Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
Indian banks are struggling to come out of the ‘net’ of Non-Performing Assets.
Banks are in the risk business. In the process of providing financial services, they assume
various kinds of risks viz. Credit Risk, Market Risk, Operational Risk, Interest Risk,
Forex Risk and Country Risk. Among these different types of risk, credit constitutes the
most dominant asset in the balance sheet, accounting for about 60% of total assets. The
credit risk is generally made up of Transaction Risk (default risk) and Portfolio Risk. The
risk management is a complex function and requires specialized skills and expertise. As a
result managing credit risk efficiently assumes greater significance.
Some of the NPA’s are excess holding of cash balance, bad and doubtful debts,
deteriorating assets and interest on loans and advances that are doubtful to be realized.
The Gross NPA of the apex bank is a percentage to the gross advances total assets
of apex bank is less when compared to other banks.
The study of non- performing asset management at Apex bank gives details of the
Gross NPA and Net NPA of the bank, which is least among the present co-operative
banks. The strategies of reducing non performing assets including prevention through
better appraisals, prevention through better follow up, rephasement of loans, merger
or acquisition of sick units by healthy units, recycling of funds, filing of civil suits,
debt recovery tribunals and recovery of advances given under government sponsored
programs or schemes.
Banks should take advantage of mergers and acquisition of sick units in order to
reduce the NPA’s. a large number of compromise proposals are being approved by
the institutions with the view of reducing NPA’s and recycling of funds instead of
restoring to expensive recovery proceedings spread over a long period of time.
1.1INDUSTRY PROFILE
In ancient Greece around the same time, there existed banking business. Even
then temples were used as depositories for the surplus funds of the people and were also
used as centers of the money lending business. The priests acted as financial agents of the
money lending business.
The practice of granting credit existed in ancient Rome. The Romans adopted
Greek system of banking. The banking business had a set back after the death of the
emperor JUSTINIAN in 565A.D. With the advent of trade and commerce in the middle
age, the banking business was mostly confined to only money lending. The JEWS and
LAMBARDY dominated the money lending business in the medieval period. The
Christians were forbidden by their religion to indulge in money lending. However in the
course of time with the weakening of the hold of religion and with the development of
trade and commerce around the 13th century, the Christians also entered the field of
money lending.
The banking business suffered a set back during the reign of Charles II in 1640
who declined to return the funds and valuables deposited by the Goldsmiths with the
exchequer under the case of government. This led to the growth of private banking and
also the establishment of the Bank of England in 1694.
Money banking system developed only after the industry resolution.
1. Banking business in ancient times.
The ancient Hindu Scripture refers to the prevalence of money lending activities
in the Vedic period. The epics Ramayana and Mahabharata refer banking business as full
fledged activity. During the Smriti period, which followed the Vedic period the members
of the Vaish community largely carried on banking business. In ancient times banking
business was mainly in the form of money lending. It laid a strong foundation for
banking industry.
• The nationalization and conversion of the Imperial Bank of India into the State
Bank of India on 11th July 1955.
• The nationalization of 14 major commercial banks on 19th July 1969 and the
future nationalization of 6 commercial banks on 15th April 1980.
• Establishment of Regional Rural Banks to cater to the needs of rural areas. About
196 rural banks are catering to the needs of rural people.
• Setting up of Land Development Banks to cater to the long-term credit needs of
agriculturists.
• Setting up of special financial institutions for meeting the specialized need of
certain sectors of the economy. Some of the specialized institutions are:
Industrial Development Bank of India (IDBI).
Industrial Credit and Investment Corporation of India (ICICI).
State Financial Corporation (SFC).
Industrial Development Corporation (IDC).
Small Industries Development Bank of India (SIDBI).
Industrial Bank for Reconstruction and Development (IBRD).
National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development (NABARD).
Export Import Bank of India (EXIM).
Export Credit Guarantee Corporation of India.
The National Housing Bank.
and several land development banks. Institutions like Life Insurance Corporation of India
and Unit Trust Bank of India also plays an important role in Indian banking system.
With the liberalization of the economy in 1991 the banking sector has undergone
a revolution. Foreign banks are based in India and this has led to further improvement and
sophistication of banking service due to competition.
Definition:
The Indian banking regulation act of 1949 has aptly defined the term ‘Banking’ in
section 5(1) (B) as “accepting for the purpose of lending or investments of deposits of
money from the public, repayable on demand or otherwise and withdraw able by cheque,
draft, order or otherwise”
RBI
Housing Banks
Short term Long term
Urban Banks
Lending Lending
Employee’s Credit Societies
Specialized Co-Operatives
State Land
State Level
Bank
Industrial Consumer
Co-Operative Co-Operative
District
Central Credit Non-Credit
Co-operative
1.2COMPANY PROFILE
The Karnataka State Co-Operative Apex Bank Limited has been playing a very
significant role in the dispensation of production, credit to the farmers. It is to the credit
of Karnataka, that the first co-operative credit institution in the entire country was
established way back in the year 1904 in a village called Kanaginahal now at Gadag
district. Primary Agricultural Credit Society (PACS) at the village level federated later to
District Central Co-Operative Banks (DCCBs) at the district level. These DCC banks
federated themselves at the state level to form Apex Bank.
