Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Subhadip Mitra subhadip.mitra@jmfl.com Tel: (91 22) 66303088 Abhishek Anand abhishek.anand@jmfl.com Tel: (91 22) 66303067 Sandeep Tulsiyan sandeep.tulsiyan@jmfl.com Tel: (91 22) 66303085
Decisions of CCEA: a) Plants commissioned after 31 Mar09 to receive imported coal at a pooled price, Pre 31 Mar09 plants get CIL coal at notified prices; b) 16GW with No LoAs and expected by FY15 not included in pooling; c) pooling effective for FY14 and FY15, further decision after review. CEAs proposed Options pooling mechanism (Exhibit 1): 1.Restricting pooling to category (a) of 60GW of projects expected by FY15 (as per CEA report of Feb12) - raises pooled coal costs by `606/T and power costs by 42p/kWh in FY14. 2.Adds category (b)-7GW (additional projects with LoAs not part of CEA list) raising pooled costs by `637/T and power costs by 45p/kWh in FY14. 3.Adds category (c)-11GW with tapering linkage raising pooled costs by `994/T and power costs by 70p/kWh in FY15. 4.Further adds category (d)-16GW NonLoA plants - raising coal costs by `1,439/T and power costs by `1.01/kWh in FY15.
Transmission Congestion a reality since CERC stipulates transmission planning to be done on basis of Long Term Open Access (LTOA) which is for 12-25 years. While for medium/short-term, no transmission system is planned, given the brief period for which STOA/MTOA is effective, making such capacities financially unviable or redundant. However, while planning the LT systems, some inherent margins are created in view of seasonal variations/margin of safety and extra system due to RoW issues, which get allocated for STOA/MTOA based on availability. However, most upcoming capacities in power surplus Chhattisgarh/Orissa region have limited LTOA creating imbalance in generation vs transmission capabilities. Moreover the Southern grid even after it is connected will be linked upto Karnataka without incremental transmission capacities to Tamil Nadu, keeping the south deficit region. These imbalances create opportunities for merchant players located especially in the South. JM View: Heightened risk for 16GW plants without LoAs (eg: Adanis Tiroda III, 2 units of Jindal Powers Tamnar II may get delayed or stranded). Transmission/coal constraints to depress supply while state elections will ensure high demand thus supporting merchant prices for 12-18 months. Remain negative on IPPs with domestic coal exposure (Adani, Lanco). Stocks: Low beta (value picks) - Power Gird (TP `128), Coal India (TP `365), NTPC (`161). High beta (near term beneficiary) - JSW Energy (TP `67) exposure to imported coal and plants located in the demand centres (South & West) insulate them from both domestic coal and transmission issues. Revise JSWEL TP to `67 factoring higher LT coal prices of $85/T and stable merchant rates of `4/kWh. We find valuations attractive at 1.1 FY15 book, given expected RoEs of 13% in FY14/15.
JM Financial Research is also available on: Bloomberg - JMFR <GO>, Thomson Publisher & Reuters. Please see important disclosure at the end of the report
India Power Sector Exhibit 1. Likely effect on increase in price of indigenous coal and cost of generation
Year Particulars Import Qty (in Million Tonnes) 2013-14 Effective increase in Price of CIL Coal in slabs GS-G17 (in ` / Tonne) Increase in per unit (kwh) cost of generation (in Paise) Import Qty (in Million Tonnes) 2014-15 Effective increase in Price of CIL Coal in slabs GS-G17 (in ` / Tonne) Increase in per unit (kwh) cost of generation (in Paise) Option-1 27 606 42 26 427 30 Option-2 28 637 45 35 573 40 Option-3 43 973 68 60 994 70 Option-4 52 1170 82 87 1439 101
21 March 2013
Source: JM Financial
Key sensitivities
Power Grid (TP `128): Despite factoring equity dilution in FY14, we believe EPS CAGR for FY13-17 will be 16% while RoEs remain stable at 16-17%. Moreover, 80-85% of capex has high visibility viz. `800-850bn of targeted `1,000bn is independent of IPPs. We find upside even in bear case scenario: 13th Plan capex at 80% of 12th Plan and post FY17 projects earning only 14% RoE gives a Bear case TP of `120.
Core RoE 16.5% 124 126 127 132 135 17.0% 129 131 133 138 141 17.5% 134 137 139 144 148
NTPC (TP `161): The Budget change to 80IA (extended till FY14 end) can impose MAT on NTPC, impacting core RoEs by 2-3%. In 9M13, NTPC has delivered about 23% core RoEs which includes 1.5-2% higher RoE due to tax grossing up benefit, since NTPC falls under full tax rate. Assuming that in FY14 NTPC falls in MAT (losing gross up benefit) and lower PAF in plants on coal constraints, the impact on core RoE will be 2-3%, implying sustainable RoEs of 20% and our current TP of `161. The CMP of `138 implies a sustainable RoE of 18% which we believe already factors bear case.
