Page 1 of 2

ejk-soh@hotmail.com
From: Date: To: Attach : Subject: <ejk-soh@hotmail.com> Sunday, February 24, 2013 11:59PM "Kerry Kennedy" <info@rfkcenter.org>; "Hon. Christy Clark" <premier@gov.bc.ca>; "Tim Louman-Gardiner" <tlouman-gardiner@farris.com>; <rsloman@farris.com>; <adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca> Notice of Application for Constitutional Remedy and finaliz Constitutional Remedy for February 2013.pdf ed Fw: Notice of February 6, 2013 Application for Constitutional Remedy

Dear Sirs: Before sending my email, I failed to attach the Notice of Application of Constitutional Remedy and finalized Constitutional Remedy for February 2013 I sorry. Here is the corrected email. m

Dear Sirs: I felt it was important to notify the law court system of my February 6, 2013 Application for Constitutional Remedy for the province enforced euthanisation of Rudi Heinz Krass and DENIAL of my Right to security of person. I could not attach the faxed documents but I did the next best thing and posted them online and the following faxed copies of Notification of my February 6, 2013 Application for Constitutional Remedy are: The Governor General David Johnston (https://skydrive.live.com/? cid=76d01868d933a2ac#cid=76D01868D933A2AC&id=76D01868D933A2AC%21793); The Lt-Governor Judith Guichon (https://skydrive.live.com/? cid=76d01868d933a2ac#cid=76D01868D933A2AC&id=76D01868D933A2AC%21795); The Supreme Court of Canada (https://skydrive.live.com/? cid=76d01868d933a2ac#cid=76D01868D933A2AC&id=76D01868D933A2AC%21796); The Toronto Dominion Bank directly (https://skydrive.live.com/? cid=76d01868d933a2ac#cid=76D01868D933A2AC&id=76D01868D933A2AC%21797); The Kelowna Supreme Court Registry (https://skydrive.live.com/? cid=76d01868d933a2ac#cid=76D01868D933A2AC&id=76D01868D933A2AC%21794). As s. 52 (1) of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms makes The Charter and The INALIENABLE Rights and Freedoms especially s. 7 and 24 (1) of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms the superior standard for all decisions plus s. 24 (1) is embodied directly in An Application for Constitutional Remedy, all law court proceedings are suspended and need to be addressed in an out of court settlement established between the Executive Branches of the Provinces where Our Majesty is the referee between the disenfranchised, The Charter of Rights and Freedoms while being opposed unconstitutionally by The Executives playing false gods. This is notification that matters are proceeding to the general public at an alarming right and I will not stop until the Constitutional Remedy is put in place and my Right to security of person is respected by The Executives and going forward with true liberty! Once received, the email receipt will be embedded in the Notice of Application of Constitutional Remedy and finalized constitutional remedy for February 6, 2013 and put online.

2/25/2013

Page 2 of 2

In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen, Ernst John Krass, Self Applicant in the February 6, 2013 Application for Constitutional Remedy and in pursuit of the Right of Liberty

2/25/2013

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm February 24, 2013

The Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Organization Governor General David Johnston by fax Lt.-Gov. Judith Guichon by fax Premier Christy Clark et al. - The Executives - by email after being faxed to the Lt.-Governor The Supreme Court of Canada - its Judges Tim Louman-Gardiner and Robert Sloman, legal representatives for The Toronto Dominion Bank Adrian Dix, Leader of the Opposition New Democrats of British Columbia

RE:

God Almighty ordered that I rewrite the Constitutional Remedy pertaining to me and my knowledge concerning the HIDDEN Rewriting of The English Language since 1934 and 1982 and then again in 1996 - the Constitutional Questions Act of 1996

Dear Sirs: 1 I had a horrible couple days because I did not understand what God wanted of me. This morning, while in a fitful state of slumber, I was ordered to rewrite and expand my Constitutional Remedy for my February 6, 2013 Application for Constitutional Remedy to encompass my knowledge of the rewriting of the English Language without the authority to do so by the Executive branches of Administration and imposing these standards upon the thoughts of the people - mind control. February 2013 Constitutional Remedy for my February 5, 2013 Application for Constitutional Remedy that complies fully with s. 24 (1) of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms 2 So, the April 2012 Constitutional Remedy pertaining to the matters of the DENIAL of right to life of Rudi Heinz Krass and the DENIAL of my right to security of person - psychological integrity - is still valid and applies to the Executives that have no validity because the 1867 Canada Act is invalid as it imposed administration without The Right to Life, security of person and liberty as defined by God Almighty through His Holy Spirit/the words of Jesus Christ/Allah through the words of Mohammed/The Great Spirit/The Mandate of Heaven/new evidence that is pure and shows that entire classes have no legitimacy just as the Executives know that they persist as false rulers by imposing and managing class war and have done so since March 31, 1960 just as the Aristocracy that they replaced. 3 As Constitutional Remedy is a process that is superior to the law court processes, all law court processes pending or ongoing against me, Ernst John Krass, or initiated by me are invalid and suspended and must be resolved through non- law court methods especially since Premier Christy 3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1
Page 1 of 5

