Design Calculation Draft

Document title:
Design Calculation
Jetty Structure
of
Terminal C
05.06.2012
REV.
DATE
Issued for approval
Storm
DESCRIPTION
PREPD
CHKD
Client:
NIGERIAN PORTS AUTHORITY

Consultant:
YOLAS CONSULTANTS
Contractor:
JULIUS BERGER
Project:
WARRI PORT REHABILITATION
APPD
Warri Port Rehabilitation

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Revision Log
Revision
07 01 1 23 001 design Calculation.docx

GmbH
Description
Pages revised
Page 2 of 50
Julius Berger International

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Section No.
Rev: 0
Description
Page
Introduction ............................................................................................................................................. 5
Facility ..................................................................................................................................................... 5
Codes and Standards ............................................................................................................................. 7
Subsoil conditions ................................................................................................................................... 7
Material ................................................................................................................................................... 8
5.1
Concrete .................................................................................................................................... 8
5.1.1
Strength Grade ........................................................................................................................ 8
5.1.2
Concrete Cover ....................................................................................................................... 8
5.1.3
Reinforcement ......................................................................................................................... 8
5.2
Partial Safety Factors ................................................................................................................ 8
Software ................................................................................................................................................ 10
Loading ................................................................................................................................................. 10
7.1
Quayside.................................................................................................................................. 10
7.1.1
Dead Load ............................................................................................................................. 10
7.1.2
Life Load ................................................................................................................................ 10
7.1.3
Mooring Loads ....................................................................................................................... 10
7.1.4
Berthing load ......................................................................................................................... 10
Max reaction force = 2*553 = 1106 kN ............................................................................................... 12

7.2
8
Design Section 1................................................................................................................................... 14

8.1
Preface .................................................................................................................................... 14
8.2
Design Section......................................................................................................................... 14
8.3
Predesign evaluations ............................................................................................................. 15
8.3.1
Estimation of anchor elasticity ............................................................................................... 15
8.3.2
Distribution of bollard load ..................................................................................................... 15
8.3.3
Additional Loads for the sheet pile design ............................................................................ 16
8.4
Calculation ............................................................................................................................... 17
8.4.1
Preface .................................................................................................................................. 17
8.4.2
Wall calculation...................................................................................................................... 17
8.4.3
Check of Profile ..................................................................................................................... 20
8.4.4
Intermediate Sheet piling....................................................................................................... 20
8.4.5
Selection of anchor ................................................................................................................ 21
8.4.6
Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 21
8.4.7
Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 22
8.5
9
Load combinations................................................................................................................... 13
Sketch with results ................................................................................................................... 23
Section 2 ............................................................................................................................................... 24
9.1
Preface .................................................................................................................................... 24

GmbH
Page 3 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
9.2
Design Section......................................................................................................................... 24
9.3
Predesign evaluations ............................................................................................................. 25
9.4
Calculation ............................................................................................................................... 26
9.4.1
Preface .................................................................................................................................. 26
9.4.2
Wall calculation...................................................................................................................... 26
9.4.3
Results of electronic calculation ............................................................................................ 28
9.4.4
Check of Profile ..................................................................................................................... 29
9.4.5
9.4.6
9.4.7
Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 29
9.4.8
Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 31
9.5
Sketch with results ................................................................................................................... 31
9.5.1
9.6
Results................................................................................................................................... 32
Options for optimisation of Section 2 ....................................................................................... 33
9.6.1
Check of Profile ..................................................................................................................... 33
9.6.2
9.6.3
9.6.4
Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 34
9.6.5
Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 35
9.6.6
Conclusion ............................................................................................................................. 35
10 Construction stage ................................................................................................................................ 36

11 Wingwall................................................................................................................................................ 38
11.1
Preface ................................................................................................................................. 38
11.2
Elevation .............................................................................................................................. 38
11.3
Cantilever wing wall ............................................................................................................. 39
11.4
Anchored wing wall section.................................................................................................. 40
12 Design of capping beam ....................................................................................................................... 44

