Professional Documents
Culture Documents
WITH RESPECT TO
RANE ENGINE VALVE LTD, PLANT3, PONNERI, RANE GROUP
By
NITHYA. D
Reg. No.: 11409631028
of
IN
ANNA UNIVERSITY
CHENNAI – 600 025.
August, 2010
ANNA UNIVERSITY: CHENNAI 600 025
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
work of Ms. NITHYA. D (Registration Number: 11409631028) who carried out the
research under my supervision. Certified further, that to the best of my knowledge the
work reported herein does not form part of any other project report or dissertation on
the basis of which a degree or award was conferred on an earlier occasion on this or
Submitted to the project and viva Examination for this project was held on_________
BONAFIDE CERTIFICATE
work of Ms. NITHYA. D (Registration Number: 11409631028) who carried out the
research under my supervision. Certified further, that to the best of my knowledge the
work reported herein does not form part of any other project report or dissertation on
the basis of which a degree or award was conferred on an earlier occasion on this or
Submitted to the project and viva Examination for this project was held on_________
Place: Chennai
Date: (Nithya. D)
ABSTRACT
respect to Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri, Rane Group” is done to understand the
effectiveness of the grievance handling procedure followed by Rane Engine Valve LTD to
The primary objective of this study is to find the effectiveness of grievance handling
procedure of the company. The secondary objective of this study is to identify the awareness
level of the employees about the grievance handling mechanism of the company and to know
the level of satisfaction towards the grievance handling procedure of the company.
The research type used in this study is descriptive in nature, which helped in developing the
concept and in decision making. Primary data is used for analysis, which is gathered using
questionnaire. Secondary data is also used for the study, which is gathered from internet and
Convenience sampling is used while selecting samples for data collection. A sample size of
100 was taken out of 308, the population of the company. The gathered information is
critically analyzed using percentage method and, statistical tools such as Chi Square and
From the findings of this study, it is concluded that Grievance Handling Procedure followed
by the company is effective and satisfactory and suggestions are given for the further
Finally I thank my parents, friends and family members who have helped me in all
possible ways to make this project a success.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1 Introduction
3.1 Findings 41
3.2 Suggestions 42
3.3 Conclusion 43
4 Appendix
Appendix 1 – Grievance Form 44
Appendix 2 – Questionnaire 45
5 References 46
LIST OF TABLES
Table no. Title Page no.
2.1.1 Distribution of respondents based on age 23
2.1.2 Distribution of respondents based on experience 24
2.1.3 Distribution of respondents based on awareness 25
level
2.1.4 Distribution of respondents on real basis of 26
identification of their grievance
2.1.5 Distribution of respondents on active involvement 27
in resolving problem
2.1.6 Distribution of respondents on confidentiality and 28
proper maintenance of records
2.1.7 Distribution of respondents on conflict resolving 29
is an important function
2.1.8 Distribution of respondents on satisfaction level 30
of the employees
2.1.9 Distribution of respondents on whom to redress 31
2.1.10 Distribution of respondents on regular follow up 32
2.1.11 Distribution of respondents on providing 33
temporary relief
2.1.12 Distribution of respondents on opportunity given 34
2.1.13 Distribution of respondents on simple and easy 35
conveying procedure
2.1.14 Distribution of respondents on authority given to 36
supervisor
2.2.1 Chi Square: Observed Frequency 37
2.2.2 Chi Square: Expected Frequency 37
2.2.3 Computation table for Chi Square 38
2.3.1 Calculation of rs 39
2.3.2 Rank table 39
LIST OF CHARTS
Chart no. Title Page no.
This research also takes into consideration the methods adopted by the organization for
handling and resolving the conflict. The main focus of this study revolves around the lower
level management of the organization.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVE:
• To identify whether the employees are aware of the grievance handling mechanism.
• To know the level of satisfaction towards the grievance handling procedure of the
organization.
1.3 SCOPE OF THE STUDY
• The study throws light on need for Grievance handling procedure and this study
facilitates the management for further improvement on the same.
• Employees differ as individuals, in their needs, expectations and behavior. When their
needs are not satisfied or their objectives are not achieved, the result is employee
dissatisfaction. It is not an easy task for the management to keep all the employees
satisfied and motivated, all the time.
