For the Dazed, Confused, and Frustrated Among Us Extended Version (Mortgages, Criminal Defense, Etc.

1. There are many kinds of laws. Laws pertain to many different kinds of venues.

2.

The laws we most often deal with are all statutory Territorial laws established by the US Congress or the State Legislatures. (Due to the Act of 1871 and various Acts of skullduggery since then, there are no real States functioning (except those that have been re-inhabited) and Territorial otherwise known as local law or Roman Civil Law, aka, lex fori is what we are living under, instead of the Common Law owed to us and guaranteed by the first organic Constitution for the united States of America. All the States you deal with everyday are franchises of the US Corporation--franchises like your local McDonalds burger joint is a franchise of McDonalds Corporation---and having exactly the same status in law. When the United States of America acts as a Corporator it lays down any claim to act with sovereignty and becomes just another corporation. See 22 USC 286(c).

3.

There are also several international venues, including Civil Maritime, International Admiralty, and International Commerce.

4.

These international venues derive from the ancient Law Merchant as it was developed and applied to conduct business internationally at sea and on land.

5. Over many years a body of International Commercial Law has developed, and it has been codified.

6.

This means that the Law has been drafted, argued over, tested, passed into Law--- several hundred years ago for many of the laws in international venues---and then it has been administratively interpreted and codified. That means it has been given to bureaucrats to implement, which they do by creating definitions and detailing how the Law is to be applied and what it requires.

7.

The Uniform Commercial Code implements International Commercial Law.

8. Individual nations decide whether or not they will adopt the Uniform Commercial Code and use it for the conduct of business domestically--meaning at home as well as internationally.

9.

The United States of America adopted the Uniform Commercial Code in the mid-1960s, and ever since, it has set the definitions and standards for operations that business uses both inside and outside the US States---all 57 of them.

[President Obama was right about there being 57 States---- 50 Domestic States and 7 Insular States. The Insular States include the District of Columbia, Guam, Puerto Rico, etc., and technically, they, not the 50 Domestic States, are recognized as the United States of America, a British Commonwealth member of the United Nations, thanks to Puerto Rico. The

50 Domestic States are properly identified as The United States of America, a washed-up, has-been Republic that is merely represented by the United States of America. Not surprisingly, each entity has a separate charter known as a Constitution, and these are equally semantically confused. There is the first, original organic document, The Constitution for the united States of America, and there is the second document known as the Constitution of the United States of America. On top of these two entities, theres a giant, horribly managed corporation called the US Corporation, which is owned by the Vatican and managed by Great Britain, and its ByLaws are also called a Constitution, only this time it is simply the United States Constitution. It is this third Constitution that the US Senators and House Representatives and the US President all take their Oath of Office to-they are elected Officers of the US Corporation.]

10.

Easy Proof 101: The Pledge of Allegiance. I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America (the seven Insular States) and to the Republic for which it stands (the 50 Domestic States which the United States of America represents). Apparently, we are too stupid to represent ourselves. The treasonous Rump Congress overthrew the national Republic with the Reconstruction Acts and the 14th Amendment following the Civil War. An equally treasonous Governors Conference overthrew the 50 State Republics (March 9, 1933) by pledging the credit of their States and the citizenry thereof as voluntary adjuncts to the bankruptcy of the United States of America--- a bankruptcy that is still ongoing as the international bankers seek to wring every penny out of us and establish bogus claims against our private property in a feeding frenzy of despicable corruption and greed.

11.

At some point, everyone will wake up and notice that neither the Rump Congress [39th] nor the Conference of Governors had any authority whatsoever to do what they did in our names. At some point also, we will all notice that the international bankers are raping us. It may occur to some

sharp tool in the American Shed to say, Hey, wait a minute, I, personally, never heard this story. None of these claims against my person, my credit, and my private property were ever disclosed or authorized by ME. I didnt pledge my credit. I didnt sign up to be a bond slave for a Vatican-owned corporation.

12.

Ah, but, back to the UCC and Tim Turner, and all the confusion surrounding the UCC-1 Financing Statement that people signed as part of his Freedom Documents package and fears that signing that and placing a claim against the Strawman trust sucks people into some terrible jurisdiction or exposes them to attack: it does NOT.

13.

The UCC-1 and the UCC in general are not the problem.

14.

President Turner was exactly right about the UCC-1. You, the living, breathing man or woman (who are always described in Law in the form of, for example, Mary Ann of the Family Boswell , never named) will---once you recoup your legal standing and your true political status--- need to file a UCC-1 Financing Statement against the so-called Strawman. President Turner just got things a little out of order and made an honest mistake. He assumed that the debts of the Strawman are the same as the legitimate debts people have---and they are not. As a result, he had people sign a Security Agreement agreeing to accept and be responsible for the debts of the Strawman---and that is where the real rub is. Everyone who signed needs to rescind their signature and agreement on that document pronto.

5 15.

What is the mysterious Strawman? Its called an Inferior Roman Trust, or a cestui que vie trust, or, whats popular with the lawyers: a constructive estate trust----sounds better----but they all mean the same thing: youve been declared legally dead, and your estate---your home, land, bank accounts, etc., have all been transferred to the ownership of the Strawman---aka, federal franchise cestui que vie trust, aka, constructive estate trust. HE is always named using Capitis Dominutio Maxima conventions--- all capital letters----and as any legal style manual will reveal, these conventions are only used to name (1) corporate entities, and (2) dead people. Really dead people.