12.1
Preface ................................................................................................................................. 44
12.2
Size and loadings ................................................................................................................. 44
12.3
Connection to king piles ....................................................................................................... 45
12.4
Insitu beam design ............................................................................................................... 47
12.5
PC-U-Beam .......................................................................................................................... 49
12.6
Reinforcement sketches ...................................................................................................... 50
13 Conclusion ............................................................................................................................................ 50

GmbH
Page 4 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
1 Introduction
The following calculation proofs the waterfront structures which are proposed to use for
the reconstruction of the Terminal C. Changes due to additional requirements or
agreements with the client in respect to the minimising of the quantities are considered
in this calculation.
Further detailed design issues for connections and reinforcement are investigated in the
following.
Instead of use the tendered Peine Piling system it is foreseen to install the Arcelor
Piling system and to consider a higher steel quality (S430 instead of S355).
The following items of the Arcelor system are foreseen:
king piles: HZM1080A (S430) and HZM 880A (S430)
Intermediate piles: AZ 14/770 (SW355)
Anchor wall AU 25 (S355)
Following additional changes are required in the design:
Bollard load of 800 kN instead of 600 kN
No additional anchor at bollards
2 Facility
The present berth structure Terminal C was constructed in the late 1970s. Due to the
serve damages at the sheet piles and at the capping beam and heavy settlements at the
Land side the stability of the structure could not be verified. Further the berth should be
upgraded for a water depth of 10m below CD.
Therefore the whole berth with a length of about 500 m will be equipped with a new
sheet piling system. The system contains a main king pile wall anchored by lightly
inclined tie rods and a continuous anchor wall. The king pile wall is equipped by a
concrete capping beam which bears the fender and mooring equipment.
The system of the berth consists of two different Sections depending on the
encountered subsoil condition. The Section 1 covers a length of 300 m, the Section 2 a
length of 180m.
GmbH
Page 5 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
LAYOUT:
Section 1
Section 2
TYPICAL SECTION:
Acc, to Tender

GmbH
Page 6 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
3 Codes and Standards

The design is based on the following standards:
Engineering Drawings and Details prepared by Yolas Consultants (MAY 2011)
EAU 2004
Recommendations of the Committee for waterfront structures, harbours

and waterways
DIN 1045-1
Structural use of Concrete
4 Subsoil conditions
Subsoil strategraphy and soil conditions according to Geotechnical Interpretative
Report (TB-GEO/April 10,2012)

GmbH
Page 7 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
The following water levels are specified:

HHWL +1,6 m (Warri Datum)
LWL + 0,0 m (Warri Datum)
GW +1,1 m (Warri Datum) in the design considered by +1,5m.
5 Material
5.1 Concrete
The design of the concrete structures is executed according to the requirements of BS
6349 which refers to BS 5400.
5.1.1 Strength Grade
The following concrete strengths as specified in BS EN 206 will be used for the
construction:
Concrete Grade C32/40 with a characteristic compressive strength at 28 days 40.0
N/mm for reinforced concrete.
5.1.2 Concrete Cover
structural
element
Insituconcrete
Precastelements
Exposure
class
XS3
XS3
XS3
XS3
requiredcover[mm]
60(exposedtoair)
30(exp.toconcrete)
60(exposedtoair)
30(exp.toconcrete)
Min.concrete
grade
C32/40
C32/40
C32/40
C32/40
5.1.3 Reinforcement
The design is based on hot rolled high yield deformed reinforcement bars grade 500 in
accordance with BS 4449.
strength grade 500: yield strength 500 N/mm2
5.2 Partial Safety Factors

For sheet piling design
Partial Safety factors acc. to EAU and DIN 1054/2005

GmbH
Page 8 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Structural steel m = 1.1

