Professional Documents
Culture Documents
COUh}TTY,
ILLINOIS
I-AVDIYISION r
r.*.. l,_
Plaintifl
v.
Skyler Case,
No.
2A1,2-L-007363
Defendant.
To:
Paul
Dufft
Prenda Law, Inc. 2 N. LaSalle St. 13th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60602
Defendant's PLEASE TAKE NOTICE that onJuly 18,201.2 the undersigned caused to sewed upon you. Answer and Affirmative Defenses, a copy of which is attached and is
Certificate of Service
A true arid coffect copy of Defendant's Answer has been delivered N. LaSalle St. 13th Floor Chicago, Illinois 60602 via s
Urbanczvk tsy: Adam Au, LLC 365 N. Jefferson Suite 712
Chicago, Illinois 60661 (312) 71.s-7312
admin@torentlitigation. com
Page
Guava, LLC,
Plaintiff,
v.
Skyler Case,
No.
201.2-L-007363
Defendant.
Defendant's Answer
NOS7 COME the Defendant, Skyler Case, by and through his attorneys at Au, LLC, and for his Answer to PlaintifPs Complaint states as follows:
l,
Paragraph 1 of the Compiaint states a legal conclusion to which no response is tequired and
references the Complaint which is a document that speaks for
Parties
2.
Defendant admits that Plaintiff is a limited liabrlity company. Defendant is without sufficient
knowledge to either admit or deny the remaining allegations of Paragraph 2 and theteby denies the same.
3.
To the extent
Defendant admits that venue is proper in Cook County, Illinois. Defendant denies the
remaining allegations contained in Paragraph 4 of Plaintiff s Complaint.
5.
To the extent
Plaintiffs Complaint.
6.
Paragraph 6 of
To the extent
Plaintiffs Complaint.
Page
Factual Backgtound
General Background
7. 8. 9.
Defendant is without suf{icient knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations o{Paragraph7 of Plaintifls Complaint and thereby denies the same. Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations of Paragraph 8
1L. Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to eithet admit or deny the allegations of Parugtaph
11 of
same.
same.
ll.
Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to either admit ot deny the allegations of Patagraph
13 of
same.
14. Defendant admits that IP ad&ess are numbers assigned to devices, such as computers, tfiat are connected to the internet. Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to eithet admit or deny the remaining allegations of Paragrapb 14 of Plaintiffs Complaint and theteby denies the same.
16. Defendant admits the allegations of Paragrapb, that the allegations imply a legal conclusion.
Count I
17. Defendant hereby incorporates his responses to the preceding paragraphs of Plaintiffs Complaint. L8. Defendant denies the allegations contained inParugnph 18 of Plaintiffs Complaint. 19. Parugraph 19 of Plaintiffs Complaint states a legal conclusion to which no response is required.
To the exteflt
1,9
of
Plainriffs Complaint.
Page 2
20. Defendant denies the allegations of Paragraph20 of Plaintiffs Complaint. 21, Paragraph 21 of Plaintiff s Complaint states a legal conclusion to which no response is requited.
To the extent
a response may be
of
PlainrifPs Complaint.
To the extent
of
II -
Trespass to Chattels
s
25. Defendant hereby incorporates his responses to the pteceding patagraphs of Plaintiff Complaint.
a legal conclusion to
To the extent
of
Plaintiffs Complaint.
27. Paragraph 27 of PlaintifPs Complaint states
alegaT conclusion
To the extent
of
PlaindtPs Complaint.
Count
III -
Breach of Conttact
s
29. Defendant hereby incorporates his responses to the preceding paragraphs of Plaintiff Complaint.
30. Defendant is without sufficient knowledge to either admit or deny the allegations of Paragraph
30 of Plaintiffs Complaint and thereby denies the same.
31. Defendant denies the allegations of Paragraph 31 of Plaintiffs Complaint. 32. Defendant denies the allegations of Paragraph32 of Plaintiffs Complaint.
33. Defendant denies the allegations of Patagrapb 33 of Plaintiffs Complaint. 34. Patagraph 34 of Plaintiffs Complaint states a legal conclusion to which rio response is required.
To the extent
of
- Civil Conspiracy
35. Defendant hereby incorporates his responses to the preceding paragraphs of Plaintiffs
Page 3
To the exteflt
of
Plaindffs Complaint.
39. Patagraph 39 of PlaintifPs Complaint states a legal conclusion to which no response is requfued.
To the exterit
of
Plainriffls Complaint.
Geneml
40. Paragraph ,10 of Plaintiffs Complaint states alegal conclusion to which no response is required.
To the exteflt
of
Plaintiffs Complaint.
41. No response is required.
By,
A Ao,
rba
Page 4