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm Clark tricked me into believing that the law court system applied in my matters even though only The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and s. 52 (1) of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and its functioning from the neutral citation 2003 SCC 54 decision, as specifically defined in my February 6, 2013 Application for Constitutional Remedy and The Right of Liberty since 1934 Exposed! document but not limited to these documents, applies solely to the Constitutional Remedy Process. 4 The evidence that I have compiled shows that, with the creation of the British Commonwealth and the implementation of centralized banking around the world in 1934, the Right of Liberty was quietly rewritten by the Executives of all nations and now means being DENIED/deprived of their Legal Right of life and security of person, where the latter is defined as bodily harm and psychological integrity, that then demands the right to a rich financial settlement. 5 When the disenfranchised learn of their Legal personal rights being DENIED, i.e. they have had the INALIENABLE Rights, since April 17, 1982 in Canada, which granted them the Right to apply to Our Majesty to have the Right to Liberty imposed summarily as defined by the disenfranchised, we have the right to revolt which is not what God wants because We, the

People, have the right to right the path that mankind is upon by providing a place for those
believing and accepting THE FREE Society where Doing unto others as you have done unto yourself and others is the primary rule. 6 The need for revolutionary war and its resulting mass murder is over, at last! 7 However, as the Executive Branches of the Confederation of Canada have DECLINED TO ACCEDE TO/comply with The Charter imposed positions put forth to them in April 2012 and s. 52 (1) of The Charter and, then, replied by imposing the law court system over the Executives absolute obligation to uphold Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms regardless of budgetary considerations and finally having been caught by one who knows that The Right of Liberty is unlimited funding of THE FREE Society of Equals that has been severely suppressed under democracy for over a century and beyond that. 8 Thus, an account containing $50 Billion, that is to be secured by gold, is to be established with The Bank of Canada in my name for the purpose of liberating THE FREE Society of Equals. These funds are not to accrue wealth and are to be drawn down to build homes that are well insulated and whose heat and electricity is to be provided by either geothermal energy on a house by house basis or wind or solar power where geothermal power and heat cannot be provided due to permafrost. 9 I, Ernst John Krass, have the right to secure my person and, when completed, I have the right to return to Canada as Canadas Charter Monarch and provide these homes in Gods Country on 60 to 80 acre plots to people choosing to abide by The Pure Fact Truth/The Holy Spirit along with the standard of Doing unto others as you have done unto you plus apply critical thinking that only allows that which is absolute Truth to guide everyone universally - evolution has been discredited by new evidence that came into existence since the book was published! 10 As money will cease to exist as a driving force of thought, taxes upon these lands is 3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1
Page 2 of 5

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm unnecessary and unacceptable because those occupying these habitations will live with nature and will, therefore. be called, chosen and Faithful: the land is supposed to support those living there not living in far off places nor pursuing money to pay taxes - annual rental fees to the false rulers. 11 In 1996, disliking this Constitutional Petition standard, the Executives created the Constitutional Questions Acts of Canada where this simple Right of applying to Our Majesty, according to s. 24 (1) of The Charter, was now limited wrongly for the disenfranchised persons having prepared and served an Application of Constitutional Remedy upon the Executives, the LtGovernor and the Governor General along with the Privative Contract stating their price for liberty that must be accepted. 12 As you can see, since 1996, the system is very much like a computer where those knowing that they have been wronged NOW have to comply with s. 8 (2)(b) of the Constitutional Questions Act as well as serve the Application of Constitutional Remedy upon the Executives, Governor General and the Lt.-Governor in order for the Right to Liberty to kick in. 13 YET, the people were purposely not informed to the hidden Constitutional Remedy due process. Consequently, the Executives have shirked their responsibility to remedy the adverse affects of their laws universally through liberty provided by a significant financial package for all those whose right to life or right to security of person were dismissed by regulation or the actions of all administrators which includes all government agents. 14 Last year, by April 2012, I had proven my case by virtue of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms but, according to s. 8 (2)(b) of the Constitutional Questions Act, applying for Liberty from the DENIAL of life of my dad, Rudi Heinz Krass, and my DENIAL of security of person both according to physical harm and psychological integrity, was NOT surrendered to/acceded to by the Executives because I had not produced an Application for Constitutional Remedy and served it upon the Executive, the Governor General and the Lt.-Governor of British Columbia along with my catching that the English Language had been rewritten which the evidence to this document proves occurred and originating at the Executive branches of Canadas Administration. 15 Thus, now, I have fulfilled everything that I did not know was being demanded of me while the lawyers effectively kept my mind busy dealing with them rather than finding s. 8 (2)(b) of the Constitutional Questions Act and then discovering the new and hidden Right to Liberty when persons are living in an economy based civilization. 16 Unfortunately, I am still awaiting the surrendering to my Application for Constitutional Remedy by the Executives and Our Majesty that was filed upon The Executives on February 6, 2013 and then served upon the Governor General and Lt.-Governor of British Columbia on February 16, 2013 and embedded in the Simple Yes or No Question put in place by Canadas Charter document within the Why the unconstitutional declining of The Charter imposed positions by the Executives document. 17 Mankind is still in the same fight for The Truth and liberty that has plagued mankind throughout history but the Executive Branches of Administration of Canada, since the Nuremberg 3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1
Page 3 of 5