For concrete design
Concrete
m = 1.5
Reinforcement m = 1.15
GmbH
Page 9 of 50

Part:
Design Calculation
Software
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Various software will be used for the structural analysis depending on the investigated
structural problem. The sheet pile wall structure will be analyzed by means of the
software developed by DC-Software, Munich, Germany.
Generally MICROSOFT Excel sheets will be used to facilitate calculations of repetitive
nature.
7 Loading
7.1 Quayside
7.1.1 Dead Load
For reinforced concrete a dead load of 25 kN/m shall be used.
7.1.2 Life Load
On the quayside a general live load of 50 kN/m is specified.
7.1.3 Mooring Loads
For the berth 800 kN bollards are required.
7.1.4 Berthing load
The following vessel are specified

GmbH
Page 10 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Calculation of necessary absorption energy (by Fender Team)

GmbH
Page 11 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Selected Fender system
Max reaction force = 2*553 = 1106 kN

Max absorption energy = 2* 203 = 406 kNm

GmbH
Page 12 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
7.2 Load combinations

For the Design two load combinations are investigated:
Loadcomb 1 (max Live load, max water pressure, max water depth)- decisive for wall
length
Loadcomb 2 ( as Loadcomb.1 + hawser pull) decisive for anchor force
Both load combinations belong to loading case 2 rare Combinations acc. to EAU. The
corresponding safety factors are considered in the design.

GmbH
Page 13 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
8 Design Section 1
8.1 Preface
The Section 1 is valid for the South area of the berth for a length of about 300 m. The
length is specified in the Tender drawings and the corresponding soil profile is evaluated
in the GIR. The Soil profile in Section 1 is more favourable for the Sheet piling System
as the Soil profile in Section 2.
8.2 Design Section

GmbH
Page 14 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
8.3 Predesign evaluations

8.3.1 Estimation of anchor elasticity
Due to the very long anchors the elasticity of the anchors is evaluated. The elasticity of
the anchorage is important for the load distribution of the bollard load and the moment
calculation of the sheet piling structure.
Spring rate K = E x A/ l
E = 2.1 *105 N/mm
A = 90x 3,14/4 = 6360 mm
L = 30 m
K = 44500 N/mm = 44,5 MN/m
8.3.2 Distribution of bollard load
Depending on the stiffness of the concrete head beam and the elasticity of the
supporting anchorage the bollard load is distributed over several anchors. The
determination of the load distribution a continuous beam supported by Springs
(Anchors) is investigated.
The distance of the supports are 2,07 m as the spacing of the anchorage and the beam
itself is considered by 1,4mx1,4m (size of the insitu concrete of head beam, continuous
reinforced).
The bollard load is considered with 800 kN (characteristic load)
System of head beam

GmbH
Page 15 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Load distribution due to capping beam (Shear force)
The Anchor load is distributed due to the head beam to about 10 anchors with a
maximum load of 130 kN per anchor.
8.3.3 Additional Loads for the sheet pile design

Bollard
Due to the hawser pull and the bollard height of about 50 cm a moment will be
transferred to the top sheet piling.
Horizontal force for sheetpile design 130/2,07 = 63 kN/m
Moment 64*0,5 = 32 kNm/m
Selfweight
GmbH
Page 16 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
For the Check of the sheet piles the normalforce due to dead load is considered
Normal force in sheet pile at max M
Due to earth pressure and deadweight of wall automatic considered by PC software
Due to capping beam
1,8*1,6*25 = 72 kN/m
Due to anchor
500 * tan 5 = 45 kN/m
8.4 Calculation
8.4.1 Preface
The Sheet piling is calculated by means of the Software DC-PIT. The relevant data of
the calculation are printed below the whole calculation is tabled in the attachment.
The wall itself is considered as full restrained in the soil.
For the sheet piling Structure the ARCELOR Profile HZ 880M A-12/AZ 14-770 are
foreseen.
For the Design two loadcombinations are investigated:
LC1 (max Live load, max water pressure, max water depth)- decisive for wall length
LC 2 ( as LC1 + hawser pull) decisive for anchor force
I
8.4.2 Wall calculation
Loadcomb 1