MARY ANN BOSWELL is presumed to be the beneficiary and heir of Mary Ann Boswell, which is the True Trust Name of Mary Ann of the Family Boswell. See? Thats why its an Inferior trust--- inferior to your True Trust---and infinitely inferior to Mary Ann of the Family Boswell, who is a sovereign and peaceful inhabitant of the Several Domestic States, a natural person whose political status is described as that of an American State National, and who is not a citizen or a resident at all, and who is, moreover, owed the Common Law and every protection of the organic Constitution for the united States of America by the elected Trustees, who are otherwise acting in flagrant Breach of Trust.

16.

How has Mary Ann of the Family Boswell, a sovereign celebrated throughout the world, been reduced to peonage? Its important to understand how the agents of the United States of America and the US Corporation have contrived to do this to you.

Step One--- they importune a Certificate of Live Birth from your Mother under conditions of non-disclosure, which she unwittingly signs merely as an Informant---thereby also unwittingly creating a trust, handing legal title to you to the government, and reducing you to the status of a

ward of the State. This, and Marriage Licenses is the way that the government gains control of such issues as custody, child support payments, required vaccinations and so forth----the parents have in ignorance granted the state trusteeship over their child.

Step Two. The state wastes no time in registering the child as a US vessel in the Merchant Marine Service, and offering securities, bonds, based on the value of the vessel. The banks buy these bonds known as CUSPD or CUSIP (depending on who is selling them) bonds, thus acquiring a financial interest in the vessel.

Step Three. The teenager is importuned to apply for a Social Security Number, told that this is a requirement of employment (only federal employment, it turns out) and that they cant be employed or have a job or earn a living without one. So they are coerced and apply under duress. The government misrepresents this as a voluntary act, and claims that the teenager has agreed to enter federal jurisdiction and accept US citizenship in exchange for the benefit of Social Security.

***Today, the state tries to make things easy on itself by forcing the Mother to sign both the Certificate of Live Birth AND an application for a Social Security Number for her child. They dont want people to have any say in their own lives and prey upon women still groggy from childbirth and little babies. Thats the ilk of people you are dealing with.***

Step Four. When the Social Security Number is issued, the US vessel disappears like magic---its corpus is rolled over into the newly created cestui que vie trust, and vessel is presumed lost at sea.

This all sounds insane until you realize that the principle jurisdiction that the federal government has is jurisdiction over navigable inland waters and on the high seas; all these ridiculous pretenses about you being a US vessel are used to establish federal jurisdiction over you and allow the legal presumption that you are (at any given time and at their convenience) an international vessel in Civil Maritime jurisdiction or a national vessel in International Admiralty jurisdiction. Either way, its a venally self-interested semantic deceit on the part of the government that is easy to refute once you realize this whole web of deceit exists.

Step Five. All these games mean that the bonds the bankers bought (which were secured by the US vessel ) are suddenly without backing, so the bankers go to court and establish a maritime salvage lien against the estate of the jolly MARY ANN BOSWELL (vessels are named with all caps italicized) and have her declared dead, presumed lost at sea.

This step of this vicious charade destroys your legal standing. From the standpoint of the courts from then on, you are a ghost. You cannot be heard in a court of law. The court has to interpret you as someone or something other than Mary Ann Boswell---for instance, as the Master of the missing vessel, or as the Withholding Agent of the cestui que vie trust.

Please note: The federal trust is a tax payer. You are not. In these and in all other federal statutory actions taken---mortgage suits, IRS claims, etc., the plaintiff suing you will in fact name the federal cestui que vie trust, because the trust owns everything you think you own. The federal trust has been presumed to be your beneficiary and has claimed title to all your property. No point in suing you, because you dont own anything.

Unfortunately, the trust appears to have the same name as you---except for being in capital letters, so acting in good faith and ignorance, living people answer the complaint raised against the federal trust, and that allows the court to presume that you, the living man or woman, are acting in a collective entity agreement and that you are offering to be the primary party responsible for the federal trusts debts, etc. This particular doctrine arises from Braswell v. United States, and results in what the courts call the Collective Entity or sometimes, Collective Agency Rule.

While you are rebutting all the other nonsense these monsters have alleged about you, be sure to state that you do not act as a collective entity with any corporate entity and you do not consent to the transaction of a security interest. That is, you are not responsible for the federal trusts debts and you dont agree to let the court steal your money.

When your original given name loses legal standing as a result of being declared dead, presumed lost at sea, you lose your ability to take any action at law and make it stick: you are dead, and until you overcome that judgment by establishing that you are alive, nothing that you can say or do holds water. You are helpless, utterly at the mercy of the court---precisely where the lawyers and politicians and bankers want you to be.

17.

How, then, do you re-establish that you are alive? You use an ancient legal document approved by the Roman Catholic Church under Ecclesiastical Law, known as an Ecclesiastical Deed Poll which is sealed in blood with your thumbprint---no signature at all, and you back it up with a Statement of Identity signed and sealed (thumbprint in red ink) by two Witnesses attesting

that they know you and your family and that you are a person of good standing and character.

These two documents provide irrefutable proof that Mary Ann of the Family Boswell is still alive---and they restore your standing at Law, meaning that you can now go forward and kick legal rump and take all the other actions you need to take to restore your political status and reclaim your property. Assuming that you use the versions of the documents included with this message, the EDP will also demand (1) dissolution of the cestui que vie trusts entered in your name, (2) recognition of your standing as the sole and primary beneficiary of these trusts, (3) recognition of the Republic and the Common Law government you are owed.

18. How

do you restore your political status? ---by invoking the Universal Right of Self-Declaration, a right guaranteed by UN treaties the United States of America signed in a weak moment in 1948.

