Professional Documents
Culture Documents
com
Also for any other projects help please mail me. I can help in any courses Finance, Management, Strategy,
Marketing, Human Resources, Organization Behavior, Economics, Excel, Dissertation, CAPSIM, Online Test
and any other kind of projects.
Capital Cost
Machine cost $$$$,$$$
Shipping charges $$$,$$$
Installation $$$,$$$
Total Capital Cost $$$$,$$$
Salvage Value at end of 4 Yrs $$$,$$$
Income Model
Units sold annually $,$$$
Revenue per unit - Yr 1 $$$$
Cost per unit - Yr 1 $$$$
Annual inflation $%
Net working capital (% of sales) $$%
Operating Model
Year 0 1 2
Revenue $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Less: Operating Cost ($$$$,$$$) ($$$$,$$$)
EBITDA $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Less: Depreciation ($$$,$$$) ($$$$,$$$)
Operating Profit $$$,$$$ $$,$$$
Less: Tax ($$$,$$$) ($$,$$$)
Operating Profit after tax $$$,$$$ $$,$$$
Add: Depreciation $$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Cash flow from operations $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Less: Initial investment ($$$$,$$$)
Less: Incremental NWC ($$$,$$$) ($$,$$$) ($$,$$$)
Add: After-tax salvage value
Add: Recovery of NWC
Project's Net Free Cash Flow ($$$$,$$$) $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Discounted Free Cash Flow ($$$$,$$$) $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Sensitivity Analysis
NPV MIRR
Of the three variables tested above, NPV and MIRR of the project is most sensitive to change in unit sales, moderately sen
Hence, cautionary measures should be taken if there is any stress observed in units sold and effective measures should be
steeper than the plots for other two variables and hence units sales is the most critical or sen
Scenario Analysis
Scenarios Probability NPV
Worst $$% ($$$$,$$$)
Base $$% $$$,$$$
Best $$% $$$$,$$$
Since the coefficient of variation at 2.19 is much above the range of average
project COV, the new project possess very high risk.
Given, risky nature of the project, the risk adjusted WACC would be
17%. Now the NPV at 17% WACC is $8,421 and MIRR is 17.7%. Since
NPV is positive and MIRR is still higher than WACC, the project should
be accepted.
Given, risky nature of the project, the risk adjusted WACC would be
17%. Now the NPV at 17% WACC is $8,421 and MIRR is 17.7%. Since
NPV is positive and MIRR is still higher than WACC, the project should
be accepted.
agement, Strategy,
PSIM, Online Test
4
$.$$%
$$$,$$$
3 4
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
$$$,$$$ $
($$,$$$) $$$,$$$
3 4
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
($$$$,$$$) ($$$$,$$$)
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
($$$,$$$) ($$$,$$$)
$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
($$$,$$$) ($$$,$$$)
$$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
$$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
$$$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
($$,$$$)
$$$,$$$
$$$,$$$
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
$$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
marks
MIRR is more than WACC, the
ence should be considered.
Salvage Value NPV MIRR WACC NPV MIRR
$25,000 $$$,$$$ $$.$% 12.0% $$$,$$$ $$.$%
$27,500 13.2%
$30,000 14.4%
$32,500 15.6%
$22,500 10.8%
$20,000 9.6%
$17,500 8.4%
NPV MIRR
NPV MIRR
o change in unit sales, moderately sensitive to change in WACC and is least affected by change in salvage value.
sold and effective measures should be initiated to restore the lost or declining sales. The plot of unit sales is much
e units sales is the most critical or sensitive variable in overall project consideration.
Capital Cost
Machine cost $$$$,$$$
Shipping charges $$$,$$$
Installation $$$,$$$
Total Capital Cost $$$$,$$$
Salvage Value at end of 4 Yrs $$$,$$$
Income Model
Units sold annually $,$$$
Revenue per unit - Yr 1 $$$$
Cost per unit - Yr 1 $$$$
Annual inflation $%
Net working capital (% of sales) $$%
Operating Model
Year 0 1 2
Revenue $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Less: Operating Cost ($$$$,$$$) ($$$$,$$$)
EBITDA $$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
Less: Depreciation ($$$,$$$) ($$$$,$$$)
Operating Profit ($$$,$$$) ($$$,$$$)
Less: Tax $$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
Operating Profit after tax ($$$,$$$) ($$$,$$$)
Add: Depreciation $$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Cash flow from operations $$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
Less: Initial investment ($$$$,$$$)
Less: Incremental NWC ($$$,$$$) ($$$$) ($$$$)
Add: After-tax salvage value
Add: Recovery of NWC
Project's Net Free Cash Flow ($$$$,$$$) $$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
Discounted Free Cash Flow ($$$$,$$$) $$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
Sensitivity Analysis
NPV MIRR
4
$.$$%
$$$,$$$
3 4
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
$$$,$$$ $
($$$$) $$$,$$$
3 4
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
($$$$,$$$) ($$$$,$$$)
$$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
($$$,$$$) ($$$,$$$)
$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
($$,$$$) ($$$,$$$)
$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
$$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
$$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
($$$$)
$$$,$$$
$$$,$$$
$$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
$$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
NPV MIRR
N PV MIRR
Capital Cost
Machine cost $$$$,$$$
Shipping charges $$$,$$$
Installation $$$,$$$
Total Capital Cost $$$$,$$$
Salvage Value at end of 4 Yrs $$$,$$$
Income Model
Units sold annually $,$$$
Revenue per unit - Yr 1 $$$$
Cost per unit - Yr 1 $$$$
Annual inflation $%
Net working capital (% of sales) $$%
Operating Model
Year 0 1 2
Revenue $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Less: Operating Cost ($$$$,$$$) ($$$$,$$$)
EBITDA $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Less: Depreciation ($$$,$$$) ($$$$,$$$)
Operating Profit $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Less: Tax ($$$,$$$) ($$$,$$$)
Operating Profit after tax $$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
Add: Depreciation $$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Cash flow from operations $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Less: Initial investment ($$$$,$$$)
Less: Incremental NWC ($$$,$$$) ($$,$$$) ($$,$$$)
Add: After-tax salvage value
Add: Recovery of NWC
Project's Net Free Cash Flow ($$$$,$$$) $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Discounted Free Cash Flow ($$$$,$$$) $$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
Sensitivity Analysis
NPV MIRR
4
$.$$%
$$$,$$$
3 4
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
$$$,$$$ $
($$,$$$) $$$,$$$
3 4
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
($$$$,$$$) ($$$$,$$$)
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
($$$,$$$) ($$$,$$$)
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
($$$,$$$) ($$$,$$$)
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
$$$,$$$ $$$,$$$
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
($$,$$$)
$$$,$$$
$$$,$$$
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
$$$$,$$$ $$$$,$$$
NPV MIRR
N PV MIR R