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm Trials and their Full Disclosure, knew that they had no validity as they were created by an Act of the British Parliamentary system and with the intention of destroying THE FREE Society that existed here while the system knew that the monetary system and the economy are also illusions made real because there are vast amounts of existence that are priceless, i.e. without monetary valuation, while those which have been given a value can only be attained through the dismissal of Heaven and earth whose existence is lost by those ruling thoughts through the enacted rules of law. 18 The actions against The Truth and Its Charter imposed positions forced the production of this Constitutional Remedy while these actions also created me due to The Charter of Rights and Freedoms and The Charter protections were illegitimately suspended in the actions against me by The Executives and its agents: hence, the Executives created the role and duties of Canadas Charter Monarch while that I have fulfilled all these demands.

Praise be unto God Almighty in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

Ernst John Krass, SoH

Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm

Attached: copy of the February 16, 2013 Simple Yes or No Question put in place by Canadas Charter document; November 30, 2012 letter from Our Majesty Queen Elizabeth II; My Application for Constitutional Remedy that was emailed to Premier Christy Clark on February 6, 2012 and which contains my contact information at the end of the document; annotated pages 1, 3 and 5 of the Executives January 22, 2013 response to my Petition; February 9, 2013 letter tying constitutional remedies to s. 7 of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms; February 18, 2013 one page letter exposing the new definition for The Right to Liberty; annotated 1934 Preamble to Canadas Centralized Banking Act that is current today Hyperlinks for those receiving a faxed copy of this document: the Simple Yes or No Question put in place by Canadas Charter document https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=76d01868d933a2ac#cid=76D01868D933A2AC&id=76D01868D933A2A C%21779

3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1

Page 4 of 5

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm
the Why the unconstitutional declining of The Charter imposed positions by the Executives document https://skydrive.live.com/?cid=76d01868d933a2ac#cid=76D01868D933A2AC&id=76D01868D933A2A C%21786

3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1

Page 5 of 5

Page 1 of 1

ejk-soh@hotmail.com
From: Date: To: Attach: Subject: <ejk-soh@hotmail.com> Saturday, February 16, 2013 1:16 PM "Hon. Christy Clark" <premier@gov.bc.ca> p1-4 of Governor General fax informing him of the Yes, No Charter imposed reality.pdf; p1-4 of Simple yes or no response fax sent to Lt.-Governor of BC.pdf; Simple Yes or No Reality put in place by The Charter.pdf Simple Yes or No to the power of s. 7 of Canada's Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Dear Premier Clark: I mistakenly sent the previous email without the attachments. I apologize for that error and this email corrects the omissions. Today, I composed a simple yes or no Charter imposed question that the attachments affirm was sent to the Governor General and the Lt.-Governor. I have enclosed a copy of the question along with its supporting documents so that everyone within the administration is on the same page. In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen. Ernst John Krass Applicant for constitutional remedy relative to Petition no. 95750 and s. 7 and 24 (1) of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms

2/16/2013

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm February 16, 2013

Premier Christy Clark et al. - The Executives - by email after being faxed Lt.-Gov. Judith Guichon by fax

RE:

Simple Yes or No Position put in place by Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms

