Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Burj Dubai
Report about Concept, Design,
And Construction of Burj Dubai.
The Burj Dubai project is designed to be the centerpiece of the large scale Burj Dubai Development that
rises into the sky to an unprecedented height of 828 meters and that consists of more than 160 floors.
Burj Khalifa (formally Dubai) is the new tallest tower in the world. Construction began on 21 September
2004 & was completed on 1 October 2009. The building was officially opened on 4 January 2010.
The Client of Burj Dubai Tower, Emaar Properties, is a major developer of lifestyle real estate in the
Middle East; Emaar put a total investment of US$ 1.5 billion in the Burj Dubai project.
The tower is designed by Skidmore, Owings and Merrill (SOM), Turner International has been designated
by the owner as the Construction Manager, and Samsung Joint Venture (consisting of Samsung, Korea
base contractor; Besix, Belgium base contractor; and Arabtec, Dubai base contractor) as the General
Contractor.
The design of Burj Dubai Tower is derived from geometries of the desert flower, which is indigenous to
the region, and the patterning systems embodied in Islamic architecture.
From the head start , it has been intended that the Burj Dubai be the Worlds’ Tallest
Building.
Burj Dubai fulfils all three criteria for tall buildings of the Council on Tall Buildings and
Urban Habitat (CTBUH). The CTBUH ranks the world’s tallest buildings based on
Height to Architectural Top, Height to Highest Occupied Floor and Height to Tip.
Burj Dubai includes163 habitable floors plus 46 maintenance levels in the spire and 9
parking levels in the basement, with a Floor Area of 309,473 m2.
The Residences
The world’s most prestigious address will be home to a select few. With 900 residences
including studios and one, two, three and four-bedroom apartments, The Residences at
Burj Dubai are designed for the connoisseur. The homes are spread over levels 19-108
of the tower.
For the convenience of homeowners, the tower is divided into sections with exclusive
Sky Lobbies on Levels 43, 76 and 123. There are state-of-the-art fitness facilities
including jacuzzis on Levels 43 and 76.
The Sky Lobbies on 43 and 76 both have swimming pools and a recreational room
that can be utilised for special gatherings and receptions.
Other facilities for residents include a private library, an upmarket convenience store,
The Gourmet Market, and a meeting place. Valet parking will be provided for guests
and visitors alike.
The Offices
A complement to The Corporate Suites is The Offices, a 12-
storey annex with direct access to Burj Dubai and The Dubai
Mall. Parking spaces for The Offices will be offered at the mall
and the tower for the convenience of tenants. The Offices have a
total area of 337,000 sq ft.
Mechanical Floors
Seven double-storey mechanical floors house the equipment that bring Burj Dubai to
life. Located every 30 storeys, the mechanical floors house the electrical sub-stations,
water tanks and pumps, air-handling units etc, that are essential for the operation of the
tower and the comfort of its occupants.
Designers purposely shaped the structural concrete Burj Dubai – “Y” shaped in plan – to reduce the wind
forces on the tower, as well as to keep the structure simple and foster constructability.
The structural system can be described as a “buttressed” core. Each wing, with its own high
performance concrete corridor walls and perimeter columns buttress the others via a six-sided central
core, or hexagonal hub. The result is a tower that is extremely stiff laterally and torsionally similar to a
closed tube.
The crowning feature of Burj Dubai is its ‘telescopic’ spire comprising more than 4,000 tonnes of
structural steel. It can be seen from 95 km (60 miles) away. The spire was built inside the building and
jacked to its full height of over 200 meters (700 feet) using hydraulic strand jacks. The spire is integral to
the overall design, creating a sense of completion for the landmark. The spire also houses
communications equipment .It utilizes a diagonally braced lateral system.
The structural steel spire was designed for gravity, wind, seismic and fatigue in accordance with the
requirements of AISC Load and Resistance Factor Design Specification for Structural Steel Buildings
(1999). The exterior exposed steel is protected with a flame applied aluminum finish.
Each tier of the building sets back in a spiral stepping pattern up the building. The setbacks are
organized with the tower’s grid, such that the building stepping is accomplished by aligning columns
above with walls below to provide a smooth load path. This allows the construction to proceed without
the normal difficulties associated with column transfers. The setbacks are organized such that the
Tower’s width changes at each setback.
The advantage of the stepping and shaping is to “confuse the wind”. The wind vortices never get
organized because at each new tier the wind encounters a different building shape.