First Step. You rescind any and all signatures and statements seeming to accept or claim US citizenship or otherwise seeming to bind you to contracts with the US Corporation, ab initio, for fraud and non-disclosure. File a simple Affidavit stating this, signed by two Witnesses in the Miscellaneous File of the local Recorders Office and send copies via Certified Return Receipt Requested US Mail to the US Secretary of State, US Secretary of the Treasury, State Governor, State Secretary of State, State Attorney General, and any other office you have to deal with.

[There have been elaborate concerns about using the US Postal Service in the past, claims that only Registered Mail are private, etc., but a public service offered by a private company under conditions of monopoly is a gift and you can do what you like with a gift.]

10

Save the receipts from the mailing, collect the return cards, and put the evidence that you have given Notice in a safe place. At the same time by the same process, you should prepare and have witnessed and give Notice of a Declaration of Exile formally exiting the United States of America and its jurisdiction, and a Declaration of Residency placing your True Trust (not you the living man or woman, but your True Trust Mary Ann Boswell) in original jurisdiction on the land of The United States of America.

19.

If you want to be sure that no issue of insufficient Notice can be raised, run a small ad three times in the Legal Notices section of the local paper(s), stating that you are rescinding all signatures on all statements and contracts or presumed contracts ever entered into with the United States of America, the US Corporation, or any of their corporate municipal franchises known as States, for fraud and non-disclosure, that you have exiled from the United States of America, and Declared the permanent residency of your True Trust in original jurisdiction on the land of The United States of America.

[****Living people, the actual men and women who are American State Nationals, dont reside ---they inhabit the land.****]

That gets rid of any basis for a court to presume that the numerous adhesion contracts youve unwittingly entered into are valid contracts, and gives you a basis to prove that you have exiled from federal jurisdiction; it also places your True Trust safely and officially in original jurisdiction, where the rats cannot lay claim to it again or presume maritime jurisdictions apply.

20. At

the same time, include a formal Affidavit to the effect that you were misinformed and coerced into signing up for a Social Security Number and falsely told that it was a general condition of employment without which you

11

could not work and earn a living. Also state that that misapprehension was the motivation for your action and that you did not willingly seek or consider participation in Social Security any benefit, but rather that you considered it an onerous extra tax that sopped up nearly 8% of your gross income (the actual tax is nearly 16%, 8% from you, 8% from your employer.) and removed it from you without any payment of interest to you. This destroys the legal presumption that you voluntarily sought benefit and received the benefits of this program in consideration for signing away your Constitutional rights, your natural political status, and all your private property in an undisclosed agreement to accept US citizenship and allow ownership of your property to be transferred to the federal cestui que vie trusts as a result.

21.

Make no mistake, youve been financially and legally defrauded, dispossessed, demeaned, sacked, burned, raped, and hung out on the dung pile to dry by the United States of America and the US Corporation. Sustained outrage and effort is called for to set your own house in order, and lay claim to your own property.

22.

How? Well, youve been the victim of a reverse trust scheme. It started when your Mother unwittingly signed you over to the tender mercies of the government. She was the donor creating the trust. The government or rather, the entity representing the government that you are actually owed, was the trustee. You were the beneficiary. But, the rats connived to turn things around and reverse things--- thanks to their undisclosed contracts and semantic deceits and your own ignorance, you were deemed to have voluntarily donated your credit, your private property, your labor and everything else to the federal trusts created using your name, and the government and the governments creditors (banks) named themselves the happy beneficiaries of all your voluntary goodwill and largesse. So, Bubba, now, having reclaimed your legal standing and your rightful political status, its time for you to do unto them what they have done to you.

12

23.

Your True Trust, Mary Ann Boswell, outguns their puny and literally inferior franchise trust. By Canon of Law #2056, any judge or trustee or administrator who doesnt IMMEDIATELY dissolve the cestui que vie trusts upon your Claim of Life and demand, is guilty of willful crime. And, as everything that ought to have been done, must appear as if having been done---it really doesnt matter whether they do anything at all. Youve proven your competence and standing and made the demand by presenting them with a properly worded Ecclesiastical Deed Poll. They are stuck, skewered on their own Rules of Court and principles of Law. From now on, any claim they make is as dead at Law as you were when you began this process.

24. Just

to drive the proverbial knife in and twist it, follow up the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll with full Due Process----that means, you send them a follow up Ecclesiastical Notice of Dishonor if they dont reply and confirm that they have dissolved the Inferior Trusts, give them 10 more days to reply, then send them an Ecclesiastical Notice of Protest for Non-Acceptance---a statement noting that they still havent replied and giving them another ten days, and after that, send them a notice of formal Judgment, stating that all elements of the Ecclesiastical Deed Poll (which includes demand to dissolve the federal trusts and return the property to the True Trust and which names the living man or woman as the Beneficiary) have been acquiesced to by all parties concerned and all right and claim to the property of MARY ANN BOSWELL is now transferred to the True Trust Mary Ann Boswell.

25. Take

this Judgment to the local Recorders Office and claim over the franchise trusts title to your property, by providing a copy of the EDP, Dishonor, Non-Acceptance, and Judgment, along with an Affidavit signed by two Witnesses, stating that the property described, blah, blah, blah, is

13

held by Mary Ann Boswell in True Trust in original jurisdiction on the land without encumbrance, claim, or tenancy agreement of any kind.

26.

This is just the beginning. It took them the better part of 80 years to lay all these traps and make all these bogus claims. Expect that it is going to take you some time to get your personal house in order and more time to clean the rats out of Washington--- but know this: you have everything you need, all the power, and all the basic insight necessary---to take these con artists and wring them dry. You can, and you must, make the Law your friend and familiar, and use it. Dont think that you can hire a lawyer to do it for you. All lawyers are members of the Bar Association and officers of the courts; they are part of the problem, not the solution.

27.