Dear Sirs: On February 12, 2013, I submitted a fax outlining that my matters in Petition no. 95750 are wholly a constitutional remedy matter and, to put this matter properly into context, I emailed my application for constitutional remedy concerning Petition no. 95750 as well as the constitutional remedy to the Hon. Christy Clark on February 6, 2012. Given that the attached November 30th, 2012 letter from Our Majesty defines the role of Our Majesty and her representatives as that of a constitutional sovereign and, as I have filed an application for constitutional remedy and put forth the constitutional remedy, I have the right to know whether Our Majestys representative will now comply with Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Constitutional Questions Act and force the Executive Branch of the Administration to accede to The Charter imposed positions NOW and end the outrageous fortune that has been imposed by the Executives once and for all. The answer now can only be yes or no because Our Majesty is bound to the functioning of s. 7 of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms and I have the right to be liberated from the economic civilization imposed by the Executives when the NO CODE Regulations existence is found in the medical reporting and Dr. Kevin J. Pistawka, cardiologist, wrote: It was felt that he (Rudi Krass - my dad) would be at high risk for re-operation with morbidity mortality and it was suggested that he be managed conservatively... I do not think that there is too much to offer (Rudi and his family) and I think that we are getting close to the stage where this gentleman simply needs palliation, i.e. to be put down: hence, the unconstitutional NO CODE Regulation was imposed! Thus, is Our Majestys answer going to be force the Executive to accede to the constitutional position (yes) or terminate Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the functioning of s. 7 of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms and the Constitutional Remedy provision of the Constitutional Questions Act of British Columbia - s. 8(2)(b) - forevermore, with a no response? 3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1
Page 1 of 2

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm Praise be unto God Almighty in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

Ernst John Krass, SoH

Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm

Attached: November 30, 2012 letter from Our Majesty Queen Elizabeth II; My Application for Constitutional Remedy that was emailed to Premier Christy Clark on February 6, 2012 and which contains my contact information at the end of the document; February 9, 2013 letter tying constitutional remedies to s. 7 of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms

3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1

Page 2 of 2

BUCKINGHAM PALACE

30th November,2012

Dear Mr Krass, The Queen has asked me to thank you for your letter of 30th October, and to say that Her Majesty has taken careful note of the views you express.
Perhaps I might explain, however, that this is not a matter in which The Queen would intervene. As a constitutional Sovereign, Her Majesty acts through her personal representative, the Governor-General, on the advice of her Canadian Ministers and it is to them that your appeal should be directed.

May I, nevertheless, take this opportunity of sending you my good wishes in the future. Yours sincerely,

Mrs. Sonia Bonici Senior Correspondence Officer

Mr Ernst John Krass"

Application for Constitutional Remedy

Premier Christy Clark and the Executives

For the relief from the DENIAL of s. 7 of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms pertaining to the wrongful death of Rudi Heinz Krass by Kelowna General Hospital

as presented in Ernst John Krass Petition to the Supreme Court no. 95750
to be heard at .

Take notice that, pursuant to s. 52 (1), s. 24 (1), and s. 7 of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms, the constitutional remedy being sought in this matter relates to the NO CODE Regulation imposed by Kelowna General Hospital that lead to the wrongful death of Rudi Heinz Krass. The pertinent words from s. 29 of the neutral citation 2003 SCC 54 quote are: 29 From this principle of constitutional supremacy also flows, as a practical corollary, the idea that Canadians should be entitled to assert the rights and freedoms that the Constitution guarantees them in the most accessible forum available, without the need for parallel proceedings before the courts: see Douglas College, supra, at pp. 603-604. S. 52 (1) of The Charter functions as follows as taken from s. 28 of the neutral citation 2003 SCC 54: 28 First, and most importantly, the Constitution is, under s. 52(1) of the Constitution Act, 1982, "the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect". The invalidity of a legislative provision

inconsistent with the Charter does not arise from the fact of its being declared unconstitutional by a court, but from the operation of s. 52(1). Thus, in principle, such a provision is invalid from the moment it is enacted, and a judicial declaration to this effect is but one remedy amongst others to protect those whom it adversely affects. In that sense, by virtue of s. 52(1), the question of constitutional validity inheres in every legislative enactment. Courts may not apply invalid laws, and the same obligation applies to every level and branch of government, including the administrative organs of the state. (And now lawyers, bankers, and all others which means you!)

The Constitutional Question in this matter goes as follows:

Constitutional Reality
Does the NO CODE regulation imposed by internal medical regulation DENY Everyone their God Given Right to Life, Liberty and Security of Person AND the right not to be DEPRIVED of the right to life, liberty and security of person EXCEPT in accordance with The Principles of Fundamental Justice - s. 7 of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms?

Yes!
Does the NO CODE regulation imposed by internal medical regulation DENY the medical and ethical obligation of Do No Harm while letting people die without providing simple intravenous feeding and hydration along with other simple transfusions?

