Professional Documents
Culture Documents
scrapping the payroll tax altogether and replacing the lost revenue with a package of levies on
things that, unlike jobs, we want less rather than more ofthings like pollution, carbon emissions,
oil imports, inefficient use of energy and natural resources, and excessive consumption. The net
tax burden on the economy would be unchanged, but the shift in relative price signals would
nudge investment from resource-intensive enterprises toward labor-intensive ones. This wouldnt
be just a tax adjustment. It would be an environmental program, an anti-global-warming program,
a youth-employment (and anti-crime) program, and an energy programGet America Working! has been
quietly pushing this combination for twenty years. In one form or another, without much fanfare, it has earned the
backing of such diverse characters as Al Gore and T. Boone Pickens, the liberal economist James Galbraith and the
conservative economist Irwin Stelzer, Republican heavies like C. Boyden Gray and Democratic heavies like Robert
Reich. Its ambitious, it jumbles ideological and partisan preconceptions, and it represents the kind of change that
great crises open political space for.
-- New Yorker senior editor Hendrik Hertzberg
The Get America Working! approach would work, in effect, by correcting a major price
distortion. The current U.S. Internal Revenue Code taxes employment far more heavily
than it does the use of natural resources. This distortion has grown progressively worse
as payroll taxes have grown. Revising this distortion would increase employment, equity
and overall economic vigor importantly. And it would do so by responding to market
price signals, not through clumsy and expensive government interventions.
-- Richard Zeckhauser, Harvard economist and a member
of the Council of Economic Advisors to the American Enterprise Institute
We should cut payroll taxes deeply and permanently, both for employers and employees. Extending current
cuts for workers now is a necessary first step. But we should also deepen them, adding cuts to employer
payroll taxes to stimulate jobs, and phasing in new taxes on sources other than labor that can permanently
replace payroll tax revenues. Giving cuts to employers and making them permanent would provide the
certainty businesses need to get off the sidelines and hire. Of course, the big question is, which revenues
could both parties agree on to offset the payroll tax? A study by the bipartisan group Get America Working!
identified 25 revenue sources that could offset payroll tax cuts. A permanent cut in the payroll tax, offset by
new sources of revenue, would be a first step to fundamental tax reform. As unemployment and economic uncertainty drag
on, and the consequences close in, its time we took it.
-- Eugene A. Ludwig, chief executive of the Promontory Financial Group and
former Comptroller of the US Currency under President Bill Clinton
Ask any economist or businessperson what kind of tax cut would be the biggest boost
to job creation and the answer is clear: a cut in payroll taxes, because it would directly
reduce the cost of employment. Ask any social justice champion which tax is the unfairest
tax of all and the answer is clear: the payroll tax, because on the employee side it is 6.3
percent of wages up to a cap of $106,800, thus taking a bigger bite, proportionally, out of
a dishwashers paycheck than a CEOs.
-- Gregory Mankiw, Harvard economics professor and former chair
of the Council of Economic Advisers under President George W. Bush