Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Madagascar
Updated,April2009
Disclaimer
This Thi presentation should not b relied upon as a representation of any matter th t a potential i t ti h ld t be li d t ti f tt that t ti l investor or th i t their adviser should consider in evaluating the Company. Potential investors must make their own independent assessment and investigation of the matters contained herein and should not rely on any statement or the adequacy or accuracy of the information provided. The Company and its related bodies corporate or any of its directors, agents, officers or employees d not make any representation or warranty, express or i li d as t di t t ffi l do t k t ti t implied, to the accuracy or completeness of any information, statements or representations contained in the presentation, and they do not accept any liability whatsoever (including in negligence) for any information, representation or statement made in or omitted from this presentation. This presentation may contain forward looking statements that are subject to risk factors associated with the oil and gas businesses. Based on currently available information, the Company believes that the expectations reflected in these statements are reasonable but they may be affected by a variety of variables and changes in underlying assumptions which could cause actual results or trends to differ materially, including but not limited to: price fluctuations, actual demand, currency fluctuations, drilling and production results, reserve estimates, loss of market, industry competition, environmental risks, physical risks, legislative, fiscal and regulatory developments, economic and financial market conditions in various countries and regions, interest and foreign exchange rates, availability of capital, political risks, project delay or advancement, approvals and cost estimates. Investors should undertake their own analysis and obtain independent advice before investing in Mocoh Resources.
2
The current costs simulation demonstrates a power production cost of between 1520 US cents/KWh, whereas the National electricity company Jirama is buying it from other producers at 3767 US cents/KWh. The key benefits of the project to Madagascar are: 1. 2. 2 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. Improved supply of energy Significant reduction in cost of energy Improved power distribution Environment friendly (natural gas vs. heavy fuels) Development of regional industries p g Increase in local employment Reduced foreign exchange exposure
Manja3108PSA j
ExpendituretodateofapproximatelyUSD8M d d f l
6
OlivierFric
Director
DavidTripodi
Director
David has worked on several mining projects in North America and Latin America. Before Mocoh he worked for Caterpillar first as a Marketing Consultant in North America, then as Allocation Manager to the Europe, Africa and Middle East (EAME) markets. David holds an MSc in Metallogeny at the University of Geneva, a P t d t d G Postgraduate degree i Mi i in Mining and E i d Environmental E i t l Engineering at EPFL and P l t h i of i t d Polytechnic f Montreal, and a certificate in Entrepreneurship at EPFL and HEC Geneva.
WillyRanjatoelina
Director
Willy has a very good knowledge of the mining and hydrocarbon sectors in Madagascar with nearly 30 years of professional experience About 10 years working with Office des Mines Nationales et des Industries experience. Stratgiques (OMNIS) including five years as a Director in charge of supervision of new ventures of joint ventures companies and the promotion of oil exploration in Madagascar. Then, nine years as General Manager of the mining company KRAOMITA MALAGASY (KRAOMA) dealing with production, beneficiation, export and marketing of chrome ore. Followed by 10 years as an administrator of companies in the private sector and local representation of several AngloSaxon companies operating in the mining sector (B iti h G l i l S i i t (British Geological Survey, F Fugro Ai b Airborne G Geophysics, etc) and i th fi ld of oil exploration h i t ) d in the field f il l ti (Amicoh Resources Ltd). Mr. Ranjatoelina holds a diploma in Political Sciences from the Institut dEtudes Politiques Paris, as well as a certificate in Petroleum Management from Massachusetts Education Institute Arthur D. Little Inc. in Cambridge, USA. 7
AlainGachet
JacquesParadis
Jacques i a f J is former executive f i from H d Q b and h was M HydroQubec d he Managing Di i Director D Deputy of Ji f Jirama, the h National electricity company in Madagascar. He has created his own company Zphyr, working on the development of power projects in Madagascar and he is also the RSW country representative.
Permitarea10,725km
10
Sikily1 GastoPower
5explorationwellsand4,141kmofseismicdata(theprofiles indarkblue,2,108km,havebeenreprocessedbyAmicoh)
Amicoh:
Satelliteimagery(tectonicsevaluation) GravityinterpretationwithexistingAeroMag i i i ih i i Geochemicalfieldstudy Reprocessingof2,108kmof2Dseismic(1980sAmoco) Acquisitionof218kmofnew2DseismicbyBGPinNov07 Acquisition of 218 km of new 2D seismic by BGP in Nov 07 FinalmigratedsectionswithKelmaninJune08 ThermographicsurveyoftheSikily1wellarea PrefeasibilitystudyofGastoPowerproject(inprogress) y y p j ( p g )
13
Sikily1wellwasdrilledin1954bySPM(SocitdesPtrolesdeMadagascar)onamappable surfacefeature,confirmedlater(195556)onagravimetrichigh f f fi dl (1955 56) i i hi h ThiswelltestedgasinMidJurassicorLiassicfrom1417mto1424mandfrom2609to2619 m with a cumulated potential pay zone of 11 5 m withacumulatedpotentialpayzoneof11.5m Thewellproduced75000m3/dofgas(2.65MMscf/d)whichwasofreasonablequality,with 9297%C1withsmallquantitiesofN andCO 92 97% C1 with small quantities of N2 and CO2 Thegasdecreasedby0.9MMCFGPDafter23hours.Nevertheless,thiswellwasunableto reachtheinitialIsalosandstonesobjective reach the initial Isalo sandstones objective
14
Recoverablegasreservesare46BCFwithapotentialof1TCF
15
GastoPowerProject j
Mocoh will be using the gas discovered in the Sikily1 well (southern part of the Manja 3108 block) for the regional supply of energy through the development of the Sikily GastoPower project.