• This forms the need for the study of the grievance redressal procedure of the
organization and its effectiveness towards job satisfaction to maintain healthy and
harmonious environment of the organization.
• The main focus of this study revolves around the lower level management of the
organization.
1.5 LIMITATION OF THE STUDY
• The respondents of the questionnaire were very busy and could not afford more time
to answer. The average time to response was 5-6 minutes only.
• The sample size was restricted to 100 and may not represent the whole employee
population.
1.6 RESEARCH DESIGN
RESEARCH:
Research is a process in which the researcher wishes to find out the end result for a
given problem and thus the solution helps in future course of action. The research has been
defined as “A careful investigation or enquiry especially through search for new fact in any
branch of knowledge”.
RESEARCH METHODOLOGY:
The procedure using, which researchers go about their work of describing, explaining
and predicting phenomena, is called Methodology. Methods compromise the procedures used
for generating, collecting, and evaluating data. Methods are the ways of obtaining information
useful for assessing explanation.
TYPE OF RESEARCH:
The type of research used in this project is descriptive in nature. Descriptive research
is essentially a fact finding related largely to the present, abstracting generations by cross
sectional study of the current situation.
The descriptive method has certain limitation; one is that the research may make
description itself an end itself. Research is essentially creative and demands the discovery of
facts on order to lead a solution of the problem. A second limitation is associated whether the
statistical techniques dominate. The desire to over emphasis central tendencies and to fact in
terms of Average, Correlation, Means and dispersion may not always be either welcome. This
limitation arises because statistics which is partly a descriptive tool of analysis can aid but not
always explain causal relation.
Sources of data
Primary Data
Primary data are fresh data which are collected through survey from the employees using
questionnaire.
Secondary Data
Secondary data are those collected from books, internet, reports of already done project
works, etc.
1. Percentage Method
2. Chi - Square
SAMPLING TECHNIQUE:
Sampling Unit : The sampling unit is limited to the employees of RANE ENGINE VALVE
LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
Population : 308
In India the auto component industry is growing at an encouraging rate in tandem with
the growth of the automobile industry. The turnover has increased from US $ 8700 million in
2004-05 to US $12,000 million in 2005-06. Exports during the corresponding period
increased from US $ 1400 million to US $ 2100 million, and imports from US $ 1450 million
to US $ 1900 million. The investment in this auto parts industry has risen from US $ 3750
million in 2004-05 to US $ 4400 in 2005-06.
Industries in this segment have become quality conscious, so as to produce materials
conforming to international standards. 524 companies are ISO 9001 certified, followed by 342
acquiring TS16949 certification, 154 are ISO 14001 certified, 81 are having QS 9000
certification, while 47 companies are OHSAS 18001 certified.
For exchange of information and especially for co-operation in trade matters, ACMA
has signed Memoranda of Understanding with its counterparts in USA, Canada, UK, France,
Italy, Spain, Japan, South Korea, Malaysia, Uzbekistan, Pakistan, Australia, Egypt, Iran,
Tunisia, and South Africa. Thailand & Scandinavia.
ACMA represents over 479 companies, whose production forms a majority of the
total auto component output in the organized sector. In the domestic market, they supply
components to vehicle manufacturers, Tier-1 suppliers, to state transport undertakings,
defense establishments, and railways and even to the replacement market. A variety of
components are being exported to OEMs and aftermarkets worldwide.
The industry has been exporting around 15% of its output and growing at the rate of
30%. In the year 2003-04, industry has exported US$ 1 billion versus US$ 760 million in year
2002-2003. Principal export items include replacement parts, tractor parts, motorcycle parts,
piston rings, gaskets, engine valves, fuel pump nozzles, fuel injection parts, filter & filter
elements, radiators, gears, leaf springs, brake assemblies & bearings, clutch facings, head
lamps, auto bulbs & halogen bulbs, spark plugs and body parts.
1.8 COMPANY PROFILE
- Rane Group had turnover of 375 million USD for the year 2009 – 10
- Rane Group is the preferred supplier to major OEMs in India and abroad
- Rane Group serves a variety of industry segments: Passenger Cars, Multi Utility Vehicles,
Light Commercial Vehicles, Medium & Heavy Commercial Vehicles, Farm Tractors, Three-
wheelers, Two-wheelers and Stationary Engines.
