THE UN-MATERIALISED EXISTENCE.

A series of analysis
The creation of order from disorder / chaos may at first seem possible. However what is the true nature
of order and disorder? The Rock could argue that the Sea has no order, and the Sea could state that it is
no less ordered than the Rock? Self - perception and desire, seem to be as important a factor as the
object under observation itself.
I maintain that the present universe is ‘Order’, not just ‘in-order’. It is the only ‘order’ that we will ever
know. Our own lack of understanding of this ‘order’ is erroneously described by some as a sign of the
fundamental disorder of the system.
Could we not visualize ‘order’ as, ‘that from which impressions of disorder are perceived’?
Must not ‘order’, precede ‘disorder’? Is it not through ‘perception’ and ‘desire’, both of which require
‘order’, that disorder / chaos is created and perceived?
Chaos as the initial and fundamental state of existence is generally meant as either;
a) Existence is in a state of disorder requiring order for a ‘Ration –al’ state of existence to
come into being.
b) Everything is in a state of ‘un-materialised existence’ and ‘order’, a particular degree of
‘materialisation’ / metamorphosis is perceived by us as ‘Existence and Order.
Chaos, and or disorder in this initial state of existence should not be restricted conceptually only to the
terms / vision of random particles or random separation of matter. It should also include the concept of
an ‘un-materialised’ existence. This un-materialised existence is what I take the Ancient Ethiopians of
Egypt/Kemit, to mean by the term ‘Noun’ / ‘Nun’ or Primordial Existence. Out of which Material
Existence is created, through a form of Metamorphosis. See FIG 3. The Appearance of a three-
dimensional object in a dimensional World. In this diagram our universe is considered as a two
dimensional world, with length and breadth but no height, similar to a piece of paper. If a three
dimensional object, for example, a ball, was to interact with this two dimensional world. How would
the people on our world perceive the ball? In the first instance there would appear, as if from nowhere,
a ‘point’ or ‘dot’ which would gradually expand into a flat disc until it reached a maximum size and it
would stay that way as long as it remained stationary. The people on the world would not have any
concepts on the other qualities of the ‘disc’. The fact that it possessed ‘height and depth’ would be
totally out of their perception because these qualities are absent from their limited universe. In a similar
way I consider the ‘Un-Materialised Existence’ as a multi-dimensional object which interacts with our
limited-dimensional universe and our understanding of the nature of its multi-dimensional qualities are
totally limited by our existence as limited-dimensional beings.
 The Laws of Nature?

In a re-interpretation of the laws of thermodynamics, it is curious to ask if the laws were developed as a
consequence of demonstrable universality or as a universal ‘myth’ to justify Mechanistic political and
economic theory.
 2DObject. 3DObject
Has only left and right, no up or down. As this passes through a 2D‘universe’
the population sees the fo llowing.

B
A

A. first appearance of 3Dobject as a point.

B. the point gradually expands.
C. the expansion reaches a maximum., then contracts to the size of B,
then A, before disappearingfromview.
D. real result of 3Dobject passing through a 2Duniverse.

Fig.3 Appearance of a 3 Dimensional object in a

2 D ime nsional Universe .

Fig.3 illustrating the transition of a 3D. object through a

2D Universe.