The center hexagonal walls are buttressed by the wing walls and hammer head walls which behave as
the webs and flanges of a beam to resist the wind shears and moments.
The core walls vary in thickness from 1300mm to 500mm. The core walls are typically linked through a
series of 800mm to 1100mm deep reinforced concrete or composite link beams at every level.
2. Strut-and-tie method in ACI 318-023 were used, with Appendix A enabling the design of link
beams somewhat beyond the conventionally designed maximum deep beam stress limit.
3. In the case of members subjected to very large shear forces, embedded built-up structural steel
sections were provided within the core of the concrete link beams to carry the entire shear and
flexure demand.
The residential and hotel floor framing system of the Tower consists of 200mm to 300mm two-way
reinforced concrete flat plate slabs spanning approximately 9 meters between the exterior columns and
the interior core wall.
Outriggers at the mechanical floors allow the columns to participate in the lateral load resistance of the
structure by linking them to the shear walls; hence, all of the vertical concrete is utilized to support both
gravity and lateral loads.
Structural Analysis
The structure was analyzed for gravity (including P-Delta analysis), wind, and
seismic loadings by ETABS version 8.4 .
The full 3D analysis model consisted of over73,500 shells and 75,000 nodes.
Seismic Loads
Dubai is situated towards the eastern edge of the geologically stable Arabian Plate and separated from
the unstable Iranian Fold Belt to the north by the Arabian Gulf. The site is therefore considered to be
located within a seismically active area.
The Dubai Municipality (DM) specifies Dubai as a UBC97 Zone 2a seismic region with a seismic zone
factor Z = 0.15 and soil profile Sc.
Seismic loading typically did not govern the design of the reinforced concrete tower structure, but
governed the design of the steel spire. Dr Max Irvine developed site-specific seismic reports for the
project, including a seismic hazard analysis.
Dynamic Analysis
The dynamic analysis indicated the first mode is lateral sidesway with a period of 11.3 seconds ,the
second mode is a perpendicular lateral sidesway with a period of 10.2 seconds, torsion is the fifth mode
with a period of 4.3 seconds
Foundations
Hyder Consulting (UK) Ltd (HCL) were appointed geotechnical consultant for the works by Emaar and
carried out the design of the foundation system.
The Tower foundations consist of a pile supported raft. The solid reinforced concrete raft is 3.7 meters
(12 ft) thick and was poured utilizing C50 (cube strength) self-consolidating concrete (SCC). The raft was
constructed in four separate pours (three wings and the center core). Each raft pour occurred over at
least a 24 hour period.
Reinforcement was typically at 300mm spacing in the raft, and arranged such that every 10th bar in each
direction was omitted, resulting in a series of “pour enhancement strips” throughout the raft at which
600mm x 600mm openings at regular intervals facilitated access and concrete placement .
Soil Investigation in 4 stages included 23 boreholes, in situ SPT’s, 40 pressuremeter tests in 3 boreholes,
installation of 4 standpipe piezometers, laboratory testing, specialist laboratory testing and
contamination testing, 3 geophysical boreholes with cross-hole, tomography geophysical surveys.
The groundwater in which the Burj Dubai substructure is constructed is particularly severe, with chloride
concentrations of up to 4.5%, and sulfates of up to 0.6%. The chloride and sulfate concentrations found
in the groundwater are even higher than the concentrations in sea water.
Due to the aggressive conditions present due to the extremely corrosive ground water, a rigorous
program of measures was required to ensure the durability of the foundations. Measures implemented
include specialized waterproofing systems, increased concrete cover, and the addition of corrosion
inhibitors to the concrete mix, stringent crack control design criteria and an impressed current cathodic
protection system utilizing titanium mesh.
A controlled permeability formwork liner was utilized for the Tower raft which results in a higher
strength / lower permeable concrete cover to the rebar. Furthermore, a specially designed concrete
mix was formulated to resist attack from the ground water.
Piles
The Tower raft is supported by 194 bored cast-in-place piles. The piles are 1.5 meter in diameter and
approximately 43 meters long with a design capacity of 3,000 tonnes each. The Tower pile load test
supported over 6,000 tonnes.
The C60 (cube strength) SCC concrete was placed by the tremie method utilizing polymer slurry. When
the rebar cage was placed in the piles, special attention was paid to orient the rebar cage such that the
raft bottom rebar could be threaded through the numerous pile rebar cages without interruption, which
greatly simplified the raft construction.