The Karnataka State Co-operative Bank was established in the year 1915 and the
late Varadaraja Iyengar has been its founder president. It made a humble beginning with
a working capital of Rs.1.80 lakh comprising of Rs.1.26 lakhs as deposits. Over 90 years,
the institution has grown by leaps and bounds and today it’s working capital is
Rs.4718.28 crores with deposit level of Rs.2264.14 crores and own fund of Rs.265.91
crores. The bank has earned Rs.13.35 crores.
Apex bank is a pioneer in agriculture finance and allied activities. Apex bank is
ranked as one of the premier state co-operative banks in the country. The main objectives
of the bank are to serve the farmers in the state by providing short term and long term
agricultural loans, general banking business and function as a leader of the co-operative
banks in the state.
NATURE OF BUSINESS
The business carried by the bank is generally related with providing short term
and long term agricultural loans. It also accepts deposits from the public. Apex bank also
provides cash credit loans to processing, marketing and consumer co-operatives as well
as sugar factories in Karnataka and working capital loans to state level and national level
institutions.
Quality Objectives:
• To serve as a state co-operative bank and as a balancing center in the state of
Karnataka for registered co-operative societies.
• To raise funds by way of deposits, loans, grants, donations, subscriptions,
subsidies etc for financing the members by way of loans, cash credits, overdrafts
and advances.
• To develop, assist and co-ordinate the member DCCBs and other co-operative
societies and secure financial assistance for them.
• To arrange/hold periodical co-operative conferences of the DCCBs and other
members of the bank and to take action for the growth and development of the co-
operative credit movement.
BANK’S OPERATION
Apex bank works in the regional level only. It does not work in national level.
The area of operation covers the entire Bangalore. It has 31 branches in Bangalore and
head quarters is situated in Chamarajpet. The branch offices of bank are adequately
delegated with power of sanction of disbursements. If the loans are to be provided up to
10 lakhs then it is handled by concerned branch offices but if it is more than 10 lakhs
then it is handled by main branch.
BRANCHES AT BANGALORE:
• Head Office Branch-Chamarajpet
• Ashoka Pillar
• Banashankari
• Basaveshwara nagar
• Girinagar
• Gokula
• Gandhinagar
• Agara-HSR layout
• Indiranagar
• Jayanagar Market Complex
• J.P Nagar
• Kalpatharu Super Bazaar
• Koramangala
• Kengeri Satellite Town
• Lakkasandra
• Magadi Road
• Ganganagar
• Padmanabha Nagar
• Public Utility Building
• Rajajinagar
• R.P.C Layout
• Vijayanagar
• Vidhana Soudha
• Legislators’ Home
• M.S Building
• Mahalakshmipuram
• Vyalikaval
• Chandra layout
• Vivekananda College (Ext. Counter)
• R.T Nagar
OWNERSHIP PATTERN
Apex bank is state co-operative bank established by the state government in the
year 1915 under the organization of Primary Agricultural Co-operatives Credit societies
(PACS)
The Karnataka State Co-operative Apex Bank Ltd has shares worth Rs.65.66
Crores. The share capital consisting of Co-operative institutions to the extent of Rs
58.62 Crores and other than co-operative institutions of Rs 7 Crores and some part by the
Government of Karnataka.
Sources of funds:
1. The bank obtains its funds from
2. Shares
3. Deposits
4. Borrowings from NABARD, RBI, SBI, IDBI, ICICI and IFC.
5. Contribution from co-operative societies
6. Other sources subject to approval to Board and the Registrar.
Service to customers
The Karnataka State Co-Operative Apex Bank Limited provides following services to
the societies:
• Financing of short term loans
• Financing of medium term loans
• Financing of Kisan credit card scheme/loan
• Credit facilities to self help groups, Advancing medium term loans for economic
development and providing cash credit loans
• Advancing workshop capital loans
• Collection of Cheques and drafts
• Loans through various schemes
• Personal banking
1) Financing of short term loans:
Financing of short term loans for seasonal agricultural operations and for
marketing of crops. These loans are repayable within one year.
These loans are advanced for the agricultural infrastructures such as lift irrigation,
diary, poultry, plantation, gobar gas etc that constitutes schematic lending.
6) Providing cash credit loans:
Providing cash credit loans to processing marketing and consumer co-operatives
as well as sugar factories in Karnataka and also term loans to sugar factories under
consortium agreement.
7) Advancing working capital loans:
Advancing working capital loans to state level co-operatives like MARKFED,
KCCF and to the national level co-operatives like IFFCO and KRIBHCO. The bank
provide similar facilities to public sector undertakings like Karnataka Silk
Marketing Board, Karnataka Handloom Development Corporation, Karnataka
Small Scale Industries Development Corporations, Food Corporations of India
directly and also through consortium arrangements with commercial banks
8) Collection of Cheques and Drafts:
The bank extends finance to the non-farm sector and to the development of
cottage industries, small scale industries and rural artisan and weavers. It is a
scheduled bank in all aspects including remittance of funds, demand drafts, mail
transfers, collection of Cheques and drafts.
