Professional Documents
Culture Documents
E. F. Cornelius, Jr.
Published in JP J Algebra, Number Theory and Applications
Vol. 31, No. 1 (2013), Pages 1-4
Abstract: Some well known combinatorial identities appear to be special
cases of more general identities in integral domains.
Let D be an integral domain (i.e., a commutative ring with 1 but without
zero divisors) embedded in its quotient eld, so that division makes sense. If
d1 ; d2 ; : : : ; dn are nonzero elements of D, n 1, and d0 = 0, then the following
relations hold:
(A)
n
P
( 1)i (dn
i=1
d0 ) (dn di
d1 di
1)
(B)
( 1)i
i=1
n
i
(C)
n
P
i=1
dn , then
1)
= 2 (dn +d0 )
1)
(D)
n
P
i=1
n+i 1
i
2n
n
1)
= 2 (n
1)!n(n+1) (2n 1)
(2n 1)!
= 2 (n
(n 1)!n!
1)!n!
(2n)!
2n(2n 1)!
(2n 1)!
= 2 (n 1)!n! .
n!n! =
n!n!
and
Sn =
(r n +r i 1 )
= rn r(rn 1
ri
n i n 1
r
n i n
r
(r
i=1
Pn
i(i+1)
Although Sn =
n
P
i=1
(dn d0 ) (dn di
d1 di
1)
does reduce to
n
P
2n
1 when di =
i=1
i=1
(dn d0 )
d1
(dn d0 ) (dn di
d1 di
(dn d0 )(dn d1 )
+ :::
d1 d2
dn
d1 dn 1 dn ([d2
+ [dn (dn
+ [di
d1 )
(dn d0 )
d1
1)
(dn dn
dn 1
2)
(dn d0 ) (dn dn
d1 dn
dn ] + [d3
dn (dn d1 )] + : : :
dn (dn d1 ) (dn di 2 )] + : : :
(dn dn 2 )] + [(dn d1 ) (dn dn
1)
1 )]).
dn
d1 )
(dn
dk (dn
dn
1 ).
dl ).
j=2 j k n; 1 l j 2
The principal hurdle in attempting analogize these generic formulas to classical combinatorics is the obvious lack of symmetry analogous to ni = nn i . In
general, it is not reasonable to expect that
i = 1; : : : ; n 1.
(dn d0 ) (dn di
d1 di
1)
(dn d0 ) (dn dn
d1 dn i
REFERENCES
[1] Cornelius, E. F., Jr. and Schultz, P., "Root bases of polynomials over
integral domains", in Models, Modules and Abelian Groups (de Gruyter 2008),
238-248. The article is posted with permission at http://www.scribd.com/doc/
109726168/Root-Bases-of-Polynomials-Over-Integral-Domains.
[2] Knuth, D., Fundamental Algorithms, Vol. 1, The Art of Computer
Programming (Addison-Wesley, 2nd ed 1973)
[3] http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Partition_(number_theory)
1)
It turns out that Qn (x) equals the rst n + 1 terms of PQn (x). To see this,
express
[a] PQn = (1 + x)(1 + x2 ) (1 + xn ) as
[b] PQn (x) = 1 + c1 x + : : : + ck xk + : : : + cn xn + : : : + c n(n
1)
n(n 1)
2
The coe cient ck of xk in [b] is the number of ways to get exponents of the
x0 s in [a] to add up to k. Since those exponents are distinct and consist of
1; 2; : : : ; k; : : : ; n, it follows that ck = q(k) for 1 k n.
An analogous
result obtains for the generating function for all partitions,
P1
P (x) = j=0 p(j)xj , where p(j) represents the number of partitions of j. Let
Pn
Pn (x) = j=0 p(j)xj . According to [3], Part 3.1, Generating function & Note
Q1
7, P (x) can be expressed as PP (x) = k=1 1 1xk . In turn,
=
PP (x) = ( 1 1 x )( 1 1x2 ) ( 1 1xk )
2
2
4
k
(1 + x + x + : : :)(1 + x + x + : : :) (1 + x + x2k + : : :) . Let
[c] PPn (x) = (1 + x + x2 + : : : + xn )(1 + x2 + x4 + : : : + x2n )
2
(1 + xn + x2n + : : : + xn ) =
[d] (1 + x1 + x1+1 + : : : + x1+:::+1 )(1 + x2 + x2+2 + : : : + x2+:::+2 )
(1 + xn + xn+n + : : : + xn+:::+n ).
1)
n2 (n
2
1)
The coe cient ck of xk in [e] is the number of ways in which exponents of the
x0 s taken from one or more of the polynomials in [d] add up to k. See [4], p. 3,
Equation (2.3), and [3], Part 3.1, Generating function. The number of ways is
just p(k) for 1 k n, so that the rst n + 1 terms of PPn (x) are the same as
the terms of Pn (x).
Suppose
P k0 + k1 + : : : is a partition of n, k0 + k1 + : : : = n. Then it seems
that
(k0 + k1 + : : : ) is the sum of all partitions of n; i.e., that
k0 k1 :::
k0 +k1 +:::=n
k0 k1 :::
k0 +k1 +:::=n
1
n
(k0 + k1 + : : : ). The
k0 k1 :::
k0 +k1 +:::=n
P1
generating function P (x) = j=0 p(j)xj then could be written as
1
P
P
n
P (x) =
[
(k0 + k1 + : : : )] xn with the usual combinatorial conn=0
k0 k1 :::
k0 +k1 +:::=n
Q(x) =
1
P
n=0
k0 >k1 >:::
k0 +k1 +:::=n
1
n
(k0 + k1 + : : : ) and
k0 >k1 >:::
k0 +k1 +:::=n
n
(k0 + k1 + : : :)] xn .