The concrete mix for the piles was a 60 MPa mix based on a triple blend with 25% fly ash, 7% silica
fume, and a water to cement ratio of 0.32. The concrete was also designed as a fully self-consolidating
concrete.
Piles Tests:
1. Static load tests on seven trial piles prior to foundation construction.
2. Static load tests on eight works piles, carried out during the foundation construction
phase (i.e. on about 1% of the total number of piles constructed).
3. In addition, dynamic pile testing was carried out on 10 of the works piles for the tower
and 31 piles for the podium, i.e. on about 5% of the total works piles.
4. Sonic integrity testing was also carried out on a number of the works piles.
Settlement
A detailed 3D foundation settlement analysis was carried out (by Hyder Consulting Ltd., UK) based on
the results of the geotechnical investigation and the pile load test results. It was determined the
maximum long-term settlement over time would be about a maximum of 80mm (3.1”). This settlement
would be a gradual curvature of the top of grade over the entire large site. When the construction was
at Level 135, the average foundation settlement was 30mm (1.2”).
Figure 4 Effect of test speed on mean base moment coefficient for two wind directions relative to
north
On a circular cylinder the mean drag coefficient also drops at a certain critical Reynolds number but then
climbs again as the Reynolds number is further increased. To be sure a similar phenomenon did not
occur on Burj Dubai, special high Reynolds number tests at 1:50 scale were initiated using the model
shown in Figure 1b. Due to size limitations of the NRC 9 m x 9 m wind tunnel the 1:50 scale model was
limited to the top part of the tower only. The tests were run at wind speeds up to 55 m/s Measurements
were made of the mean and instantaneous pressure distributions around six crosssections of the tower
and were compared with similar measurements made at 1:500 scale in RWDI’s 2.4 m x 1.9 m wind
tunnel. Fig. 5 compares the sectional force coefficient on one of the crosssections at the two model
scales and shows very little difference. On the 1:500 scale model, tests were made both with and
without vertical ribs that are a feature of the tower’s wall system in order to understand how much their
effect was. At 1:500 scale the ribs were very small and thus had been left off for the main test program.
The conclusions from the comparison of the high Reynolds number results with those at normal test
Reynolds number were that the aerodynamic coefficients did indeed reach asymptotic values and that
the 1:500 scale aeroelastic model and pressure model tests had reached high enough Reynolds numbers
for the asymptotic state to be achieved closely enough for
engineering purposes. Thus no special Reynolds number corrections were needed. Furthermore, the
1:500 results with and without ribs showed that the effects of the ribs were very minor.
BUILDING MOTIONS
Based on the High-Frequency-Force-Balance test results combined with local wind statistics the building
motions in terms of peak accelerations were predicted for various return periods in the 1 to 10 year
range. Initial predictions obtained in May 2003, at over 37 milli-g for the 5 year return period were well
above the ISO standard recommended values. However, through a combination of reorienting the
tower, adjusting its shape, modifying the structural properties, and more in-depth studies of the wind
statistics for the region the predictions came down By the end of 2004 November 2003 they had come
down to about 19 milli-g for the same return period and at a slightly higher level. About half of this
improvement came about as a result of improved knowledge of the wind statistics and the rest through
re-orientation, structural improvements and shape adjustments. improved. Several variations of tower
height were tested using aeroelastic models. The accelerations were found to be significantly less than
indicated by the force balance tests, down in the range of 12 milli-g. Part of this was due to the lower
Reynolds number of the force balance tests, which put them in a range where Reynolds number effects
were beginning to become significant, but aerodynamic damping and a lower kurtosis in the dynamic
response were also contributors. This
indicates the importance of considering aeroelastic effects in cases where building motions are having
important consequences. A range of damping values was considered in the test program. The
acceleration results quoted above were all evaluated assuming a damping ratio for the building of 1.5%
in its fundamental modes of vibration for each direction. This is a likely value for a slender concrete
structure such as the Burj Dubai. For higher modes, which involved significant flexing of the upper part
of the tower, lower damping values were examined also since the upper part of the tower is primarily
steel. Higher modes contributed little to motions in the residential levels. Studies were also undertaken
to examine adding supplementary damping systems such as tuned mass dampers but for the residential
units the wind tunnel predictions indicated the motions would be well within acceptable limits without
supplementary damping. The upper reaches of the spire are quite slender and supplementary damping
systems are still under study for controlling those motions.
