Professional Documents
Culture Documents
EXPLICIT FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD FOR THE FRACTIONAL NON-LINEAR WAVE EQUATION WITH THE RIESZ FRACTIONAL DERIVATIVE
N. H. SWEILAM1 & T. A. ASSIRI2
1 2
ABSTRACT
In this paper, the explicit finite difference method (EFDM) for solving nonlinear fractional wave equation is considered. The stability and convergence of the method are discussed by means of Greschgorin theorem and using the stability matrix analysis. Numerical studies for a model is presented to confirm the accuracy and the effectiveness of the proposed method. The obtained results are compared with exact solutions. It is found that the proposed method is simple and efficient for such nonlinear problem.
KEYWORDS: Explicit Finite Difference Method, Fractional Wave Equation, Riesz Fractional Derivative, Stability
Matrix Analysis, Greschgorin Theorem
INTRODUCTION
Fractional order differential equations (FDE) have been the focus of many studies due to their frequent appearance in various applications especially in the fields of fluid mechanics, viscoelasticity, biology, physics and engineering ([4]-[7], [14], and the references cited therein). Consequently, considerable attention has been given to the solutions of fractional ordinary/partial differential equations of physical interest. Most fractional differential equations do not have exact solutions, so approximation and numerical techniques ([6] - [14]) must be used. In this work the explicit finite difference method (FDM) is presented to study the fractional order wave equation with a nonlinear source term. The fractional derivative is described in Riesz sense. Especial attentions are given to study the stability analysis and the convergence of the method. Numerical test example is presented to show the efficiency of the method. In the following the generalized Riesz fractional derivative definition, when the order 1 < 2, is introduced.
DEFINITION
The Rizes fractional derivative is defined as follows [1]:
R f (x ) =
sec( 2 ) 1 d 2 ( (2 ) 2 dx 2
f ( )d 1 d2 + ( ) ( x ) 1 2 dx 2
( )
f ( )d
( x ) 1
) = x ,
where x (a, b) . THEOREM 1 (Gerschgorin theorem) Let the matrix A = (anm ) has eigenvalues and define the absolute row and column sums respectively by:
rn =
k = 0, k n
an, k ,
cm =
k = 0, k m
ak , m ,
194
then each eigenvalue lies in the union of the row circles Rn , n = 1,2,..., N , where
Rn = {z : z ann rn } ,
each eigenvalue lies in the union of the row circles Cm , m = 1,2,..., N , where
Cm = {z : z amm cm }.
PROOF. see ([8]).
2u t 2
= x R u ( x, t ) + f (u, x, t ),
u ( x,0) = ( x ), ut ( x,0) = ( x ) , u (b, t ) = 2 ( x ) , a x b, 0 t T,
Let us assume that the function f (u , x, t ) is nonlinear and satisfies the Lipschitz condition i.e.,
f (u1 , x, t ) f (u 2 , x, t ) L u1 u 2 ,
and for simplify , let us assume A = sec(
).
Then using the generalized of the Riesz fractional derivative we can rewrite equation (1) in the following form
2u A d 2 u ( , t )d d 2 u ( , t )d = ( + ) = x + f (u , x , t ) . t 2 (2 ) d 2 ( ) 1 d 2 ( ) 1 a
(4)
In the following, the EFDM notion and the shifted Grnwald formula are introduced. First, the relationship between the Grnwald Letnikov and Riemann - Liouville fractional derivatives [8] to approximate the integrals in Riesz fractional derivative definition is given as follows:
[ h ] 1 d 2 u ( , t )d ( ) = L im h ( 1) j 2 1 h0 j =0 ( 2 ) d a ( )
x a
u ( x jh , t ) ,
(5)
an d
[ b x ] h 1 d 2 b u ( , t )d ( ) = L im h ( 1) j u ( x + jh , t ) . 1 2 j =0 ( 2 ) d ( ) h0 j
(6 )
For the numerical approximation of equations (5), (6), pick an integers m, T > 0, define the space step size
h=
ba m
Explicit Finite Difference Method for the Fractional Non-Linear Wave Equation with the Riesz Fractional Derivative
195
From the shifted Grnwald formula [4] for the fractional derivative approximation, we can rewrite equations (5) and (6) in the following forms
1 d 2 ( (2 ) d 2 an d 1 d 2 ( (2 ) d 2
u ( , t )d ) = x i h ( ) 1
i +1
i| + 1 k u ( x i , t j ) ,
(7 )
k =0
u ( , t )d ) = x i +1 h ( ) 1
k = i 1
k ( i 1) u ( x i , t j ) m ,
(8 )
where = ( 1) k . k
j
Substituting equations (7), (8) into (4), and using EFDM we get:
u ij+1 2u ij + u ij1 = A h i+1 k u ij + A h
k =0 i +1
k = i 1
k ( i 1)u ij + f i j ,
(9)
(10)
(11)
where i = 1,..., m 1,
j j let U j = (u m 1 , um 2 ,..., u1j )T , and
j = 1,..., n 1.
j j Ar0 um + Arm u0j Ar2 um j j Arm 1u0 Ar3 um . . j B = . . + . . j Ar3 u0j Arm 1um j Ar u j + Ar u j Ar2 u0 m m 0 0
1 P j = Ar 0 .
2 1
. 0
0 1 . ...