Finally getting back to Tim Turner and the whole UCC-1 issue. You can see now why filing the UCC-1 without first having re-established legal standing as a living man or woman would be a useless gesture; TT had things a bit out of order, but was headed in the right direction. You can also, hopefully see that you are an inhabitant of, literally, a different country than the United States of America. You are an American State National living in a Domestic State. They are all US citizens living like parasites on the land of the Domestic States. US citizens are actually, literally, legally-foreigners on our turf. So it makes sense that when you file a claim against a US citizen (the corporate franchise cestui que vie trust that has been abusing your NAME is considered a person and a US citizen under the Diversity of Citizenship Clause ---Section 1332(c) of Title 28 of Federal Code) you have to file an internationally viable claim, a UCC-1, and advance your status as a Secured Third Party Creditor, but not just any secured Third Party----you are the PRIMARY Beneficiary, and you enjoy the first and unique rights of salvage and unassailable claim to everything that has been stolen from you.

14

28.

Another thing that TT has right---- dont get mad. Get even. Bind together and kick these rotten lawyers and undeclared Foreign Agents and crooked bankers right off the Continental Shelf. Keep at it, day after day, and year after year. Take what youve learned and for Gods sake, stop paying Federal Income Taxes. As the name should suggest, you have no Federal income, and as you are not in a collective entity relationship with the Strawman trust operated by the Department of the Treasury of Puerto Rico, you are not its Withholding Agent. You are not a Taxpayer and you never were. You, the living man or woman, are totally, absolutely EXEMPT from LEVY, and you always have been.

Just stop filing, and if the IRS comes around, give that agent your best Clint Eastwood stare, and say, I am not a taxpayer. I am not a US citizen. I have no federal income. I do not act as a withholding agent for any US citizen living in Puerto Rico or elsewhere. I am not in a collective entity relationship with any federal trust or any other legal fiction of any kind. I have never and will never be responsible for importing any revenue to Puerto Rico. And you are standing on posted private property harassing someone you have no right to even speak to.

If they keep at it, insist that they put everything they want to say in writing, and answer everything they ask by asking them pointed questions sent by Certified Return Receipt Requested Mail. Never ignore anything the IRS sends you, always answer----with pointed questions regarding their jurisdiction and definitions of income and taxpayer, etc. Never take their suggestions. Never admit or allow any suggestion that you are a taxpayer or a client of the IRS.

[One of their favorite tricks is to send people exit surveys asking them to rate the service they have received from the IRS---if the living man or

15

woman answers by filling out the survey, they have just admitted to being a client of the IRS. If they dont return an answer and round file the survey, they are in dishonor because they have ignored an offer of exchange. The correct response is to send back a note (via Certified Mail, Return Receipt Requested) informing them that you arent a client of the Internal Revenue Service, and would they please remove your name from their list?

Do you see how sneaky and duplicitous these people are? You can take nothing for granted. Even a postcard sent to you by an agent on vacation in Hawaii has to be responded to or you can be accused of evasion. You must carefully consider every correspondence you receive from them and never, ever agree to talk to them. Always insist that everything be addressed to you in writing and use your wits to assess their every move. If you get called in on a subpoena spend the hundred bucks to take along a professional recording secretary to record and transcribe every word of the conversation. Its worth it just to watch the agents squirm. You have no reason to talk to them and they have no reason to talk to you. Make it stick, and if they ask you anything you dont want to answer or that you are unsure of how to answer, do not hesitate to take the protection of the 5th Amendment. It is not an admission of guilt.

If they subpoena your financial records from the banks, etc., realize that they already have access to this information anyway, because they work for the banks as a collection agency.

(See Title 5 of the Federal Code and observe that the Secretary of the Treasury (of Puerto Rico) was named by the Creditors (banks) as their Bankruptcy Trustee as part of the ongoing fraudulently imposed bankruptcy of The United States of America. Timothy Geithner is the Secretary of the Treasury of Puerto Rico. The rats just conveniently leave off

16

the of Puerto Rico part of it, or youd figure out the con and roast them, tails and all.)

Let them look all they like at your financial records. You have nothing to hide. As American State National living and working exclusively in one of the Domestic States, you operate exclusively in the private sector and your earnings are legally defined as property----private property, not income. Only corporate entities accrue income. Living people accrue property. Coppage v. Kansas is one of the key US Supreme Court cases that discusses this fine point.

Never send a Petition to the US Tax Court. THINK, people! Submitting a petition grants them jurisdiction where they have NONE otherwise. Stand on your little flat feet and send the Tax Court a reply, telling them you are an American State National, not a taxpayer, not responsible for any excise taxes owed for the privilege of importing revenue to Puerto Rico, that you do not consent to the transaction of a security interest and that you do not stand under the courts jurisdiction. Stop feeding the Beast. Just stop. And know this--- if you dont stop filing and paying, you face a felony and a five year stint in a federal pen for pretending to be a Withholding Agent when youre not one--- under penalty of perjury.

Thats why I stopped filing. That was 18 years ago. Nobody can importune you to sign a false statement under penalty of perjury. If they do, and continue to do so even after you have told them bluntly that you are not a taxpayer and not a withholding agent, they have committed several crimes for which they can be held accountable and indicted---harassment, coercion, attempted extortion, importuning false witness, and the list goes on.

17

The federal income tax is an excise tax, specifically, an impost duty, on the privilege of importing revenue to Puerto Rico.

This is how it works.

When you go into a bank and set up an account, the bank misunderstands on purpose and sets up an account for the federal franchise cestui que vie trust instead. Look on your personal checks--- MARY ANN BOSWELL.