CLADDING LOADS
Cladding loads were evaluated through testing a 1:500 scale model instrumented with 1142 pressure
taps and using the methodology described by Irwin, 1988. The procedures were essentially the same as
for a tower of lesser height and the predicted 50 year peak suctions, including an allowance for internal
pressures and stack effect, ranged from 2.0 kPa to 5.5 kPa. Most 50 year suctions were in the range 2.0
kPa to 3.5 kPa. The highest suctions were seen, as might be expected, near discontinuities in the surface
geometry. Peak positive pressures ranged from 1.5 kPa to 3.5 kPa with the great majority being in the
range 1.5 kPa to 2.5 kPa.
Initial results from the thermal comfort study highlighted the need to introduce shade structures to
avoid the strong adverse impact of solar radiation on thermal comfort in Dubai. A number of canopies
and other types of shade structure were architecturally designed at ground level. Initial tests on the
bare terraces indicated the potential for frequent uncomfortably strong winds. Further tests on the
terraces showed that significant improvements could be obtained through a combination of parapet
walls, overhead trellises, and vertical screens.
Construction of the Tower Superstructure
Currently the tower is under construction and the foundation system (pile & raft) were
completed in February 2005, including pile foundation and the raft foundation. The tower
superstructure construction started in April 2005.
Rebar Prefabrication
Composite Link Beams
In addition to connecting the vertical core wall elements rigidly for maximum strength
and stiffness for the lateral load resisting system, the link beams are also used as means
of transferring and equalizing the gravity loads between the vertical members (core-wall
elements and nose columns). This equalizes stresses and strains between the members.
Because the link beams are subject to large shears and bending moments, many of the
link beams had to be composite (steel members encased in high strength concrete). Thus
the steel beams imposed special demands on the cranes, pre-assembly and lifting
methods.
Composite Link Beam Installation
Slab Formwork System
Figure 13 shows a drop head system (also known as slab support system is specially
designed to sustain a large combination of grid sizes, resulting in maximum reusability of
formwork & economy) used for the slab construction. Meva Deck Drop Head slab
formwork system was selected because of its installation simplicity, lightness, panel
formwork material and strength, prop strength and stiffness, system flexibility and
suitability for the slab hanging geometry, and allowance for cambering where needed.
Concrete Pumping
The utilization of high strength concrete and concrete pumping technologies was critical
in the construction of the project. See Table 1 for a summary of the concrete types used
for both the vertical and horizontal members.
Cladding
30000 glass panels of high quality European glass enough to cover 17 football fields, The
glass is thicker at the top to resist the high wind. Its designed to let the maximum light in
and to keep heat out.
Tests on Cladding
Test 1 : Air infiltration test
To measure how much air gets in through the joints
Test 2 : static water test
• Water is spread evenly for 15 minutes from nozles attached to the glass
• Transducers measures how much water gets in
• The data is transferred to computer for analysis
Test 3 : Dynamic water Test
• It’s a simulation for a desert – Storm
• The wind is Generated by a giant Fan and its Spread water against the glass for 15
minutes
Test 4 : Earthquake Test
• Earthquake Simulation which move the mock-up floor of curtain walls 10 mm in
two directions
• With this test the know that curtain wall won’t break
Façade Maintenance
The tower's primary window washing and facade maintenance system consists of three
permanently-installed, track-mounted, telescopic building maintenance machines located
in internal "garage" positions on uppermost levels. it will take 36 workers three to four
months to clean the entire exterior façade.
References
BUNGALE S. TARANATH Ph.D., S.E. John A. Martin & Associates, Inc. (2005). WIND
and EARTHQUAKE RESISTANT BUILDINGS STRUCTURAL ANALYSIS AND DESIGN.
New York: Library of Congress. p1-10, p83-97.
Joël VAN CRANENBROECK, Belgium Douglas McL HAYES, Dubai Ian R SPARKS,
Australia. (2006). DRIVING BURJ DUBAI CORE WALLS WITH AN ADVANCED DATA
FUSION SYSTEM.. Available:
http://www.fig.net/commission6/baden_2006/PDF/OC/VanCranenbroeck.pdf. Last
accessed 5th mar 2011.
SOM. (2005). Structural Design of the World’s Tallest Building: The Burj Dubai
Tower. Available: http://cantilever.files.wordpress.com/2008/06/som_tallest.pdf.
Last accessed 5th mar 2011.