3 . . . 1 + Ar 2 . . . 2
0 1
.
3
0 ... 0 . . . + 2 I m 1 . ... 2 1
(12)
1 0 From (2), we have ui0 = 1 ( xi ) and ui ui = 2 ( xi ), for i = 0,1,..., N . System (12) can be written in the following matrix form
196
U j +1 = P jU j U j 1 + B j + F j .
(13)
The following lemmas will be used to derive the stability condition of the scheme (13). Lemma 1 The procedure that used to replace the integrals in Riesz definition by finite sums in equations (7), (8) is of order
O (h ) :
i +1 1 d 2 u ( , t )d ( 2 ) = h i+1 k u ( xi , t j ) + O(h) , | 1 = xi ( 2 ) d a ( ) k =0
and
m 1 d 2 b u ( , t ) d ( 2 ) = h k (i 1) u ( xi , t j ) + O (h) . 1 = xi +1 ( 2 ) d ( ) k = i 1
The coefficients k = (1) k , for 1 < < 2, and k = 0,1,... , satisfy the following conditions: j
0 = 1. 1 < 0 and k > 0 for any k > 1. 1 + 2 + . . . = 0 .
t = t j +1 is denoted by e j +1 = U
j +1
PROOF
j j when F j = diag (( 2 Lm 1 ,.., 2 L1`)T ). Noting that Lij L, for any i, j. Then
Explicit Finite Difference Method for the Fractional Non-Linear Wave Equation with the Riesz Fractional Derivative
197
Pj
= max ( Arm (i 1) + ... + Ar3 + Ar0 + Ar2 + Ar1 + Ar1 + 2 + Ar2 + Ar0
1 i m 1
for any i, j.
From
is holds when
2h . A ( + )
Under this condition, and using the infinite norm definition, we claim
Pj = 2 + Ar i + Ar
i =0 k +1 m ( k 1) i =0
i ,
i + Ar
i=k +2
i 2
i = m ( k 2)
Since
i ,
i=k +2
i 0 , so when 2
i = m ( k 2)
2 h , A ( + )
e j +1
P j + F j (1 + ) e j = s1 e j
ej
+ e j 1
+ C ( 2 + h)
+ e j 1
+ C ( 2 + h)
+ e j 1
+ s2
We have
s1 ( s1 e j 1
+ e j 2
+ s2 ) + e j 1
+ s2
2 + s2 ( s1 + s1 + 2)
3 ( s1 + 2 s1 )( s1 e j 3
+ e j4
2 + s 2 ) + ( s1 + 1) e j 3
.... C k e j k .... C N 1 e1
+ Ck 1 e j k 1 + C N 2 e0
+ s 2 (C k 1 + C k 2 + C k 3 + C k 4 )
+ s2 (C N 1 + C N 2 + C N 3 + C N 4 ).
k = 0,1,..., N ,
C0 = 1, C1 = s.
Then we have
+ C N 2 e0 + s2 (C N 1 + C N 2 + C N 3 + C N 4 )
e j +1
C N 1 e 0
O ( 2 + h).
198
W 0 and U 0 , respectively.
THEOREM 3 W PROOF
j +1
j +1
C1W
f o r an y j , w h en 2
2 h . A ( + )
where
( 2 + 2 L), when
2
j +1
Then
( 2 + 2 L)
j 1
j +1
s (s
2
j 1 j 1
+ e j2
) + e j 1
(s + 1 )
3
+s
j 2 2 j 3 0
(s + 2s ) .... Ck
j 2
+ ( s + 1)
j k 1
+ Ck 1 + CN 2
j k 1
.... C N 1
Such that
Ck = sCk 1 + Ck ,
k = 0,1,..., N ,
C0 = 1, C1 = s. 0
, where
Then
j +1
C N 1 0
+ CN 2 0
C 0
Therefore, for the system (13), if there is a perturbation in U 0 , the small change would not cause large error in the numerical solution. Then the system (13) is stable when
2h . A ( + )
Explicit Finite Difference Method for the Fractional Non-Linear Wave Equation with the Riesz Fractional Derivative
199
NUMERICAL RESULTS
Example : Consider the following non linear fractional wave equation
2 u ( x, t ) t 2
with = 1.5 , where f (u , x, t ) =
= 0.5 cos( / 2) x R u ( x, t ) + f (u , x, t ),
2u t +1
2
(t 2 + 1)(
16 x 2 6 x 3 ), (3 ) ( 4 )
and u ( x,0) = x 2 (8 x), ut ( x,0) = 0, where 0 x 8, T = 1. let = 1, = 0. The exact solution of the this problem is u ( x, t ) = x 2 (8 x)(t 2 + 1). In the following, a comparison between the numerical and the exact solutions using the method given above with
h = 0.04 and = 0.005 at t = 0.15 is presented in table (1) and it shown in figure(1), and figure(2) the numerical solution
in 3-D.