Yes!
As an unanimous conclusion, the NO CODE Regulation is found to be of no effect, invalid, not saved and a gross DENIAL of every reasonable code and The Charter of Rights and Freedoms, s. 7 of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms - Everyones LEGAL Rights, which, therefore, demands that simple lifesaving measures MUST ALWAYS be applied so that all persons will have the chance to defy the predictions of the administrators and those making the assumptions and then making the outcome a foregone conclusion through DENIAL of Everyones personal need for hydration and nutrition and rejuvenating internal organs to restart their nature regenerative process.

The Adverse Affects of this undeniable breach of Rudi Heinz Krass Right to life, liberty and security of person through an unconstitutional NO CODE Regulation is that not only is Rudi Heinz Krass dead at the hands of Kelowna General Hospital but also Ernst John Krass, his dependent, saw and knew that his dad, Rudi Heinz Krass, was being murdered but was absolutely helpless to change the outcome which is cruel and unusual treatment as it depraved Ernst John Krass of psychological integrity. Ernst John Krass is now deprived of the presence of the support of his loving dad, Rudi Heinz Krass, who was the sole financial support of Ernst John Krass, due to the DENIAL of Rudi Heinz Krasss s. 7 Charter Rights. This matter is a foregone conclusion given the Full Disclosure medical information and their words as there is no doubt that both Rudi Heinz Krass and Ernst John Krass Rights to life, liberty and security of person have been DENIED and DEPRIVED in this matter which is outlined in Petition to the Court document no. 95750, Kelowna Registry. The term NO CODE in hospital records is the medical communitys means of declaring the deceased as having been a medical mistake thereby informing the reader that they qualify for a constitutional remedy of the administrations DENIAL of their right to life, liberty and security of person/out of court settlement and the systems means for recognizing its need to remedy the DENIAL of the most basic of Charter Rights - the right to life and security of person. The relief for the DENIAL of security of person is based upon s. 10 of the January 22, 2013 response to my Notice of Constitutional Question on Petition no. 95677 by Richard Butler which affirms that Security of person is limited under jurisprudence to bodily harm and psychological integrity. On February 4, 2013, the judge at the hearing dismissed The Supremacy of God as being a concept having no authority. Thus, the judgment of the unconstitutional NO CODE Regulation in this matter is controlled by me under negotiation plus this fact proves that Canada is corrupt because no law is as a decree from Henri VIII concerning the flatness or roundness of the earth and beyond correction by pure fact Truth. The premature death from the premeditated actions of the Kelowna General Hospital medical staff clearly DENIED Rudi Heinz Krass his right to life and DENIED me my right to security of person according to jurisprudence standards especially since the documents show that, upon return from St. Pauls Hospital on December 15, 2011, Rudi Krass and I were told that we, KGH, will do our best with our medical therapy, but we cannot remove the compressive effects from his right ventricle and as such, he will always have some difficulties and need to be careful in regards to these issues. (Exhibit E of the Petition no. 95750) There is now undeniable evidence from The Province of British Columbia that jurisprudence recognizes the DENIAL of security of person as it pertains to bodily harm and psychological integrity while premeditated death is dealt with plainly by the right to life. Thus, this application for

constitutional remedy is neither without foundation nor is scandalous nor vexatious and therefore does not constitute a frivolous lawsuit. To plan the murder of someone over whom you have medical authority is premeditated murder and is never supposed to occur in Canada or anywhere while the medical reporting affirms it was undertaken concerning Rudi Heinz Krass. The DENIAL of the Right Life and Security of Person is fully supported concerning not only Rudi Heinz Krass but also Ernst John Krass. If I had conspired to have done these actions, I would have been charged and convicted of murder by now and The Province of British Columbia knows that. Plus, the constitutional questions act of British Columbia confirms that, for this corruption, there is a constitutional remedy open for all persons to keep the proof of the scheme beyond the eyes of the general public. I have proposed a constitutional remedy in this matter which I hope is responded to quickly by the Executive without having a court arbitrate in this matter and the evidence being produced for the general public thereby disclosing the heretofore well hidden constitutional remedies and forcing negotiations with the Executives so that they accede to the demands of the realities. The matters in Petition no. 95750 are wholly constitutional that demand a negotiated constitutional remedy for the wrongful death of Rudi Heinz Krass at the hands of Kelowna General Hospital and the resulting DENIAL of my rights to security of person as clearly defined by jurisprudence. The Constitutional Questions Act was prepared to insure that those whose rights as guaranteed by s. 7 of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms are to be granted their constitutional remedy given their discovery of this special but highly hidden and secretive process. Refusal to accede means that you must negotiate until a remedy is found and not force people through court! The Right to life, liberty and security of person are the only rights that all Canadians have and, with the Executive adopting an economy based civilization, the only real means for attaining liberty is a very good constitutional remedy package consisting of a high monetary payout as that relieves those harmed from having to deal with the ongoing demands of the Ponzi scheme civilization while flying under the radar by paying the imposed bills for many decades as in my case as I am only 46 but suffering from a job injury that the Executive knows about and DENIED the cure down in Los Angeles repeatedly since 1996 through today as the Executive had this well hidden constitutional remedy awaiting me but only if I got this far.