9) Loans through various schemes:
Such as:
• Vehicle loans
• Housing loans
• Mortgage loans
• Installment loans
• Jewel loans
10) Personal Banking:
Apex bank provides the following deposit schemes to the customers:
11) Fixed Deposits:
In this account, the customer deposits the deposit money period up to 10 years
12) Current Deposits:
In this type, the individuals or businessmen operate. This account is kept open
for the entire day. The customer can make any number of deposits and
withdrawals in a day during business hour.
13) Saving Bank Deposits:
In this deposits, the low income class groups and marginal customers deposits
the money.
The focus of the financial analysis is on key figures in the financial statements
and the significant relationships that exist between them. The analysis of financial
statements is a process of evaluating relationship between component parts of financial
statements to obtain a better understanding of the Company’s position and performance.
The first task of the financial analyst is to select the information relevant to the decision
under consideration from the total information contained in the financial statement. The
second step involved in financial analysis is to arrange the information in a way to
highlight significant relationships. The final step is interpretation and drawings of
inferences and conclusions. In brief, financial analysis is the process of selection,
relation and evaluation.
The present data is devoted to an in depth analysis of financial statements use for
decision-making. The present data is mainly focused on NPA as the most widely used
technique of financial statement analysis, importance of NPA and limitations of NPA.
In Today banks have become a part and parcel of our life. Now banks offer
access even a common and their activities extend to areas which are untouched. Apart
from their traditional business oriented functions they have now come out to fulfill
national responsibilities. They accelerate the economic growth of a country and steer the
wheels of the economy towards its goal of “self reliance in all fields”.
VISION,MISSION AND QUALITY POLICY
VISION:
As a state co-operative bank, Apex bank shall be a dominant financial
institution in the state, leading the state to economic prosperity.
They shall be the model of an effective, protective, dynamic and financial sound
organization, respectively to state goals and aspiration.
They shall maintain highly trained and motivated professionals committed to the highest
standards of ethics and excellence.
They shall contribute to building progressive and standard of co-operative societies in the
service of farmers and rural areas
MISSION:
Ensuring the best quality of life and success of their farmers, agricultural co-
operative societies, district central co-operative banks, clients and employees who
are the reasons for their being.
OUALITY POLICY
For their Farmers:
They shall continue to improve their socio-economic status through timely
financial and technical support.
For their PACS and DCC banks
They shall ensure mutual co-operation and compliment action to achieve optimum
gains in an achievement of confidence and trust.
For their Employees
They shall ensure a work atmosphere of mutual respect and team work
within a system of recognition and regards. They shall continue to provide
appropriate training and value enhancement to ensure the highest degree of
professionalism and integrity.
For the People of Karnataka:
They commit their unvarying loyalty and dedicated service in the pursuit of
state farmer’s interest.
Schedule As at As at
31.03.2008 31.03.2009
(Rs. 00’000) (Rs. 00’000)
(NON-PERFORMING ASSETS)
Definition
A loan or lease that is not meeting its stated principal and interest payments.
Banks usually classify as nonperforming assets any commercial loans which are more
than 90 days overdue and any consumer loans which are more than 180 days overdue.
More generally, an asset which is not producing income.
What is a NPA?
Action for enforcement of security interest can be initiated only if the secured
asset is classified as Non Performing Asset.
Non Performing Asset means an asset or account of borrower, which has been
classified by a bank or financial institution as sub-standard, doubtful or loss asset, in
accordance with the directions or guidelines relating to asset classification issued by RBI.
An amount due under any credit facility is treated as "past due" when it has not
been paid within 30 days from the due date. Due to the improvement in the payment and
settlement systems, recovery climate, up gradation of technology in the banking system,
etc., it was decided to dispense with 'past due' concept, with effect from March 31, 2001.
Accordingly, as from that date, a Non performing asset (NPA) shell be an advance where
i. Interest and /or installment of principal remain overdue for a period of more than
180 days in respect of a Term Loan,
ii. The account remains 'out of order' for a period of more than 180 days, in respect
of an overdraft/ cash Credit(OD/CC),
iii. The bill remains overdue for a period of more than 180 days in the case of bills
purchased and discounted,
iv. Interest and/ or installment of principal remains overdue for two harvest seasons
but for a period not exceeding two half years in the case of an advance granted for
agricultural purpose, and
v. Any amount to be received remains overdue for a period of more than 180 days in
respect of other accounts.
Overdue
Any amount due to the bank under any credit facility is 'overdue' if it is not paid
on the due date fixed by the bank.
