynolds (2005) two-way schooling method where Aboriginal
and Torres Strait Islander education and culture is taught in tandem to mainstream education
resulting in an organized differentiated classroom.
Section 2
Peer feedback for the standards and focus areas which were selected for this lesson plan was
across the board positive with only one comment on possible improvement. Almost all
feedback stated that each standard was appropriately selected and that each annotation
explained its purpose. The only feedback which suggested change was that of possibly
focusing on other ways the lesson plan caters to student learning needs. This is a good
suggestion that helped in writing section 1 of this report. However it did not ultimately cause
a decision to alter or change the selected focus areas as different ways the lesson plan caters
for student learning needs was explored fully in section 1 and was left out of annotations due
to word count restrictions.
Assignment 2
References:
Australian Institute for Teaching and School Leadership (2014) retrieved April 23, 2016,
from http://www.aitsl.edu.au
Marsh, C.J., Clark, M., Pittaway, S. (2014) Marshs becoming a teacher (6thEd.) Frenchs
Forest, Australia: Pearson Australia
Moore, K. D. (2012) Effective instructional strategies (3rd ed.) Thousand Oaks: Sage.
Reynolds, R. J. (2005). The education of Australian Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander
students. Childhood Education, Fall, 31-5.
Simpson, L., & Clancy, S. (2005). Enhancing opportunities for Australian Aboriginal literacy
learners in early childhood settings. Childhood education, 15, 327-32.
Sprenger, M. B. (2008). Differentiation through learning styles and memory. Thousand Oaks:
Corwin/Sage.