Praise be unto God Almighty in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

Ernst John Krass, SoH Spokesperson for THE FREE SOCIETY OF EQUALS and Its Truth based Realm

Address:

3929 Woodell Road WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1

Phone:

(250) 768-5150

DATE: February 6, 2012

Reading materials: page 5 of Richard Butlers January 22, 2013 response to Constitutional Question on file no. 95677

Court File No. 95677 Kelowna Registry

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF BRITISH COLUIIBIA

Between:

ERNST JOHN KRASS

PETITIONER

and

Representatives of The Executive Branches of the Provinces

THE PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA HONOURABLE PREMIER CHRISTY GLARK HONOURABLE SHIRLEY BOND, TUIINISTER OF JUSTICE AND ATTORNEY GENERAL OF BRITISH COLUil'IBIA

RESPONDENTS

RESPONSE TO NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL QUEST'ON

Filed

by:

The Attorney General of British Columbia

THIS lS A RESPONSE TO the notice of constitutional question dated ,for hearing

February 4,2013, and delivered on January 15,2013

Part 1:

ORDERS GONSENT TO

The Attorney General consents to the granting ,of the relief sought in the following
paragraphs of notice of constitutionalquestion: nil

Part 2'.

ORDERS OPPOSED

The Attorney General opposes the granting of the relief sought in all paragraph(s) of the notice of constitutional question.

-J-

,l

6,

From time to time while these proceedings have been pending, including at some

points on a daily basis, the petitioner has provided the respondents with a deluge

of emails, filings and other communications of purported relevance to

constitutional question.

these

proceedings, including successive unfiled versions of the petition and notices of

7. ln response, the respondents through counsel first declined to accede to the

positions asserted in those documents and then declined to read anything other than what was filed in evidence.

8. On January 15, 2013, the petitioner delivered notice of hearing of the petition. 9. ln a Ietter dated January
17, 2013, delivered to the petitioner with a copy to the

court file, the Attorney General through counsel put the petitioner on notice as to

what proceeding was to be the subject of the hearing, on the basis of what
pleadings and on what filed evidence, and advised the Attorney General would object to anything else being considered at the hearing.

Part

5:

LEGAL BASIS

lntroduction

Constitutional Sovereign means having produced an Application for Constitutional Remedy and having served it along with the Privative Contract on The Executive and The Governor General
response

1. The Attorney General appears as of right in

constitutional question and notice of hearing.

to the notice

of

ConstitutionalQuestion Acf, R.S.B.C. 1996, c. 68, s. 8

2.

The petitioner appears to submit that he has a constitutional right to receive an

inheritance under his late falher's

will. That right is alleged to arise pursuant to

some mixture of Charter sections 11(d), 7 and 12.

-5-

Here, the petitioner apparently considers that not receiving money he may
otherwise have inherited under his late father's witl constitutes a deprivation of
Charter-protected security of the person

The Right of Liberty since 1934

!securityofthepersonwasinitiatly'.*i,"oIbodilysecurit5
and later expanded to include the protection of psychological integrity. lt has been argued that it should also be extended to state adion which deprives a person of arr or

"'ro:H,iflfi"E$HtBli*[6gE

ro

produce an income.

11. For example, in Gosselh, it was argued that section 7 imposed on govemment a positive obligation to provide adequate welfare beneftts to those who were without other sources of income. The plaintiff in that case had been unable to participate in'wokfare", a prerequisite for income assistance benefits. While the majority of the Supreme Court lefl open the possibility that Charter sedion 7 security of the percon may, in some circumstances and on sufficient evidence, be extended to include financialsecurity, that invitation has not yet been accepted
by the courts.

v Quebec 2002 SCC 84; see Melanson v New Brunswick (Attomey General) 2007 NBCA 12, at para. 20 and 21; contrast Victoria (City) v Adams 2009 BCCA 563, at para. 95.
Gosse/r,h 12. Professor Hogg notes that, unlike the due proce$s clauses in the United States

Constitution, property rights were not included in the protedion provided under
Charter section to

7.