2. Depositors do not receive a market return on savings. In the worst case if the bank
fails, depositors lose their assets or uninsured balance. Banks also redistribute losses to
other borrowers by charging higher interest rates. Lower deposit rates and higher lending
rates repress savings and financial markets, which hampers economic growth.
3. Non-Performing loans epitomize bad investment. They misallocate credit from good
projects, which do not receive funding, to failed projects. Bad investment ends up in
misallocation of capital and, by extension, labor and natural resources. The economy
performs below its production potential.
4. Non-performing loans may spill over the banking system and contract the money
stock, which may lead to economic contraction. This spillover effect can channelize
through illiquidity or bank insolvency; (a) when many borrowers fail to pay interest,
banks may experience liquidity shortages. These shortages can jam payments across the
country, (b) illiquidity constraints bank in paying depositors e.g. cashing their paychecks.
Banking panic follows. A run on banks by depositors as part of the national money stock
become inoperative. The money stock contracts and economic contraction follows (c)
undercapitalized banks exceeds the bank’s capital base.
Lending by banks has been highly politicized. It is common knowledge that loans
are given to various industrial houses not on commercial considerations and viability of
project but on political considerations; some politician would ask the bank to extend the
loan to a particular corporate and the bank would oblige. In normal circumstances banks,
before extending any loan, would make a thorough study of the actual need of the party
concerned, the prospects of the business in which it is engaged, its track record, the
quality of management and so on. Since this is not looked into, many of the loans become
NPAs.
The loans for the weaker sections of the society and the waiving of the loans to
farmers are another dimension of the politicization of bank lending.
Most of the depositor’s money has been frittered away by the banks at the
instance of politicians, while the same depositors are being made to pay through taxes to
cover the losses of the bank.
1. PSBs performed creditably in respect of all parameters set for them. However, in
the early 1990s, it emerged that PSBs were suffering from acute capital
inadequacy and many of them had negative profitability. This is because the
parameters set for their functioning were deficient and they did not project the
paramount need for these corporate goals. Incorrect goal perception and
identification led them to the wrong destination.
2. The pre-reform era witnessed directed banking for PSBs which functioned under
the overall control and direction of the Finance Ministry, which along with the
Reserve Bank of India (RBI), decided/directed all aspects of the working of the
banks, leaving little freedom to price their products in competition with each
other, cater their products to segments of their choice, or invest their funds in their
best interest as they determined.
3. Since the 1970s, the SCBs of India functioned totally as captive capsule units cut
off from international banking and unable to participate in the structural
transformations, the sweeping changes, and the new types of lending products
emerging in global banking institutions. Their personnel lacked needed training
and knowledge resources required to compete with international players.
4. Major policy decisions were taken externally by the Finance Ministry/RBI. The
environment of receiving decisions from a political background as distinguished
from a professional outfit prevented the best talents coming to occupy key
positions.
5 The quantum of credit extended by the PSBs increased by about 160 times in the
three decades after nationalization (from around 3000 crore in 1970 to 475 113
Crore on 31 March 2000). The Banks were not sufficiently developed in terms of
skills and expertise to regulate such growth and manage the diverse risks that
emerged in the process.
6 The need for organizing an effective mechanism to gather and disseminate credit
information amongst the commercial banks was never felt or implemented. The
archaic laws of secrecy of customer information prevented banks from publishing
names of defaulters for common knowledge of the other banks in the system.
7 Effective recovery from defaulting and overdue borrowers was hampered on
account of a sizeable overhang component arising from infirmities in the existing
process of debt recovery, inadequate legal provisions on foreclosure and
bankruptcy and difficulties in the execution of court decrees. Legal remedies were
beset with too many formalities and were very time-consuming.
8 Effective corporate management was an alien concept. In respect of PSBs, the
boards were ineffective and the only/main shareholder was the government of
India. The government exercised multiple roles and concerns, and the instinct to
act as a watchful shareholder and increase shareholders value of banks and
financial institutions was never felt or experienced.
9 Credit management on the part of the lenders to the borrowers to secure their
genuine and bonafide interests was not based on pragmatically calculated
anticipated cash flows of the borrower’s concern, while recovery of installments
of term loans was not out of profits and surplus generated but through recourse to
the corpus of working capital of the borrowing concerns.
10 Functional inefficiency was also caused due to overstaffing, manual processing of
bloated operations and a failure to computerize the banks in India, when elsewhere
Throughout the world the system switched over to computerization of operations.
Impact on profitability
Indian banking in 2002 represents a sea change from where it was in the
preceding decade. There has been a decade of professional banking moving towards
global standards. Banks, in general, performed extremely well in 2001-2002 and
onwards.
The public sector banks which suffered losses of Rs.3 293 crore in 1992-1993 and
Rs.4349 crore in 1993-1994, i.e. in the initial years of introduction of prudential norms,
ended the year 1997-1998 with a net profit of Rs.5 027 crore. Net NPAs of public sector
banks formed 8.2% of the net advances and 3.3% of the total assets as at the end of
March 1998. Corresponding figures as at 31 March 2002 are 5.82% and 2.42%. PSBs
recorded an aggregate net profit of Rs.8 301 crore in 2001-2002.