Core RoE 19.0% 149 152 155 160 166 20.0% 154 157 161 167 174 21.0% 159 163 168 174 183
Page 2
21 March 2013
Adani Power (valuations factor rewards not risks): APLs 4.6GW face fuel supply risk, while future capacities depend on Australian (Galilee) mine where price is yet undecided. With 55-60% dependence on spot coal imports, potential discounted supply from parents Indonesian mines remains the only game changer. Tariff hike may not be a trigger: If CERC allows a PPA tariff hike based on Indonesian law change, then it will imply that all imported coal purchases will continue perpetually on spot basis, keeping costs up. Hence a tariff hike may not add to current profit estimates/valuations (which already discount coal supply). CMP of `44 does not factor all risks: We arrive at a TP of `52 factoring all positives of a) decline in imported coal rates, b) cheap coal from Bunyu over FY14-16 (at $36/T), and c) 30% CIL supply for Mundra units. However the downside risk of no tariff hike/low coal supply from Bunyu are not factored. Our bear case scenario implies a TP of `36/share assuming no tariff hike and perpetual spot coal imports. High Debt/Equity further adds to risk: The high D/E of 9x in FY13, may well improve to 4.7x by FY15 if project cash flows are as expected with benefit of either cheap coal supply from Bunyu or an equivalent tariff hike. However if any of the above do not work out risks of over-leveraging would be imminent. Key risks to our call: a) Discounted Bunyu coal supply not commencing in FY15, b) no supply from CIL to Mundra. However, low merchant exposure and lucrative Case1 PPAs in new projects (Tiroda) may cushion some of the downside.
45
61
PLF 75:80:85
39
61
Merchant -10p:Base:+10p
49
56
Forex: 55.5:53.5:51.5
48
56
Source: JM Financial
Coal India (BUY, TP `365): At CMP, the stock trades at sub 5x EBITDA15E (discount to international peers), and is pricing in an implied negative long term growth, as per JMFe. A 3-4% dividend yield also offers strong downside support. Our revised earnings estimate factors in conservative assumptions on prices (partial pass through of cost increases), volumes (10% below company guidance), and penalties. At CMP, we think the risk reward is favorable for investors. We upgrade CIL with TP of `365 (Mar14) implying 6x EBITDA FY14 and 11x EPS FY14 (ex-Overburden Removal provisioning).
Page 3
21 March 2013
India | Utilities | Company Update Price: `53 BUY Target: `67 (Mar14)
Subhadip Mitra subhadip.mitra@jmfl.com Tel: (91 22) 66303088 Abhishek Anand abhishek.anand@jmfl.com Tel: (91 22) 66303067 Sandeep Tulsiyan sandeep.tulsiyan@jmfl.com Tel: (91 22) 66303085
JSW Energy
| JSW IN
Key Data Market cap (bn) Shares in issue (mn) Diluted share (mn) 3-mon avg daily val (mn) 52-week range Sensex/Nifty `/US$ Daily Performance
` 85.3 / US$ 1.6 1,640.1 1,640.1 ` 127.2/US$ 2.3 ` 75.0/40.1 18,884/5,694 54.3
15% 10% 5% 0% -5% -10% -15% -20% -25% -30% -35% -40%
1M -17.3 -13.5
3M -23.1 -20.2
Shareholding Pattern
Dec-1 2 Promoters FI I DII Public / Oth ers 76.7 2.3 6.1 14.8
(%)
Dec-1 1 76.7 3.9 5.7 13.6
(` mn)
FY15E 77 ,6 27 1.8 30 ,9 45 33.4 10 ,1 81 6.2 8.3 11.6 13.2 8.4 1.1 4.9
JM Financial Research is also available on: Bloomberg - JMFR <GO>, Thomson Publisher & Reuters. Please see important disclosure at the end of the report
21 March 2013
Barmer continues at 80%+ PLF in Jan-Feb, on track for turnaround: The plant delivered 81% PLF and achieved break even based on adhoc tariff revision. Management indicates Coal Ministry clearance for Kapodi expansion mine plan is expected soon. Additional 405MW capacity has been commissioned in last 2 months and will be fuelled by 3mnT of sanctioned production from Kapodi. This should suffice till 1H14 for entire 1080MW, by when clearance for the expansion should be received. However, we conservatively assume slow ramp up with optimal RoEs only by FY15-16. Key Risks: Under-recoveries in Barmer plant may continue incase of delay in supply from captive lignite mines. Any sharp fall in merchant rates or rise in coal prices can also impact earning estimates.