Table 1: Absolute Error between the Exact the Approximate Solution
x 0.0000 0.4000 0.8000 1.2000 1.6000 2.0000 2.4000 2.8000 3.2000 3.6000 4.0000 4.4000 4.8000 5.2000 5.6000 6.0000 6.4000 6.8000 7.2000 7.6000 8.0000
Absolute Error 0.00000000 0.00023054 0.00101979 0.00220045 0.00369367 0.00541511 0.00727923 0.00920005 0.01109142 0.01286710 0.01444079 0.01572615 0.01663686 0.01708654 0.01698883 0.01625734 0.01480572 0.01254756 0.00939648 0.00526609 0.00000000
200
Figure 1: Comparison between the Exact Solution and Solution and the Approximate Solution
Figure 2: Comparison between the Exact Solution and the Approximate Solution in 3-D
is not satisfied, the results showed in figure(3), we note that the numerical solution is unstable.
Figure 3
Explicit Finite Difference Method for the Fractional Non-Linear Wave Equation with the Riesz Fractional Derivative
201
CONCLUSIONS
In this paper, EFDM with Riesz fractional definition for solving the nonlinear fractional wave equation is presented. The stability and the convergence of the method are proved. Numerical test example is given and the results obtained by the method are compared with the exact solutions. The comparison certifies that EFDM gives good results. Summarizing these results, we can say that EFDM in its general form gives a reasonable calculations, easy to use and can be applied for the nonlinear fractional differential equations . All results obtained by using MATLAB version 7.1 .
REFERENCES
1. Cem celik, Melda Duman, Crank-Nicolson method for the fractional equation with the Riesz fractional derivative, Journal of computational physics 231 (2012)1743-1750. 2. D. Ingman, J. Suzdalnitsky, and M. Zeifman, Constitutive Dynamic Order Model for Nonlinear Contact Phenomena, Journal of Applied Mechanics, 67, 2, 383-390,( 2000). 3. D. Ingman , J. Suzdalnitsky, Application of Differential Operator With Servo-Order Function in Model of Viscoelastic Process, Journal of Engineering Mechanics, 131, 7, 763- 767, (2005). 4. H. Jafari and V. Daftardar-Gejji, Solving linear and nonlinear fractional diffusion and wave equations by Adomian decomposition, Appl. Math. and Comput., 180, (488-497), 2006. 5. 6. I. Podlubny ,Fractional Differential Equations , Acadeic press,(1999). J. H. He, Approximate analytical solution for seepage flow with fractional derivatives in porous media, Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, 167(1-2), (57-68),1998. 7. N. H. Sweilam, M. M. Khader and R. F. Al-Bar, Numerical studies for a multi-order fractional differential equation, Physica Letters A, 371, (26-33), 2007. 8. N. H. Sweilam, A. M. Nagy, Numerical solution of fractional wave equation using crank- Nicolson method, Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics 235, 28322841, 2011. 9. N. H. Sweilam, M. M. Khader and A. M. Nagy, Numerical solution of two-sided space fractional wave equation using finite difference method, world applied sciences Journal 13, 7175, 2011.
202
10. N. H. Sweilam, M. M. Khader, and A.M.S. Mahd , Crank Nicolson Finite Difference Method for Solving Time-Fractional Diffusion Equation, Journal of Fractional Calculus and Applications, Vol. 2., No. 2, 1-9, 2012. 11. N. H. Sweilam, M. M. Khader, and T. A. Assiri, Efficient Numerical Treatment for Fractional Partial Differential Equations, Nonlinear Sci. Lett.A, Vol.2, No.4, 181-189, 2011. 12. M. M. Meerschaert and C. Tadjeran, Finite difference approximations for fractional advection-dispersion flow equations, J. Comput. Appl. Math. 172(1), (65-77), 2004. 13. M. M. Meerschaert and C. Tadjeran, Finite difference approximations for two-sided space-fractional partial differential equations, Appl. Numer. Math. 56, (80-90), 2006. 14. R. L. Bagley and P.J. Torvik, On the appearance of the fractional derivative in the behavior of real materials, J. Appl. Mech., 51,(294-298), 1984. 15. R. Lin, F. Liu, V. Anh , I. Turner, Stability and Convergence of a New Explicit Finite-Difference Approximation for the Variable-Order Nonlinear Fractional Diffusion Equation, Applied Mathematics and Computation, 212, 435445, (2009).