VISION:
- Provide superior products and services to our customers and maintain market leadership
- Ensure the highest standards of ethics and integrity in all our actions
- Provide superior products and services to our customers and maintain market leadership
Rane group comprises of a holding company & 7 manufacturing companies serving different
segments:
(Holding Company)
(Brake Linings, Disc Pads, Clutch Facings, Composite Brake Blocks, CV Brake Pads &
Sintered Brake Pads)
Rane Group sales for the year 2009 – 10 : INR 17075 Million (~375 million USD)
Rane Group brings to its clientele, the best of technology and expertise through strategic
technical partnerships with leaders from around the world.
All divisions of the group are in tune with international quality assurance norms. The Quality
Management System is further endorsed by the conferment of the Deming Application Prize
to four of the group.
2005 – Rane TRW Steering Systems Limited (SGD) wins Deming Application Prize
2007 – Rane (Madras) Limited wins Deming Application Prize
HRD Vision
“To stimulate and nurture the intrinsic desire in people to learn, grow and enhance
performance to achieve business success and growth”
HRD Goals
- Foster employee involvement and develop a work ethos that builds dignity and pride
HRD Organization
- At Group Level – Formulates policies, and designs major people development initiatives to
enhance professional capability of employees at group level
- At Business Unit Level – Companies implement group policies and develop Unit specific
interventions
Specific strategies and initiatives are designed to enable actualization of HRD Goals
High caliber employees are recruited through well structured process including campus
recruitments of Diploma and Graduate Engineers and lateral recruitment of experienced
employees.
- Internal candidates first considered for job vacancies, thereby, providing employees
opportunity for lateral & upward growth
- Professional Knowledge and skills enhanced through continuous education at Rane Institute
for Employee Development (RIED) and other reputed academic institutions.
Leadership Development
Leadership and managerial capabilities are developed through specific training programmes,
job rotation, participation in cross-functional teams etc.
Specific strategies and initiatives are developed and implemented in each business unit so as
to achieve HRD goals.
MILESTONES:
1959 – Diversified into manufacturing and established plant for IC Engine Valves.
1960 – Established facility to make Tie Rod Ends.
1974 – Established Kar Mobiles Limited to manufacture Automotive and Large Valves.
2000 – TQM launched under guidance of “Union of Japanese Scientists and Engineers”,
Japan.
- Rane TRW Steering Systems Limited – (Steering Gear Division) wins Deming
Application Prize.
It started manufacturing Engine Valves in 1959 in collaboration with Farnborough Engg. Co,
UK (1958-73). Then it collaborated with TRW, Inc., USA (1974-2008).It is the Leading
manufacturer of Engine Valves and Valve Train components in India.
PLANT PROFILE:
Products Valve guide & Tappet
Annual capacity 10.4 million Guides
2.0 million Tappets
Total area 20235 Sq. Meters
Built-up area 3087 Sq. Meters
Staff 30
Operators 278
Total 308
PLANT 3 MILESTONES:
Quality Certifications
TQM initiatives
CHAPTER 2
DATA ANALYSIS
AND
INTERPRETATION
DATA ANALYSIS AND INTERPRETATION
2.1 PERCENTAGE METHOD
Distribution of respondents based on age
Table 2.1.1
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 87% of the employees are between the age group 19 to
25 years, 7% of the employees are between the age group 26 to 30 years and 6% of the
employees are above 30 years of age.
Chart 2.1.1
AGE
Table 2.1.2
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 81% of the respondents have experience between 1 to
3 years, 13% have experience between 4 to 10 years and 6% of the respondents have above 10
years of experience.
Chart 2.1.2
DISTRIBUTION OF RESPONDENTS BASED ON EXPERIENCE
EXPERIENCE
Table 2.1.3
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 74% of the employees are aware about the grievance
redressal committee of the company, its members and about the committee meeting that is
held every month in the company and 26% of the employees are not aware about any of the
above.
