Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Chapter VII
119
Keeping in mind the framework within which a firm operates there are certain factors that affect the firms profitability, and risk and in turn the financial policies and strategies. The decisions that are taken in the organization reflect the features and dynamics of the industry as a whole rather than the company as such.
ii.
iii.
iv. v.
Let us now shift our focus towards the several theoretical and empirical studies that consider the firms financial decisions as an integral part of its overall competitive strategy.
121
author shows that the optimal initial capital structure for a firm is depended on the demand elasticity for industry output. But at the same time, the firms maintain various options to increase the leverage in an opportunistic way. In a similar discussion, Maksimovic in 1990, stated the importance of the type of loan contract that the firm may receive from a bank, based on the premise that the firm operates in a competitive industry. The commercial loan contracts are basically of two types, one being a simple loan and the other being a commitment contract. The former carries no commitment on the part of the bank to lend any additional loan amount to the firm in future. In the former type of loan, the firm can borrow immediately and even has the option to borrow any further amount in the future at a predetermined interest rate. The commitment contract provides a valuable option to the firm. Here, the firm is required to pay a substantial fee to a bank so as to secure a loan commitment. Now, an obvious question that comes into the forefront is that, why at all a firm should pay any fee to secure a commitment contract rather than go for a security with simple loans with the banks over a period of time when the firm would require the funds. The author of the paper (Maksimovic) puts forth the argument that, a firm can take help of a loan commitment as a strategic tool, in order to compete more effectively against industry rivals. Let us now see how at all this issue can be explained. Let us consider here the case of a firm A, that is competing with its rivals in an industry, where the future market demand for the industry output is not certain, now, say all the firms within the industry produce their initial composite output capacity as per the current market demand. It may happen later that this market demand fluctuates in either direction. Now, say the market demand rises, those firms that are in a position to increase their output quickly will gain the market share, whereas the other firms stand to lose. On the other hand, if the market demand falls, any firms that have earlier promised to outsize their output capacity may have to suffer substantial losses and may even turn out to be a failure. So, in brief, it can be said that the loan commitment allows a firm to be more flexible in terms of its financials, thus letting it, to compete strategically in a competitive and uncertain product market.
Relationship between Financial Decisions and Production and Product Market Decisions
Several research papers have stated that there exists a clear level of interaction between the firms production and product market decision with that of its financial decisions. Say for example, many of them have come out with the fact that the firms product quality, pricing and warranties is depended on the firms risk of bankruptcy. If there is a substantial bankruptcy for a firm because of increased leverage, it may opt for cutting costs. This it will do, at the cost of its product quality, as a result its product warranties may be of little value to its purchasing consumers. If viewed from another angle, the firm may intentionally increase its leverage, and in turn its bankruptcy risks, and it may use this as a means of securing concessions from its employees, suppliers or customers. There has been enough evidence of the existence of the effect of financial decision on the production and product market decision of a firm. In a particular study mode by Phillips (1995), the pricing and productions decisions of four industries have been done. These industries have recently increased their financial leverage to a 123
considerable degree. In three out of these four industries, it was found that the industry output was negatively related with the average debit ratio of the industry. Further it was seen that, with these leverage increasing recaps, the incentives to the managers in order to maximize shareholders wealth had increased substantially. The firms were found to increase their profit margins and decrease outputs, which reflected that the increase in leverage decreased the agency cost and also inefficient investment. At the same time it was seen that, the firms within each of these industries increased their leverage simultaneously. Thus it can be safely said that the rival firms operating in a particular industry should respond as a coherent unit as far as financial decisions are concerned. This will ultimately result in greater efficiency to the firms.
SUMMARY
Agency theory suggests that firms in an industry shall be grouped into two. One would consist of large, capital intensive, levered and highly profitable firms and the other group shall consist of small, labor intensive, less levered and less profitable firms. As a result of the asset substitution problem associated with debt, the firms would come under two major segments one would consist of highly levered firms who would pursue more profitable projects and the other group shall consist of firms with low leverage and will pursue less risky projects. An industry may have an optimal debt capacity even though individual firms within the industry do not. This happens as a result of bankruptcies and liquidations within the industry, when it is depressed. Hence the assets are sold at fire sale prices. Hence the future expected cost of financial distress and bankruptcy increases thereby limiting the composite debt capacity in the industry. A firms leverage should be set to balance the managerial agency costs (which decreases as the firms leverage decreases) with the costs associated with competition in terms of product market strategy (which increases with the firms leverage). The executive compensation contracts should reflect the firms industry relative performance as well as absolute performance, depending upon the level of competition in an industry. A firm in a competitive industry should maintain excess debt capacity as a matter of competitive strategy. Leverage can be used to create a barrier to the entry of rival firms in an industry. Co-operative relationship among firms, like joint ventures and strategic alliances are becoming means to compete effectively in an industry. 125