Thereafter when you deposit your paycheck in that account, you are unwittingly donating your money to the trust. The federal franchise literally acquires 100% ownership interest in your money, and being that the trust is a resident of Puerto Rico, you have imported revenue to Puerto Rico. As far as the judge can see, and until you rebut it, you are a US citizen in a collective entity relationship with a federal franchise trust, acting as a withholding agent, and you are responsible for paying the impost.

All these years you have been paying them for the privilege of giving them your money.

Its all bunko and fraud. The bank has unlawfully converted ownership of your property without your knowledge or consent, and THEY are the ones responsible for importing your money to Puerto Rico. Ask the IRS agents to show you your signature on a lawful two-party, wet-ink, in-kind, fully disclosed contract that provides equitable consideration to you, which gives the banks permission to shunt your money into an account belonging to a federal franchise trust located in Puerto Rico?

18

Hope youve got your Big Boy pants and some heavy duty dung-buster boots on, because once you get your legal standing and political status issues sorted out and know the presumption and mechanics of the fraud that has been practiced against you, all the weapons of the Law are in your hands, not theirs. Its time to go hunting the banks in their own killing field, time to clean clocks for the IRS bullies, too.

If any of their hoodlum buddies on the bench fail to run and duck, as they certainly should, impeach the courts jurisdiction. The court cant enforce any of this hokum against you, because they have no viable jurisdiction.

29. Take

the initiative when they come looking for you. Dont be afraid. Know who you really are. Know your rights. Know the law. Know the presumptions. These are bullies, crooks, con artists, white collar criminals and a whole bunch of clueless henchmen who think they are working for the right government, when they couldnt be more wrong.

30.

And here is your ultimate Ace in the Hole: all these things that have been practiced against you, all these bogus claims and identities, all these fake, invalid, undisclosed contracts and relationships that are merely presumed, etc., etc., etc., ----it is ALL fraud, and fraud vitiates everything. The presence of fraud, its taint, destroys any and every kind of claim and legal action. These arrogant excuses for human beings have grown bold and careless, leaving it very easy to prove fraud, unlawful conversion, and numerous other crimes they have committed. You could claim fraud about virtually anything these people say or do, and now that you are clued in, you will find that you are able to prove it, too. Shout it to the heavens, sing it to the trees---These false trustees defrauded me!

19

31. A few words about courts and jurisdictions--- because your real country has been dismantled and left vacated --- just as Tim Turner told you it was--there are no courts that hold jurisdiction over you left in this country. None. The statutory courts only hold jurisdiction over statutory citizens.

You are not a statutory citizen because you are self-evidently not a corporation or other form of legal fiction. Period. There go all the statutory laws that you are accustomed to dealing with, right out the window. Poof! 80 million laws and regulations and licenses have just hit the waste bin so far as being applied to you is concerned.

The ONLY jurisdictions left that exist that legitimately allow you to take action against or interact whatsoever with the United States of America are international venues. You can only attack them and they can only attack you, in international venues and, in international courts. The US District Courts attempt to use international venues to attack you while putting their own men over you as judges----a very, very serious conflict of interest that cannot stand examination.

You can avoid persecution by these duplicitous monsters by (1) pointing out that there is no valid contract binding you to maritime jurisdictions and (2) self-evidently, you are not a US vessel acting in any such venue. (Haul out your handy dandy Ecclesiastical Deed Poll with blood seal. Its pretty hard for a vessel in the Merchant Marine service to ooze human blood.) and (3) that the judge receives his paycheck from the United States of America which is the plaintiff in the case, so that there is no common ground or level playing field, only a giant improper offer to transact a security interest, which you, quite correctly refuse to accept and do not consent to.

20

Stand there and again, employ your best Clint Eastwood stare. That criminal on the bench knows what he is doing. He knows you have him by the incontrovertible throat. He knows that if it gets pushed up the food chain even one more notch, he is going to lose his job and be disbarred and eat his own law license for breakfast----not for being dishonest and corrupt, which he obviously is----but for being STUPID and pushing issues that he cannot push.

This same conundrum means that you cannot take them to court in their own courts, whether they offer an international venue or not. You have to go OUTSIDE the court system of the United States of America to sue the United States of America (or its agents) and obtain impartial hearing of the issues. Most of us are content to merely avoid prosecution and get on with our lives, but if you want to carry the issues forward and prosecute THEM, please have sense enough to realize that it must be done in international courts that are not run by the United States of America.

32.

If you want to restore the Republic, however, it will take more than just recognition of your individual lawful political status. It will require rebutting the false claims that have been made on a national level.

Ask yourself what gave the Governors Conference acting in March of 1933 any authority to pledge the credit of their States anymore than they had permission to pledge the good faith and credit of the citizenry thereof?

As for the individual, so for the actual States of the Republic that are defined by metes and bounds on the land---they, too, have been defrauded, and that must be addressed. For the past 80 years, the States of the Republic have been subjected as --- voluntary adjuncts----to the still ongoing bankruptcy

21

of the United States of America, based on the say-so of elected officials who committed treason.

Look up Louis T. McFadden. Much of what we have won back, much of what we know, and much of what we can stand to gain back, is because of the work and words of a single Congressman--- Louis T. McFadden.

The rats defrauded our States in exactly the same way that they have defrauded us----even using the same terminology. All this is supposedly voluntary, just like your voluntary payment of federal income taxes and your voluntary donation of the money in your bank account and your voluntary donation of ownership interest in your home.

Is this voluntary? Was it ever? Did the People of the individual States ever take a vote, a referendum, or plebiscite agreeing to pledge the credit of their States in payment of debts owed by a foreign entity, the United States of America? NO. We, the People, werent asked. Some jackdaws in suits who were selected by the gangs we called political parties sold us down the river at an afternoon coffee klatsch presided over by Franklin Delano Roosevelt.