• The process of deregulation freed the banks from the control of the Finance
Ministry and RBI. The RBI, hereafter, acts as a regulator. In the year 1994, RBI
further fine-tuned the process by constituting a separate Board of Financial
Supervision (BFS) with the objective of segregating the supervisory role from the
regulatory functions of RBI. Banks now operate independently in a competitive
financial market, but have to comply with prudential norms and safeguards
essential for their wellbeing.
• Banks were permitted to seek infusions of fresh equity from the public with
the government retaining a 51% share of equity capital. A number of PSBs
entered the market and raised Tier I and Tier II capital accordingly. This has
created a new class of stakeholder (albeit shareholders) vitally interested in the
wellbeing of the banks and qualified/empowered to question the Board of
Directors at the appropriate forum.
• The Credit Information Bureau (India) Ltd.: In order to expedite credit and
investment decisions by banks and financial institutions, and curb the accretion of
fresh NPAs, the Credit Information Bureau (India) Ltd., (CIBIL) was set up by
the State Bank of India in association with HDFC in August 2000. CIBIL was to
be technology driven to ensure speedy processing, periodic updating and
availability of error-free data at all times in the system. As a first step towards
activating the CIBIL, it was decided to initiate the process of collection and
dissemination of some relevant information within the existing legal framework.
The RBI accordingly decided to constitute a group drawing representation from
CIBIL, the Indian Banks' Association (IBA), select banks and FIs to examine the
possibility of the CIBIL performing the role of collecting and disseminating
information on the list of suit-filed accounts and the list of defaulters, including
willful defaulters, which is presently handled by the Reserve Bank. The group is
also expected to examine other aspects of information collection and
dissemination, such as the extent, periodicity and coverage, and the feasibility of
supplying information on-line to members in the future.
• Norms of lenders' liability: RBI has come out with broad guidelines for framing
the Fair Practices Code with regard to lenders' liability to be followed by
commercial banks and financial institutions, emphasizing transparency and proper
assessment of borrowers' credit requirements. RBI has issued a draft of the model
code and has advised the individual banks to adopt model guidelines for framing
their respective Fair Practices Codes with the approval of their Boards. This is a
balancing measure. It imposes self-discipline on the part of the banks, which will
only indirectly prevent accounts turning into NPAs on account of the bank's own
failures or wrong actions.
• Risk assessment and risk management: Since the year 1998, the RBI has been
making serious efforts towards evolving a suitable and comprehensive model for
risk-management by the banks and to integrate this new discipline in the working
systems of banks. The RBI has identified risk-prone areas in asset-liability
management, credit management, changes in market conditions and counter-party
and country risks and has evolved suitable models for managing all such risks.
RBI has also evolved a system of Risk-based Supervision of Banks. It also
advised banks on a parallel scheme for carrying out internal audit based on risk
perception.
• E-banking and VRS: The influence of these areas of banking reforms may not
appear directly relevant to a reduction of NPAs. However, computerization
provides for data-accuracy and operational efficiency and results in a better
Management Information Service (MIS). VRS rationalizes the work force, which
in turn results in better productivity and operational efficiency.
• Compromise settlement schemes: Banks are free to design and implement their
own policies for recovery and write-off incorporating compromise and negotiated
settlements with the approval of their Boards, particularly for old and unresolved
cases falling under the NPA category. The policy framework suggested by RBI
provides for setting up of independent Settlement Advisory Committees headed
by a retired judge of the High Court to scrutinize and recommend compromise
proposals. Specific guidelines were issued in May 1999 to PSBs for one time non-
discretionary and non-discriminatory settlement (OTS) of NPAs of the small
enterprise sector. The scheme was operative up to September 30, 2000. (Public
sector banks recovered Rs. 668 crore through compromise settlement under this
scheme). Guidelines were modified in July 2000 for recovery of the stock of
NPAs of Rs. 5 crore and less, as on 31 March 1997. (The above guidelines which
were valid up to 30 June 2001, helped the public sector banks to recover Rs. 2 600
crore by September 2001). An OTS scheme covering advances of Rs. 25 000 and
• Circulation of information on defaulters: The RBI has put in place a system for
periodic circulation of details of willful defaults of borrowers of banks and
financial institutions. This serves as a cautionary list while considering requests
for new or additional credit limits from defaulting borrowing units and also from
the directors/proprietors/partners of these entities. RBI also publishes a list of
borrowers (with aggregate outstanding of Rs. 1 crore and above) against whom
banks and FIs have filed suits for recovery of their funds, as on 31 March every
year. These measures serve as a negative basket of steps shutting off fresh loans
to these defaulters.
• Recovery action against large NPAs: RBI advised public sector banks to
examine all cases of willful default of Rs. 1 crore and above and file suits in such
cases, and file criminal cases in regard to willful defaults. Boards of Directors are
required to review NPA accounts of Rs.1 crore and above with special reference
to fixing of staff accountability.