Exhibit 6. SOTP
Projects JSWEL-I JSWEL-II JSWERL RWPL Add: Cash for FY14 Sub-total
Source: Company, JM Financial
Type Imp coal Imp coal Imp coal Lignite/ Imp coal
(` mn)
Old Estimates FY15E 20,999 92,526 1.5 30,945 -2.2 10,181 6.2 8.3 FY13E 18,849 90,554 48.0 28,561 97.3 10,388 6.3 243.5 FY14E 20,053 93,291 3.0 34,346 20.3 11,496 7.0 10.7 FY15E 20,999 94,401 1.2 34,692 1.0 13,083 8.0 13.8 0 0 -18 -18 -22 -22 0 -8 -11 FY13E 0 0 % Change FY14E 0 -2 FY15E 0 -2 FY14E 20,053 91,131 0.6 31,645 10.8 9,402 5.7 -9.5
Old Estimates FY15E 3,140 20,999 9,633 3.93 3.70 2.09 1.47 0.48 85 100 54 FY13E 2,654 18,849 10,395 4.45 4.01 2.44 1.52 0.55 90 85 53 FY14E 3,105 20,053 9,253 4.49 3.91 2.06 1.71 0.57 85 100 53 FY15E 3,140 20,999 9,633 4.18 3.79 2.00 1.65 0.62 80 100 53 FY13E 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
FY14E 3,105 20,053 9,253 4.24 3.80 2.09 1.58 0.47 85 100 54
Page 5
21 March 2013
(` mn)
FY15 E 77 ,627 1.8 1 4,899 5 4,926 1,490 5,166 30 ,945 3 3.4 -2.2 2,033 8,452 2 4,526 -1 0,834 1 3,692 3,511 0 0 1 0,181 10 ,181 1 1.0 1,640 6 .2 8.3 1,801
Balance Sheet
Y/E March Sh are capital Ot her capit al Reserves an d surplu s Networth Tot al lo an s Minorit y int erest Sources of funds In tang ible asset s Fixed asset s Less: Depn. an d amort. Net block Capit al WIP In vestment s Def tax assets/- liabilit y Curren t assets In ven tories Su ndry debt ors Cash & bank balan ces Ot her curren t asset s Lo an s & advan ces Curren t liabilit ies & prov. Curren t liabilit ies Provisio ns and oth ers Net current assets Ot hers (n et) Application of funds FY11A 16,401 0 40,364 56,765 96,376 724 153,865 0 74,152 9,767 64,385 77,080 4,842 -1,562 29,741 5,348 7,637 9,779 0 6,977 20,622 20,622 0 9,120 0 153,865 FY12A 16,401 0 40,600 57,001 99,947 500 157,448 0 150,253 14,801 135,453 10,993 4,971 -1,306 41,571 7,658 4,710 6,686 22,516 0 34,235 34,235 0 7,336 0 157,448 FY13E 16,401 0 48,558 64,958 99,729 500 165,188 0 168,336 21,574 146,762 10,850 4,971 -1,306 33,993 5,591 7,261 3,871 17,270 0 30,082 30,082 0 3,911 0 165,188 FY14E 16,401 0 56,297 72,697 97,816 500 171,014 0 168,336 30,087 138,249 18,083 4,971 -1,306 37,838 5,522 7,579 9,972 14,764 0 26,821 26,821 0 11,017 0 171,014
(` mn)
FY15E 16,401 0 64,677 81,077 90,402 500 171,979 0 186,418 38,539 147,880 0 4,971 -1,306 46,524 6,180 8,190 17,682 14,473 0 26,090 26,090 0 20,434 0 171,979
Y/E March Net sales (Net o f excise) Gro wt h (%) Ot her o perat ion al in come Raw material (or COGS) Perso nnel cos t Ot her exp enses (or SG &A) EBITDA EBITDA (%) Gro wt h (%) Ot her n on-op . inco me Depreciat io n and amort. EBIT Ad d: Net int erest inc ome Pre tax profit Taxes Ad d: Ext raordinary items Les s: M in orit y interest Repo rt ed net p rofit Adju sted net profit Marg in (%) Dilut ed sh are cap. (mn ) Diluted EPS (`) Gro wt h (%) Tot al Dividen d + Tax
(` mn)
FY15 E 1 0,181 8,452 -1,999 0 16 ,634 0 0 292 292 0 -1,801 -7,415 0 -9 ,216 7,710 9,972 1 7,682
Key Ratios
Y/E March BV/ Sh are (` ) ROIC (%) ROE (%) Net Debt/equity ratio (x ) Va luation ratios (x) PER PBV EV/EBITDA EV/Sales Turnover ratios (no.) Debt or days In ven tory days Credito r days 69 48 303 33 54 311 35 27 202 36 26 185 39 29 173 10.2 1.5 10.7 4.1 28.2 1.5 12.0 3.4 8.2 1.3 6.2 2.3 9.1 1.2 5.3 2.2 8.4 1.1 4.9 2.0 FY11A 34.6 9.1 16.0 1.4 FY12A 34.8 6.4 5.3 1.5 FY13E 39.6 11.7 17.0 1.4 FY14E 44.3 11.3 13.7 1.1 FY15E 49.4 11.6 13.2 0.8
Page 6
21 March 2013
Recommendation history
45 46 48 49 48 56 82 82 Mar-12 Mar-13 Mar-13 Mar-13 Mar-13 Sep-13 Mar-14 Mar-14
JSW Energy
90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Aug-11 H H H H H H B B
Nov-11
Feb-12
May-12
Target Price
Aug-12
Nov-12
JSW Energy
Feb-13
Page 7