So, for example, that section contains no protection in

E*r-*hw* rlor-rt He conctudes that the terms

relation
&DDl

Nobody owns "liberty" and "security of the person" in Charter section 7 should "be interpreted anything in as excluding economic tiberty and economic security [as] otherwise property Canada!
Quebec t1989] 1 S.C.R. 927,

having been shut out of the front door, would enter by the baek [citing lrwin Toy v

1003f'. p.Anrl[,a,.r .S Uo.ytr SrL--- La--,-

^S-\cfud

Hogg, Constitutional Law of Canada (5h suppl.) pp. 47-12

- 47-18.

13. Moreover, the only evidence in the case at bar of alleged deprivation arising from

the irnpugned provisions of the Wills Act and Esfafe Admini$ration Act is that

With the Executives owning everything and giving the illusion of ownership, God has been abolished because He alone owns this planet, this solar system and galaxy and its processes that we are discovering and all religions recognize property rights because God/Allah/The Great Spirit/ etc. acknowledged this standard: the world was never round as the Executives previously claimed!

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm February 9, 2013

Premier Christy Clark et al. - The Executives Lt.-Gov. Judith Guichon

RE:

How constitutional remedy is tied to s. 7 of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms Everyones Legal Rights

Dear Sirs: S. 7 of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms are Canadians only real Legal Rights that are binding on the Executives as well as Our Majesty Queen Elizabeth II, Defender of The Faith. S. 7 of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms reads as follows: Everyone has the Right to life, liberty and security of person... Life and death are easily determined and, in my application for constitutional remedy and the provided remedy, it is established that there is a Canada wide medical regulation called NO CODE where, when invoked, the medical staff are prohibited from providing intravenous nutrition and hydration even though it must be provided to save the life of those given a drug to which a known negative reaction was going to result - premeditated murder. Canadians in general dont know of this NO CODE Regulations existence because, if they knew, then, they would no longer seek medical attention nor live their lives within this economy based civilization. So, life has been expunged from s. 7 of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms and those whom the NO CODE Regulation touches fall under s. 24 (1) of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms. In s. 10 of the Executives January 22, 2013 response to one of my petitions, the Executives provided clear evidence that security of person is limited in jurisprudence to bodily harm and psychological integrity. My application for constitutional remedy and the constitutional remedy fully expound on how those watching their loved ones being premeditatively murdered by medical personnel of the provinces have their psychological integrity destroyed especially if they are knowledgeable enough to know what is going on and helpless to do Right because of the NO CODE Regulation being entered into the medical records. Thus far, the right to life and security of person have been affirmed to have been DENIED 3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1
Page 1 of 3

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm by the Executives in the wrongful death of Rudi Heinz Krass as well as relative to the life of Ernst John Krass since he was born in 1966 - 6 years after property rights and God were dismissed by the Executives making them into the Aristocracy of old. But, what then is liberty? Well, as the economy based civilization is the result of an enactment of the Executives in 1934 where the Central Bank is their agent overseeing the implementation of goods and services above all else, then, by its existence Constitutional Remedy is the means of liberating those whose rights to life and security of person were DENIED according to s. 24 (1) of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms with significant financial redress. As such, I have every Right now to expect the Executives finally to accede to the constitutional remedy put to them relative to the matters embodied in Petition no. 95750 with the Supreme Court of British Columbia even though the demand for filing the petition was nothing more than a negotiating ploy so that I would have to find constitutional remedy in the Constitutional Questions Act in order to obtain the liberty from the economy based civilization once and for all and forevermore: I am only 46 years old and was 45 when I was forced to watch my dad being euthanised with my hands tied behind my back. The Executives are in possession of my Application for Constitutional Remedy and my Constitutional Remedy that complies fully with s. 7 of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms as well as s. 24 (1) of Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms. I would like this matter finally resolved quickly and quietly because that is the only proper course going forward due to Canadas Charter of Rights and Freedoms. Any further negotiating tactics and I will take everything public forthwith without any notification of the Executives so that Everyone learns of Constitutional Remedy and how they qualify for them all the way back to 1982. The Constitutional Questions Act - s. 8 (2) (b), s. 9 (1) and s. 8 (3) - and s. 52 (1) of The Charter of Rights and Freedoms makes it absolutely clear that I have every right to expect my constitutional remedies to be acceded to and without any further delay by the Executives! The pertinent words from s. 29 of the neutral citation 2003 SCC 54 quote are: 29 From this principle of constitutional supremacy also flows, as a practical corollary, the idea that Canadians should be entitled to assert the rights and freedoms that the Constitution guarantees them in the most accessible forum available, without the need for parallel proceedings before the courts: see Douglas College, supra, at pp. 603-604. The role of the Lt.-Governor is to insure that governance remains in place regardless of its failings which is why I have sent this document to the Hon. Judith Guichon. 3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1