• Special mention accounts: In a recent circular, RBI has suggested to the banks to
have a new asset category or “special mention accounts” for early identification of
bad debts. This would be strictly for internal monitoring. Loans and advances
overdue for less than one quarter and two quarters would come under this
category. Data regarding such accounts will have to be submitted by banks to the
RBI. However, special mention assets would not require provisioning, as they are
not classified as NPAs. An asset may be transferred to this category once the
earliest signs of sickness/irregularities are identified. This will help banks look at
accounts with potential problems in a focused manner right from the onset of the
problem, so that monitoring and remedial actions can be more effective. Once
these accounts are categorized and reported as such, proper top management
attention would also be ensured. Borrowers having genuine problems due to a
temporary mismatch in funds flow or sudden requirements of additional funds
may be entertained at the branch level and for this purpose, a special limit to tide
over such contingencies may be built into the sanction process itself.
2.3Statement of problem
This project is conducted to analyze the non-performing assets level of apex bank
and its impact on the performance of the bank.
Non- performing assets is a major bane for the banks in India, so as in the case of
apex bank the study has been undertaken to know the status, practices and impact of
NPA’s on the profitability of the bank. The problem lies in understanding and analyzing
the NPA’s.
2.6 Methodology
Introduction
The quality of the project work depends on the methodology adopted for the
study. Methodology, in turn, depends on the nature of the project work. The use of proper
methodology is an essential part of any research. In order to conduct the study
scientifically, suitable methods & measures are to be followed.
Research Design
The type of research used for the collection & analysis of the data is “Historical
Research Method”.
The main source of data for this study is the past records prepared by the bank.
The focus of the study is to determine the non-performing assets of the bank since its
inception & to identify the ways in which the performance especially the non-performing
assets of the Apex Bank can be improved.
The data regarding bank history & profile are collected through “Exploratory
Research Design” particularly through the study of secondary sources and discussions
with individuals.
Secondary Data
Collection of data through bank annual reports, bank manuals and other relevant
documents.
Collection of data through the literature provided by the bank.
The chart showing the percentage change in NPA at the KSCAB Ltd.
0
-2
-4
-6
2007-08
-8
2008-09
-10
2009-10
-12
-14
-16
1st Qtr 2nd Qtr 3rd Qtr 4th Qtr
Inference:
The above charts show in the financial year 2007-08 NPA is -14.68
from the financial year 2008-09 to 2009-10 NPA is increased.
This enhances the small amount of the NPA increased of the bank. The
reduction in NPA can attribute to the positive strategies undertaken by Apex
bank.
TABLE NO.2
The table showing the percentage of NPA in different sector in
the financial year 31.03.2007.
18.48
13.20
Agriculture
Sugar
Others
67.8
Inference:
The above chart shows total NPA in different sector in the year 2007 Sugar
sector has increasing trend 67.82% from sugar sector 18.48% from the agriculture
sector and 13.2% from the other sector.
Table 1: Table showing gross NPA of the bank (in lakhs) from 2006 to 2008
2006 3831.36
2007 2679.22
2008 898.49
Analysis:
The table shows the gross NPA of Apex Bank from 2006 to 2008. It is clearly
evident from the table that the gross NPA has come down from Rs. 3831.36 lakhs to Rs.
898.49 lakhs as on 2008 this is appreciable, as the gross NPA has gradually reduced
during the period.
Chart 1: Chart showing gross NPA of the bank (in lakhs) in the last three
years
Inference:
Every best possible effort is taken by the bank to curb the growth of NPA. The
bank has been focusing its attention on the recovery of the NPAs and as a result it has
been able to reduce the NPA’s during the last years. Since the gross NPA is an indicator
of inherent quality of the banks credit appraisal capabilities, the banks focuses to a large
extent in reduction of its gross NPA
2006 14.65%
2007 10.94%
2008 4.3%
Analysis:
The percentage of net NPA as on 2006 was 14.65%, where as in 2007 it was
10.94% this is the period where NPA level has drastically come down, and in the 2008 it
is 4.3%, from this we can infer that the situation is under effective control.
Chart 2: Chart showing percentage of gross NPA of Apex Bank from 2006 to
2008
16.00%
14.00%
12.00%
10.00%
8.00%
6.00%
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
2006 2007 2008
Inference:
The analysis of the three years shows a gradual decrease in the percentage of the
gross NPA to the loans and advances. This is appreciable to the growth of the
profitability of the bank. This is achieved by adopting the various recovery measures
adopted by the bank.
Table 3: Table showing the net NPA of the Apex Bank from 200 to 2008
2006 2944.78
2007 1388.59
2008 658.20
Analysis:
The table shows the analysis of the net NPA of apex bank there is a gradual
decrease in the net NPA from 2944.78 in2006 to Rs. 1388.59 lakhs in 2007 and
Rs. 658.20 lakhs in the year 2008.
Chart 3: Chart showing net NPA of apex bank from 2006 to 2008
3000
2500
2000
1500 West
1000
500
0
2006 2007 2008
Inference:
The chart shows the analysis of the net NPA where it is decreasing continuously.