No such action or vote of the People was ever recorded, nor asked for. All these deals were made behind closed doors and hushed up for decades afterward.

Note the explanation and citations in this recent Petition placed before the Alaska Supreme Court:

22

On March 6, 1933 the federal government (Franklin Delano Roosevelt) got the Conference of Governors to pledge the full faith and credit of the several States of the Union and their citizenry to the aid of the National Government, (see pp. 18 - 24 of The Public Papers and Addresses of Franklin Roosevelt, Volume II, The Year Of Crisis, March 6, 1933) for what they openly admitted to doing. They also encouraged the President to ask for and use extra-constitutional powers during the "emergency" that continues to this day. This was a completely voluntary action on the part of the Governors. They acted without granted Authority and without any sufficient material interest to pledge the full faith and credit of then- 48 States and that of the States citizenry as credit in behalf of the United States of America. It was fraud on the face of it. They individually had no granted Authority to pledge the full faith and credit of their States, which they did not own, as collateral. Likewise it was purely fraudulent for the Governors to claim material interest in the privately held resources of the Citizens of their State. The Petitioners and their Progenitors never gave their consent to this action and were for the most part never even made aware of it. There has sometimes been an assumption that the Governors were acting under a special law or regulation and that they were entitled to exercise it in the face of an emergency, but such is not and never has been the case. "Emergency does not create power. Emergency does not increase granted power or remove or diminish restrictions imposed upon power granted or reserved. The Constitution was adopted IN a period of grave emergency. Its grants of power to the Federal Government and its limitations of the power of the States were determined in the light of emergency and they are not altered by emergency." [Emphasis added] Home Building & Loan Assoc. v Blaisdell 290 US 426 (1934).

23

The Governors acting in 1933 and the Respondents, Members of Congress, acting now have no special or extra powers during an emergency, declared or undeclared, yet that is what they specifically and dishonestly claimed in 1933 and what they are continuing to claim as the excuse for their infringements against The Constitution of the United States of America today. Likewise the Governors of the 50 States United acting in 1933 had no new, special, different, or greater claim upon the resources of their States or upon the Citizens of those States as a result of any economic emergency. "The Constitution of the United States is a LAW for rulers and people equally in war and peace, and covers with the shield of its protection ALL classes of men, at ALL times, and under ALL circumstances. No doctrine, involving more pernicious consequences, was EVER invented by the wit of man than that any of its provisions can be suspended during any of the great exigencies of the government. Such a doctrine leads directly to anarchy or to despotism." [Statement of Opinion, U.S. Supreme Court, Annals 1866, in response to a new class of proposed infringing Reconstruction legislation that was similarly promoted on the basis national emergency.] Likewise, powers and property interests that the Governors didnt possess prior to the emergency did not magically accrue to them as the result of any emergency, economic or otherwise. Their action pledging the full faith and credit of the 50 States and their citizenry was not allowed prior to the bankruptcy and was not made possible because of it. As in all cases of fraud, the victims were not notified of any such agreement being made in their behalf, for the simple reason that the Citizens of the now 50 States if allowed to consider their options under conditions of full disclosure, would never have agreed. We can safely assert this, because of the tremendously deleterious results: (1) loss of national sovereignty, (2) giving the bankers and politicians access to unlimited and unrestricted credit, (3) gross indebtedness for unstipulated goods and services now in evidence as a more than $15 trillion dollar National Debt. No loyal or even rationally self-interested American ever agreed to this.

24

Restoring the Republic begins with restoring the legal standing (Claim of Life provided by the EDP process) and political status (Declaration of Exile from any jurisdiction held by the United States of America, Declaration of Residency of the True Trust in original jurisdiction on the land) of each American State National. Each one must act to dissolve the cestui que vie trusts associated with their names and reclaim their private property.

After that, two white men over the age of majority who have re-established their legal standing and political status as American State Nationals must reclaim the land described by metes and bounds for each State. Local county and State governments must be reorganized representing each State in the Republic, and opposition to the national bankruptcy must be entered on the basis of fraud practiced against the People of the American Domestic States.

[The reason that you cant just create a new national government under the original Constitutionwhich is what Tim Turner has been trying to do---is that claim to the land we live on only derives from the States.

Trying to reclaim the federal government without first reclaiming the States is like grabbing the saddle and bridle without having a horse to ride.

The federal government created by The Constitution has no natural jurisdiction over the land and is entirely a maritime power. Put another way, the federal government created by the original Constitution cannot speak to land ownership issues like bankruptcy and foreclosure for the States in a Republic---thats why the Conference of Governors had to be enlisted. Roosevelt couldnt enter the States into bankruptcy----as voluntary adjuncts or otherwise.

25

We must argue that the Conference of Governors didnt have the right to do it, either.

A Governors role is administrative and executive; he or she works for the People, who are the real parties of interest, the owners of the States. The People of the individual States had to be consulted and had to give their permission to enter bankruptcy. They were not consulted and did not give their permission. They werent even told.

The Governors Conference acting in 1933 grossly, unforgivably, and treasonously overstepped any granted authority possessed by the individual Governors, and what they did not possess individually, they could not claim collectively. The Governors didnt own their States, just like they didnt own the good faith and credit of the citizenry of their States. Those things were not theirs to pledge.

33.

A word about the mortgage crisis. Look at your mortgage paperwork and your land title and deed, etc. Its all in the name of the cestui que vie trust, all capital letters. No surprises. By now, you know the drill. You were presumed dead, the federal franchise was presumed to be your beneficiary, everything you own was transferred to the ownership of the federal trust.