Page 2 of 3

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm Praise be unto God Almighty in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

Ernst John Krass, SoH

Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm

Attached: Page 3 and 5 of the January 22, 2013 response to my Petition no. 95677; annotated page 2 of the 1934 Banking Act

3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1

Page 3 of 3

Page 1 of 1

ejk-soh@hotmail.com
From: Date: To: Attach: Subject: <ejk-soh@hotmail.com> Monday, February 18, 2013 6:59 AM "Kerry Kennedy" <info@rfkcenter.org>; "Hon. Christy Clark" <premier@gov.bc.ca>; "Tim Louman-Gardiner" <tlouman-gardiner@farris.com>; <rsloman@farris.com>; <adrian.dix.mla@leg.bc.ca> Governor General fax with Liberty equation.pdf; Lt-Governor fax with Liberty Equation.pdf; Ultrasimple equation for liberty.pdf Right to Liberty equation produced

Dear Sirs: This is the evidence for which everyone has been looking and here it is in a very simple format for you to see. I hope that The Executives now accede to my Application for Constitutional Remedy from February 6, 2013. All the demands upon me have been met! In the Name of Jesus Christ, Amen, Ernst John Krass Self Applicant for His Right to Liberty

2/18/2013

Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH

Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of Medicine Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm February 18, 2013

The Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. Organization Premier Christy Clark et al. - The Executives - by email after being faxed to the Lt.-Governor Lt.-Gov. Judith Guichon by fax Tim Louman-Gardiner and Robert Sloman, legal representatives for The Toronto Dominion Bank Adrian Dix, Leader of the Opposition New Democrats of British Columbia

RE:

Simple equation for liberty that was hidden by the Executive

Dear Sirs: Y B Y C DENIAL of security of person - psychological integrity Y D DENIAL of life - NO CODE Regulation DENIAL of security of person - bodily harm Liberty demanded through Application of Constitutional Remedy

Right to Liberty in this sense means financial independence without limitation when an economic civilization is imposed - Preamble to Canadas Banking Act - and the Executive must accede! This is the evidence that everyone has been looking for but could not tell me about because I had to discover it on my own in order to free all mankind with the gift of my knowledge from beyond the economic civilization. Knowing this does NOT make me any happier or engender psychological integrity because the discovery was at great cost to me and, only by Gods Grace, have I been able to keep myself together against this onslaught.

Praise be unto God Almighty in the name of Jesus Christ, Amen.

Ernst John Krass, SoH

Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm

3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1

Page 1 of 1

i)Ol i"-lit-i *Tt

.e

?*"&

E ^d,.-"r

"t T{^* F"-i{-t^

LOI SURLABANQUE DU CANADA

B-2
An Act respecting the Bank of Canada
Preamble WHEREAS it is desirable to establish a central bank in Can adato regulate credit and currency in the best interests of the economic life of the nation, to control and protect the external value of the national monetary unit and to mitigate by its influence fluctuations in the general level of production, trade, prices and employment, so far as may be possible within the scope of monetary action, and generally to promote the economic and financial welfare of
Canada;

B-2 Loi concernant la Banque du Canada

Pr6ambule
Considdrant qu'il est opportun d'instituer une banque centrale pour rdglementer le cr6dit et la monnaie dans I'int6r0t de la vie 6conomique de la nation, pour contr0ler et prot6ger la valeur de la monnaie nationale sur les marchds internationaux, pour att5nuer, autarrt que possible par I'action mondtaire,les fluctuations du niveau gdndral de la production, du commerce, des prix et de I'emploi, et de fagon gdnercle pour favoriser la prospdrite dconomique et financidre du
Canada,
-2

Mammon/the pursuit of wealth - monetary policy dies in 2008 so the ideal of the economy is dead!
l'avis et avec le consentement du la Chambre des communes du Canada, Sdnat et de ddicte :
Sa Majest6, sur

THEREFORE,

SHORT TITLE
Short title

TITRE ABREGE Titre abr6g6

as the Bank

Act may be cited Canada Act .

1. This
R.S .)

of

l. Loi sur la Banque du Canada .

S.R., ch. B-2, art.

c.B-2, s. 1.

l.

INTERPRETATION
Definitions

DEFINITIONS
D6finitions
2. Les ddfinitions qui suivent s'appliquent d la
prdsente loi.

2.In this Act,

"autho rized foreign bank"

<<banque dtrangdre autorisde
>>

<administrateuD)
"

director"

Page 2

r0/08/2008