GmbH
Page 17 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Load comb 2

GmbH
Page 18 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Results of electronic calculation

GmbH
Page 19 of 50

Part:
Load
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Load case
comb Acc. to EAU
Md
Nd
wall
Ak
Ad
Lk
Ad/2,07m
wall
(kN/m)
(kN)
(m)
(kN/m)
(kN/m)
(m)
(kN)
1630
-430
23,8
450
622
26,3
1290
1534
-440
23,7
522
722
27,9
1500
8.4.3 Check of Profile

Selected Profile HZ 880M A-12/AZ 14-770 (S430)
A = 292,4 / 2,067 = 141 cm/m
Wy = 4830 cm/m
Check
440/141 * 10 + 1630/4830*10 = 31,2 + 337,4 = 368,7 MN/m
368,7/430*1,1 = 0,94 < 1,0
8.4.4 Intermediate Sheet piling
Selected AZ 14 /770 S 355
Check of length of intermediate sheet piles
(recommendation acc. to EAU 1990 2,5 m below sea bed)
Length are calculated with check of hydraulic failure
Check of hydraulic failure
Considered pile toe at -13,1 (pile length 15 m)

GmbH
Page 20 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
8.4.5 Selection of anchor

For the anchorage anchor of grade 500 are foreseen:
Max Ad = 1500 kN selected upset anchor grade 500 M90 (Rd = 1624 kN)
8.4.6 Anchor wall

For the anchor wall a dead man system is considered.
With the check of the lower failure plane the required depth of the anchor is evaluated.
For the check the biggest anchor force are considered. The soil conditions for the wall
are considered as uniform with a friction angle of 35 due to the compaction of the fill
and the subsoil compaction by pile driving this assumption is verified. The LL is
considered by 20 kN/m.
The check is executed by means of a excel-calculation sheet.
Designacc.toEAU20068.4.9.7SafetyagainstFailureofAnchoringSoil
Conditions:
OnesoillayerwithGroundwater
LimitStateCase1BFailureofstructure
INPUTCELLS
RESUTCELLS
Symbol
description
Soilparameters
friction
'
weight
weight
'
Geometryparameters
h
walltoebelowGS
h'
GWbelowGS
P
uniformliveload
Loadcase
forselctionofsafetyparameters
LC
Loadcase
Anchorforce
Ad
Designanchorforce
DesignVaues
earthresistance
EP
Permanentactions
G
variableactions
Q
kah(=2/3phi)
GmbH
Page 21 of 50
unit
value
()
(kN/m)
(kN/m)
(m)
(m)
(kN/m)
(1/2/3)
(kN/m)
()
()
()
()
35
20
11
7,3
2
20
722
1,3
1,2
1,3
0,22

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Eah,k(G)
Eah,k(P)
Eph,k
kph(=0)
activeearthpressure(soil)
activeearthpressure(LiveLoad)
passiveearthpressure
check
Rd/Ed
()
(kN/m)
(kN/m)
(kN/m)
3,69
67
33
1109
()
1,01
OK
h
h
GW
Ad
p(=0)
a(=2/3)
Eph
Eah
The required toe of the wall is 7,2 m below surface. By consideration of a 5m long wall
the top of wall is CD+1,3m and the anchor elevation at CD -1,2 m.
Check of the passive friction angle by the verification of the equilibrium of the vertical
forces (Characteristic).
V anchor = 522* tan 5,5 = 50 kN/m
V active earth pressure = (67+33)*tan 23.3 = 43 kN/m
V dead weight of wall = 5* 1,5 = 7,5 kN
43+7,5 = 50,5 > 50 OK
8.4.7 Anchor wall