Chart 2.1.3
RESPONDENTS
NO. OF
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 28% of the respondents strongly agree that real basis of
their problem is identified, 45% agrees, 17% stands neutral, 8% disagrees for the statement
and 2% strongly disagrees with the statement.
Chart 2.1.4
Distribution of respondents based on grievance redressal committee members’ active
involvement in resolving problem
Table 2.1.5
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 68% of the employees say that grievance redressal
committee members actively engage in resolving their problem and 32% of the employees say
that committee members are not actively engage in resolving their problem.
Chart 2.1.5
Distribution of respondents based on confidentiality and proper maintenance of
grievance records by the grievance handling committee members
Table 2.1.6
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 61% agrees that confidentiality is maintained regarding
grievances and 39% disagrees with the maintenance of confidentiality. It is also known that
71% of the respondents say that proper records are maintained regarding grievance and 29%
disagrees with the statement.
Chart 2.1.6
CONFIDENTIALITY AND PROPER MAINTENANCE OF RECORDS
NO. OF RESPONDENTS
Table 2.1.7
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 31% strongly agree that conflict resolving is an
important function for the smooth functioning of an organization, 52% of the respondents
agrees, 16% stands neutral and 1% disagrees with the statement.
Chart 2.1.7
RESPONDENTS
NO. OF
HIGHLY HIGHLY
EXPERIENCE SATISFIED SATISFIED Neutral DISSATISFIED DISSATISFIED TOTAL
1-3 Years 21 34 26 0 0 81
4-10 Years 5 5 2 0 1 13
Above 10
Years 3 0 1 2 0 6
Total 100
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that in 1-3 years experience group 25.93% are highly
satisfied, 41.97% are satisfied and 32.1% are neutral; in 4-10 years experience group 38.46%
are highly satisfied, 38.46% are satisfied, 15.38% are neutral and 7.7% are highly dissatisfied;
in employees having more than 10 years of experience 50% are highly, 16.67% is neutral and
33.33% are dissatisfied toward the conflict resolving procedure of the company.
Chart 2.1.8
SATISFIED
Table 2.1.9
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 65% of the respondents communicate their grievance
to the personal officer and 35% of the respondents communicate to their supervisor.
Chart 2.1.9
Distribution of respondents regarding regular follow up to ensure that the right decision
has ended up in satisfaction
Table 2.1.10
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the table it is inferred that 82% of the respondents agree that regular follow up is made
to ensure that the right decision has ended up in satisfaction and 18% of the respondents
disagree with the above statement.
Chart 2.1.10
Distribution of respondents towards any temporary relief provided until proper decision
is made so that it does not raise any adverse effects within the company.
Table 2.1.11
PROVIDING TEMPORARY RELIEF NO. OF RESPONDENTS PERCENTAGE
Yes 67 67%
No 33 33%
Total 100 100%
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 67% of the respondents agree that temporary relief is
provided and 33% of the respondents says that no temporary relief is provided.
Chart 2.1.11
Distribution of respondents towards the opportunity given to the employees to take the
complaint to the higher official is decision provided is not satisfactory
Table 2.1.12
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the table its is inferred that 85% of the respondents agree that opportunity given to the
employees to take the complaint to the higher official is decision provided is not satisfactory
and 15% of the respondents disagrees.
Chart 2.1.12
Distribution of respondents with respect to simple and easy grievance conveying
procedure
Table 2.1.13
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 84% of the respondents agree that grievance conveying
procedure is simple and easy and 16% of the respondents disagrees.
Chart 2.1.13
Distribution of respondents with respect the supervisor given authority to take
necessary action to resolve the problem
Table 2.1.14
Source: Data collected from employees of Rane Engine Valve LTD, Plant 3, Ponneri.
INFERENCE:
From the above table it is inferred that 66% of the respondents agree that the supervisor is
given authority to take necessary action to resolve the problem and 34% of the respondents
disagree with the statement the supervisor is given authority to take necessary action to
resolve the problem.
Chart 2.1.14
2.2 CHI SQUARE TEST
Satisfaction level of the conflict resolving procedure of the company based on
experience.