Okay. With this con job, our friends the bankers advertised home loans. Acting in good faith, millions of Americans received what they thought were home loans from lending institutions----but were not loans at all.

26

The crazy - like a - fox monetary system set up by FDR allows for some very strange things. One of them is that promissory notes are defined as legal tender (31 CFR 103.11) and as negotiable instruments (UCC 3-104).

This means that when you, the living man or woman, sign a Promissory Note, it becomes Actual Cash Value ---legal tender----for the banks.

Stop a moment and realize that your Promissory Note was legal tender for the bank and that discharged the ENTIRE amount of the loanit actually prepaid the loan that they claimed they gave you.

Banks and other lending institutions are not allowed to loan depositors money because of the matching provisions under GAAP and they are prevented from loaning their own money by Federal Reserve rules. They have no money to lend, until you create it for them. All they do is credit your deposit and write a check based upon it.

Okay, so they loan you your own money, but they launder it first. How?

Our old friend, the cestui que vie trust.

The banks deposit your promissory note in the trusts account by entering numbers crediting the account---- creating checkbook money also known properly as money of account with the flick of a keystroke. The full value of your promissory note has just been unlawfully converted to the ownership of the federal trust by the bank, acting without your knowledge or permission.

27

The bank now withdraws the money from the federal trusts account by writing a check based on the money you donated to the federal trust, and gives it to you, claiming that they-- the bank, has given you a loan.

Thats unlawful conversion of your property and two major frauds before we even got out of bed.

Always remember that a check is not money. A check is just a way of transferring money between accounts---in this case, between the cestui que vie trusts special escrow account, and its normal checking account which you think belongs to you.

What has actually happened, but which is never disclosed to you, is that there is no mortgage contract with the supposed lender and there never was one.

The bank has a totally different role than it advertises: its not a lender at all.

The Creditoraccording to the bank records---is the federal cestui que vie trust.

You purportedly borrowed the money from the federal trust. Lets just ignore the fact that you were also the one who donated all that money to the federal trust, thanks to the bank shunting your assets into the trusts account without your knowledge or permission.

28

The trusts name goes on the title to the home as the owner, as indeed, it is. The second the promissory note was deposited, the federal cestui que vie trust owned your house lock, septic, and window. Look up the legal meaning of closing----its literal. When you left the closing table the entire transaction was done.

However, while they were handling the legitimate details, the bank offered you a Security Agreement ---- a document that no bank employee signed, only you. Though it was deceptively worded, the Security Agreement is an implied trust indenture; someone named with your name agrees to be the donor and the bank happily agrees to be the beneficiary of a 100% equity interest in the home---for free, and to receive the security interest as well.

To you, acting on the idea that you have received a loan from the bank, this demand for equity to secure the loan seems reasonable enough. Its only when you realize that you havent received a loan from the bank that the alarm sirens go off.

Signing the Security Agreement means that not only do they get a free equity interest in your home, they can sell the mortgage paper on the home as a mortgage backed security and profit twice from the same generous (and undisclosed) gift.

Meantime, back at the ranch, an escrow account is set up in the trusts name, and month after month, you send in your monthly mortgage payments plus interest to pay back the federal cestui que vie trust for the generous loan it gave you. And month after month, the money sits in the account untouched.

29

After a period of time stipulated by law, the bank says---What, ho? This money has been sitting here for a long time. It must be abandoned funds.

So they claim the mortgage payments as abandoned funds and they pretend that the Beneficiary----the federal cestui que vie trust is unknown. Well, after all, it lives in Puerto Rico.

So lets line this out for you--- your Promissory Note literally pre-paid the entire amount of money spent on your home. You gave the bank the security interest and 100% equity interest in the home for free. And the bank has been collecting your mortgage payments plus interest as abandoned funds for umpty-ump years.

What is that? 500% profit, in exchange for a few duplicitous, undisclosed keystrokes unlawfully converting ownership of your promissory note to the benefit of a federal cestui que vie trust that you are completely unaware of. 500%, more or less, for setting up a false presumption and otherwise keeping ones lips zipped.

Lets recap this sordid, bizarre study in fraud most venal:

(1)

They falsely advertise home loans and set up false presumptions from the start. They know that they have no money to loan and wont have any money to loan until you create it by signing a promissory note. (2) They keep up the ruse throughout the whole process, consistently leading you to believe that you are receiving a loan from them---calling it a LOAN and feeding you through their LOAN DEPARTMENT and talking about your credit rating----which means nothing at all. (3) They

30

offer you a Security Agreement that they know you will sign under the false presumptions they set up in steps one and two. (4) They never disclose their real role. (5) They never disclose the nature of the transaction. (6) They never disclose the existence of the cestui que vie trust or its role. (7) They never give you ANYTHING amounting to equitable consideration. (8) They open an account in the name of the cestui que vie trust and deposit the actual cash value of your promissory note ---an amount equal to the entire amount of the alleged loan---in this account belonging to another, separate legal entity without your knowledge or permission. (9) They never disclose the existence of the escrow account. If they did, you could send in your monthly mortgage payment plus interest one day and come get it back out again the next day.

You think the bank is going to take your home? You think they have a leg to stand on? You think any judge in his right mind is going to touch this with a forty foot pole? Not if you stand up and speak knowledgeably to these issues.

If more people, including judges, knew what these monsters are doing, theyd never be able to foreclose on a home loan from now until the Second Coming.

And now that you know, you can not only defend yourself. You can defend others.

Also---remember that no court the banker rats can access has jurisdiction. If the judge glazes over and flunked mathematics, just raise your hand and challenge jurisdiction. You can do it at any time in the proceedings.