The decrease in NPA is due to the strict recovery strategies laid by the bank and proper
classification of assets and timely recovery of the loans and advances. The decrease in the
net NPA enriches the strengths of the financial position of the company by decreasing the
credit loss and increasing the asset.
Table 4: Table showing the percentage of net NPA of Apex Bank.
2008 3.15%
2009 1.70%
2010 1.13%
Analysis:
The three years analysis of % of net NPA states that there is decrease in the
percentage of NPA from 3.15% in 2008 to 1.70% in the year 2009 and 1.13% in the year
2010. This decrease in %of net NPA is appreciable.
3.50%
3.00%
2.50%
2.00%
1.50%
East
1.00%
0.50%
0.00%
1st Qtr 2nd 3rd
Qtr Qtr
Inference:
The decrease in the percentage of the net NPA is due to the proper asset
classification and the appropriate recovery measures, which are taken for enhancing the
profitability of the bank.
The bank has successfully reduced its net NPA from 3.15% in 2008 to 1.13% in
2010. Steps are taken on a continuous basis to control the level of NPAs and ensure
recovery of the existing bad debts. The bank has formulated a recovery policy with built
in mechanism to settle NPAs by compromise as well.
Table 5: Table showing the gross and net NPA position of the Apex Bank
Analysis:
The table shows the amount of gross NPA and net NPA during 2006 to 2008.
There has been a continuous reduction in GNPA and NNPA.
4000
3500
3000
2500
2000 East
1500 We st
1000
500
0
2006 2007 2008
Inference
Table 6: Table showing the percentage of gross NPA and net NPA.
As at % of GNPA % of NNPA
Analysis:
The table shows the percentages of GNPA and NNPA from 2006 to 2008 the
GNPA has come down from 14.65% to 4.3%. Similarly the NNPA has also reduced from
11.26% to 3.15%.
Chart 6: Chart showing the percentage of GNPA and NNPA of Apex Bank from 200
to 2008
16.00%
14.00%
12.00%
10.00%
8.00% East
6.00% West
4.00%
2.00%
0.00%
2006 2007 2008
Inference:
The bank is focusing its attention on the recovery of NPAs and also taking several
measures to reduce the NPAs and as a result of which it is reducing from past three years.
The net NPA has declined from 11.26% to 3.15% from 200 to 2008 and the gross NPA
has declined from 14.65% to 4.3% in 2006 to 2008.
The bank is striving hard to reduce NPA and increase the profitability of bank. It
has started recovery wings at its regional offices.
2006 58.3%
2007 69.96%.
2008 73.49%
Analysis:
The table percentage of cash recovery for the period 200 to 2008. The bank has
recovered 58.3% in the year 2006 and 69.96%. In 2007 and 73.49% in 2008
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
50.00%
40.00%
30.00%
20.00%
10.00%
0.00%
2006 2007 2008
Inference:
Under the cash recovery, the bank has recorded an all time high in the year 2008
of 73.49% compared to last two years i.e., 58.3% and 69.96%.
Table 8: Table showing the classification of assets at Apex bank.
Analysis:
The table shows the classification of assets into different categories. The
substandard assets are decreasing year after year. It has decreased from Rs. 16956.75
lakhs in2006 to Rs. 9074.82 lakhs in2008.
Doubtful assets have been increasing from Rs. 927.85 lakhs to Rs. 11273.68 lakhs in
2008.
Loss assets show a drastic decrease in its value i.e. from Rs. 8268.03 lakhs in
2006 to Rs. 546.77 lakhs in 2008.
18000
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2006 2007 2008
Inference:
The decrease in the sub standard assets in the past three years shows the
development in the banks performance. The doubtful assets are gradually decreasing. The
loss assets are decreasing year after year. The decrease in the sub-standard assets and
doubtful assets are due to the strict recovery policy of the bank. The loss assets show an
irregular pattern for strict recovery measures are to be followed.
The bank is taking action in large number of cases for recovery of its NPA’s
under the SARFAESI act 2002. This has helped the bank to recover its NPAs and lower
the level of NPA’s and it is striving hard to decrease it to fuller extent.
Table 9: Table showing the performance of sub standard assets during the
last three years.
2006 16956.75
2007 15491.72
2008 9074.82
Analysis:
18000
16000
14000
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2006 2007 2008
Inference:
The sub standard assets are decreasing year after year. This shows the
improvement in the performance of the bank. The bank is taking several steps to increase
the performance of standard asset, which shows the credit appraisal capabilities of the
bank. It also enriches the strength of the balance sheet.
The bank has adopted the strategy of identifying slippage of assets to NPA
category and timely recognition of NPA and action to that helps in reducing sub standard
assets.
Table 10: Table showing the performance of bad and doubtful assets during
the last three financial years.