Null Hypothesis: There is no significant association between the experience and the
satisfaction level of the employees in the conflict resolving procedure of the employees
Alternative Hypothesis: There is significant association between the experience and the
satisfaction level of the employees in the conflict resolving procedure of the employees
Degree Of Freedom = (r - 1) (c - 1)
= (3 - 1) (3 - 1)
=4
Table value for Chi Square for 4 degrees of freedom at 5% level of significance = 9.488
RESULT:
Hence there is no significant association between the experience and the satisfaction level of
the employees in the conflict resolving procedure of the employees.
Satisfaction level of the conflict resolving procedure of the company and nature of work
and work environment of the employees
NULL HYPOTHESIS: Nature of work and work environment, and satisfaction level are
independent.
LEVEL OF SIGNIFICANCE: 5%
Z VALUE FOR TWO TAILED TEST: |Z| = 1.96 for 5% level of significance
Let,
Y= Satisfaction level
rs = 1- (6 (∑D2) / (n(n2-1))
DECISION:
Hence Nature of work and work environment, and satisfaction level are independent.
CHAPTER 3
FINDINGS,
SUGGESSTIONS
AND
CONCLUSION
3.1 FINDINGS
1. 87% of the employees are of under the age group 19-25 years
4. 28% strongly agrees and 45% agrees that real basis of the problem is
identified.
6. 61% of the respondents say that proper records regarding grievance and
confidentiality is maintained.
8. 68% of the employees are satisfied with the grievance handling procedure
followed by the company.
9. 82% agrees that importance is given to what is right rather than who is
right.
10. 67% of the employees say that temporary relief is provided until proper
decision is made.
3.2 SUGGESTIONS
Some of the suggestions based on the findings are:
The study reveals that the Grievance handling procedure is satisfactory. The organization is
recognizing the importance of satisfying the employees and retaining them. Further
improvements can be made so that all members are highly satisfied with the procedure. The
suggestions and recommendations when implemented will still more benefit the organization.
Most of the surveyed employees are satisfied with the method adopted by the organization for
redressing the grievances or complaints of the employees.
CHAPTER 4
APPENDICES
APPENDIX 1
GRIEVANCE FORM
Plant 3,Ponneri
Name of employee:
Describe in detail the nature of your complaint including names of all individuals involved, witnesses
of the incident and any proof you might have about the complaint:
Give details about how the incident has affected your ability to work effectively:
What actions could the company take in order to effectively deal with your complaint?
Give any additional comments that would be helpful in dealing with your complaint:
PERSONAL INFORMATION:
Name:
Gender: [ ] Male [ ] Female
Age: [ ] 19 – 25 [ ] 26 – 30 [ ] Above 30
Educational Qualification:
[ ] Higher Secondary [ ] Diploma
[ ] Under Graduate [ ] Post Graduate
Marital status: [ ] Single [ ] Married
Department:
Designation:
Experience:
Monthly Income:
QUESTIONS:
1. Are you aware of the grievance redressal committee of your company?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
[ ] Yes [ ] No
3. Are you aware of the monthly meetings of the grievance redressal committee which are
being held?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
--------------------------------
5. Is the real basis of your problem identified?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
8. Is there regular follow up to ensure that the right decision has ended up in satisfaction?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
9. Is there any temporary relief provided until proper decision is made so that it does not raise
any adverse effects within the company?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
[ ] Yes [ ] No
11. If the decision is not satisfactory, are you given opportunity to take it to higher officials?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
[ ] Yes [ ] No
13. Are the procedures for conveying grievance simple and easy to utilize?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
14. Is the supervisor given authority to take necessary action to resolve the problem?
[ ] Yes [ ] No
[ ] Yes [ ] No
18. I try to find out the ideal solution where both persons emerge as “winners”.
19. Conflict resolving is an important function for the smooth functioning of an organization.
20. Rate the satisfaction level for the conflict resolving procedure adopted by your company.
Date:
Place: Signature
CHAPTER 5
REFERENCES
REFERENCES
Books Referred:
• Aswathappa K, Human Resource and Personnel management, Tata McGraw- Hill
• Uma Sekaran, Research Methods for Business, Wiley India, New Delhi
Websites Referred:
• www.citehr.com
• www.ranegroup.com
• www.scribd.com
• www.wikipedia.com