31

Remember that because State courts are federal franchises, they have only statutory venues and administer only Territorial law. Theres no way they CAN address you if you stand up and rebut the presumptions of US citizenship and collective entity relationship with the federal cestui que vie trusts. US District Courts have international commerce, civil maritime, and international admiralty jurisdictions, but there is no valid maritime contract binding you to these venues---blow off the berth certificate signed by your Mother, and no matter what they say or do, what venue they invoke----they are still receiving their paycheck from the Plaintiff. Recognize the conflict of interest.

34.

Always remember---the NAME is unavoidably the same, because the rats named the federal trust after you, so when the trust is named as the Defendant in a law suit, you become a Defendant in Error. Dont take the bait. Look at the name of the entity being charged. See? Its in all capital letters. Its the trust that is being addressed, not you, the living man or woman. When you go to court to settle their hash, you say I am here in the matter of the name of(your name) and you make it clear that you are not the same as the federal cestui que vie trust and that you do not act as a collective entity with respect to it, that you do not accept responsibility for it or its debts, and that you are instead the lawful beneficiary of all cestui que vie trusts operated by any level of government for any reason whatsoever.

This is important not only because you need to rebut and forestall any presumption that you are in cahoots with this trust, but also because many of these Puerto Rican-based cestui que vie trusts run by the Department of the Treasury (of Puerto Rico) are involved in very, very unsavory business operations-----distilleries, drug refining operations, smuggling, arms sales, chemical warfare, prostitution---activities that you do not want to be involved in at all, and which, if they are allowed to be associated with you, cast a long shadow over you good character.

32

Ever wonder why everyone hates the Americans? Its because the child porn operation down the street in Bolivia and the white slavers in Laos and the local drug lords in Ecuador are all Americans ---for example, DOROTHY K. WHITE takes in the profits from a local distillery in Honduras, and PETER L. JOHNSON receives the profit from a really nasty mine operation in the Democratic Republic of the Congo.

The real Dorothy K. White is a gentle, kind-hearted grandmother in Ohio, who lives on a tiny pension, and goes to church every Sunday and has no idea on this planet that she is involved in rum running. And Peter L. Johnson is a high school Biology teacher in Lansing, Michigan, who would never hurt a fly, much less condemn men to slow death from Uranium exposure.

This is what you are dealing with. Criminal cartels of global reach have found means to enslave you, claim your property, and then use the profit from this to spawn every kind of graft and cruelty known to man. They are doing this IN YOUR NAME, or rather in the name of your presumed beneficiary---the federal franchise trust---and they are generously blaming it all on you.

The Department of the Treasury (of Puerto) which runs this whole nightmare keeps an IRS Master File on every NAME in their system. Some of us have in years past used legal means to gain access to our files and have seen the kinds of things weve been up to. It isnt pretty: drugs, alcohol, tobacco, human slavery, prostitution, smuggling, extortion rackets, gambling, arms dealing.

This is why decent people from here to Bangkok hate Americans.

33

Take home message---its not just your butt in this wringer. Millions of innocent people worldwide are being sacrificed, impoverished, and endangered because you havent kept control of your government.

35.

How can we help President Turner? The same way we can help a lot of other people. First, share the basic information. The federales have no viable jurisdiction if he really digs his heels in. And, as President of the Republic, he can invoke the International Court--- right after he observes that the judge is being paid by the Plaintiff.

Second, we point out that when there are criminal charges involving an American State National, the burden on the federales is heavy indeed.

There are no thought crimes and no statutory crimes and no victimless crimes that can be applied against an American State National. For example, Tim Turner never needed a passport from the United States of America to travel anywhere and still doesnt. If there was an improper act due to misunderstanding on his part, who or what caused that misunderstanding? The de facto government purposefully misinforms people, making them think that they are all US citizens and that they all need a US Passport. They misinformed Tim along with everyone else. He should be able to identify what publications or informants misinformed him about US Passports and grill them.

Who caused the problem? What redress is there? Who is injured? How? Wheres the proof? Wheres the valid jurisdiction?

34

State Nationals have the original apparatus of the nation to provide their passports--- glue a passport sized picture of yourself to a sturdy piece of paper and beside the photo, a drop of your blood and your thumbprint and write a valid home mailing address and the date; go down to the Post Office, have two Witnesses with you and in front of the local Postmaster have them sign the paper under a brief statement affirming that this is you and that you are a person of known family and good character, born in blahblah Domestic State of the Union. Have the Postmaster witness this as the third person, affix Registered Letter Postage, and cancel the stamp for you. Thats it. Theres your passport, good to travel anywhere in the world. Passports are issued by the Post Office for a reason---and it doesnt matter what frou-frou-rah forms and seals the United States of America requires---all that matters is that you, an American State National meet the requirements that your country, The United States of America.

That, and the fact that the IRS is blowing smoke in its accusation of him, cuts the charges down to what?

The Feds have to dig up a corpus delecti and allege and then prove real specific injury to someone.

So if Tim Turner hasnt harmed anyone, they are going to be hard pressed.

Someone, a live man or woman, has to stand up and accuse him of injuring them under penalty of perjury and full commercial liability, and thanks to Trinsey v. Pagliaro, the accuser cannot be an attorney acting in behalf of an agency. So lets see who is stupid enough to do that in the DOJ.

35

In addition to establishing a valid complaining party, they have to prove standing, too. The injury has to be caused directly and specifically by Tim Turner and not the result of fraud or acts committed by identifiable Third Parties. The injury has to be redress-able. If the court cant deliver redress to the injured party, the court is stuck.

A lot of the legal eagles out there forget the basics, and the basics often offer the best, most incontrovertible defense. Tim knows this. Remind him. And keep working toward what we all know has to be done.