Wall length 5 m
Md wall = (722/5,0 )*(5,0/2)/2 = 451 kNm
Nec W (S355) = 451/0,355*1,1 = 1398 cm
Propoased profile:
AU 20 (S355) (wy = 2000 cm) (same profile will be used for Section 2 too)
Selected Profile AU 25 (Arcelor proposal)
Walling
GmbH
Page 22 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Walling force Wd = 722 kN/m

Md = 722*2,07/10 = 309 kNm
Nec W (S355) = 309/0,355*1,1 = 957 cm
Proposed 2* U 300 (S355) (W = 1070cm)
Selected Profile 2U 320 (Arcelor proposal)
8.5 Sketch with results

GmbH
Page 23 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
9 Section 2
9.1 Preface
The Section 2 is valid for the North area of the berth for a length of about 180 m. The
length is specified in the Tender drawings and the corresponding soil profile is evaluated
in the GIR. The Soil profile in Section 2 is more unfavourable for the Sheet piling
System as the Soil profile in Section 1. Therefore heavier profiles will be necessary.
9.2 Design Section

GmbH
Page 24 of 50
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Part:
Design Calculation
9.3
Predesign evaluations
For the Section 2 the same pre-design evaluations and loadings are valid as for
Section1.
Horizontal force for sheetpile design 130/2,07 = 63 kN/m
Moment 64*0,5 = 32 kNm/m
Due to earth pressure and deadweight of wall automatic considered by PC software
Due to capping beam
1,8*1,6*25 = 72 kN/m
Due to anchor
500 * tan 5 = 45 kN/m

GmbH
Page 25 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
9.4 Calculation
9.4.1 Preface
The Sheet piling is calculated by means of the Software DC-PIT. The relevant data of
the calculation are printed below the whole calculation is tabled in the attachment.
For the sheet piling Structure the ARCELOR Profile HZ 1080M A-12/AZ 14-770 are
foreseen.
The pile toe shall be at elevation -24m (pile 100% restrained)
For the Design two loadcombinations are investigated:
LC1 (max Live load, max water pressure, max water depth)- decisive for wall length
LC 2 (as LC1 + hawser pull) decisive for anchor force
9.4.2 Wall calculation

Load comb 1

GmbH
Page 26 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Load comb 2

GmbH
Page 27 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
9.4.3 Results of electronic calculation

Load
Load case
Md
Nd
Lw
Ak
Ad
Lk
Ad/2,07m
comb Acc. to EAU

GmbH
Page 28 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
(kN/m) (kN)
(m)
(kN)
(kN/m)
(m)
(kN)
1983
- 406
27,2
505
703
30,2
1457
1876
-408
27
578
813
31,9
1682

A = 371/2,07 = 179 cm/m
Wy = 7080 cm/m
406/179 * 10 + 1983/7080*10 = 22,8 + 280 = 302,8 MN/m
302,8/430*1,1 =0,77 < 1,0
Check of hydraulic failure - Considered pile toe at -13,1 (pile length 15 m)

Max Ad = 1682 kN selected upset anchor grade 500 M95 (Rd = 1822 kN)
9.4.7 Anchor wall
For the check the biggest anchor force are considered. The soil conditions for the wall
are considered as uniform with a friction angle of 35 due to the compaction of the fill
and the subsoil compaction by pile driving this assumption is verified. The LL is
considered by 20 kN/m.
The check is executed by means of a excel-calculation sheet.
GmbH
Page 29 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
The required toe of the wall is 8 m below surface. By consideration of a 6m long wall the
top of wall is CD+1,5m and the anchor elevation at CD -1,5 m.