(In lakhs)
2006 927.85
2007 8342.68
2008 11273.68
Analysis:
The table shows the performance of doubtful assets the performance of doubtful
assets is increasing continuously. The amount was Rs. 927.85 lakhs in the year 2006 it
has increased to Rs. 8342.68 lakhs in the year 2007 and in the year 2008 it has further
still increased to Rs. 11273.68 lakhs.
12000
10000
8000
6000
4000
2000
0
2006 2007 2008
Inference:
The doubtful assets are increasing year after year. The bank is taking several steps
to curb the level of doubtful assets but it is not successful in its steps. The bank is closely
monitoring NPAs and has put in place NPA management plan for efficient recovery,
which has helped in the increase in the doubtful asset.
Table 11: Table showing the performance of the loss assets during the last
three financial years
2006 8268.03
2007 655.81
2008 546.77
Analysis:
The table shows the performance of loss assets. The loss assets have decreased in
the year 2007 from Rs. 8268.03 lakhs in the year 2006 to Rs. 655.81 lakhs and later due
to strict recovery measures it has decreased to Rs. 546.77 lakhs in the year 2008
Chart 11: Chart showing the performance of loss assets for the last three
financial years from 2006 to 2008
9000
8000
7000
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2006 2007 2008
Inference:
The loss assets show an irregular pattern initially it was increased and later the
management took steps to reduce the loss assets and it was reduced to a large extent. The
bank has adopted SARFAESI act to reduce the loss assets. The SARFAESI act has
strengthened the ability of lenders to resolve non-performing assets by granting them
greater rights as to enforcement of security and recovery of dues from borrowers
including removal of reference to BIFR and stay there to.
2006 4090.31
2007 4396.91
2008 5141.93
Analysis:
From the table it can be observed that the total deposits have increased from
Rs.4090.31 crores in 2006 to Rs. 4396.91 crores this shows that there is substantial
growth in deposits growth rate.
6000
5000
4000
3000
2000
1000
0
2006 2007 2008
Inference:
The deposits have increased from 4090.31 crores to 5141.93 cores i.e. from 2006
to 2008
Table 13: Table showing the growth of reserves at the Indian bank from 2006
to 2008
2006 179.20
2007 210.18
2008 233.52
Analysis:
From the above data it is noticed that there was a substantial increase in the
reserves from Rs.179.20 cores in 2006 to Rs. 210.18 cores in 2007 and further to Rs.
233.52 cores in 2008.
250
200
150
100
50
0
2006 2007 2008
Inference:
The reserves have increased every quarter during the period 2006 to 2008 from
Rs179.20 crores in the year 2006 to Rs233.52 crores by the year 2008. This shows that
the banks growth rate has increased due to better management of NPAs.
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
• The operations of Apex Bank have been increasing steadily over the past three
years.
• The study confines that there is continuous decrease in the Non-Performing
Assets from 14.65% in 2006 to 4.3% in the year 2007.
• The bank is adopting various strategies in minimizing NPA.
• The NPA plays a major role in assessing the performance of the bank and it also
contributes to net profits of the bank. Hence, bank has taken several steps for
recovery of NPA’S
• The one time settlement policy and its implementation on a phased manner was
an important issue was a good exit policy to chronic defaulters.
• The loans and advances are increasing year after year in spite of the % 0f NPA is
decreasing. The banks performance has improved showing a steady decrease in
the sub standard assets. This is enclave through continuous inspection and timely
classification of assets.
• There is large number of scattered accounts in the bank, which makes the bank
difficult in realizing the accounts.
• The bank is facing difficulty in controlling NPA’S because of lack of adequate
staff for the recovery.
• The NPA is important because it enhances the growth of the bank.NPA has a
significant impact on the profit and loss account and balance account of the bank.
• The cash recovery of the bank has increased due to the various strategies used and
by implementing SARFAESI act.
• Apex bank has considerably less percentage of gross NPA when compared with
various other scheduled banks.
SUGGESTIONS
NPA has affected the profitability, liquidity and competitive functioning of the
bank to reduce the level of NPA of the bank the following suggestions can be considered
• Head offices and regional offices should be proactive in having ‘industry watch’
and provide timely information to branches, about difficulties faced by specific
industry, to strengthen follow up of such accounts.
• Conducting and launching massive recovery campaign in each zone and branch
offices by making up to date information on the assets with greater consideration
towards the assets, which are on the verge of becoming loss assets.
• Proper pre-sanction appraisal of the loan proposals by taking multiple scenarios to
arrive potentiality of the project.
CONCLUSION
To conclude, it can be stated that the Apex Bank has been following well-
established systems, policies, and procedures with respect to NPA and recovery. The
Bank has recovered the loans in a systematic manner, disbursement of loans/ advances to
all the priority sectors and has crossed the total business targets for 2006 and 2007.
However, as suggested, the Bank should consider some additional strategies and policies
to face challenges of the competitors in future, to improve the quality of its service of
lending and recovery.
In sum the present, NPA assignment has been very useful in getting firsthand
experience with respect to the management of NPA in the Banks, with an insight into one
of the important segments of recovery.