Professional Documents
Culture Documents
3= 1
c=1m plate 1
2 = 0.6
1 = 0.4
a.) Determine the net rate of radiation heat transfer from plates 1 and 2. This problem can be solved either using Eqs. (10-96) and (10-97) or, equivalently, using Eq. (10-100) to compute each of the F parameters and then using Eq. (10-107) to obtain the solution. Here, we will use Eqs. (10-96) and (10-97) to obtain a solution and then use the F parameter to interpret the solution in a way that would not otherwise be possible. Finally, the same solution will be obtained using Eq. (10-107). The inputs are entered in EES; note that 3 is entered as a number close to but not equal to 1 in order to avoid dividing by zero in Eq. (10-96):
"Example 10.5-3" $UnitSystem SI MASS RAD PA K J $TABSTOPS 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 3.5 in a=1 [m] b=1 [m] c=1 [m] T[1]=600 [K] T[2]=350 [K] T[3]=300 [K] "emissivities" e[1]=0.4 [-] e[2]=0.6 [-] e[3]=0.9999 [-] "width of plate in y-direction" "width of plate in x-direction" "plate separation distance" "temperature of plate 1" "temperature of plate 2" "temperature of surroundings"
The areas of each surface are computed. The areas of the two plates are: A1 = A2 = a b The area of the surroundings (A3) is arbitrary and is set to a large value:
"areas" A[1]=a*b A[2]=a*b A[3]=1e10 [m^2] "area of plate 1" "area of plate 2" "area of surroundings, ~infinite"
The view factors between the surfaces must be determined. The view factor from surface 1 to itself (F1,1) is zero since plate 1 is flat. The view factor from surface 1 to surface 2 may be obtained using the function F3D_1 in EES view factor library. The view factor from surface 1 to the surroundings is obtained using the enclosure rule written for surface 1:
F1,3 = 1 F1,1 F1, 2
"view factors" "surface 1" F[1,1]=0 F[1,2]=F3D_1(a,b,c) F[1,3]=1-F[1,1]-F[1,2]
"plate 1 cannot see itself" "view factor from surface 1 to 2" "enclosure rule written for plate 1"
The view factor from surface 2 to itself (F2,2) must be zero since plate 2 is also flat. The view factor from surface 2 to the surface 3 is obtained using the enclosure rule written for surface 2:
F2,3 = 1 F2,1 F2 ,2
"surface 2" F[2,1]=A[1]*F[1,2]/A[2] F[2,2]=0 F[2,3]=1-F[2,1]-F[2,2] "reciprocity between surfaces 2 and 1" "plate 2 cannot see itself" "enclosure rule written for plate 2"
The view factors between surface 3 and surfaces 1 and 2 are determined from reciprocity:
F3,1 = A1 F1,3 A3 A2 F2 ,3 A3
F3, 2 =
The view factor from the surroundings to itself is obtained using the enclosure rule written for surface 3: F3,3 = 1 F3,1 F3,2
"surface 3" F[3,1]=A[1]*F[1,3]/A[3] F[3,2]=A[2]*F[2,3]/A[3] F[3,3]=1-F[3,1]-F[3,2] "reciprocity between surfaces 1 and 3" "reciprocity between surfaces 2 and 3" "enclosure rule written for surroundings"
Equations (10-96) and (10-97) are written for each surface: qi = i Ai ( Eb ,i J i ) for i = 1...3
(1 i )
The boundary conditions for each surface correspond to the specified temperature:
Eb ,i = Ti 4 for i = 1...3
"boundary conditions" E_b[1]=sigma#*T[1]^4 E_b[2]=sigma#*T[2]^4 E_b[3]=sigma#*T[3]^4
Solving the problem leads to the net heat transfer from each surface. The net heat transfer from plate 1 is q1 = 2719 W (i.e., 2719 W must be provided to surface 1 in order to keep it at T1 = 600 K) and the net heat transfer from plate 2 is q2 = -102 W (i.e., 102 W must be removed from surface 2 in order to keep it at T2 = 350 K). b.) Determine the rate of heat transfer from plate 1 to plate 2. The heat transfer from surface 1 to surface 2 cannot be computed directly using the solution obtained in part (a); in order to determine q1 to 2 , it is necessary to determine the F parameters for the system using Eq. (10-100):
"determine F-hat parameters" duplicate i=1,3 duplicate j=1,3 F_hat[i,j]=F[i,j]+sum((1-e[k])*F[i,k]*F_hat[k,j],k=1,3) end end
Once the view factors for the system have been determined, it is possible to use Eq. (10-106) to determine the net rate of heat transfer from plate 1 to plate 2:
q1 to 2 = 2 1 A1 F1, 2 T14 T24
q_dot_1to2=sigma#*e[2]*e[1]*A[1]*F_hat[1,2]*(T[1]^4-T[2]^4)
which leads to q1 to 2 = 314.6 W. It is interesting to note that the problem could be solved using the F parameters rather than using Eqs. (10-96) and (10-97). The corresponding equations are commented out:
{"Radiosity method" duplicate i=1,3 q_dot[i]=e[i]*A[i]*(E_b[i]-J[i])/(1-e[i]) q_dot[i]=A[i]*sum(F[i,j]*(J[i]-J[j]),j=1,3) end}
for i = 1..3
which leads to q1 = 2719 W and q2 = -102 W; the same answer that was found in part (a).