GmbH
Page 30 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
V anchor = 578* tan 5,4 = 55 kN/m
V dead weight of wall = 6* 1,5 = 9 kN/m
50+9 = 5) > 50 OK
9.4.8 Anchor wall

Wall length 6 m
Md wall = (813/6,0 )*(6,0/2)/2 = 609 kNm
Nec W (S355) = 609/0,355*1,1 = 1889 cm
Proposed profile
AU 20 (S355) (wy = 2000 cm) (same profile will be used for Section 2 too)
Selected Profile AU 25 (Arcelor Proposal)
Walling
Md = 813*2,07/10 = 348 kNm
Nec W (S355) = 348/0,355*1,1 = 1078 cm
Proposed 2* U 300 (S355) (W = 1070cm)
Selected Profile 2U 320 (Arcelor proposal)
9.5 Sketch with results

GmbH
Page 31 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
9.5.1 Results
As proofed the utilisation of the main wall is not very high for the optimisation
of the wall the wall length could be reduced (restrain grade reduced) in respect to
the increasing anchor forces.

GmbH
Page 32 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
9.6 Options for optimisation of Section 2

In order to create a higher utilization of the Sheet piling profile the restrain grade is
reduced to 80% which leads to a shorter wall..
In the following the checks for the reduced restrain grade is executed.
Results of electronic calculation

Load
Load case
Md
Nd
Lw
Ak
Ad
Lk
Ad/2,07m
(kN/m) (kN)
(m)
(kN)
(kN/m)
(m)
(kN)
comb Acc. to EAU

1
2173
-412
26
527
703
30,2
1578
2060
-415
25,8
599
813
32
1798

A = 371/2,07 = 179 cm/m
Wy = 7080 cm/m
412/179 * 10 + 2173/7080*10 = 23 + 307 = 330 MN/m
330/430*1,1 =0,84 < 1,0
Check of hydraulic failure
Considered pile toe at -13,1 (pile length 15 m)

Max Ad = 1798kN selected upset anchor grade 500 M95 (Rd = 1822 kN)
GmbH
Page 33 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
9.6.4 Anchor wall


GmbH
Page 34 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
The required toe of the wall is 8 m below surface. By consideration of a 6m long wall the
top of wall is CD+1,5m and the anchor elevation at CD -1,5 m.
V anchor = 599* tan 5,4 = 57 kN/m
V dead weight of wall = 6* 1,5 = 9 kN/m
50+9 = 59 > 57 OK
9.6.5 Anchor wall

Wall length 6 m
Md wall = (868/6,0 )*(6,0/2)/2 = 651 kNm
Nec W (S355) = 651/0,355*1,1 = 2017 cm
proposed profile
AU 20 (S355) (wy = 2000 cm)
Walling
Md = 868*2,07/10 = 372 kNm
Nec W (S355) = 372/0,355*1,1 = 1152 cm
proposed 2 U 320 (S355) (w=1358 cm)
9.6.6 Conclusion
With the selected Sheet piling profile the piling length could be reduced by 1 m without
changing the anchorage system.

GmbH
Page 35 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
10 Construction stage
Due to the installation of the new sheet piling structure in front of the existing and the
partial dismantling of the existing the new structure has to secure the stability meantime
without anchor.
In the following it is proofed the loading conditions for these construction stage in order
not minimise the deflection of the cantilever system to 10 cm at the top of wall. The
purpose is to guaranty the use of the PC elements of the headbeam.
The investigation is executed for the condition of Section 1 with the small wall profile.
The following Construction sequence are foreseen:
Installation of King piles
Installation of intermediated sheet piling
Check of sea bed ensure sea bed elevation of -5,0m (possible fill)
Fill of gab between new and old wall up to Elevation 0,0 m
Partial excavation at anchor wall
Installation of anchor wall
Remove of subsoil up to 0,0 m over 10 m length
Dismantling of existing capping beam and removal of existing anchors if necessary
Installation of new Anchor
Refill to final elevation
Installation of capping beam

GmbH
Page 36 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Result: Due to the above described construction sequence the deformation of the
wall is in the specified limit.

GmbH
Page 37 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
11 Wingwall
11.1 Preface
The wing wall secures the sheet piling structure to the South. For the neighbouring
embankment a design is not yet existing for the wing wall design it is assumed that the
embankment is sloped 1:2 and protected by an adequate system.
11.2 Elevation

GmbH
Page 38 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
11.3 Cantilever wing wall

For the area of a height less than 7 m a cantilever system is designed. The loading and
the soil properties are considered as for Section 1. Due to the capping beam the loads
will be distributed of the whole wall. Therefore for the design a height of 5,5 m is
considered.