1.GasExtraction 2.PowerGeneration 3.PowerSupply
ToliaraRegion(Jirama,AERP) TotalHeavyOilsExtraction MiningCompanies DevelopmentofnewIndustries
NaturalGasPower
Power stations fired by natural gas will be a major part of the futures lowercarbon economy because natural gas is the cleanest fossil fuel available. When used in power generation, gasfired power typically produces 50 percent less carbon dioxide than conventional coalfired plants. Gas fired power plants run with the help of gas turbines, which are similar to airplane engines. Compressed air is forced into combustion chambers, where it mixes with natural gas fuel. The mixture is then burned, making combustion gas. This hot gas expands through the turbine, and its heat energy drives a generator, producing cleaner electricity. Plant fitted with cogeneration technology has an added benefit as some of the steam can be used to supply nearby industry. Supplying h t and power t th lik thi i hi hl energyefficient, cutting overall f l S l i heat d together like this is highly ffi i t tti ll fuel consumption and carbon dioxide emissions.
(source, BP website: www.bp.com )
16
Economics
Gas Price $/Mcf Case 1 Case 2 Case 3 14.4 9.1 91 8.3 Power Price* $/KWh 0.11 0.07 0 07 0.06 Required Gas BCF 8.2 32.6 32 6 47.8 Max Plant Capacity MW 5 - 11 27 - 37 44 - 54
INPUT Capex:
WellCosts:US10M/well ProductionFacilities:
1. 2. 3. Case1(2MMScf):US$12M Case2(5MMScf):US$16M Case3(8MMScf):US$20M
OUTPUT GasPrice(assumingNPV=0):
1. 2. 3. Case 1: Case 2: Case 3: 14.4 US$/MScf 9.1 US$/MScf 8.3 US$/MScf
Notintegratedinthepresentmodel: g p
Transportation Capex and Opex
Opex:
1. 2. 3. Case 1 (2MMScf): US$2M/y Case 2 (5MMScf): US$3M/y Case 3 (8MMScf): US$4M/y ( ) $ y
OtherCosts:
Royalty: 8%
17
WorkProgrammeUntilProduction
1. PreFeasibility Study (Year1) Pre FeasibilityStudy(Year1)
Acquisitionof5060kmof2DseismicintheSikilyarea(USD2M forYear1)
2. FullFeasibility
Testwelltoproperlyassesssizeandproductionrates(USD10M Test well to properly assess size and production rates (USD 10M forYear2) Reviewoverallprojectseconomics(Year2)
3. Construction(Year3Year4) 4. BeginningofProduction(Year5)
18
WorkProgramYear1 TimeLine
Datacompilation,ongoingevaluation,dataacquisition
Budget Item Amicoh visit to OMNIS Re-interpret additional information from BP Overall Review of existing data G&G work to reassess block Sikily Pre-Feasibility Study Thermal Imaging Acquisition of 2D Seismic Interpretation of new seismic Well evaluation & planning Basin modelling Studies Supplementary data gathering trips to Manja Ongoing analysis of the geology of the block
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
19
BudgetYear1
Q1 USD LICENCE COSTS Administration Fee Training Fee Sub Total WORK PROGRAM Sikily Pre-Feasibility Study Thermal Imaging Manja 2D Seismic Seismic Reprocessing Well Planning Sub Total GEOLOGY & GEOPHYSICS G&G interpretation of existing data Sub Total IN COUNTRY OFFICE COSTS Antananarivo Office Sub Total TRAVEL Management visits to Madagascar Sub Total TOTAL COSTS 16,000 16,000 16 000 360,000 16,000 16,000 16 000 305,000 16,000 16,000 16 000 305,000 16,000 16,000 16 000 1,125,000 64,000 64,000 64 000 2,095,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 9,000 36,000 36,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 80,000 320,000 320,000 105,000 200,000 200,000 15,000 20,000 1,020,000 90,000 200,000 200,000 1,000,000 90,000 400,000 1,000,000 15,000 20,000 1,525,000 100,000 100 000 50,000 150,000 100,000 100 000 50,000 150,000 Q2 USD Q3 USD Q4 USD Total USD
20
21
23
Manja The Sikily gas represents a clean alternative for a gasfired power 3108
plant to substitute highcost power generation
24
Natural gas is an extremely important source of energy for reducing pollution and maintaining a clean and healthy environment. In addition to being a domestically abundant and secure source of energy, the use of natural gas also offers a number of environmental benefits over other sources of energy, particularly other fossil fuels. As well as providing an efficient competitively priced fuel for the generation efficient, of electricity, the increased use of natural gas allows for the improvement in the emissions profile of the electric generation industry. Essentially, electric generation and industrial applications that require energy, particularly for heating, use the combustion of fossil fuels for that energy. Because of its clean burning nature, the use of natural gas wherever possible, either in conjunction with other fossil fuels, or instead of them, can help to reduce the emission of harmful pollutants. p p
25
26
27
CONCLUSION
TheSikilyGastoPowerprojectrespondstomanyoftheenvironmentaland socialinvestmentcriteriaforNGOsandcommercialinvestors:
Improved supply of energy I d l f Significant reduction in cost of energy Improved power distribution Environment friendly (natural gas vs. heavy fuels) Development of regional industries Increase in local employment Reduced foreign exchange exposure Madagascan gas for the people of Madagascar
Wewouldbedelightedtospeakwithinterested partiesatyourconvenience
28
CONTACTDETAILS
DavidTripodi David Tripodi 14,RueEtienneDumont 1204Geneva Switzerland Tel:+41223109401 Tel + 41 22 310 9401 Fax:+41223105245 email:david.tripodi@mocoh.ch or MichaelHacking h l k 14,RueEtienneDumont 1204Geneva Switzerland Tel:+41223105244 l Fax:+41223105245 email:michael.hacking@mocoh.ch