GmbH
Page 39 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Profile Check
(HZ 880N A-12/AZ14-770) S430
= 1534/4830*10= 317 N/mm < 430/1,1 = 390 N/mm
Wall length 17 m
11.4 Anchored wing wall section

For the area of a height of 7m to 14 m an anchored system is designed. The loadings
and the soil properties are considered as for Section 1. Due to the capping beam the
loads will be distributed of the whole wall. Therefore for the design a height of 11 m is
considered.

GmbH
Page 40 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Profile Check
(HZ 880N A-12/AZ14-770) S430
=837/4830*10= 173 N/mm < 430/1,1 = 390 N/mm
Wall length 20 m (1 m more than calculated because of scour)
Anchor
Ak = 317 kN/m
Ad = 443 kN/m
Ad = 917 kN/anchor
Nec. Upset anchor M72 , grade 500 (Frd = 1005 kN), = 22,5 m
Anchor wall
GmbH
Page 41 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Due to the anchor layers of the main wall the anchors have to be positioned horizontal.
Therefore for the anchor wall a restrained wall is required.

GmbH
Page 42 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Profile Check
Nec W ((AU 25) S355
=706/2500*10= 282 N/mm < 355/1,1 = 322 N/mm
Wall length 8,5 m (top 1m below Ground surface)
Waling
Ad = 443 kN
Md = 443 *2,07/10 = 199 kNm
Nec W (S355) = 199/355*1,1*10. = 616 cm
2 U 260 (Wy = 742 cm)

GmbH
Page 43 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
12 Design of capping beam

12.1 Preface
For the concrete capping beam an U-shaped PC-element as lost formwork is used.
The concrete-infill itself is used as bearing structure. The capping beam is stressed by
the bollard and mooring loads and the outer surface are designed to resist to the
environmental conditions.
12.2 Size and loadings

PC-U-beam
The PC-U-beam is designed with the following size
Loadings
Bollard load
HBk = 800 kN, bollard height ca. 50 cm

MXk = 1.3*800 = 1300 kNm
Fender load
HVk = 1100 kN
Mxk = 1100*0,2 = 220 kNm
Mzk = 1100*0,15*1,5 = 250 kNm

GmbH
Page 44 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
12.3 Connection to king piles

To ensure the connection of the head beam to the king piles connectors are necessary.
For the connectors 4 bars 28 mm BSt 500 are foreseen as shown below:
Allowable Md for connection = 616*2*500/1,1*0,8/10 = 448 kNm
Max Md (Top of pile due to bollard) = 1,5*130 * (1,4+0.5) = 370 kNm
Max Md (Top of pile due to impact) = 1,5*1100/6*0,7 = 192 kNm
Welding length a = 10 mm
L = 500/1,1*616/(10*430/1,1) = 72 mm
GmbH
Page 45 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Chosen both sides 2 * 20 cm

The shear force is transferred by the contact area pile/Grout to PC element.
Max shear force Vd = 1,5 *130 = 195 kN
Vrd = 0,2*0,45*20= 1,8 MN
Vrd >> Vd

GmbH
Page 46 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
12.4 Insitu beam design

For the beam design the following system are considered:
For bollard load continuous beam supported by springs (anchors)
For fender impact continuous beam bedded on spil
h = 140 cm
d = 132 cm
Max Md = 1810 kNm
Kd = 132/1810/1,4 =3,67 Ks = 2,36
Nec As = 2,36*1810/132 = 32, 4 cm
Max Vd = 547 kN

GmbH
Page 47 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Vessel impact
Max Md = 2050 kNm
Max Qd = 825 kN

GmbH
Page 48 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
Required
Rev: 0
As side = 35,3 + 21.1/4 = 40,3 cm

As stirrup 14 cm/m
Chosen reinforcement
Bothe sides 9 25 (44,2 cm)
Top and bottom 8 20 ( 25,1 cm)
Stirrups generell 14/15 ( 20,5 cm), at bolloard and fenders 14/12,5 (24,7 cm) for
3m.
12.5 PC-U-Beam
The PC u-beam is reinforced in respect to structural reasons by an crosswise uniform
reinforcement 10/15 inside and outside
Check of Wall reinforcement(due to insitu fill)
Considered safety factor for casting 1.5 dyn effects
Md = 1.5*1.4*25*1.4/6*1,5 = 25,7 kNm
Nec as = 2,6 *25,7/15 = 4.5 cm/m
Chosen reinforcement 10/15 crosswise inside and out side at the edges bars 12
GmbH
Page 49 of 50

Part:
Document No: 07 01 1 23 001
Rev: 0
Date: 05.06.2012
Design Calculation
12.6 Reinforcement sketches
13 Conclusion
The above executed calculation verifies that the structures are able to bear the loadings
in respect to the specified safety factors.

GmbH
Page 50 of 50

Design Calculation Draft

Uploaded by

Document Information

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Design Calculation Draft

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Document title:

Issued for approval

NIGERIAN PORTS AUTHORITY

WARRI PORT REHABILITATION

Warri Port Rehabilitation

Document No: 07 01 1 23 001

07 01 1 23 001 design Calculation.docx

Julius Berger International

Warri Port Rehabilitation

Document No: 07 01 1 23 001

Codes and Standards ............................................................................................................................. 7

Subsoil conditions ................................................................................................................................... 7

Strength Grade ........................................................................................................................ 8

Concrete Cover ....................................................................................................................... 8

Partial Safety Factors ................................................................................................................ 8

Dead Load ............................................................................................................................. 10

Life Load ................................................................................................................................ 10

Mooring Loads ....................................................................................................................... 10

Berthing load ......................................................................................................................... 10

Max reaction force = 2*553 = 1106 kN ............................................................................................... 12

Design Section 1................................................................................................................................... 14

Predesign evaluations ............................................................................................................. 15

Estimation of anchor elasticity ............................................................................................... 15

Distribution of bollard load ..................................................................................................... 15

Additional Loads for the sheet pile design ............................................................................ 16

Check of Profile ..................................................................................................................... 20

Intermediate Sheet piling....................................................................................................... 20

Selection of anchor ................................................................................................................ 21

Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 21

Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 22

Sketch with results ................................................................................................................... 23

07 01 1 23 001 design Calculation.docx

Julius Berger International

Warri Port Rehabilitation

Document No: 07 01 1 23 001

Predesign evaluations ............................................................................................................. 25

Results of electronic calculation ............................................................................................ 28

Check of Profile ..................................................................................................................... 29

Intermediate Sheet piling....................................................................................................... 29

Selection of anchor ................................................................................................................ 29

Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 29

Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 31

Sketch with results ................................................................................................................... 31

Options for optimisation of Section 2 ....................................................................................... 33

Check of Profile ..................................................................................................................... 33

Intermediate Sheet piling....................................................................................................... 33

Selection of anchor ................................................................................................................ 33

Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 34

Anchor wall ............................................................................................................................ 35

10 Construction stage ................................................................................................................................ 36

Cantilever wing wall ............................................................................................................. 39

Anchored wing wall section.................................................................................................. 40

12 Design of capping beam ....................................................................................................................... 44

Size and loadings ................................................................................................................. 44

Connection to king piles ....................................................................................................... 45

Insitu beam design ............................................................................................................... 47

Reinforcement sketches ...................................................................................................... 50

07 01 1 23 001 design Calculation.docx

Julius Berger International

Warri Port Rehabilitation

Document No: 07 01 1 23 001

Julius Berger International

Warri Port Rehabilitation

Document No: 07 01 1 23 001